3. Division - Girone 2 — Home Advantage
Norway · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Molde II | +27% | +31% | +23% | 2.08/0.85 |
| 2 |  Nardo | +25% | +9% | +41% | 1.69/0.85 |
| 3 |  Herd | +24% | +14% | +34% | 1.46/1.00 |
| 4 |  Strindheim | +20% | +23% | +16% | 2.54/1.92 |
| 5 |  Ranheim II | +17% | +13% | +21% | 1.46/0.77 |
| 6 |  Rosenborg II | +16% | +19% | +14% | 1.77/1.08 |
| 7 |  Orkla | +14% | +12% | +15% | 1.08/0.69 |
| 8 |  NTNUI | +9% | +11% | +7% | 1.31/0.92 |
| 9 |  Byåsen | +6% | -7% | +18% | 1.69/1.69 |
| 10 |  Aalesund II | +2% | +26% | -23% | 1.08/0.85 |
| 11 |  Volda | -1% | +17% | -19% | 2.38/2.08 |
| 12 |  Melhus | -1% | -2% | 0% | 1.38/1.85 |
| 13 |  Spjelkavik | -2% | -11% | +7% | 1.23/1.23 |
| 14 |  Kvik Trondheim | -5% | -5% | -5% | 1.08/1.38 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
3. Division - Girone 2 (Norway) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the 3. Division - Girone 2 (Norway), the average home win rate is 47% compared to 35% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Molde II shows the strongest home advantage, winning 62% of home games versus just 23% away (a difference of +38%). At the other end, Melhus actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 38% versus 54% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Molde II | +31% | 3.62 | 1.92 |
| 2 | Aalesund II | +26% | 2.23 | 1.31 |
| 3 | Strindheim | +23% | 3.69 | 2.31 |
| 4 | Rosenborg II | +19% | 2.69 | 1.85 |
| 5 | Volda | +17% | 3.38 | 2.38 |
| 6 | Herd | +14% | 2.23 | 1.69 |
| 7 | Ranheim II | +13% | 2.69 | 2.08 |
| 8 | Orkla | +12% | 1.85 | 1.46 |
| 9 | NTNUI | +11% | 1.54 | 1.23 |
| 10 | Nardo | +9% | 2.77 | 2.31 |
| 11 | Melhus | -2% | 2.15 | 2.23 |
| 12 | Kvik Trondheim | -5% | 1.38 | 1.54 |
| 13 | Byåsen | -7% | 2.15 | 2.46 |
| 14 | Spjelkavik | -11% | 1.62 | 2.00 |
3. Division - Girone 2 (Norway) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Molde II has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the 3. Division - Girone 2 (Norway), netting 3.62 goals/match at home versus 1.92 away — a Scoring Advantage of +31%. In contrast, Spjelkavik scores more away (2.00/match) than at home (1.62/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -11% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nardo | +41% | 1.23 | 2.92 |
| 2 | Herd | +34% | 1.62 | 3.31 |
| 3 | Molde II | +23% | 2.38 | 3.77 |
| 4 | Ranheim II | +21% | 2.46 | 3.77 |
| 5 | Byåsen | +18% | 1.54 | 2.23 |
| 6 | Strindheim | +16% | 1.00 | 1.38 |
| 7 | Orkla | +15% | 2.54 | 3.46 |
| 8 | Rosenborg II | +14% | 1.62 | 2.15 |
| 9 | NTNUI | +7% | 1.92 | 2.23 |
| 10 | Spjelkavik | +7% | 2.00 | 2.31 |
| 11 | Melhus | 0% | 1.23 | 1.23 |
| 12 | Kvik Trondheim | -5% | 2.31 | 2.08 |
| 13 | Volda | -19% | 1.23 | 0.85 |
| 14 | Aalesund II | -23% | 3.69 | 2.31 |
3. Division - Girone 2 (Norway) — Home Defence Analysis
Nardo has the best home defensive record in the 3. Division - Girone 2 (Norway), conceding just 1.23 goals/match at home compared to 2.92 away — a Defence Advantage of +41%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Aalesund II concedes more at home (3.69/match) than away (2.31/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Molde II | +33% | 1.69 | 0.85 |
| 2 | Strindheim | +27% | 2.00 | 1.15 |
| 3 | Melhus | +22% | 1.08 | 0.69 |
| 4 | Volda | +21% | 1.54 | 1.00 |
| 5 | Rosenborg II | +20% | 1.15 | 0.77 |
| 6 | NTNUI | +18% | 1.00 | 0.69 |
| 7 | Spjelkavik | +18% | 1.00 | 0.69 |
| 8 | Aalesund II | +17% | 1.31 | 0.92 |
| 9 | Nardo | +16% | 1.38 | 1.00 |
| 10 | Ranheim II | +15% | 1.15 | 0.85 |
| 11 | Herd | +8% | 0.54 | 0.46 |
| 12 | Byåsen | +7% | 1.15 | 1.00 |
| 13 | Orkla | -13% | 0.77 | 1.00 |
| 14 | Kvik Trondheim | -14% | 0.46 | 0.62 |
3. Division - Girone 2 (Norway) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Molde II has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 3. Division - Girone 2 (Norway), netting 1.69 goals/match at home versus 0.85 away — a Scoring Advantage of +33%. At the other end, Kvik Trondheim shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.46/match at home against 0.62 away (-14%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rosenborg II | +50% | 0.31 | 0.92 |
| 2 | Nardo | +50% | 0.46 | 1.38 |
| 3 | Herd | +46% | 0.77 | 2.08 |
| 4 | Orkla | +30% | 1.00 | 1.85 |
| 5 | Molde II | +26% | 1.00 | 1.69 |
| 6 | NTNUI | +19% | 0.85 | 1.23 |
| 7 | Byåsen | +18% | 0.69 | 1.00 |
| 8 | Strindheim | +9% | 0.38 | 0.46 |
| 9 | Ranheim II | +5% | 1.54 | 1.69 |
| 10 | Spjelkavik | +4% | 1.00 | 1.08 |
| 11 | Volda | -7% | 0.62 | 0.54 |
| 12 | Kvik Trondheim | -8% | 1.08 | 0.92 |
| 13 | Melhus | -14% | 0.62 | 0.46 |
| 14 | Aalesund II | -20% | 1.38 | 0.92 |
3. Division - Girone 2 (Norway) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Rosenborg II has the best home defensive record in the 3. Division - Girone 2 (Norway), conceding just 0.31 goals/match at home compared to 0.92 away — a Defence Advantage of +50%. Aalesund II struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.38/match at home versus 0.92 away (-20%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aalesund II | +41% | 0.92 | 0.38 |
| 2 | Orkla | +40% | 1.08 | 0.46 |
| 3 | Molde II | +28% | 1.92 | 1.08 |
| 4 | Strindheim | +19% | 1.69 | 1.15 |
| 5 | Rosenborg II | +18% | 1.54 | 1.08 |
| 6 | Herd | +16% | 1.69 | 1.23 |
| 7 | Volda | +14% | 1.85 | 1.38 |
| 8 | Ranheim II | +11% | 1.54 | 1.23 |
| 9 | Nardo | +3% | 1.38 | 1.31 |
| 10 | NTNUI | 0% | 0.54 | 0.54 |
| 11 | Kvik Trondheim | 0% | 0.92 | 0.92 |
| 12 | Melhus | -18% | 1.08 | 1.54 |
| 13 | Byåsen | -19% | 1.00 | 1.46 |
| 14 | Spjelkavik | -36% | 0.62 | 1.31 |
3. Division - Girone 2 (Norway) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Aalesund II has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 3. Division - Girone 2 (Norway), netting 0.92 goals/match at home versus 0.38 away — a Scoring Advantage of +41%. At the other end, Spjelkavik shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.62/match at home against 1.31 away (-36%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ranheim II | +38% | 0.92 | 2.08 |
| 2 | Nardo | +33% | 0.77 | 1.54 |
| 3 | Molde II | +20% | 1.38 | 2.08 |
| 4 | Strindheim | +20% | 0.62 | 0.92 |
| 5 | Byåsen | +19% | 0.85 | 1.23 |
| 6 | Herd | +19% | 0.85 | 1.23 |
| 7 | Melhus | +11% | 0.62 | 0.77 |
| 8 | Spjelkavik | +10% | 1.00 | 1.23 |
| 9 | Orkla | +2% | 1.54 | 1.62 |
| 10 | Rosenborg II | -3% | 1.31 | 1.23 |
| 11 | Kvik Trondheim | -3% | 1.23 | 1.15 |
| 12 | NTNUI | -4% | 1.08 | 1.00 |
| 13 | Aalesund II | -25% | 2.31 | 1.38 |
| 14 | Volda | -33% | 0.62 | 0.31 |
3. Division - Girone 2 (Norway) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Ranheim II has the best home defensive record in the 3. Division - Girone 2 (Norway), conceding just 0.92 goals/match at home compared to 2.08 away — a Defence Advantage of +38%. Volda struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.62/match at home versus 0.31 away (-33%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Norway
- 1. Division Home Advantage— Division Gold
- 1. Division Women Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- 2. Division - Group 1 Home Advantage— Division Regional
- 2. Division - Group 2 Home Advantage— Division Regional
- 2. Division - Play-offs Home Advantage— Division Regional
- 3. Division - Girone 1 Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 3 Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 4 Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 5 Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 6 Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- Eliteserien Home Advantage— Division Premium
- NM Cupen Home Advantage— Division Gold
- Nasjonal U19 Champions League Home Advantage— Division Academy
- Obos Supercup Home Advantage— Division Premium
- Super Cup Home Advantage— Division Premium
- Toppserien Home Advantage— Division Women's Elite