2. Division - Group 2 — Home Advantage
Norway · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Ull/Kisa | +26% | +40% | +13% | 0.77/0.23 |
| 2 |  Skeid | +25% | +55% | -5% | 1.69/0.31 |
| 3 |  Junkeren | +17% | +28% | +6% | 1.54/1.08 |
| 4 |  Lørenskog | +16% | +38% | -7% | 1.77/1.31 |
| 5 |  Hønefoss | +14% | +3% | +25% | 2.23/1.54 |
| 6 |  Kjelsås | +14% | +8% | +20% | 2.38/2.15 |
| 7 |  Stjørdals-Blink | +13% | -2% | +27% | 1.54/1.46 |
| 8 |  Trygg/Lade | +11% | +7% | +15% | 0.38/0.38 |
| 9 |  Eidsvold | +10% | +2% | +19% | 2.46/2.15 |
| 10 |  Levanger | +6% | 0% | +13% | 1.92/2.31 |
| 11 |  Grorud | +6% | +19% | -8% | 2.15/1.62 |
| 12 |  Rana | +1% | -10% | +13% | 1.31/1.23 |
| 13 |  Tromsdalen Uil | 0% | +4% | -5% | 1.46/1.46 |
| 14 |  Follo | -1% | -24% | +22% | 0.77/0.77 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
2. Division - Group 2 (Norway) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the 2. Division - Group 2 (Norway), the average home win rate is 49% compared to 39% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Skeid shows the strongest home advantage, winning 54% of home games versus just 8% away (a difference of +46%). At the other end, Levanger actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 62% versus 77% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Skeid | +55% | 2.38 | 0.69 |
| 2 | Ull/Kisa | +40% | 1.62 | 0.69 |
| 3 | Lørenskog | +38% | 2.38 | 1.08 |
| 4 | Junkeren | +28% | 1.92 | 1.08 |
| 5 | Grorud | +19% | 2.15 | 1.46 |
| 6 | Kjelsås | +8% | 2.62 | 2.23 |
| 7 | Trygg/Lade | +7% | 1.23 | 1.08 |
| 8 | Tromsdalen Uil | +4% | 1.92 | 1.77 |
| 9 | Hønefoss | +3% | 2.38 | 2.23 |
| 10 | Eidsvold | +2% | 2.46 | 2.38 |
| 11 | Levanger | 0% | 2.46 | 2.46 |
| 12 | Stjørdals-Blink | -2% | 1.69 | 1.77 |
| 13 | Rana | -10% | 1.38 | 1.69 |
| 14 | Follo | -24% | 1.00 | 1.62 |
2. Division - Group 2 (Norway) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Skeid has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the 2. Division - Group 2 (Norway), netting 2.38 goals/match at home versus 0.69 away — a Scoring Advantage of +55%. In contrast, Follo scores more away (1.62/match) than at home (1.00/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -24% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stjørdals-Blink | +27% | 1.23 | 2.15 |
| 2 | Hønefoss | +25% | 1.15 | 1.92 |
| 3 | Follo | +22% | 1.62 | 2.54 |
| 4 | Kjelsås | +20% | 1.08 | 1.62 |
| 5 | Eidsvold | +19% | 0.85 | 1.23 |
| 6 | Trygg/Lade | +15% | 2.15 | 2.92 |
| 7 | Ull/Kisa | +13% | 2.85 | 3.69 |
| 8 | Rana | +13% | 1.62 | 2.08 |
| 9 | Levanger | +13% | 1.08 | 1.38 |
| 10 | Junkeren | +6% | 1.69 | 1.92 |
| 11 | Tromsdalen Uil | -5% | 1.77 | 1.62 |
| 12 | Skeid | -5% | 2.23 | 2.00 |
| 13 | Lørenskog | -7% | 1.85 | 1.62 |
| 14 | Grorud | -8% | 1.08 | 0.92 |
2. Division - Group 2 (Norway) — Home Defence Analysis
Stjørdals-Blink has the best home defensive record in the 2. Division - Group 2 (Norway), conceding just 1.23 goals/match at home compared to 2.15 away — a Defence Advantage of +27%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Grorud concedes more at home (1.08/match) than away (0.92/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ull/Kisa | +71% | 0.46 | 0.08 |
| 2 | Skeid | +55% | 1.31 | 0.38 |
| 3 | Lørenskog | +29% | 0.85 | 0.46 |
| 4 | Grorud | +27% | 1.08 | 0.62 |
| 5 | Tromsdalen Uil | +26% | 0.92 | 0.54 |
| 6 | Trygg/Lade | +20% | 0.69 | 0.46 |
| 7 | Junkeren | +9% | 0.92 | 0.77 |
| 8 | Eidsvold | +6% | 1.31 | 1.15 |
| 9 | Rana | +6% | 0.69 | 0.62 |
| 10 | Kjelsås | +4% | 1.08 | 1.00 |
| 11 | Hønefoss | -4% | 0.92 | 1.00 |
| 12 | Levanger | -12% | 1.08 | 1.38 |
| 13 | Follo | -20% | 0.46 | 0.69 |
| 14 | Stjørdals-Blink | -20% | 0.46 | 0.69 |
2. Division - Group 2 (Norway) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Ull/Kisa has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 2. Division - Group 2 (Norway), netting 0.46 goals/match at home versus 0.08 away — a Scoring Advantage of +71%. At the other end, Stjørdals-Blink shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.46/match at home against 0.69 away (-20%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rana | +50% | 0.38 | 1.15 |
| 2 | Kjelsås | +43% | 0.31 | 0.77 |
| 3 | Follo | +30% | 0.62 | 1.15 |
| 4 | Junkeren | +18% | 0.69 | 1.00 |
| 5 | Hønefoss | +18% | 0.54 | 0.77 |
| 6 | Trygg/Lade | +15% | 0.85 | 1.15 |
| 7 | Stjørdals-Blink | +10% | 0.69 | 0.85 |
| 8 | Ull/Kisa | +5% | 1.62 | 1.77 |
| 9 | Levanger | 0% | 0.54 | 0.54 |
| 10 | Tromsdalen Uil | 0% | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| 11 | Skeid | -7% | 1.15 | 1.00 |
| 12 | Grorud | -8% | 0.54 | 0.46 |
| 13 | Lørenskog | -12% | 0.69 | 0.54 |
| 14 | Eidsvold | -17% | 0.54 | 0.38 |
2. Division - Group 2 (Norway) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Rana has the best home defensive record in the 2. Division - Group 2 (Norway), conceding just 0.38 goals/match at home compared to 1.15 away — a Defence Advantage of +50%. Eidsvold struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.54/match at home versus 0.38 away (-17%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Skeid | +56% | 1.08 | 0.31 |
| 2 | Junkeren | +53% | 1.00 | 0.31 |
| 3 | Lørenskog | +43% | 1.54 | 0.62 |
| 4 | Ull/Kisa | +30% | 1.15 | 0.62 |
| 5 | Levanger | +13% | 1.38 | 1.08 |
| 6 | Grorud | +12% | 1.08 | 0.85 |
| 7 | Kjelsås | +11% | 1.54 | 1.23 |
| 8 | Hønefoss | +9% | 1.46 | 1.23 |
| 9 | Stjørdals-Blink | +7% | 1.23 | 1.08 |
| 10 | Eidsvold | -3% | 1.15 | 1.23 |
| 11 | Trygg/Lade | -7% | 0.54 | 0.62 |
| 12 | Tromsdalen Uil | -10% | 1.00 | 1.23 |
| 13 | Rana | -22% | 0.69 | 1.08 |
| 14 | Follo | -26% | 0.54 | 0.92 |
2. Division - Group 2 (Norway) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Skeid has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 2. Division - Group 2 (Norway), netting 1.08 goals/match at home versus 0.31 away — a Scoring Advantage of +56%. At the other end, Follo shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.54/match at home against 0.92 away (-26%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eidsvold | +47% | 0.31 | 0.85 |
| 2 | Stjørdals-Blink | +42% | 0.54 | 1.31 |
| 3 | Hønefoss | +30% | 0.62 | 1.15 |
| 4 | Levanger | +22% | 0.54 | 0.85 |
| 5 | Ull/Kisa | +22% | 1.23 | 1.92 |
| 6 | Follo | +16% | 1.00 | 1.38 |
| 7 | Trygg/Lade | +15% | 1.31 | 1.77 |
| 8 | Kjelsås | +5% | 0.77 | 0.85 |
| 9 | Lørenskog | -3% | 1.15 | 1.08 |
| 10 | Skeid | -4% | 1.08 | 1.00 |
| 11 | Junkeren | -4% | 1.00 | 0.92 |
| 12 | Tromsdalen Uil | -8% | 1.08 | 0.92 |
| 13 | Grorud | -8% | 0.54 | 0.46 |
| 14 | Rana | -14% | 1.23 | 0.92 |
2. Division - Group 2 (Norway) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Eidsvold has the best home defensive record in the 2. Division - Group 2 (Norway), conceding just 0.31 goals/match at home compared to 0.85 away — a Defence Advantage of +47%. Rana struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.23/match at home versus 0.92 away (-14%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Norway
- 1. Division Home Advantage— Division Gold
- 1. Division Women Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- 2. Division - Group 1 Home Advantage— Division Regional
- 2. Division - Play-offs Home Advantage— Division Regional
- 3. Division - Girone 1 Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 2 Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 3 Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 4 Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 5 Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 6 Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- Eliteserien Home Advantage— Division Premium
- NM Cupen Home Advantage— Division Gold
- Nasjonal U19 Champions League Home Advantage— Division Academy
- Obos Supercup Home Advantage— Division Premium
- Super Cup Home Advantage— Division Premium
- Toppserien Home Advantage— Division Women's Elite