MatchPulse
Obos Supercup

Obos SupercupHome Advantage

Norway · 2026

Home Advantage

#TeamHome AdvantageScoredDefencePPG (Home / Away)
1Hønefoss+36%+32%+40%2.00/2.00
2Skeid+31%+29%+33%3.00/2.00
3Asker+31%+29%+33%1.50/1.00
4Bærum+30%+25%+35%1.67/0.00
5Lokomotiv Oslo+30%0%+60%0.50/0.00
6Eik-Tønsberg+13%+40%-14%1.00/0.50
7Lørenskog+4%+8%0%2.00/1.00
8Eidsvold-4%+25%-33%2.00/2.00
9Ull/Kisa-26%-8%-45%0.00/2.33
10Grorud-32%-50%-14%0.67/2.00

1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.

2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.

3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.

The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.

Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.

Obos Supercup (Norway) — Home Advantage Analysis

In the Obos Supercup (Norway), the average home win rate is 38% compared to 32% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Lørenskog shows the strongest home advantage, winning 67% of home games versus just 0% away (a difference of +67%). At the other end, Ull/Kisa actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 0% versus 67% on the road.

Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Eik-Tønsberg+40%2.331.00
2Hønefoss+32%4.502.33
3Skeid+29%4.502.50
4Asker+29%3.001.67
5Bærum+25%3.332.00
6Eidsvold+25%2.501.50
7Lørenskog+8%2.332.00
8Lokomotiv Oslo0%1.001.00
9Ull/Kisa-8%2.002.33
10Grorud-50%0.672.00

Obos Supercup (Norway) — Home Goals Scored Analysis

Eik-Tønsberg has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Obos Supercup (Norway), netting 2.33 goals/match at home versus 1.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +40%. In contrast, Grorud scores more away (2.00/match) than at home (0.67/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -50% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.

Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Lokomotiv Oslo+60%1.506.00
2Hønefoss+40%1.002.33
3Bærum+35%1.673.50
4Skeid+33%1.002.00
5Asker+33%1.503.00
6Lørenskog0%2.002.00
7Grorud-14%1.331.00
8Eik-Tønsberg-14%2.672.00
9Eidsvold-33%2.001.00
10Ull/Kisa-45%3.501.33

Obos Supercup (Norway) — Home Defence Analysis

Lokomotiv Oslo has the best home defensive record in the Obos Supercup (Norway), conceding just 1.50 goals/match at home compared to 6.00 away — a Defence Advantage of +60%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Ull/Kisa concedes more at home (3.50/match) than away (1.33/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.

1st Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Bærum+100%1.670.00
2Eik-Tønsberg+100%1.000.00
3Skeid+50%1.500.50
4Hønefoss+20%2.501.67
5Ull/Kisa0%1.001.00
6Lokomotiv Oslo-14%0.500.67
7Asker-33%0.501.00

Obos Supercup (Norway) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Bærum has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Obos Supercup (Norway), netting 1.67 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Asker shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.50/match at home against 1.00 away (-33%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.

1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Hønefoss+100%0.000.67
2Bærum+71%0.332.00
3Eik-Tønsberg+64%0.331.50
4Lokomotiv Oslo+40%1.002.33
5Skeid+33%1.002.00
6Asker+14%1.001.33
7Ull/Kisa-64%1.500.33

Obos Supercup (Norway) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Hønefoss has the best home defensive record in the Obos Supercup (Norway), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.67 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Ull/Kisa struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.50/match at home versus 0.33 away (-64%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.

2nd Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Asker+58%2.500.67
2Hønefoss+50%2.000.67
3Lokomotiv Oslo+20%0.500.33
4Skeid+20%3.002.00
5Eik-Tønsberg+14%1.331.00
6Bærum-9%1.672.00
7Ull/Kisa-14%1.001.33

Obos Supercup (Norway) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Asker has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Obos Supercup (Norway), netting 2.50 goals/match at home versus 0.67 away — a Scoring Advantage of +58%. At the other end, Ull/Kisa shows the weakest home output in this period, with 1.00/match at home against 1.33 away (-14%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.

2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Lokomotiv Oslo+76%0.503.67
2Asker+54%0.501.67
3Hønefoss+25%1.001.67
4Bærum+6%1.331.50
5Skeid0%0.000.00
6Ull/Kisa-33%2.001.00
7Eik-Tønsberg-65%2.330.50

Obos Supercup (Norway) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Lokomotiv Oslo has the best home defensive record in the Obos Supercup (Norway), conceding just 0.50 goals/match at home compared to 3.67 away — a Defence Advantage of +76%. Eik-Tønsberg struggles most in this period at home, conceding 2.33/match at home versus 0.50 away (-65%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.

Home Advantage TablesNorway