MatchPulse
3. Division - Girone 5

3. Division - Girone 5 — Home Advantage

Norway · 2026

Norway — 3. Division - Girone 5 2026 — Detailed Stats
Competition
Home & Away TablesForm TableHome AdvantageAway AdvantageDrawsPredictions
Goals
AVG TotalGoals ScoredGoals ConcededClean SheetsBTTSFailed To Score
Over/Under
Over 0.5 ~ 5.5 TablesUnder 0.5 ~ 5.5 Tables
More
1st Half Table2nd Half TableWinning / Losing at HT

Home Advantage

#TeamHome AdvantageScoredDefencePPG (Home / Away)
1Harstad+28%+40%+16%2.46/1.54
2Fløya+25%+16%+33%2.46/1.92
3Skedsmo+23%+16%+30%2.31/2.00
4Alta+22%+22%+22%2.31/1.38
5Strømsgodset II+19%+23%+15%1.54/1.00
6Kongsvinger II+19%+21%+17%1.77/1.15
7Skjervøy+19%+25%+12%1.38/0.69
8Ulfstind+18%+17%+20%0.77/0.38
9Finnsnes+18%+10%+26%1.77/1.31
10Tromsø II+18%+9%+26%1.38/0.92
11Skjetten+6%+14%-2%1.46/1.54
12Lillestrøm II+5%+13%-3%1.23/1.38
13Fauske Sprint+3%-3%+8%1.08/1.31
14Bossekop-2%-21%+17%0.69/1.00

1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.

2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.

3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.

The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.

Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.

3. Division - Girone 5 (Norway) — Home Advantage Analysis

In the 3. Division - Girone 5 (Norway), the average home win rate is 49% compared to 37% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Harstad shows the strongest home advantage, winning 77% of home games versus just 46% away (a difference of +31%). At the other end, Bossekop actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 15% versus 31% on the road.

Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Harstad+40%4.622.00
2Skjervøy+25%1.921.15
3Strømsgodset II+23%2.921.85
4Alta+22%3.001.92
5Kongsvinger II+21%2.691.77
6Ulfstind+17%1.851.31
7Fløya+16%3.622.62
8Skedsmo+16%2.852.08
9Skjetten+14%2.772.08
10Lillestrøm II+13%3.622.77
11Finnsnes+10%2.081.69
12Tromsø II+9%2.231.85
13Fauske Sprint-3%2.382.54
14Bossekop-21%1.462.23

3. Division - Girone 5 (Norway) — Home Goals Scored Analysis

Harstad has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the 3. Division - Girone 5 (Norway), netting 4.62 goals/match at home versus 2.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +40%. In contrast, Bossekop scores more away (2.23/match) than at home (1.46/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -21% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.

Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Fløya+33%0.921.85
2Skedsmo+30%1.001.85
3Finnsnes+26%1.312.23
4Tromsø II+26%1.312.23
5Alta+22%1.231.92
6Ulfstind+20%3.004.46
7Bossekop+17%2.854.00
8Kongsvinger II+17%2.313.23
9Harstad+16%1.381.92
10Strømsgodset II+15%1.922.62
11Skjervøy+12%2.463.15
12Fauske Sprint+8%3.464.08
13Skjetten-2%2.232.15
14Lillestrøm II-3%2.462.31

3. Division - Girone 5 (Norway) — Home Defence Analysis

Fløya has the best home defensive record in the 3. Division - Girone 5 (Norway), conceding just 0.92 goals/match at home compared to 1.85 away — a Defence Advantage of +33%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Lillestrøm II concedes more at home (2.46/match) than away (2.31/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.

1st Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Harstad+49%2.230.77
2Strømsgodset II+40%1.620.69
3Ulfstind+23%0.620.38
4Skjervøy+22%0.850.54
5Tromsø II+22%1.080.69
6Lillestrøm II+21%1.541.00
7Fløya+20%1.380.92
8Kongsvinger II+15%1.461.08
9Fauske Sprint+12%1.080.85
10Skedsmo+8%1.000.85
11Skjetten+6%1.311.15
12Alta+3%1.461.38
13Finnsnes-5%0.770.85
14Bossekop-12%0.540.69

3. Division - Girone 5 (Norway) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Harstad has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 3. Division - Girone 5 (Norway), netting 2.23 goals/match at home versus 0.77 away — a Scoring Advantage of +49%. At the other end, Bossekop shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.54/match at home against 0.69 away (-12%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.

1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Skedsmo+57%0.230.85
2Alta+47%0.310.85
3Tromsø II+37%0.461.00
4Strømsgodset II+36%0.691.46
5Harstad+33%0.541.08
6Fauske Sprint+24%1.232.00
7Ulfstind+22%1.231.92
8Skjervøy+16%1.001.38
9Finnsnes+14%0.690.92
10Bossekop+11%1.311.62
11Kongsvinger II+6%1.151.31
12Skjetten0%1.001.00
13Fløya-11%0.770.62
14Lillestrøm II-14%1.230.92

3. Division - Girone 5 (Norway) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Skedsmo has the best home defensive record in the 3. Division - Girone 5 (Norway), conceding just 0.23 goals/match at home compared to 0.85 away — a Defence Advantage of +57%. Lillestrøm II struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.23/match at home versus 0.92 away (-14%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.

2nd Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Alta+48%1.540.54
2Harstad+32%2.381.23
3Kongsvinger II+28%1.230.69
4Skjervøy+27%1.080.62
5Skjetten+23%1.460.92
6Finnsnes+21%1.310.85
7Skedsmo+20%1.851.23
8Ulfstind+14%1.230.92
9Fløya+14%2.231.69
10Lillestrøm II+8%2.081.77
11Strømsgodset II+6%1.311.15
12Tromsø II0%1.151.15
13Fauske Sprint-13%1.311.69
14Bossekop-25%0.921.54

3. Division - Girone 5 (Norway) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Alta has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 3. Division - Girone 5 (Norway), netting 1.54 goals/match at home versus 0.54 away — a Scoring Advantage of +48%. At the other end, Bossekop shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.92/match at home against 1.54 away (-25%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.

2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Fløya+78%0.151.23
2Finnsnes+36%0.621.31
3Kongsvinger II+25%1.151.92
4Bossekop+22%1.542.38
5Tromsø II+19%0.851.23
6Ulfstind+18%1.772.54
7Skedsmo+13%0.771.00
8Skjervøy+10%1.461.77
9Alta+8%0.921.08
10Lillestrøm II+6%1.231.38
11Harstad0%0.850.85
12Skjetten-3%1.231.15
13Strømsgodset II-3%1.231.15
14Fauske Sprint-4%2.232.08

3. Division - Girone 5 (Norway) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Fløya has the best home defensive record in the 3. Division - Girone 5 (Norway), conceding just 0.15 goals/match at home compared to 1.23 away — a Defence Advantage of +78%. Fauske Sprint struggles most in this period at home, conceding 2.23/match at home versus 2.08 away (-4%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.

Home Advantage Tables — Norway