2. Division - Group 2 — Form Table
Norway · 2026
Combined Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Kjelsås | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 9 | +9 | 16 | LDWWWWW | 2.29 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 2.57 | 100% | 86% | 3.86 | |
| 2 |  Grorud | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 8 | +8 | 15 | WWWWLLW | 2.14 | 43% | 14% | 43% | 2.29 | 100% | 71% | 3.43 | |
| 3 |  Stjørdals-Blink | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 6 | +7 | 15 | WWWLWWL | 2.14 | 57% | 14% | 29% | 1.86 | 71% | 43% | 2.71 | |
| 4 |  Eidsvold | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 11 | +5 | 15 | WWLWWWL | 2.14 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 2.29 | 86% | 86% | 3.86 | |
| 5 |  Levanger | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 11 | +3 | 13 | WLLDWWW | 1.86 | 29% | 29% | 57% | 2.00 | 71% | 57% | 3.57 | |
| 6 |  Tromsdalen Uil | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 10 | +10 | 12 | WLWWLWL | 1.71 | 43% | 0% | 57% | 2.86 | 86% | 86% | 4.29 | |
| 7 |  Lørenskog | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 15 | +1 | 10 | LWLDLWW | 1.43 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 2.29 | 100% | 86% | 4.43 | |
| 8 |  Hønefoss | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 10 | WWLDWLL | 1.43 | 29% | 14% | 71% | 1.43 | 71% | 71% | 3.14 | |
| 9 |  Junkeren | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 9 | WLWLLLW | 1.29 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.86 | 100% | 86% | 4.14 | |
| 10 |  Skeid | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 18 | -5 | 9 | LLWLWLW | 1.29 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.86 | 100% | 86% | 4.43 | |
| 11 |  Rana | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 9 | LWWLLLW | 1.29 | 29% | 43% | 29% | 0.86 | 71% | 43% | 2.43 | |
| 12 |  Follo | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 7 | LDLLWWL | 1.00 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.57 | 71% | 57% | 3.29 | |
| 13 |  Ull/Kisa | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 21 | -14 | 3 | LLLWLLL | 0.43 | 0% | 57% | 43% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 14 |  Trygg/Lade | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 20 | -13 | 1 | LLLDLLL | 0.14 | 0% | 43% | 57% | 1.00 | 71% | 71% | 3.86 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Is in the Best Form in the Last 7 Games?
Kjelsås leads the form table with 71% wins and 2.29 PPG in the last 7 games.
Grorud is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.14 PPG.
Stjørdals-Blink is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.14 PPG.
Trygg/Lade is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 0% and 0.14 PPG.
Ull/Kisa is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 14% and 0.43 PPG.
Follo has the worst form over the last 7 games with just 29% wins and only 1.00 PPG.
- •The 2. Division - Group 2 (Norway) Last 7 Games Form Table covers 14 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent games.
- •Win rate across the 2. Division - Group 2 in this period is 47%
- •Teams score an average of 1.84 goals per game and concede 1.84 — a combined 3.67 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 57% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 23% of games.
2. Division - Group 2 (Norway) Last 7 Games — Form Table Insights
Kjelsås, Grorud and Stjørdals-Blink have been the standout performers in the 2. Division - Group 2 (Norway) over the last 7 games, leading the form table with 2.29, 2.14 and 2.14 PPG respectively. Across the 2. Division - Group 2, teams score an average of 1.84 goals and concede 1.84 per game — a combined 3.67 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 57% of fixtures while 23% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Trygg/Lade and Ull/Kisa have struggled in recent games, collecting just 0.14 and 0.43 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the 2. Division - Group 2.
Home Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eidsvold | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 5 | +13 | 19 | WWDWWWW | 2.71 | 29% | 14% | 71% | 2.57 | 71% | 71% | 3.29 | |
| 2 | Kjelsås | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 6 | +15 | 16 | LWWWDWW | 2.29 | 57% | 0% | 43% | 3.00 | 100% | 71% | 3.86 | |
| 3 | Hønefoss | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 8 | +12 | 16 | WWWDWWL | 2.29 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.86 | 100% | 86% | 4.00 | |
| 4 | Grorud | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 8 | +9 | 15 | LWWWWLW | 2.14 | 43% | 14% | 43% | 2.43 | 86% | 71% | 3.57 | |
| 5 | Stjørdals-Blink | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 8 | +8 | 15 | WWLWWLW | 2.14 | 43% | 14% | 43% | 2.29 | 86% | 57% | 3.43 | |
| 6 | Levanger | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 8 | +10 | 13 | LWWLDWW | 1.86 | 29% | 29% | 57% | 2.57 | 86% | 71% | 3.71 | |
| 7 | Skeid | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 21 | -5 | 12 | LLWLWWW | 1.71 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 2.29 | 100% | 100% | 5.29 | |
| 8 | Tromsdalen Uil | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 12 | +2 | 10 | DWLWWLL | 1.43 | 29% | 14% | 71% | 2.00 | 86% | 71% | 3.71 | |
| 9 | Junkeren | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 10 | WWDWLLL | 1.43 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 1.71 | 71% | 57% | 3.43 | |
| 10 | Rana | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 10 | WDWLLWL | 1.43 | 14% | 43% | 43% | 1.29 | 71% | 57% | 2.86 | |
| 11 | Lørenskog | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 20 | -5 | 8 | LLDWDLW | 1.14 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.14 | 100% | 86% | 5.00 | |
| 12 | Follo | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 6 | LLLWLLW | 0.86 | 29% | 43% | 29% | 0.71 | 57% | 29% | 2.00 | |
| 13 | Ull/Kisa | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 19 | -10 | 4 | LDLLLWL | 0.57 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.29 | 100% | 86% | 4.00 | |
| 14 | Trygg/Lade | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 1 | LDLLLLL | 0.14 | 0% | 43% | 57% | 0.86 | 57% | 43% | 2.71 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms? (Last 7 Home Games)
Eidsvold leads the form table with 86% wins and 2.71 PPG in the last 7 home games.
Kjelsås is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.29 PPG.
Hønefoss is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.29 PPG.
Trygg/Lade is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 0% and 0.14 PPG.
Ull/Kisa is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 14% and 0.57 PPG.
Follo has the worst form over the last 7 home games with just 29% wins and only 0.86 PPG.
- •The 2. Division - Group 2 (Norway) Home Form Table (Last 7) covers 14 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent home games.
- •Win rate across the 2. Division - Group 2 in this period is 49%
- •Teams score an average of 2.00 goals per game and concede 1.63 — a combined 3.63 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 60% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 20% of games.
2. Division - Group 2 (Norway) — Home Form Table Insights (Last 7 Home Games)
Eidsvold, Kjelsås and Hønefoss have been the standout performers in the 2. Division - Group 2 (Norway) over the last 7 home games, leading the form table with 2.71, 2.29 and 2.29 PPG respectively. Across the 2. Division - Group 2, teams score an average of 2.00 goals and concede 1.63 per game — a combined 3.63 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 60% of fixtures while 20% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Trygg/Lade and Ull/Kisa have struggled in recent home games, collecting just 0.14 and 0.57 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the 2. Division - Group 2.
Away Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Levanger | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 11 | +9 | 15 | WLWWWLW | 2.14 | 57% | 0% | 43% | 2.86 | 86% | 71% | 4.43 | |
| 2 | Eidsvold | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 11 | +7 | 15 | WWWWLWL | 2.14 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 2.57 | 86% | 86% | 4.14 | |
| 3 | Grorud | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 5 | +7 | 14 | WWDDWWL | 2.00 | 43% | 29% | 43% | 1.71 | 71% | 29% | 2.43 | |
| 4 | Stjørdals-Blink | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 13 | WWDLWWL | 1.86 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 1.57 | 71% | 71% | 3.43 | |
| 5 | Tromsdalen Uil | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 6 | +8 | 12 | WLLWLWW | 1.71 | 43% | 29% | 29% | 2.00 | 71% | 57% | 2.86 | |
| 6 | Kjelsås | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 12 | LWLLWWW | 1.71 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.86 | 86% | 86% | 3.71 | |
| 7 | Hønefoss | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 10 | WLWWLDL | 1.43 | 29% | 14% | 71% | 1.86 | 71% | 71% | 4.00 | |
| 8 | Junkeren | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 10 | LLDWWLW | 1.43 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.57 | 100% | 71% | 3.57 | |
| 9 | Rana | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 9 | LWLWLLW | 1.29 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 1.57 | 86% | 57% | 3.57 | |
| 10 | Lørenskog | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 6 | LLLWLLW | 0.86 | 29% | 71% | 0% | 0.71 | 71% | 43% | 2.71 | |
| 11 | Follo | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 15 | 20 | -5 | 5 | DLLDLWL | 0.71 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.14 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 12 | Trygg/Lade | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 24 | -15 | 5 | LWDLLDL | 0.71 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.29 | 100% | 86% | 4.71 | |
| 13 | Skeid | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 15 | -11 | 1 | LLDLLLL | 0.14 | 0% | 43% | 57% | 0.57 | 86% | 43% | 2.71 | |
| 14 | Ull/Kisa | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 27 | -24 | 0 | LLLLLLL | 0.00 | 0% | 57% | 43% | 0.43 | 100% | 100% | 4.29 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms? (Last 7 Away Games)
Levanger leads the form table with 71% wins and 2.14 PPG in the last 7 away games.
Eidsvold is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.14 PPG.
Grorud is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 57% and 2.00 PPG.
Ull/Kisa is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Skeid is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.14 PPG.
Trygg/Lade has the worst form over the last 7 away games with just 14% wins and only 0.71 PPG.
- •The 2. Division - Group 2 (Norway) Away Form Table (Last 7) covers 14 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent away games.
- •Win rate across the 2. Division - Group 2 in this period is 40%
- •Teams score an average of 1.62 goals per game and concede 2.06 — a combined 3.68 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 60% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 22% of games.
2. Division - Group 2 (Norway) — Away Form Table Insights (Last 7 Away Games)
Levanger, Eidsvold and Grorud have been the standout performers in the 2. Division - Group 2 (Norway) over the last 7 away games, leading the form table with 2.14, 2.14 and 2.00 PPG respectively. Across the 2. Division - Group 2, teams score an average of 1.62 goals and concede 2.06 per game — a combined 3.68 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 60% of fixtures while 22% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Ull/Kisa and Skeid have struggled in recent away games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.14 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the 2. Division - Group 2.
Form Tables — Norway
- 1. Division Form Table— Division Gold
- 1. Division Women Form Table— Division Women's Pro
- 2. Division - Group 1 Form Table— Division Regional
- 2. Division - Play-offs Form Table— Division Regional
- 3. Division - Girone 1 Form Table— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 2 Form Table— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 3 Form Table— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 4 Form Table— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 5 Form Table— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 6 Form Table— Division Amateur
- Eliteserien Form Table— Division Premium
- NM Cupen Form Table— Division Gold
- Nasjonal U19 Champions League Form Table— Division Academy
- Obos Supercup Form Table— Division Premium
- Super Cup Form Table— Division Premium
- Toppserien Form Table— Division Women's Elite