MatchPulse
1. Division Women

1. Division Women — Home Advantage

Norway · 2026

Norway — 1. Division Women 2026 — Detailed Stats
Competition
Home & Away TablesForm TableHome AdvantageAway AdvantageDrawsPredictions
Goals
AVG TotalGoals ScoredGoals ConcededClean SheetsBTTSFailed To Score
Over/Under
Over 0.5 ~ 5.5 TablesUnder 0.5 ~ 5.5 Tables
More
1st Half Table2nd Half TableWinning / Losing at HT

Home Advantage

#TeamHome AdvantageScoredDefencePPG (Home / Away)
1Frigg Oslo FK W+40%+67%+12%0.88/0.33
2Åsane W+32%+36%+29%2.71/2.00
3Klepp W+29%+51%+7%0.67/0.38
4Bryne W+17%+41%-8%1.25/0.88
5Fyllingsdalen W+12%+20%+3%1.67/0.38
6Arna-Bjørnar W+11%-13%+36%2.38/1.78
7Start W+10%+15%+5%2.75/2.44
8Odd W+4%-6%+14%1.33/1.00
9Viking FK W+4%-21%+28%2.00/2.22
10Grei W-1%-12%+10%1.00/1.00
11Kolbotn W-3%0%-6%0.88/1.00
12TIL 2020 W-9%-3%-14%1.67/1.88

1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.

2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.

3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.

The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.

Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.

1. Division Women (Norway) — Home Advantage Analysis

In the 1. Division Women (Norway), the average home win rate is 49% compared to 38% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Fyllingsdalen W shows the strongest home advantage, winning 56% of home games versus just 13% away (a difference of +43%). At the other end, TIL 2020 W actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 44% versus 63% on the road.

Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Frigg Oslo FK W+67%1.130.22
2Klepp W+51%1.560.50
3Bryne W+41%1.500.63
4Åsane W+36%2.571.22
5Fyllingsdalen W+20%1.891.25
6Start W+15%2.882.11
7Kolbotn W0%1.501.50
8TIL 2020 W-3%2.002.13
9Odd W-6%1.111.25
10Grei W-12%1.672.14
11Arna-Bjørnar W-13%2.383.11
12Viking FK W-21%2.253.44

1. Division Women (Norway) — Home Goals Scored Analysis

Frigg Oslo FK W has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the 1. Division Women (Norway), netting 1.13 goals/match at home versus 0.22 away — a Scoring Advantage of +67%. In contrast, Viking FK W scores more away (3.44/match) than at home (2.25/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -21% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.

Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Arna-Bjørnar W+36%0.631.33
2Åsane W+29%0.430.78
3Viking FK W+28%0.751.33
4Odd W+14%1.331.75
5Frigg Oslo FK W+12%2.252.89
6Grei W+10%2.002.43
7Klepp W+7%3.564.13
8Start W+5%1.001.11
9Fyllingsdalen W+3%2.332.50
10Kolbotn W-6%2.252.00
11Bryne W-8%1.751.50
12TIL 2020 W-14%1.000.75

1. Division Women (Norway) — Home Defence Analysis

Arna-Bjørnar W has the best home defensive record in the 1. Division Women (Norway), conceding just 0.63 goals/match at home compared to 1.33 away — a Defence Advantage of +36%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, TIL 2020 W concedes more at home (1.00/match) than away (0.75/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.

1st Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Klepp W+68%0.670.13
2Bryne W+14%0.500.38
3Arna-Bjørnar W+11%1.381.11
4Viking FK W+10%1.631.33
5Åsane W+7%1.141.00
6Frigg Oslo FK W+6%0.250.22
7Grei W+4%0.780.71
8Fyllingsdalen W-6%0.670.75
9TIL 2020 W-12%0.891.13
10Start W-12%1.131.44
11Kolbotn W-14%0.380.50
12Odd W-64%0.221.00

1. Division Women (Norway) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Klepp W has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 1. Division Women (Norway), netting 0.67 goals/match at home versus 0.13 away — a Scoring Advantage of +68%. At the other end, Odd W shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.22/match at home against 1.00 away (-64%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.

1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Start W+68%0.130.67
2Åsane W+22%0.140.22
3Viking FK W+19%0.380.56
4Klepp W+14%1.892.50
5Bryne W+9%0.630.75
6Odd W+6%0.560.63
7Arna-Bjørnar W+5%0.500.56
8Frigg Oslo FK W-12%1.130.89
9Kolbotn W-16%1.381.00
10TIL 2020 W-19%0.560.38
11Grei W-22%1.110.71
12Fyllingsdalen W-24%1.220.75

1. Division Women (Norway) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Start W has the best home defensive record in the 1. Division Women (Norway), conceding just 0.13 goals/match at home compared to 0.67 away — a Defence Advantage of +68%. Fyllingsdalen W struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.22/match at home versus 0.75 away (-24%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.

2nd Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Frigg Oslo FK W+100%0.880.00
2Åsane W+73%1.430.22
3Bryne W+60%1.000.25
4Odd W+56%0.890.25
5Start W+45%1.750.67
6Fyllingsdalen W+42%1.220.50
7Klepp W+41%0.890.38
8Kolbotn W+6%1.131.00
9TIL 2020 W+5%1.111.00
10Grei W-23%0.891.43
11Arna-Bjørnar W-33%1.002.00
12Viking FK W-54%0.632.11

1. Division Women (Norway) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Frigg Oslo FK W has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 1. Division Women (Norway), netting 0.88 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Viking FK W shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.63/match at home against 2.11 away (-54%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.

2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Arna-Bjørnar W+72%0.130.78
2Viking FK W+35%0.380.78
3Åsane W+32%0.290.56
4Grei W+32%0.891.71
5Frigg Oslo FK W+28%1.132.00
6Fyllingsdalen W+22%1.111.75
7Odd W+18%0.781.13
8Kolbotn W+7%0.881.00
9Klepp W-1%1.671.63
10TIL 2020 W-8%0.440.38
11Bryne W-20%1.130.75
12Start W-33%0.880.44

1. Division Women (Norway) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Arna-Bjørnar W has the best home defensive record in the 1. Division Women (Norway), conceding just 0.13 goals/match at home compared to 0.78 away — a Defence Advantage of +72%. Start W struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.88/match at home versus 0.44 away (-33%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.

Home Advantage Tables — Norway