MatchPulse
3. Division - Girone 4

3. Division - Girone 4Home Advantage

Norway · 2026

Home Advantage

#TeamHome AdvantageScoredDefencePPG (Home / Away)
1Viking II+50%+50%+50%2.60/0.56
2Stabæk II+23%+22%+25%1.90/0.78
3Flekkerøy+22%+15%+29%2.33/1.10
4Vindbjart+16%+16%+17%2.22/1.50
5Madla+16%+9%+23%2.56/1.80
6Odd II+14%+25%+4%1.22/1.10
7Våg+14%+29%-1%1.50/0.78
8Mandalskameratene+13%-12%+38%2.00/1.56
9Brodd+12%+19%+5%1.60/1.11
10Hinna+11%+11%+11%1.33/0.70
11Åkra+4%+9%-2%0.78/0.70
12Haugesund II0%-6%+6%1.11/1.10
13Staal Jørpeland-6%-8%-3%0.80/1.56
14Varhaug-14%-14%-13%1.20/2.22

1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.

2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.

3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.

The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.

Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.

3. Division - Girone 4 (Norway) — Home Advantage Analysis

In the 3. Division - Girone 4 (Norway), the average home win rate is 50% compared to 34% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Viking II shows the strongest home advantage, winning 80% of home games versus just 11% away (a difference of +69%). At the other end, Varhaug actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 30% versus 67% on the road.

Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Viking II+50%3.701.22
2Våg+29%1.801.00
3Odd II+25%2.331.40
4Stabæk II+22%2.601.67
5Brodd+19%2.301.56
6Vindbjart+16%2.892.10
7Flekkerøy+15%2.441.80
8Hinna+11%2.001.60
9Madla+9%2.892.40
10Åkra+9%1.441.20
11Haugesund II-6%1.782.00
12Staal Jørpeland-8%1.802.11
13Mandalskameratene-12%2.102.67
14Varhaug-14%1.602.11

3. Division - Girone 4 (Norway) — Home Goals Scored Analysis

Viking II has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the 3. Division - Girone 4 (Norway), netting 3.70 goals/match at home versus 1.22 away — a Scoring Advantage of +50%. In contrast, Varhaug scores more away (2.11/match) than at home (1.60/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -14% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.

Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Viking II+50%0.702.11
2Mandalskameratene+38%1.102.44
3Flekkerøy+29%1.222.20
4Stabæk II+25%1.803.00
5Madla+23%1.001.60
6Vindbjart+17%1.001.40
7Hinna+11%2.563.20
8Haugesund II+6%2.673.00
9Brodd+5%1.902.11
10Odd II+4%2.222.40
11Våg-1%1.801.78
12Åkra-2%2.892.80
13Staal Jørpeland-3%2.502.33
14Varhaug-13%1.601.22

3. Division - Girone 4 (Norway) — Home Defence Analysis

Viking II has the best home defensive record in the 3. Division - Girone 4 (Norway), conceding just 0.70 goals/match at home compared to 2.11 away — a Defence Advantage of +50%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Varhaug concedes more at home (1.60/match) than away (1.22/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.

1st Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Viking II+76%1.600.22
2Hinna+43%1.000.40
3Flekkerøy+38%1.110.50
4Varhaug+34%0.900.44
5Brodd+33%1.100.56
6Stabæk II+21%1.200.78
7Våg+13%1.000.78
8Vindbjart-1%0.890.90
9Haugesund II-1%0.890.90
10Odd II-2%0.670.70
11Madla-11%0.891.10
12Mandalskameratene-15%0.901.22
13Staal Jørpeland-30%0.601.11
14Åkra-38%0.220.50

3. Division - Girone 4 (Norway) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Viking II has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 3. Division - Girone 4 (Norway), netting 1.60 goals/match at home versus 0.22 away — a Scoring Advantage of +76%. At the other end, Åkra shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.22/match at home against 0.50 away (-38%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.

1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Viking II+74%0.100.67
2Stabæk II+50%0.702.11
3Mandalskameratene+47%0.401.11
4Flekkerøy+38%0.441.00
5Madla+20%0.330.50
6Varhaug+14%0.500.67
7Våg+14%0.500.67
8Åkra+3%1.221.30
9Hinna-1%1.111.10
10Vindbjart-5%0.670.60
11Haugesund II-5%1.111.00
12Brodd-12%1.000.78
13Staal Jørpeland-15%0.900.67
14Odd II-15%1.220.90

3. Division - Girone 4 (Norway) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Viking II has the best home defensive record in the 3. Division - Girone 4 (Norway), conceding just 0.10 goals/match at home compared to 0.67 away — a Defence Advantage of +74%. Odd II struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.22/match at home versus 0.90 away (-15%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.

2nd Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Våg+57%0.800.22
2Odd II+41%1.670.70
3Viking II+35%2.101.00
4Åkra+27%1.220.70
5Vindbjart+25%2.001.20
6Stabæk II+22%1.400.89
7Madla+21%2.001.30
8Brodd+9%1.201.00
9Staal Jørpeland+9%1.201.00
10Flekkerøy+1%1.331.30
11Hinna-9%1.001.20
12Mandalskameratene-9%1.201.44
13Haugesund II-11%0.891.10
14Varhaug-41%0.701.67

3. Division - Girone 4 (Norway) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Våg has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 3. Division - Girone 4 (Norway), netting 0.80 goals/match at home versus 0.22 away — a Scoring Advantage of +57%. At the other end, Varhaug shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.70/match at home against 1.67 away (-41%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.

2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Viking II+41%0.601.44
2Vindbjart+41%0.330.80
3Mandalskameratene+31%0.701.33
4Madla+25%0.671.10
5Flekkerøy+21%0.781.20
6Odd II+20%1.001.50
7Brodd+19%0.901.33
8Hinna+18%1.442.10
9Haugesund II+13%1.562.00
10Staal Jørpeland+2%1.601.67
11Åkra-5%1.671.50
12Våg-8%1.301.11
13Stabæk II-11%1.100.89
14Varhaug-33%1.100.56

3. Division - Girone 4 (Norway) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Viking II has the best home defensive record in the 3. Division - Girone 4 (Norway), conceding just 0.60 goals/match at home compared to 1.44 away — a Defence Advantage of +41%. Varhaug struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.10/match at home versus 0.56 away (-33%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.

Home Advantage TablesNorway