MatchPulse
1. Division Women

1. Division WomenBTTS

Norway · 2026

Both Teams To Score (BTTS)

#TeamMPBTTSBTTS%Home%Away%
1Fyllingsdalen W171271%67%75%
2Kolbotn W161169%38%100%
3Grei W161063%67%57%
4Odd W171059%44%75%
5Start W171059%63%56%
6Klepp W17847%67%25%
7Arna-Bjørnar W17847%38%56%
8TIL 2020 W17847%56%38%
9Viking FK W17847%25%67%
10Åsane W16638%43%33%
11Frigg Oslo FK W17635%63%11%
12Bryne W16531%38%25%

Home / BTTS

#TeamMPBTTS%
1Klepp W9667%
2Grei W9667%
3Fyllingsdalen W9667%
4Start W8563%
5Frigg Oslo FK W8563%
6TIL 2020 W9556%
7Odd W9444%
8Åsane W7343%
9Kolbotn W8338%
10Arna-Bjørnar W8338%
11Bryne W8338%
12Viking FK W8225%

Away / BTTS

#TeamMPBTTS%
1Kolbotn W88100%
2Fyllingsdalen W8675%
3Odd W8675%
4Viking FK W9667%
5Grei W7457%
6Arna-Bjørnar W9556%
7Start W9556%
8TIL 2020 W8338%
9Åsane W9333%
10Klepp W8225%
11Bryne W8225%
12Frigg Oslo FK W9111%

Which teams are involved in the most BTTS games?

Fyllingsdalen W has the highest BTTS rate in the league71%

Kolbotn W is #2 for BTTS rate69%

Grei W is #3 for BTTS rate63%

Bryne W has one of the lowest BTTS rates31%

Frigg Oslo FK W has one of the lowest BTTS rates35%

Åsane W has one of the lowest BTTS rates38%

League BTTS Stats

  • consists of 12 teams
  • League BTTS rate: 51%
  • Home BTTS rate: 51%
  • Away BTTS rate: 51%

1st Half — BTTS Rate

#TeamMPBTTS%Home%Away%
1Fyllingsdalen W17635%33%38%
2Kolbotn W16531%25%38%
3Grei W16531%44%14%
4Arna-Bjørnar W17424%25%22%
5TIL 2020 W17424%33%13%
6Odd W17424%11%38%
7Viking FK W17424%13%33%
8Åsane W16319%14%22%
9Klepp W17318%22%13%
10Start W17318%13%22%
11Frigg Oslo FK W17212%25%0%
12Bryne W1616%0%13%

Home / BTTS in 1st Half

#TeamMPBTTS%
1Grei W9444%
2TIL 2020 W9333%
3Fyllingsdalen W9333%
4Kolbotn W8225%
5Arna-Bjørnar W8225%
6Frigg Oslo FK W8225%
7Klepp W9222%
8Åsane W7114%
9Viking FK W8113%
10Start W8113%
11Odd W9111%
12Bryne W800%

Away / BTTS in 1st Half

#TeamMPBTTS%
1Kolbotn W8338%
2Fyllingsdalen W8338%
3Odd W8338%
4Viking FK W9333%
5Arna-Bjørnar W9222%
6Åsane W9222%
7Start W9222%
8Grei W7114%
9Klepp W8113%
10TIL 2020 W8113%
11Bryne W8113%
12Frigg Oslo FK W900%

1st Half BTTS Insights

Fyllingsdalen W has the highest BTTS rate in 1H35%

Kolbotn W is #2 for BTTS in 1H31%

Grei W is #3 for BTTS in 1H31%

Bryne W rarely sees BTTS in 1H6%

Frigg Oslo FK W rarely sees BTTS in 1H12%

Start W rarely sees BTTS in 1H18%

1ST HALF BTTS STATS

  • 12 teams
  • 1H BTTS league rate: 22%
  • Home 1H BTTS rate: 22%
  • Away 1H BTTS rate: 22%
  • Teams with 1H BTTS ≥20%: 58% (7/12)

2nd Half — BTTS Rate

#TeamMPBTTS%Home%Away%
1Fyllingsdalen W17741%44%38%
2Kolbotn W16531%13%50%
3Grei W16531%11%57%
4Arna-Bjørnar W17529%0%56%
5Viking FK W17529%13%44%
6Start W17529%63%0%
7Klepp W17424%33%13%
8Odd W17424%22%25%
9Åsane W16319%29%11%
10TIL 2020 W17318%22%13%
11Frigg Oslo FK W17318%38%0%
12Bryne W1616%13%0%

Home / BTTS in 2nd Half

#TeamMPBTTS%
1Start W8563%
2Fyllingsdalen W9444%
3Frigg Oslo FK W8338%
4Klepp W9333%
5Åsane W7229%
6TIL 2020 W9222%
7Odd W9222%
8Kolbotn W8113%
9Viking FK W8113%
10Bryne W8113%
11Grei W9111%
12Arna-Bjørnar W800%

Away / BTTS in 2nd Half

#TeamMPBTTS%
1Grei W7457%
2Arna-Bjørnar W9556%
3Kolbotn W8450%
4Viking FK W9444%
5Fyllingsdalen W8338%
6Odd W8225%
7Klepp W8113%
8TIL 2020 W8113%
9Åsane W9111%
10Start W900%
11Bryne W800%
12Frigg Oslo FK W900%

2nd Half BTTS Insights

Fyllingsdalen W has the highest BTTS rate in 2H41%

Kolbotn W is #2 for BTTS in 2H31%

Grei W is #3 for BTTS in 2H31%

Bryne W rarely sees BTTS in 2H6%

Frigg Oslo FK W rarely sees BTTS in 2H18%

TIL 2020 W rarely sees BTTS in 2H18%

2ND HALF BTTS STATS

  • 12 teams
  • 2H BTTS league rate: 25%
  • Home 2H BTTS rate: 25%
  • Away 2H BTTS rate: 25%
  • Teams with 2H BTTS ≥40%: 8% (1/12)

1. Division Women (Norway) — BTTS (Both Teams To Score) Analysis

In the 1. Division Women (Norway), both teams score in 102% of matches this season. Fyllingsdalen W is involved in the most BTTS games with a rate of 71% (12 games), with 67% at home and 75% away. Bryne W has the lowest BTTS rate at 31%.

Betting Angle — BTTS Markets

BTTS Yes is most reliable when two high-BTTS teams meet. When a top-BTTS team faces a low-BTTS team, consider BTTS No — the defensive team may suppress the higher-BTTS side. Always combine with goals-conceded data for the full picture.

Statistics TablesNorway