League Two — Form Table
China · 2026
Combined Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Nantong Haimen Codion | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 3 | +10 | 17 | DWWDWWW | 2.43 | 57% | 0% | 43% | 1.86 | 86% | 29% | 2.29 | |
| 2 |  Dalian Kewei | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 5 | +4 | 15 | WDWDWDW | 2.14 | 43% | 14% | 57% | 1.29 | 57% | 43% | 2.00 | |
| 3 |  Guangdong Mingtu | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 13 | WDDWDDW | 1.86 | 43% | 29% | 57% | 1.00 | 57% | 29% | 1.57 | |
| 4 |  Changchun Xidu | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 13 | WDDWWDD | 1.86 | 57% | 43% | 43% | 0.86 | 43% | 29% | 1.29 | |
| 5 |  Shandong Taishan II | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 6 | +3 | 12 | DLWDDWW | 1.71 | 43% | 29% | 57% | 1.29 | 71% | 43% | 2.14 | |
| 6 |  Dalian Yingbo B | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 6 | +4 | 11 | LWDDWWL | 1.57 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 1.43 | 71% | 43% | 2.29 | |
| 7 |  Shanghai Port II | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 11 | WWLWDLD | 1.57 | 57% | 29% | 43% | 1.14 | 57% | 43% | 2.00 | |
| 8 |  Rizhao Yuqi | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 11 | WWLLDDW | 1.57 | 43% | 43% | 43% | 1.14 | 71% | 43% | 2.00 | |
| 9 |  Xi'an Ronghai | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 11 | LWDWWLD | 1.57 | 43% | 43% | 29% | 0.71 | 29% | 14% | 1.29 | |
| 10 |  Tai'an Tiankuang | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 6 | +3 | 10 | DDDWDLW | 1.43 | 43% | 43% | 43% | 1.29 | 71% | 43% | 2.14 | |
| 11 |  BIT | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 | WLWDDDD | 1.43 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 1.14 | 86% | 29% | 2.29 | |
| 12 |  Qingdao Red Lions | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 10 | WLLDLWW | 1.43 | 43% | 29% | 29% | 0.71 | 57% | 29% | 1.86 | |
| 13 |  Xiamen Feilu | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 8 | LWLDWDL | 1.14 | 43% | 57% | 14% | 1.14 | 57% | 43% | 2.00 | |
| 14 |  Langfang Glory City | 7 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 8 | DLDDDWD | 1.14 | 43% | 57% | 43% | 0.86 | 57% | 29% | 1.86 | |
| 15 |  Guizhou Zhucheng | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 8 | LLWDLWD | 1.14 | 29% | 43% | 43% | 0.71 | 43% | 29% | 1.57 | |
| 16 |  Wuhan Three Towns II | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 8 | DLWDWLL | 1.14 | 43% | 57% | 14% | 0.71 | 71% | 14% | 1.71 | |
| 17 |  Shanghai Second | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 7 | LDDLDDW | 1.00 | 29% | 29% | 57% | 0.71 | 57% | 14% | 1.71 | |
| 18 |  Guangzhou Dandelion | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 6 | LLDWDLD | 0.86 | 29% | 43% | 57% | 0.86 | 57% | 43% | 1.86 | |
| 19 |  Hubei Chufeng Heli | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 6 | LDWDLDL | 0.86 | 29% | 29% | 57% | 0.86 | 71% | 29% | 2.00 | |
| 20 |  Shenzhen 2028 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 5 | WDLLLDL | 0.71 | 29% | 43% | 43% | 0.71 | 57% | 29% | 2.00 | |
| 21 |  Yichun Grand Tiger | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 5 | WLDLLDL | 0.71 | 29% | 57% | 29% | 0.43 | 57% | 29% | 1.86 | |
| 22 |  Shangyu Pterosaur | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 5 | LLWLDDL | 0.71 | 0% | 57% | 43% | 0.57 | 71% | 43% | 2.29 | |
| 23 |  Jiangxi Liansheng | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 4 | LWLLDLL | 0.57 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 0.71 | 57% | 57% | 2.00 | |
| 24 |  Chengdu Rongcheng II | 7 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 4 | DDLDLLD | 0.57 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 0.86 | 100% | 29% | 2.57 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Is in the Best Form in the Last 7 Games?
Nantong Haimen Codion leads the form table with 71% wins and 2.43 PPG in the last 7 games.
Dalian Kewei is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 57% and 2.14 PPG.
Guangdong Mingtu is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 43% and 1.86 PPG.
Chengdu Rongcheng II is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 0% and 0.57 PPG.
Jiangxi Liansheng is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 14% and 0.57 PPG.
Shangyu Pterosaur has the worst form over the last 7 games with just 14% wins and only 0.71 PPG.
- •The League Two (China) Last 7 Games Form Table covers 24 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent games.
- •Win rate across the League Two in this period is 30%
- •Teams score an average of 0.96 goals per game and concede 0.98 — a combined 1.94 total goals per match, keeping most games Under 2.5 goals.
- •BTTS occurs in 46% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 36% of games.
League Two (China) Last 7 Games — Form Table Insights
Nantong Haimen Codion, Dalian Kewei and Guangdong Mingtu have been the standout performers in the League Two (China) over the last 7 games, leading the form table with 2.43, 2.14 and 1.86 PPG respectively. Across the League Two, teams score an average of 0.96 goals and concede 0.98 per game — a combined 1.94 total goals, keeping most games Under 2.5. BTTS has occurred in 46% of fixtures while 36% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Chengdu Rongcheng II and Jiangxi Liansheng have struggled in recent games, collecting just 0.57 and 0.57 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the League Two.
Home Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Xi'an Ronghai | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 2 | +7 | 17 | WWDWWWD | 2.43 | 71% | 14% | 29% | 1.29 | 57% | 14% | 1.57 | |
| 2 | Dalian Kewei | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 15 | WDWDDWW | 2.14 | 43% | 14% | 57% | 1.57 | 71% | 57% | 2.43 | |
| 3 | Rizhao Yuqi | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 5 | +5 | 14 | DWWWLDW | 2.00 | 57% | 14% | 43% | 1.43 | 57% | 43% | 2.14 | |
| 4 | Shenzhen 2028 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 5 | +7 | 13 | WWWLWLD | 1.86 | 43% | 29% | 29% | 1.71 | 57% | 29% | 2.43 | |
| 5 | Nantong Haimen Codion | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 11 | 5 | +6 | 13 | DWDDDWW | 1.86 | 43% | 14% | 57% | 1.57 | 86% | 43% | 2.29 | |
| 6 | Guangdong Mingtu | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 3 | +6 | 13 | DWDWWDD | 1.86 | 71% | 29% | 29% | 1.29 | 57% | 29% | 1.71 | |
| 7 | Qingdao Red Lions | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 4 | +5 | 13 | LWDWWLW | 1.86 | 57% | 43% | 14% | 1.29 | 29% | 14% | 1.86 | |
| 8 | Guizhou Zhucheng | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 4 | +4 | 13 | LWWDLWW | 1.86 | 57% | 29% | 29% | 1.14 | 43% | 43% | 1.71 | |
| 9 | Tai'an Tiankuang | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 4 | +5 | 12 | LWDDDWW | 1.71 | 57% | 43% | 29% | 1.29 | 43% | 43% | 1.86 | |
| 10 | Langfang Glory City | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 12 | WDWWLDD | 1.71 | 57% | 57% | 29% | 1.00 | 43% | 29% | 1.86 | |
| 11 | BIT | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 8 | +2 | 11 | LLWDWWD | 1.57 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 1.43 | 71% | 57% | 2.57 | |
| 12 | Wuhan Three Towns II | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 7 | +2 | 10 | WLWLDWL | 1.43 | 29% | 43% | 29% | 1.29 | 86% | 29% | 2.29 | |
| 13 | Shandong Taishan II | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 8 | +1 | 10 | DDLDDWW | 1.43 | 14% | 29% | 71% | 1.29 | 71% | 43% | 2.43 | |
| 14 | Shanghai Port II | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 | LLWWWLD | 1.43 | 43% | 29% | 43% | 1.14 | 57% | 43% | 2.29 | |
| 15 | Chengdu Rongcheng II | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 10 | +2 | 9 | WWLDDLD | 1.29 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.71 | 86% | 43% | 3.14 | |
| 16 | Xiamen Feilu | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 8 | LDLWDWL | 1.14 | 57% | 57% | 14% | 1.00 | 57% | 43% | 1.71 | |
| 17 | Shangyu Pterosaur | 7 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 8 | DDDLWDD | 1.14 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.57 | 100% | 43% | 3.29 | |
| 18 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 8 | WDLLWLD | 1.14 | 43% | 57% | 29% | 0.71 | 57% | 29% | 1.57 | |
| 19 | Changchun Xidu | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 8 | LLLWDDW | 1.14 | 29% | 43% | 43% | 0.71 | 57% | 29% | 1.71 | |
| 20 | Dalian Yingbo B | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 11 | +1 | 7 | LLLWDWL | 1.00 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 1.71 | 86% | 71% | 3.29 | |
| 21 | Hubei Chufeng Heli | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 6 | DDLLLWD | 0.86 | 29% | 43% | 43% | 0.71 | 57% | 14% | 1.57 | |
| 22 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 | DLDLWLD | 0.86 | 43% | 43% | 57% | 0.86 | 57% | 57% | 2.14 | |
| 23 | Yichun Grand Tiger | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 6 | DLDWLDL | 0.86 | 29% | 43% | 43% | 0.57 | 57% | 14% | 1.57 | |
| 24 | Shanghai Second | 7 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 4 | LLDLDDD | 0.57 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 0.57 | 86% | 14% | 1.86 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms? (Last 7 Home Games)
Xi'an Ronghai leads the form table with 71% wins and 2.43 PPG in the last 7 home games.
Dalian Kewei is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 57% and 2.14 PPG.
Rizhao Yuqi is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 57% and 2.00 PPG.
Shanghai Second is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 0% and 0.57 PPG.
Yichun Grand Tiger is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 14% and 0.86 PPG.
Guangzhou Dandelion has the worst form over the last 7 home games with just 14% wins and only 0.86 PPG.
- •The League Two (China) Home Form Table (Last 7) covers 24 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent home games.
- •Win rate across the League Two in this period is 37%
- •Teams score an average of 1.20 goals per game and concede 0.93 — a combined 2.14 total goals per match, keeping most games Under 2.5 goals.
- •BTTS occurs in 45% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 31% of games.
League Two (China) — Home Form Table Insights (Last 7 Home Games)
Xi'an Ronghai, Dalian Kewei and Rizhao Yuqi have been the standout performers in the League Two (China) over the last 7 home games, leading the form table with 2.43, 2.14 and 2.00 PPG respectively. Across the League Two, teams score an average of 1.20 goals and concede 0.93 per game — a combined 2.14 total goals, keeping most games Under 2.5. BTTS has occurred in 45% of fixtures while 31% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Shanghai Second and Yichun Grand Tiger have struggled in recent home games, collecting just 0.57 and 0.86 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the League Two.
Away Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nantong Haimen Codion | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 5 | +6 | 16 | LWWWDWW | 2.29 | 43% | 14% | 43% | 1.57 | 86% | 29% | 2.29 | |
| 2 | Shandong Taishan II | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 14 | WWWDLWD | 2.00 | 43% | 14% | 57% | 1.57 | 71% | 57% | 2.43 | |
| 3 | Langfang Glory City | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 7 | +3 | 13 | WDWDDWD | 1.86 | 29% | 14% | 71% | 1.43 | 71% | 43% | 2.43 | |
| 4 | Changchun Xidu | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 11 | DDDWWDD | 1.57 | 29% | 29% | 71% | 1.14 | 71% | 43% | 2.00 | |
| 5 | Wuhan Three Towns II | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 | WDWLDWL | 1.57 | 43% | 43% | 29% | 1.14 | 71% | 43% | 2.29 | |
| 6 | Dalian Kewei | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 11 | LWDLWWD | 1.57 | 43% | 14% | 43% | 1.00 | 57% | 29% | 2.00 | |
| 7 | Dalian Yingbo B | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 11 | LWDWLDW | 1.57 | 43% | 43% | 29% | 0.71 | 43% | 14% | 1.43 | |
| 8 | Shanghai Port II | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 10 | LWWLWLD | 1.43 | 43% | 43% | 29% | 1.00 | 57% | 29% | 1.71 | |
| 9 | Guangdong Mingtu | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 10 | DDLDWDW | 1.43 | 43% | 57% | 43% | 0.71 | 43% | 29% | 1.29 | |
| 10 | Xi'an Ronghai | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 | WWWLLDL | 1.43 | 29% | 57% | 29% | 0.71 | 29% | 29% | 1.43 | |
| 11 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 | WWWLLLL | 1.29 | 43% | 14% | 43% | 1.00 | 57% | 43% | 2.00 | |
| 12 | Rizhao Yuqi | 7 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 8 | DDDDWLD | 1.14 | 57% | 71% | 29% | 0.57 | 43% | 29% | 1.29 | |
| 13 | Hubei Chufeng Heli | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 8 | WLWDDLL | 1.14 | 29% | 29% | 57% | 1.00 | 57% | 43% | 2.29 | |
| 14 | Yichun Grand Tiger | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 7 | DDDWLDL | 1.00 | 57% | 71% | 14% | 0.43 | 57% | 14% | 1.43 | |
| 15 | Xiamen Feilu | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 7 | WLLWLLD | 1.00 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.14 | 86% | 57% | 3.00 | |
| 16 | Guizhou Zhucheng | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 6 | WLDLDLD | 0.86 | 43% | 43% | 43% | 1.00 | 57% | 29% | 2.14 | |
| 17 | Shanghai Second | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 6 | DLDLLDW | 0.86 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 1.14 | 71% | 57% | 2.71 | |
| 18 | Tai'an Tiankuang | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 6 | WDLLDDL | 0.86 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 1.00 | 71% | 43% | 2.43 | |
| 19 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 6 | LLDWLDD | 0.86 | 29% | 57% | 43% | 0.71 | 57% | 29% | 1.86 | |
| 20 | BIT | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 6 | LLWLDDD | 0.86 | 0% | 43% | 57% | 1.00 | 86% | 29% | 2.71 | |
| 21 | Shenzhen 2028 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 5 | WLDDLLL | 0.71 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 0.86 | 57% | 43% | 2.14 | |
| 22 | Qingdao Red Lions | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 5 | LDLLDLW | 0.71 | 14% | 43% | 43% | 0.57 | 71% | 29% | 2.00 | |
| 23 | Chengdu Rongcheng II | 7 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 4 | DDLDDLL | 0.57 | 29% | 57% | 43% | 0.43 | 71% | 14% | 1.71 | |
| 24 | Shangyu Pterosaur | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 18 | -18 | 1 | DLLLLLL | 0.14 | 14% | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 57% | 57% | 2.57 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms? (Last 7 Away Games)
Nantong Haimen Codion leads the form table with 71% wins and 2.29 PPG in the last 7 away games.
Shandong Taishan II is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 57% and 2.00 PPG.
Langfang Glory City is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 43% and 1.86 PPG.
Shangyu Pterosaur is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.14 PPG.
Chengdu Rongcheng II is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.57 PPG.
Qingdao Red Lions has the worst form over the last 7 away games with just 14% wins and only 0.71 PPG.
- •The League Two (China) Away Form Table (Last 7) covers 24 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent away games.
- •Win rate across the League Two in this period is 28%
- •Teams score an average of 0.91 goals per game and concede 1.15 — a combined 2.07 total goals per match, keeping most games Under 2.5 goals.
- •BTTS occurs in 44% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 41% of games.
League Two (China) — Away Form Table Insights (Last 7 Away Games)
Nantong Haimen Codion, Shandong Taishan II and Langfang Glory City have been the standout performers in the League Two (China) over the last 7 away games, leading the form table with 2.29, 2.00 and 1.86 PPG respectively. Across the League Two, teams score an average of 0.91 goals and concede 1.15 per game — a combined 2.07 total goals, keeping most games Under 2.5. BTTS has occurred in 44% of fixtures while 41% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Shangyu Pterosaur and Chengdu Rongcheng II have struggled in recent away games, collecting just 0.14 and 0.57 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the League Two.
Form Tables — China
- FA Cup Form Table— Division Gold
- League One Form Table— Division Gold
- Super Cup Form Table— Division Premium
- Super League Form Table— Division Premium