MatchPulse
2. Division - Group 1

2. Division - Group 1 — Home Advantage

Norway · 2026

Norway — 2. Division - Group 1 2026 — Detailed Stats
Competition
Home & Away TablesForm TableHome AdvantageAway AdvantageDrawsPredictions
Goals
AVG TotalGoals ScoredGoals ConcededClean SheetsBTTSFailed To Score
Over/Under
Over 0.5 ~ 5.5 TablesUnder 0.5 ~ 5.5 Tables
More
1st Half Table2nd Half TableWinning / Losing at HT

Home Advantage

#TeamHome AdvantageScoredDefencePPG (Home / Away)
1Arendal+28%+28%+29%1.62/0.77
2Eik-Tønsberg+26%+29%+24%0.77/0.23
3Sotra+17%+16%+19%2.15/1.54
4jerv+13%+7%+20%2.46/2.08
5Træff+12%+2%+22%1.54/1.38
6Mjondalen+10%+8%+12%2.15/1.92
7Vidar+7%+17%-3%0.38/0.62
8Pors Grenland+6%-3%+16%1.23/1.08
9Sandviken+4%+6%+2%1.08/1.00
10Kvik Halden+2%-19%+22%1.31/1.54
11Lysekloster+1%+3%0%0.62/1.08
12Notodden-3%-2%-3%1.31/1.62
13Bjarg-5%+13%-23%1.92/2.23
14Brattvåg-10%+8%-28%1.92/2.00

1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.

2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.

3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.

The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.

Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.

2. Division - Group 1 (Norway) — Home Advantage Analysis

In the 2. Division - Group 1 (Norway), the average home win rate is 43% compared to 40% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Arendal shows the strongest home advantage, winning 46% of home games versus just 15% away (a difference of +31%). At the other end, Lysekloster actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 8% versus 31% on the road.

Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Eik-Tønsberg+29%1.380.77
2Arendal+28%1.771.00
3Vidar+17%1.080.77
4Sotra+16%2.772.00
5Bjarg+13%2.622.00
6Brattvåg+8%2.462.08
7Mjondalen+8%2.081.77
8jerv+7%2.462.15
9Sandviken+6%1.381.23
10Lysekloster+3%1.381.31
11Træff+2%1.771.69
12Notodden-2%1.621.69
13Pors Grenland-3%1.231.31
14Kvik Halden-19%1.151.69

2. Division - Group 1 (Norway) — Home Goals Scored Analysis

Eik-Tønsberg has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the 2. Division - Group 1 (Norway), netting 1.38 goals/match at home versus 0.77 away — a Scoring Advantage of +29%. In contrast, Kvik Halden scores more away (1.69/match) than at home (1.15/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -19% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.

Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Arendal+29%1.152.08
2Eik-Tønsberg+24%1.853.00
3Kvik Halden+22%1.081.69
4Træff+22%1.542.38
5jerv+20%0.921.38
6Sotra+19%1.001.46
7Pors Grenland+16%1.231.69
8Mjondalen+12%1.151.46
9Sandviken+2%1.851.92
10Lysekloster0%2.152.15
11Notodden-3%1.381.31
12Vidar-3%2.772.62
13Bjarg-23%1.460.92
14Brattvåg-28%1.921.08

2. Division - Group 1 (Norway) — Home Defence Analysis

Arendal has the best home defensive record in the 2. Division - Group 1 (Norway), conceding just 1.15 goals/match at home compared to 2.08 away — a Defence Advantage of +29%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Brattvåg concedes more at home (1.92/match) than away (1.08/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.

1st Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Sotra+47%1.920.69
2Arendal+47%0.850.31
3Bjarg+26%1.310.77
4Mjondalen+24%1.000.62
5jerv+20%1.150.77
6Sandviken+18%0.770.54
7Vidar+17%0.540.38
8Eik-Tønsberg+17%0.540.38
9Træff+16%0.850.62
10Lysekloster+13%0.690.54
11Brattvåg+9%1.381.15
12Notodden0%1.001.00
13Pors Grenland-20%0.310.46
14Kvik Halden-25%0.460.77

2. Division - Group 1 (Norway) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Sotra has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 2. Division - Group 1 (Norway), netting 1.92 goals/match at home versus 0.69 away — a Scoring Advantage of +47%. At the other end, Kvik Halden shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.46/match at home against 0.77 away (-25%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.

1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Kvik Halden+44%0.381.00
2Sotra+44%0.381.00
3Eik-Tønsberg+44%0.691.77
4Arendal+37%0.461.00
5Mjondalen+25%0.460.77
6Notodden+25%0.460.77
7jerv+20%0.460.69
8Pors Grenland+14%0.690.92
9Træff+11%0.921.15
10Lysekloster+8%0.851.00
11Vidar0%1.081.08
12Sandviken0%0.770.77
13Brattvåg-23%0.620.38
14Bjarg-25%0.770.46

2. Division - Group 1 (Norway) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Kvik Halden has the best home defensive record in the 2. Division - Group 1 (Norway), conceding just 0.38 goals/match at home compared to 1.00 away — a Defence Advantage of +44%. Bjarg struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.77/match at home versus 0.46 away (-25%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.

2nd Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Eik-Tønsberg+37%0.850.38
2Vidar+17%0.540.38
3Arendal+14%0.920.69
4Brattvåg+8%1.080.92
5Pors Grenland+4%0.920.85
6Bjarg+3%1.311.23
7jerv-3%1.311.38
8Mjondalen-3%1.081.15
9Lysekloster-5%0.690.77
10Notodden-6%0.620.69
11Sandviken-6%0.620.69
12Træff-8%0.921.08
13Kvik Halden-14%0.690.92
14Sotra-21%0.851.31

2. Division - Group 1 (Norway) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Eik-Tønsberg has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 2. Division - Group 1 (Norway), netting 0.85 goals/match at home versus 0.38 away — a Scoring Advantage of +37%. At the other end, Sotra shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.85/match at home against 1.31 away (-21%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.

2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Træff+33%0.621.23
2Arendal+22%0.691.08
3jerv+20%0.460.69
4Pors Grenland+18%0.540.77
5Sandviken+3%1.081.15
6Eik-Tønsberg+3%1.151.23
7Mjondalen0%0.690.69
8Kvik Halden0%0.690.69
9Vidar-5%1.691.54
10Lysekloster-6%1.311.15
11Sotra-14%0.620.46
12Bjarg-20%0.690.46
13Notodden-26%0.920.54
14Brattvåg-31%1.310.69

2. Division - Group 1 (Norway) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Træff has the best home defensive record in the 2. Division - Group 1 (Norway), conceding just 0.62 goals/match at home compared to 1.23 away — a Defence Advantage of +33%. Brattvåg struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.31/match at home versus 0.69 away (-31%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.

Home Advantage Tables — Norway