MatchPulse
2. Division - Group 2

2. Division - Group 2 — AVG Total

Norway · 2026

Average Total Goals

#TeamMPTotalAVGHome AVGAway AVG
1Ull/Kisa261154.424.464.38
2Hønefoss261003.853.544.15
3Kjelsås26983.773.693.85
4Levanger26963.693.543.85
5Trygg/Lade26963.693.384
6Skeid26953.654.622.69
7Tromsdalen Uil26923.543.693.38
8Eidsvold26903.463.313.62
9Lørenskog26903.464.232.69
10Stjørdals-Blink26893.422.923.92
11Follo26883.382.624.15
12Rana26883.3833.77
13Junkeren26863.313.623
14Grorud26732.813.232.38

Home / AVG Total Goals

#TeamMP⊕ Total GoalsØ AVG
1Skeid13604.62
2Ull/Kisa13584.46
3Lørenskog13554.23
4Tromsdalen Uil13483.69
5Kjelsås13483.69
6Junkeren13473.62
7Levanger13463.54
8Hønefoss13463.54
9Trygg/Lade13443.38
10Eidsvold13433.31
11Grorud13423.23
12Rana13393.00
13Stjørdals-Blink13382.92
14Follo13342.62

Away / AVG Total Goals

#TeamMP⊕ Total GoalsØ AVG
1Ull/Kisa13574.38
2Follo13544.15
3Hønefoss13544.15
4Trygg/Lade13524.00
5Stjørdals-Blink13513.92
6Levanger13503.85
7Kjelsås13503.85
8Rana13493.77
9Eidsvold13473.62
10Tromsdalen Uil13443.38
11Junkeren13393.00
12Skeid13352.69
13Lørenskog13352.69
14Grorud13312.38

Which teams experience the most goals?

Ull/Kisa is the top team for total goals — 4.42 per game

Hønefoss is #2 for total goals — 3.85 per game

Kjelsås is #3 for total goals — 3.77 per game

Grorud is one of the lowest-scoring teams — 2.81 per game

Junkeren is one of the lowest-scoring teams — 3.31 per game

Rana is one of the lowest-scoring teams — 3.38 per game

League Goal Stats

  • consists of 14 teams
  • League avg goals per game: 3.56 per game
  • Home avg: 3.56 per game
  • Away avg: 3.56 per game
  • Teams avg Over 2.5 goals: 100% (14/14)

1st Half — AVG Goals

#TeamMP⊕ GoalsØ AVGHome ØAway Ø
1Ull/Kisa26511.962.081.85
2Skeid26501.922.461.38
3Levanger26461.771.621.92
4Eidsvold26441.691.851.54
5Junkeren26441.691.621.77
6Hønefoss26421.621.461.77
7Kjelsås26411.581.381.77
8Trygg/Lade26411.581.541.62
9Follo26381.461.081.85
10Tromsdalen Uil26371.421.621.23
11Rana26371.421.081.77
12Grorud26351.351.621.08
13Stjørdals-Blink26351.351.151.54
14Lørenskog26331.271.541.00

Home / 1st Half Goals

#TeamMP⊕ GoalsØ AVG
1Skeid13322.46
2Ull/Kisa13272.08
3Eidsvold13241.85
4Levanger13211.62
5Tromsdalen Uil13211.62
6Grorud13211.62
7Junkeren13211.62
8Lørenskog13201.54
9Trygg/Lade13201.54
10Hønefoss13191.46
11Kjelsås13181.38
12Stjørdals-Blink13151.15
13Follo13141.08
14Rana13141.08

Away / 1st Half Goals

#TeamMP⊕ GoalsØ AVG
1Levanger13251.92
2Ull/Kisa13241.85
3Follo13241.85
4Hønefoss13231.77
5Junkeren13231.77
6Kjelsås13231.77
7Rana13231.77
8Trygg/Lade13211.62
9Eidsvold13201.54
10Stjørdals-Blink13201.54
11Skeid13181.38
12Tromsdalen Uil13161.23
13Grorud13141.08
14Lørenskog13131.00

1st Half Goal Insights

Ull/Kisa is the top team for 1H goals — 1.96 goals/game in 1H

Skeid is #2 for 1H goals — 1.92 goals/game in 1H

Levanger is #3 for 1H goals — 1.77 goals/game in 1H

Lørenskog is one of the lowest-scoring teams in 1H — 1.27 goals/game in 1H

Stjørdals-Blink is one of the lowest-scoring teams in 1H — 1.35 goals/game in 1H

Grorud is one of the lowest-scoring teams in 1H — 1.35 goals/game in 1H

1ST HALF GOAL STATS

  • consists of 14 teams
  • 1H league avg: 1.58 goals/game in 1H
  • 1H home avg: 1.58 goals/game in 1H
  • 1H away avg: 1.58 goals/game in 1H
  • Teams avg Over 1.0 in 1H: 100% (14/14)

2nd Half — AVG Goals

#TeamMP⊕ GoalsØ AVGHome ØAway Ø
1Ull/Kisa26642.462.382.54
2Hønefoss26582.232.082.38
3Kjelsås26572.192.312.08
4Lørenskog26572.192.691.69
5Tromsdalen Uil26552.122.082.15
6Trygg/Lade26552.121.852.38
7Stjørdals-Blink26542.081.772.38
8Rana26511.961.922.00
9Levanger26501.921.921.92
10Follo26501.921.542.31
11Eidsvold26461.771.462.08
12Skeid26451.732.151.31
13Junkeren26421.622.001.23
14Grorud26381.461.621.31

Home / 2nd Half Goals

#TeamMP⊕ GoalsØ AVG
1Lørenskog13352.69
2Ull/Kisa13312.38
3Kjelsås13302.31
4Skeid13282.15
5Tromsdalen Uil13272.08
6Hønefoss13272.08
7Junkeren13262.00
8Levanger13251.92
9Rana13251.92
10Trygg/Lade13241.85
11Stjørdals-Blink13231.77
12Grorud13211.62
13Follo13201.54
14Eidsvold13191.46

Away / 2nd Half Goals

#TeamMP⊕ GoalsØ AVG
1Ull/Kisa13332.54
2Hønefoss13312.38
3Stjørdals-Blink13312.38
4Trygg/Lade13312.38
5Follo13302.31
6Tromsdalen Uil13282.15
7Eidsvold13272.08
8Kjelsås13272.08
9Rana13262.00
10Levanger13251.92
11Lørenskog13221.69
12Skeid13171.31
13Grorud13171.31
14Junkeren13161.23

2nd Half Goal Insights

Ull/Kisa is the top team for 2H goals — 2.46 goals/game in 2H

Hønefoss is #2 for 2H goals — 2.23 goals/game in 2H

Kjelsås is #3 for 2H goals — 2.19 goals/game in 2H

Grorud is one of the lowest-scoring teams in 2H — 1.46 goals/game in 2H

Junkeren is one of the lowest-scoring teams in 2H — 1.62 goals/game in 2H

Skeid is one of the lowest-scoring teams in 2H — 1.73 goals/game in 2H

2ND HALF GOAL STATS

  • consists of 14 teams
  • 2H league avg: 1.98 goals/game in 2H
  • 2H home avg: 1.98 goals/game in 2H
  • 2H away avg: 1.98 goals/game in 2H
  • Teams avg Over 1.5 in 2H: 93% (13/14)

Which team's games produce the most goals in the 2. Division - Group 2?

In the 2026 campaign, Ull/Kisa lead the 2. Division - Group 2 in combined goal volume: their 26 fixtures have produced 115 goals in total, working out to 4.42 per game when both sides of the scoreline are counted. The away picture is equally lively — Ull/Kisa road games average 4.38 goals, suggesting their fixtures tend to deliver action regardless of venue.

Close behind are Hønefoss and Kjelsås, both sustaining high scoring rates this season. Hønefoss have clocked up 100 combined goals across 26 outings (3.85/game), while Kjelsås have registered 98 over 26 matches (3.77/game). A blended average of 3.81 between the two confirms that prolific fixtures extend well beyond a single outlier this term.

At the other extreme, Grorud's fixtures are the quietest in the 2. Division - Group 2, generating just 73 combined goals across 26 matches — a per-game rate of 2.81. Punters looking at Under 2.5 or low-scoring markets could find Grorud a recurring reference point this season.

Betting Angle — Over/Under Markets

For Over/Under markets, teams with an average above 3.86 are statistically strong Over 2.5 candidates, while those below 3.26 are better suited to Under markets. Always compare home and away averages separately — home advantage can shift the line significantly.

Statistics Tables — Norway