MatchPulse
1. Division Women

1. Division Women — Home Advantage

Norway · 2026

Norway — 1. Division Women 2026 — Detailed Stats
Competition
Home & Away TablesForm TableHome AdvantageAway AdvantageDrawsPredictions
Goals
AVG TotalGoals ScoredGoals ConcededClean SheetsBTTSFailed To Score
Over/Under
Over 0.5 ~ 5.5 TablesUnder 0.5 ~ 5.5 Tables
More
1st Half Table2nd Half TableWinning / Losing at HT

Home Advantage

#TeamHome AdvantageScoredDefencePPG (Home / Away)
1Frigg Oslo FK W+31%+43%+20%0.64/0.27
2Klepp W+28%+55%+1%0.55/0.27
3Åsane W+24%+18%+29%2.45/2.18
4Fyllingsdalen W+21%+25%+17%1.64/0.55
5Arna-Bjørnar W+19%+1%+36%2.36/2.00
6Grei W+15%+15%+15%1.36/1.00
7Viking FK W+12%-10%+33%2.27/2.18
8Start W+12%+12%+11%2.82/2.36
9Odd W+5%0%+9%1.36/1.09
10Kolbotn W+1%+13%-11%0.91/1.00
11Bryne W0%+4%-4%1.18/0.91
12TIL 2020 W-7%-5%-9%1.45/1.64

1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.

2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.

3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.

The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.

Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.

1. Division Women (Norway) — Home Advantage Analysis

In the 1. Division Women (Norway), the average home win rate is 48% compared to 39% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Fyllingsdalen W shows the strongest home advantage, winning 55% of home games versus just 18% away (a difference of +36%). At the other end, TIL 2020 W actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 36% versus 55% on the road.

Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Klepp W+55%1.550.45
2Frigg Oslo FK W+43%0.910.36
3Fyllingsdalen W+25%1.821.09
4Åsane W+18%2.641.82
5Grei W+15%2.091.55
6Kolbotn W+13%1.641.27
7Start W+12%2.912.27
8Bryne W+4%1.181.09
9Arna-Bjørnar W+1%3.273.18
10Odd W0%1.451.45
11TIL 2020 W-5%1.822.00
12Viking FK W-10%2.553.09

1. Division Women (Norway) — Home Goals Scored Analysis

Klepp W has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the 1. Division Women (Norway), netting 1.55 goals/match at home versus 0.45 away — a Scoring Advantage of +55%. In contrast, Viking FK W scores more away (3.09/match) than at home (2.55/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -10% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.

Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Arna-Bjørnar W+36%0.641.36
2Viking FK W+33%0.641.27
3Åsane W+29%0.551.00
4Frigg Oslo FK W+20%2.183.27
5Fyllingsdalen W+17%2.002.82
6Grei W+15%2.002.73
7Start W+11%0.730.91
8Odd W+9%1.361.64
9Klepp W+1%3.914.00
10Bryne W-4%2.182.00
11TIL 2020 W-9%1.090.91
12Kolbotn W-11%2.361.91

1. Division Women (Norway) — Home Defence Analysis

Arna-Bjørnar W has the best home defensive record in the 1. Division Women (Norway), conceding just 0.64 goals/match at home compared to 1.36 away — a Defence Advantage of +36%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Kolbotn W concedes more at home (2.36/match) than away (1.91/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.

1st Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Klepp W+60%0.730.18
2Viking FK W+26%2.001.18
3Grei W+20%0.820.55
4Arna-Bjørnar W+13%1.551.18
5Fyllingsdalen W+8%0.640.55
6Kolbotn W0%0.550.55
7Åsane W-4%1.181.27
8TIL 2020 W-5%0.820.91
9Start W-6%1.361.55
10Bryne W-11%0.360.45
11Frigg Oslo FK W-20%0.180.27
12Odd W-43%0.360.91

1. Division Women (Norway) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Klepp W has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 1. Division Women (Norway), netting 0.73 goals/match at home versus 0.18 away — a Scoring Advantage of +60%. At the other end, Odd W shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.36/match at home against 0.91 away (-43%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.

1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Start W+71%0.090.55
2Viking FK W+40%0.270.64
3Åsane W+33%0.180.36
4Fyllingsdalen W+12%1.001.27
5Arna-Bjørnar W+9%0.450.55
6Bryne W+8%1.001.18
7Klepp W+6%2.092.36
8Frigg Oslo FK W0%0.820.82
9Odd W-7%0.730.64
10Grei W-9%1.090.91
11TIL 2020 W-17%0.640.45
12Kolbotn W-18%1.180.82

1. Division Women (Norway) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Start W has the best home defensive record in the 1. Division Women (Norway), conceding just 0.09 goals/match at home compared to 0.55 away — a Defence Advantage of +71%. Kolbotn W struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.18/match at home versus 0.82 away (-18%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.

2nd Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Frigg Oslo FK W+78%0.730.09
2Klepp W+50%0.820.27
3Åsane W+45%1.450.55
4Fyllingsdalen W+37%1.180.55
5Start W+36%1.550.73
6Odd W+33%1.090.55
7Kolbotn W+20%1.090.73
8Bryne W+13%0.820.64
9Grei W+12%1.271.00
10TIL 2020 W-4%1.001.09
11Arna-Bjørnar W-7%1.732.00
12Viking FK W-56%0.551.91

1. Division Women (Norway) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Frigg Oslo FK W has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 1. Division Women (Norway), netting 0.73 goals/match at home versus 0.09 away — a Scoring Advantage of +78%. At the other end, Viking FK W shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.55/match at home against 1.91 away (-56%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.

2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Arna-Bjørnar W+64%0.180.82
2Grei W+33%0.911.82
3Frigg Oslo FK W+29%1.362.45
4Åsane W+27%0.360.64
5Viking FK W+27%0.360.64
6Odd W+22%0.641.00
7Fyllingsdalen W+21%1.001.55
8TIL 2020 W0%0.450.45
9Kolbotn W-4%1.181.09
10Klepp W-5%1.821.64
11Bryne W-18%1.180.82
12Start W-27%0.640.36

1. Division Women (Norway) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Arna-Bjørnar W has the best home defensive record in the 1. Division Women (Norway), conceding just 0.18 goals/match at home compared to 0.82 away — a Defence Advantage of +64%. Start W struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.64/match at home versus 0.36 away (-27%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.

Home Advantage Tables — Norway