MatchPulse
2. Division - Group 2

2. Division - Group 2 — Goals Conceded

Norway · 2026

Goals Conceded

#TeamMPTotal/GameHomeAwayHome Adv%
1Grorud26261.001412-8%
2Eidsvold26271.041116+19%
3Levanger26321.231418+13%
4Kjelsås26351.351421+20%
5Hønefoss26401.541525+25%
6Tromsdalen Uil26441.692321-5%
7Stjørdals-Blink26441.691628+27%
8Lørenskog26451.732421-7%
9Junkeren26471.812225+6%
10Rana26481.852127+13%
11Follo26542.082133+22%
12Skeid26552.122926-5%
13Trygg/Lade26662.542838+15%
14Ull/Kisa26853.273748+13%

Home / Goals Conceded

#TeamMP⊕ ConcededØ AVG
1Ull/Kisa13372.85
2Skeid13292.23
3Trygg/Lade13282.15
4Lørenskog13241.85
5Tromsdalen Uil13231.77
6Junkeren13221.69
7Follo13211.62
8Rana13211.62
9Stjørdals-Blink13161.23
10Hønefoss13151.15
11Levanger13141.08
12Grorud13141.08
13Kjelsås13141.08
14Eidsvold13110.85

Away / Goals Conceded

#TeamMP⊕ ConcededØ AVG
1Ull/Kisa13483.69
2Trygg/Lade13382.92
3Follo13332.54
4Stjørdals-Blink13282.15
5Rana13272.08
6Skeid13262.00
7Hønefoss13251.92
8Junkeren13251.92
9Tromsdalen Uil13211.62
10Kjelsås13211.62
11Lørenskog13211.62
12Levanger13181.38
13Eidsvold13161.23
14Grorud13120.92

Which teams concede the most goals?

Ull/Kisa concedes the most goals in the league — 3.27 per game

Trygg/Lade is #2 for goals conceded — 2.54 per game

Skeid is #3 for goals conceded — 2.12 per game

Grorud has one of the tightest defences — 1.00 per game

Eidsvold has one of the tightest defences — 1.04 per game

Levanger has one of the tightest defences — 1.23 per game

League Defensive Stats

  • consists of 14 teams
  • League avg conceded per game: 1.78 per game
  • Home avg conceded: 1.59 per game
  • Away avg conceded: 1.97 per game

1st Half — Goals Conceded

#TeamMP⊕ ConcededØ AVGHome ØAway Ø
1Ull/Kisa26441.691.621.77
2Skeid26281.081.151.00
3Trygg/Lade26261.000.851.15
4Follo26230.880.621.15
5Junkeren26220.850.691.00
6Stjørdals-Blink26200.770.690.85
7Rana26200.770.381.15
8Tromsdalen Uil26180.690.690.69
9Hønefoss26170.650.540.77
10Lørenskog26160.620.690.54
11Levanger26140.540.540.54
12Kjelsås26140.540.310.77
13Grorud26130.500.540.46
14Eidsvold26120.460.540.38

Home / 1st Half Conceded

#TeamMP⊕ ConcededØ AVG
1Ull/Kisa13211.62
2Skeid13151.15
3Trygg/Lade13110.85
4Tromsdalen Uil1390.69
5Junkeren1390.69
6Lørenskog1390.69
7Stjørdals-Blink1390.69
8Follo1380.62
9Levanger1370.54
10Eidsvold1370.54
11Grorud1370.54
12Hønefoss1370.54
13Rana1350.38
14Kjelsås1340.31

Away / 1st Half Conceded

#TeamMP⊕ ConcededØ AVG
1Ull/Kisa13231.77
2Follo13151.15
3Trygg/Lade13151.15
4Rana13151.15
5Skeid13131.00
6Junkeren13131.00
7Stjørdals-Blink13110.85
8Hønefoss13100.77
9Kjelsås13100.77
10Tromsdalen Uil1390.69
11Levanger1370.54
12Lørenskog1370.54
13Grorud1360.46
14Eidsvold1350.38

1st Half Defensive Insights

Ull/Kisa concedes most in 1H — 1.69 conceded/game

Skeid is #2 conceded 1H — 1.08 conceded/game

Trygg/Lade is #3 conceded 1H — 1.00 conceded/game

Eidsvold has the tightest 1H defence — 0.46 conceded/game

Grorud has the tightest 1H defence — 0.50 conceded/game

Kjelsås has the tightest 1H defence — 0.54 conceded/game

1ST HALF DEF. STATS

  • 14 teams
  • 1H conceded avg: 0.79 conceded/game
  • Home conceded 1H: 0.70 conceded/game
  • Away conceded 1H: 0.87 conceded/game
  • Teams avg ≥0.5 conceded 1H: 93% (13/14)

2nd Half — Goals Conceded

#TeamMP⊕ ConcededØ AVGHome ØAway Ø
1Ull/Kisa26411.581.231.92
2Trygg/Lade26401.541.311.77
3Follo26311.191.001.38
4Lørenskog26291.121.151.08
5Rana26281.081.230.92
6Skeid26271.041.081.00
7Tromsdalen Uil26261.001.080.92
8Junkeren26250.961.000.92
9Stjørdals-Blink26240.920.541.31
10Hønefoss26230.880.621.15
11Kjelsås26210.810.770.85
12Levanger26180.690.540.85
13Eidsvold26150.580.310.85
14Grorud26130.500.540.46

Home / 2nd Half Conceded

#TeamMP⊕ ConcededØ AVG
1Trygg/Lade13171.31
2Ull/Kisa13161.23
3Rana13161.23
4Lørenskog13151.15
5Tromsdalen Uil13141.08
6Skeid13141.08
7Follo13131.00
8Junkeren13131.00
9Kjelsås13100.77
10Hønefoss1380.62
11Levanger1370.54
12Grorud1370.54
13Stjørdals-Blink1370.54
14Eidsvold1340.31

Away / 2nd Half Conceded

#TeamMP⊕ ConcededØ AVG
1Ull/Kisa13251.92
2Trygg/Lade13231.77
3Follo13181.38
4Stjørdals-Blink13171.31
5Hønefoss13151.15
6Lørenskog13141.08
7Skeid13131.00
8Tromsdalen Uil13120.92
9Junkeren13120.92
10Rana13120.92
11Levanger13110.85
12Eidsvold13110.85
13Kjelsås13110.85
14Grorud1360.46

2nd Half Defensive Insights

Ull/Kisa concedes most in 2H — 1.58 conceded/game

Trygg/Lade is #2 conceded 2H — 1.54 conceded/game

Follo is #3 conceded 2H — 1.19 conceded/game

Grorud has the tightest 2H defence — 0.50 conceded/game

Eidsvold has the tightest 2H defence — 0.58 conceded/game

Levanger has the tightest 2H defence — 0.69 conceded/game

2ND HALF DEF. STATS

  • 14 teams
  • 2H conceded avg: 0.99 conceded/game
  • Home conceded 2H: 0.88 conceded/game
  • Away conceded 2H: 1.10 conceded/game
  • Teams avg ≥0.5 conceded 2H: 50% (7/14)

2. Division - Group 2 (Norway) — Goals Conceded Analysis

Teams in the 2. Division - Group 2 (Norway) concede an average of 1.78 goals per game this season. Grorud has the best defence, conceding only 26 goals (1.00/game), with 14 at home and 12 away. Ull/Kisa has the most porous defence with 85 goals conceded (3.27/game).

Betting Angle — Defence Strength

A low goals-conceded average is a key indicator for Clean Sheet, Under 2.5, and Asian Handicap markets. Teams with a strong home defence and a weak away defence create value in venue-specific markets — always check the split before betting.

Statistics Tables — Norway