1. Division — Form Table
Norway · 2026
Combined Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Stromsgodset | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 3 | +18 | 18 | WWWWWLW | 2.57 | 57% | 14% | 29% | 3.00 | 71% | 57% | 3.43 | |
| 2 |  Ranheim | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 12 | +9 | 16 | WWLDWWW | 2.29 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 3.00 | 100% | 86% | 4.71 | |
| 3 |  Stabaek | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | +6 | 16 | WLDWWWW | 2.29 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 1.86 | 86% | 57% | 2.86 | |
| 4 |  Haugesund | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 11 | +5 | 16 | WWDWLWW | 2.29 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 2.29 | 100% | 71% | 3.86 | |
| 5 |  ODD Ballklubb | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 11 | +4 | 13 | WWWWLLD | 1.86 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 2.14 | 86% | 71% | 3.71 | |
| 6 |  Kongsvinger | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 13 | +7 | 12 | WWWLWLL | 1.71 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 2.86 | 100% | 86% | 4.71 | |
| 7 |  Bryne | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 10 | +5 | 11 | WWLDLDW | 1.57 | 43% | 0% | 57% | 2.14 | 86% | 71% | 3.57 | |
| 8 |  Strommen | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 14 | +3 | 11 | LDDWWWL | 1.57 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 2.43 | 86% | 86% | 4.43 | |
| 9 |  Egersund | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 18 | -5 | 9 | LLWDDDW | 1.29 | 14% | 29% | 71% | 1.86 | 86% | 86% | 4.43 | |
| 10 |  Sogndal | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 7 | LLLDWWL | 1.00 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.57 | 86% | 86% | 3.29 | |
| 11 |  Moss | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 7 | WLWDLLL | 1.00 | 14% | 57% | 43% | 0.71 | 71% | 57% | 2.29 | |
| 12 |  Sandnes ULF | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 6 | LDDLLWD | 0.86 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.57 | 100% | 86% | 4.14 | |
| 13 |  Lyn | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 6 | LLLLWLW | 0.86 | 29% | 29% | 43% | 1.14 | 71% | 71% | 3.29 | |
| 14 |  Asane | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 17 | -10 | 6 | LLWLLWL | 0.86 | 0% | 43% | 57% | 1.00 | 71% | 71% | 3.43 | |
| 15 |  hodd | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 19 | -7 | 4 | LLLDWLL | 0.57 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.71 | 100% | 86% | 4.43 | |
| 16 |  Raufoss | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 19 | -14 | 1 | LLDLLLL | 0.14 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 0.71 | 100% | 71% | 3.43 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Is in the Best Form in the Last 7 Games?
Stromsgodset leads the form table with 86% wins and 2.57 PPG in the last 7 games.
Ranheim is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.29 PPG.
Stabaek is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.29 PPG.
Raufoss is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 0% and 0.14 PPG.
hodd is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 14% and 0.57 PPG.
Sandnes ULF has the worst form over the last 7 games with just 14% wins and only 0.86 PPG.
- •The 1. Division (Norway) Last 7 Games Form Table covers 16 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent games.
- •Win rate across the 1. Division in this period is 42%
- •Teams score an average of 1.88 goals per game and concede 1.88 — a combined 3.75 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 66% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 18% of games.
1. Division (Norway) Last 7 Games — Form Table Insights
Stromsgodset, Ranheim and Stabaek have been the standout performers in the 1. Division (Norway) over the last 7 games, leading the form table with 2.57, 2.29 and 2.29 PPG respectively. Across the 1. Division, teams score an average of 1.88 goals and concede 1.88 per game — a combined 3.75 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 66% of fixtures while 18% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Raufoss and hodd have struggled in recent games, collecting just 0.14 and 0.57 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the 1. Division.
Home Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Haugesund | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 6 | +18 | 21 | WWWWWWW | 3.00 | 57% | 0% | 43% | 3.43 | 100% | 71% | 4.29 | |
| 2 | Stromsgodset | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 5 | +16 | 18 | LWWWWWW | 2.57 | 43% | 14% | 43% | 3.00 | 86% | 71% | 3.71 | |
| 3 | Kongsvinger | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 32 | 12 | +20 | 16 | WDWWWWL | 2.29 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 4.57 | 100% | 100% | 6.29 | |
| 4 | Stabaek | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 12 | +8 | 16 | WWLWDWW | 2.29 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 2.86 | 100% | 86% | 4.57 | |
| 5 | Strommen | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 9 | +7 | 14 | DLWWDWW | 2.00 | 43% | 14% | 57% | 2.29 | 71% | 57% | 3.57 | |
| 6 | Lyn | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 13 | +3 | 13 | WWDLLWW | 1.86 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 2.29 | 86% | 71% | 4.14 | |
| 7 | Egersund | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 12 | +2 | 12 | WLDDWDW | 1.71 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 2.00 | 100% | 71% | 3.71 | |
| 8 | ODD Ballklubb | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 10 | +6 | 11 | WLDWWLD | 1.57 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 2.29 | 86% | 71% | 3.71 | |
| 9 | Bryne | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 11 | LWLWWDD | 1.57 | 29% | 29% | 43% | 1.29 | 86% | 29% | 2.57 | |
| 10 | Ranheim | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 20 | 17 | +3 | 10 | LLLDWWW | 1.43 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 2.86 | 100% | 100% | 5.29 | |
| 11 | Sogndal | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 9 | +1 | 10 | LWLDLWW | 1.43 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.43 | 86% | 43% | 2.71 | |
| 12 | hodd | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 10 | WWLLDWL | 1.43 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 2.00 | 100% | 71% | 4.00 | |
| 13 | Sandnes ULF | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 5 | LLLDLDW | 0.71 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.29 | 86% | 57% | 3.57 | |
| 14 | Asane | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 4 | LLDLWLL | 0.57 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.00 | 86% | 86% | 3.14 | |
| 15 | Moss | 7 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 3 | DDLLLDL | 0.43 | 14% | 29% | 71% | 1.14 | 86% | 71% | 3.43 | |
| 16 | Raufoss | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 3 | LLLWLLL | 0.43 | 0% | 43% | 57% | 0.71 | 100% | 71% | 2.86 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms? (Last 7 Home Games)
Haugesund leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 home games.
Stromsgodset is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 86% and 2.57 PPG.
Kongsvinger is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.29 PPG.
Moss is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 0% and 0.43 PPG.
Raufoss is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 14% and 0.43 PPG.
Asane has the worst form over the last 7 home games with just 14% wins and only 0.57 PPG.
- •The 1. Division (Norway) Home Form Table (Last 7) covers 16 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent home games.
- •Win rate across the 1. Division in this period is 46%
- •Teams score an average of 2.15 goals per game and concede 1.70 — a combined 3.85 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 68% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 16% of games.
1. Division (Norway) — Home Form Table Insights (Last 7 Home Games)
Haugesund, Stromsgodset and Kongsvinger have been the standout performers in the 1. Division (Norway) over the last 7 home games, leading the form table with 3.00, 2.57 and 2.29 PPG respectively. Across the 1. Division, teams score an average of 2.15 goals and concede 1.70 per game — a combined 3.85 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 68% of fixtures while 16% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Moss and Raufoss have struggled in recent home games, collecting just 0.43 and 0.43 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the 1. Division.
Away Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stromsgodset | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 6 | +10 | 16 | WWWDWWL | 2.29 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 2.29 | 86% | 43% | 3.14 | |
| 2 | Kongsvinger | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 11 | +3 | 13 | WWWDWLL | 1.86 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 2.00 | 86% | 57% | 3.57 | |
| 3 | Haugesund | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 14 | +2 | 13 | WLWWDLW | 1.86 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 2.29 | 100% | 71% | 4.29 | |
| 4 | Bryne | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 8 | +5 | 12 | WWLWLLW | 1.71 | 57% | 14% | 29% | 1.86 | 86% | 57% | 3.00 | |
| 5 | Stabaek | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 7 | +3 | 12 | WWLLLWW | 1.71 | 43% | 29% | 29% | 1.43 | 86% | 43% | 2.43 | |
| 6 | Ranheim | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 15 | +2 | 11 | WLDWLDW | 1.57 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.43 | 100% | 71% | 4.57 | |
| 7 | ODD Ballklubb | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 10 | DLWLWWL | 1.43 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 2.00 | 86% | 71% | 4.43 | |
| 8 | Moss | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 9 | LLWWWLL | 1.29 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.29 | 86% | 86% | 3.00 | |
| 9 | Strommen | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 8 | LWDLDWL | 1.14 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.86 | 100% | 86% | 4.14 | |
| 10 | Asane | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 8 | LWDDLLW | 1.14 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.57 | 86% | 86% | 4.00 | |
| 11 | Lyn | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 7 | LWDWLLL | 1.00 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.71 | 86% | 71% | 3.86 | |
| 12 | Egersund | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 17 | -10 | 6 | WLDLLDD | 0.86 | 29% | 43% | 43% | 1.00 | 86% | 57% | 3.43 | |
| 13 | Sandnes ULF | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 20 | -9 | 5 | LWLDLLD | 0.71 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.57 | 100% | 86% | 4.43 | |
| 14 | hodd | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 25 | -14 | 4 | LWLDLLL | 0.57 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.57 | 100% | 100% | 5.14 | |
| 15 | Sogndal | 7 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 2 | LDLLLDL | 0.29 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.43 | 100% | 86% | 3.71 | |
| 16 | Raufoss | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 31 | -24 | 1 | LLLDLLL | 0.14 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.00 | 100% | 86% | 5.43 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms? (Last 7 Away Games)
Stromsgodset leads the form table with 71% wins and 2.29 PPG in the last 7 away games.
Kongsvinger is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 57% and 1.86 PPG.
Haugesund is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 57% and 1.86 PPG.
Raufoss is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.14 PPG.
Sogndal is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.29 PPG.
hodd has the worst form over the last 7 away games with just 14% wins and only 0.57 PPG.
- •The 1. Division (Norway) Away Form Table (Last 7) covers 16 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent away games.
- •Win rate across the 1. Division in this period is 35%
- •Teams score an average of 1.71 goals per game and concede 2.21 — a combined 3.91 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 69% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 17% of games.
1. Division (Norway) — Away Form Table Insights (Last 7 Away Games)
Stromsgodset, Kongsvinger and Haugesund have been the standout performers in the 1. Division (Norway) over the last 7 away games, leading the form table with 2.29, 1.86 and 1.86 PPG respectively. Across the 1. Division, teams score an average of 1.71 goals and concede 2.21 per game — a combined 3.91 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 69% of fixtures while 17% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Raufoss and Sogndal have struggled in recent away games, collecting just 0.14 and 0.29 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the 1. Division.
Form Tables — Norway
- 1. Division Women Form Table— Division Women's Pro
- 2. Division - Group 1 Form Table— Division Regional
- 2. Division - Group 2 Form Table— Division Regional
- 2. Division - Play-offs Form Table— Division Regional
- 3. Division - Girone 1 Form Table— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 2 Form Table— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 3 Form Table— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 4 Form Table— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 5 Form Table— Division Amateur
- 3. Division - Girone 6 Form Table— Division Amateur
- Eliteserien Form Table— Division Premium
- NM Cupen Form Table— Division Gold
- Nasjonal U19 Champions League Form Table— Division Academy
- Obos Supercup Form Table— Division Premium
- Super Cup Form Table— Division Premium
- Toppserien Form Table— Division Women's Elite