1. Division — Home Advantage
Norway · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Raufoss | +23% | +13% | +33% | 0.93/0.47 |
| 2 |  Sogndal | +22% | +20% | +24% | 1.64/0.47 |
| 3 |  Egersund | +21% | +13% | +29% | 1.87/0.71 |
| 4 |  Haugesund | +20% | +6% | +34% | 2.64/1.87 |
| 5 |  Asane | +17% | +24% | +11% | 1.13/0.64 |
| 6 |  Ranheim | +17% | +20% | +14% | 1.80/1.00 |
| 7 |  hodd | +15% | +15% | +15% | 1.73/0.86 |
| 8 |  ODD Ballklubb | +15% | +9% | +21% | 1.67/1.50 |
| 9 |  Stromsgodset | +14% | +8% | +21% | 2.53/1.79 |
| 10 |  Kongsvinger | +14% | +32% | -3% | 2.33/1.71 |
| 11 |  Sandnes ULF | +13% | +8% | +17% | 1.29/0.80 |
| 12 |  Stabaek | +12% | +24% | -1% | 2.43/1.60 |
| 13 |  Strommen | +5% | +3% | +6% | 1.50/1.00 |
| 14 |  Bryne | +2% | +6% | -1% | 1.57/1.40 |
| 15 |  Lyn | -3% | +10% | -15% | 1.27/1.07 |
| 16 |  Moss | -3% | -9% | +3% | 0.79/1.20 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
1. Division (Norway) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the 1. Division (Norway), the average home win rate is 51% compared to 32% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Sogndal shows the strongest home advantage, winning 50% of home games versus just 7% away (a difference of +43%). At the other end, Moss actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 14% versus 40% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kongsvinger | +32% | 3.73 | 1.93 |
| 2 | Stabaek | +24% | 2.93 | 1.80 |
| 3 | Asane | +24% | 1.73 | 1.07 |
| 4 | Sogndal | +20% | 2.00 | 1.33 |
| 5 | Ranheim | +20% | 3.00 | 2.00 |
| 6 | hodd | +15% | 1.93 | 1.43 |
| 7 | Egersund | +13% | 1.87 | 1.43 |
| 8 | Raufoss | +13% | 1.21 | 0.93 |
| 9 | Lyn | +10% | 1.73 | 1.43 |
| 10 | ODD Ballklubb | +9% | 2.13 | 1.79 |
| 11 | Sandnes ULF | +8% | 1.57 | 1.33 |
| 12 | Stromsgodset | +8% | 2.93 | 2.50 |
| 13 | Haugesund | +6% | 3.07 | 2.73 |
| 14 | Bryne | +6% | 1.57 | 1.40 |
| 15 | Strommen | +3% | 1.79 | 1.67 |
| 16 | Moss | -9% | 1.29 | 1.53 |
1. Division (Norway) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Kongsvinger has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the 1. Division (Norway), netting 3.73 goals/match at home versus 1.93 away — a Scoring Advantage of +32%. In contrast, Moss scores more away (1.53/match) than at home (1.29/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -9% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Haugesund | +34% | 1.07 | 2.20 |
| 2 | Raufoss | +33% | 1.79 | 3.53 |
| 3 | Egersund | +29% | 1.40 | 2.57 |
| 4 | Sogndal | +24% | 1.64 | 2.67 |
| 5 | Stromsgodset | +21% | 0.93 | 1.43 |
| 6 | ODD Ballklubb | +21% | 1.27 | 1.93 |
| 7 | Sandnes ULF | +17% | 1.64 | 2.33 |
| 8 | hodd | +15% | 1.73 | 2.36 |
| 9 | Ranheim | +14% | 2.07 | 2.71 |
| 10 | Asane | +11% | 2.00 | 2.50 |
| 11 | Strommen | +6% | 2.00 | 2.27 |
| 12 | Moss | +3% | 2.07 | 2.20 |
| 13 | Stabaek | -1% | 1.21 | 1.20 |
| 14 | Bryne | -1% | 1.43 | 1.40 |
| 15 | Kongsvinger | -3% | 1.67 | 1.57 |
| 16 | Lyn | -15% | 2.33 | 1.71 |
1. Division (Norway) — Home Defence Analysis
Haugesund has the best home defensive record in the 1. Division (Norway), conceding just 1.07 goals/match at home compared to 2.20 away — a Defence Advantage of +34%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Lyn concedes more at home (2.33/match) than away (1.71/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | hodd | +49% | 1.27 | 0.43 |
| 2 | Egersund | +43% | 1.27 | 0.50 |
| 3 | Sogndal | +43% | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| 4 | Stabaek | +32% | 1.43 | 0.73 |
| 5 | Raufoss | +26% | 0.57 | 0.33 |
| 6 | Lyn | +20% | 1.07 | 0.71 |
| 7 | ODD Ballklubb | +15% | 1.27 | 0.93 |
| 8 | Ranheim | +14% | 1.33 | 1.00 |
| 9 | Kongsvinger | +14% | 1.33 | 1.00 |
| 10 | Sandnes ULF | +10% | 0.57 | 0.47 |
| 11 | Haugesund | +9% | 1.43 | 1.20 |
| 12 | Bryne | +3% | 0.86 | 0.80 |
| 13 | Stromsgodset | +3% | 1.07 | 1.00 |
| 14 | Moss | -2% | 0.57 | 0.60 |
| 15 | Asane | -3% | 0.53 | 0.57 |
| 16 | Strommen | -8% | 0.57 | 0.67 |
1. Division (Norway) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, hodd has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 1. Division (Norway), netting 1.27 goals/match at home versus 0.43 away — a Scoring Advantage of +49%. At the other end, Strommen shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.57/match at home against 0.67 away (-8%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Egersund | +58% | 0.40 | 1.50 |
| 2 | Asane | +46% | 0.53 | 1.43 |
| 3 | Sandnes ULF | +45% | 0.43 | 1.13 |
| 4 | Bryne | +40% | 0.29 | 0.67 |
| 5 | Haugesund | +24% | 0.57 | 0.93 |
| 6 | Raufoss | +22% | 0.93 | 1.47 |
| 7 | Sogndal | +20% | 0.93 | 1.40 |
| 8 | ODD Ballklubb | +20% | 0.67 | 1.00 |
| 9 | hodd | +16% | 0.67 | 0.93 |
| 10 | Stromsgodset | +13% | 0.33 | 0.43 |
| 11 | Kongsvinger | +7% | 0.80 | 0.93 |
| 12 | Strommen | +7% | 0.93 | 1.07 |
| 13 | Moss | +6% | 1.07 | 1.20 |
| 14 | Ranheim | -6% | 1.13 | 1.00 |
| 15 | Stabaek | -15% | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| 16 | Lyn | -24% | 0.93 | 0.57 |
1. Division (Norway) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Egersund has the best home defensive record in the 1. Division (Norway), conceding just 0.40 goals/match at home compared to 1.50 away — a Defence Advantage of +58%. Lyn struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.93/match at home versus 0.57 away (-24%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kongsvinger | +44% | 2.40 | 0.93 |
| 2 | Asane | +41% | 1.20 | 0.50 |
| 3 | Ranheim | +25% | 1.67 | 1.00 |
| 4 | Stabaek | +17% | 1.50 | 1.07 |
| 5 | Stromsgodset | +11% | 1.87 | 1.50 |
| 6 | Strommen | +10% | 1.21 | 1.00 |
| 7 | Bryne | +9% | 0.71 | 0.60 |
| 8 | Sandnes ULF | +7% | 1.00 | 0.87 |
| 9 | Raufoss | +3% | 0.64 | 0.60 |
| 10 | Sogndal | +3% | 1.00 | 0.93 |
| 11 | Haugesund | +3% | 1.64 | 1.53 |
| 12 | ODD Ballklubb | +1% | 0.87 | 0.86 |
| 13 | Lyn | -3% | 0.67 | 0.71 |
| 14 | Moss | -13% | 0.71 | 0.93 |
| 15 | hodd | -20% | 0.67 | 1.00 |
| 16 | Egersund | -21% | 0.60 | 0.93 |
1. Division (Norway) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Kongsvinger has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 1. Division (Norway), netting 2.40 goals/match at home versus 0.93 away — a Scoring Advantage of +44%. At the other end, Egersund shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.60/match at home against 0.93 away (-21%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Haugesund | +43% | 0.50 | 1.27 |
| 2 | Raufoss | +41% | 0.86 | 2.07 |
| 3 | Ranheim | +29% | 0.93 | 1.71 |
| 4 | Sogndal | +28% | 0.71 | 1.27 |
| 5 | Stromsgodset | +25% | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| 6 | ODD Ballklubb | +21% | 0.60 | 0.93 |
| 7 | hodd | +15% | 1.07 | 1.43 |
| 8 | Stabaek | +14% | 0.50 | 0.67 |
| 9 | Strommen | +6% | 1.07 | 1.20 |
| 10 | Egersund | +3% | 1.00 | 1.07 |
| 11 | Moss | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 12 | Sandnes ULF | -1% | 1.21 | 1.20 |
| 13 | Lyn | -10% | 1.40 | 1.14 |
| 14 | Kongsvinger | -15% | 0.87 | 0.64 |
| 15 | Asane | -16% | 1.47 | 1.07 |
| 16 | Bryne | -22% | 1.14 | 0.73 |
1. Division (Norway) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Haugesund has the best home defensive record in the 1. Division (Norway), conceding just 0.50 goals/match at home compared to 1.27 away — a Defence Advantage of +43%. Bryne struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.14/match at home versus 0.73 away (-22%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Norway
- 1. Division Women Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- 2. Division - Group 1 Home Advantage— Division Regional
- 2. Division - Group 2 Home Advantage— Division Regional
- 2. Division - Play-offs Home Advantage— Division Regional
- 3. Division - Girone 1 Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 2 Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 3 Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 4 Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 5 Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 6 Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- Eliteserien Home Advantage— Division Premium
- NM Cupen Home Advantage— Division Gold
- Nasjonal U19 Champions League Home Advantage— Division Academy
- Obos Supercup Home Advantage— Division Premium
- Super Cup Home Advantage— Division Premium
- Toppserien Home Advantage— Division Women's Elite