MLS Next Pro — Home Advantage
USA · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +29% | +31% | +26% | 1.00/0.29 | |
| 2 | +25% | +26% | +24% | 1.57/0.50 | |
| 3 | +25% | +19% | +30% | 2.27/0.94 | |
| 4 | +24% | +28% | +21% | 1.86/0.71 | |
| 5 | +23% | +10% | +36% | 1.71/1.00 | |
| 6 | +21% | +23% | +19% | 1.43/0.21 | |
| 7 | +21% | +10% | +32% | 2.21/1.06 | |
| 8 | +21% | +20% | +21% | 2.41/1.43 | |
| 9 | +19% | +17% | +20% | 2.14/0.93 | |
| 10 | +18% | +20% | +16% | 0.86/0.14 | |
| 11 | +18% | +29% | +7% | 1.50/0.93 | |
| 12 | +18% | +15% | +21% | 1.43/0.43 | |
| 13 | +17% | +25% | +9% | 1.64/1.40 | |
| 14 | +17% | +28% | +6% | 1.79/1.13 | |
| 15 | +16% | +19% | +12% | 1.57/1.13 | |
| 16 | +15% | +17% | +14% | 1.86/0.79 | |
| 17 | +15% | +21% | +8% | 1.07/0.29 | |
| 18 | +14% | +23% | +6% | 2.00/1.21 | |
| 19 | +13% | +19% | +6% | 2.06/1.47 | |
| 20 | +12% | +18% | +6% | 1.43/1.33 | |
| 21 | +12% | +6% | +18% | 1.80/1.57 | |
| 22 | +10% | +24% | -4% | 1.57/1.29 | |
| 23 | +8% | -8% | +25% | 1.50/1.43 | |
| 24 | +7% | -7% | +21% | 2.06/1.64 | |
| 25 | +6% | +2% | +11% | 1.43/1.57 | |
| 26 | +4% | +8% | -1% | 1.57/1.56 | |
| 27 | -4% | -17% | +9% | 0.79/0.79 | |
| 28 | -6% | -5% | -8% | 1.50/1.53 | |
| 29 | -7% | -14% | 0% | 1.56/2.14 | |
| 30 | -19% | +4% | -43% | 2.19/2.21 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the MLS Next Pro (USA), the average home win rate is 48% compared to 29% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Vancouver Whitecaps II shows the strongest home advantage, winning 43% of home games versus just 0% away (a difference of +43%). At the other end, Portland Timbers II actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 38% versus 64% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +31% | 1.50 | 0.79 | |
| 2 | +29% | 1.93 | 1.07 | |
| 3 | +28% | 2.29 | 1.29 | |
| 4 | +28% | 2.00 | 1.13 | |
| 5 | +26% | 1.71 | 1.00 | |
| 6 | +25% | 2.57 | 1.53 | |
| 7 | +24% | 2.43 | 1.50 | |
| 8 | +23% | 1.71 | 1.07 | |
| 9 | +23% | 2.60 | 1.64 | |
| 10 | +21% | 1.21 | 0.79 | |
| 11 | +20% | 2.47 | 1.64 | |
| 12 | +20% | 1.29 | 0.86 | |
| 13 | +19% | 2.38 | 1.60 | |
| 14 | +19% | 2.13 | 1.44 | |
| 15 | +19% | 2.14 | 1.47 | |
| 16 | +18% | 1.71 | 1.20 | |
| 17 | +17% | 2.07 | 1.47 | |
| 18 | +17% | 2.00 | 1.43 | |
| 19 | +15% | 1.64 | 1.21 | |
| 20 | +10% | 1.57 | 1.29 | |
| 21 | +10% | 1.93 | 1.59 | |
| 22 | +8% | 2.21 | 1.88 | |
| 23 | +6% | 2.00 | 1.79 | |
| 24 | +4% | 1.94 | 1.79 | |
| 25 | +2% | 1.79 | 1.71 | |
| 26 | -5% | 1.57 | 1.73 | |
| 27 | -7% | 2.19 | 2.50 | |
| 28 | -8% | 1.21 | 1.43 | |
| 29 | -14% | 1.13 | 1.50 | |
| 30 | -17% | 1.07 | 1.50 |
MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
FC Cincinnati II has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the MLS Next Pro (USA), netting 1.50 goals/match at home versus 0.79 away — a Scoring Advantage of +31%. In contrast, Sporting KC II scores more away (1.50/match) than at home (1.07/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -17% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +36% | 1.00 | 2.14 | |
| 2 | +32% | 1.07 | 2.06 | |
| 3 | +30% | 1.07 | 2.00 | |
| 4 | +26% | 1.64 | 2.79 | |
| 5 | +25% | 1.07 | 1.79 | |
| 6 | +24% | 1.50 | 2.43 | |
| 7 | +21% | 1.12 | 1.71 | |
| 8 | +21% | 1.36 | 2.07 | |
| 9 | +21% | 1.50 | 2.29 | |
| 10 | +21% | 1.13 | 1.71 | |
| 11 | +20% | 1.29 | 1.93 | |
| 12 | +19% | 1.79 | 2.64 | |
| 13 | +18% | 1.00 | 1.43 | |
| 14 | +16% | 2.21 | 3.07 | |
| 15 | +14% | 1.71 | 2.29 | |
| 16 | +12% | 1.14 | 1.47 | |
| 17 | +11% | 1.50 | 1.86 | |
| 18 | +9% | 2.43 | 2.93 | |
| 19 | +9% | 1.57 | 1.87 | |
| 20 | +8% | 1.71 | 2.00 | |
| 21 | +7% | 1.36 | 1.57 | |
| 22 | +6% | 1.36 | 1.53 | |
| 23 | +6% | 1.36 | 1.53 | |
| 24 | +6% | 1.19 | 1.33 | |
| 25 | +6% | 1.53 | 1.71 | |
| 26 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 27 | -1% | 1.86 | 1.81 | |
| 28 | -4% | 2.07 | 1.93 | |
| 29 | -8% | 1.64 | 1.40 | |
| 30 | -43% | 1.06 | 0.43 |
MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Defence Analysis
Tacoma Defiance has the best home defensive record in the MLS Next Pro (USA), conceding just 1.00 goals/match at home compared to 2.14 away — a Defence Advantage of +36%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Austin II concedes more at home (1.06/match) than away (0.43/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +46% | 1.36 | 0.50 | |
| 2 | +34% | 1.07 | 0.53 | |
| 3 | +33% | 0.71 | 0.36 | |
| 4 | +33% | 0.71 | 0.36 | |
| 5 | +33% | 1.29 | 0.64 | |
| 6 | +33% | 0.57 | 0.29 | |
| 7 | +30% | 1.07 | 0.57 | |
| 8 | +27% | 0.94 | 0.53 | |
| 9 | +25% | 1.00 | 0.60 | |
| 10 | +25% | 1.21 | 0.73 | |
| 11 | +22% | 0.79 | 0.50 | |
| 12 | +20% | 0.64 | 0.43 | |
| 13 | +16% | 0.64 | 0.47 | |
| 14 | +13% | 0.64 | 0.50 | |
| 15 | +12% | 1.00 | 0.79 | |
| 16 | +12% | 0.93 | 0.73 | |
| 17 | +9% | 0.86 | 0.71 | |
| 18 | +9% | 0.93 | 0.79 | |
| 19 | +7% | 1.07 | 0.94 | |
| 20 | +7% | 0.57 | 0.50 | |
| 21 | +6% | 0.86 | 0.76 | |
| 22 | +3% | 0.79 | 0.73 | |
| 23 | 0% | 0.43 | 0.43 | |
| 24 | -3% | 0.88 | 0.93 | |
| 25 | -6% | 0.67 | 0.75 | |
| 26 | -7% | 0.50 | 0.57 | |
| 27 | -7% | 1.13 | 1.29 | |
| 28 | -18% | 0.75 | 1.07 | |
| 29 | -20% | 0.43 | 0.64 | |
| 30 | -26% | 0.25 | 0.43 |
MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Toronto II has the biggest home scoring advantage in the MLS Next Pro (USA), netting 1.36 goals/match at home versus 0.50 away — a Scoring Advantage of +46%. At the other end, Portland Timbers II shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.25/match at home against 0.43 away (-26%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +42% | 0.50 | 1.21 | |
| 2 | +35% | 0.71 | 1.50 | |
| 3 | +31% | 0.79 | 1.50 | |
| 4 | +30% | 0.60 | 1.13 | |
| 5 | +29% | 0.35 | 0.64 | |
| 6 | +27% | 0.57 | 1.00 | |
| 7 | +27% | 0.50 | 0.87 | |
| 8 | +23% | 0.36 | 0.57 | |
| 9 | +23% | 0.71 | 1.14 | |
| 10 | +21% | 0.56 | 0.86 | |
| 11 | +18% | 0.50 | 0.71 | |
| 12 | +16% | 0.57 | 0.79 | |
| 13 | +16% | 0.57 | 0.79 | |
| 14 | +15% | 0.64 | 0.87 | |
| 15 | +15% | 0.27 | 0.36 | |
| 16 | +14% | 0.71 | 0.94 | |
| 17 | +13% | 0.71 | 0.93 | |
| 18 | +13% | 1.21 | 1.57 | |
| 19 | +11% | 0.57 | 0.71 | |
| 20 | +9% | 0.50 | 0.60 | |
| 21 | +8% | 0.57 | 0.67 | |
| 22 | -1% | 0.44 | 0.43 | |
| 23 | -3% | 0.36 | 0.33 | |
| 24 | -6% | 0.80 | 0.71 | |
| 25 | -10% | 1.21 | 1.00 | |
| 26 | -11% | 0.79 | 0.63 | |
| 27 | -12% | 0.93 | 0.73 | |
| 28 | -14% | 1.14 | 0.86 | |
| 29 | -19% | 0.31 | 0.21 | |
| 30 | -33% | 0.86 | 0.43 |
MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Huntsville City has the best home defensive record in the MLS Next Pro (USA), conceding just 0.50 goals/match at home compared to 1.21 away — a Defence Advantage of +42%. North Texas struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.86/match at home versus 0.43 away (-33%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +50% | 1.07 | 0.36 | |
| 2 | +48% | 1.43 | 0.50 | |
| 3 | +38% | 1.59 | 0.71 | |
| 4 | +36% | 1.07 | 0.50 | |
| 5 | +36% | 1.47 | 0.69 | |
| 6 | +35% | 1.64 | 0.80 | |
| 7 | +32% | 1.67 | 0.86 | |
| 8 | +25% | 1.19 | 0.71 | |
| 9 | +22% | 1.00 | 0.64 | |
| 10 | +21% | 0.93 | 0.60 | |
| 11 | +19% | 1.36 | 0.93 | |
| 12 | +19% | 1.07 | 0.73 | |
| 13 | +17% | 1.00 | 0.71 | |
| 14 | +17% | 0.50 | 0.36 | |
| 15 | +15% | 1.44 | 1.07 | |
| 16 | +13% | 1.07 | 0.82 | |
| 17 | +13% | 0.64 | 0.50 | |
| 18 | +12% | 1.00 | 0.79 | |
| 19 | +12% | 0.93 | 0.73 | |
| 20 | +11% | 1.07 | 0.87 | |
| 21 | +10% | 1.14 | 0.94 | |
| 22 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 23 | -4% | 0.93 | 1.00 | |
| 24 | -4% | 0.86 | 0.93 | |
| 25 | -7% | 1.06 | 1.21 | |
| 26 | -10% | 0.88 | 1.07 | |
| 27 | -12% | 0.79 | 1.00 | |
| 28 | -14% | 0.64 | 0.86 | |
| 29 | -18% | 0.64 | 0.93 | |
| 30 | -18% | 0.64 | 0.93 |
MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, FC Cincinnati II has the biggest home scoring advantage in the MLS Next Pro (USA), netting 1.07 goals/match at home versus 0.36 away — a Scoring Advantage of +50%. At the other end, Toronto II shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.64/match at home against 0.93 away (-18%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +52% | 0.36 | 1.12 | |
| 2 | +42% | 0.64 | 1.57 | |
| 3 | +39% | 0.50 | 1.14 | |
| 4 | +35% | 1.00 | 2.07 | |
| 5 | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 6 | +30% | 0.47 | 0.88 | |
| 7 | +30% | 0.93 | 1.71 | |
| 8 | +24% | 0.79 | 1.29 | |
| 9 | +21% | 0.56 | 0.86 | |
| 10 | +20% | 0.86 | 1.29 | |
| 11 | +19% | 0.73 | 1.07 | |
| 12 | +19% | 0.79 | 1.14 | |
| 13 | +18% | 0.79 | 1.13 | |
| 14 | +17% | 0.76 | 1.07 | |
| 15 | +15% | 0.73 | 1.00 | |
| 16 | +15% | 0.79 | 1.07 | |
| 17 | +13% | 1.21 | 1.57 | |
| 18 | +7% | 0.93 | 1.07 | |
| 19 | +6% | 1.21 | 1.36 | |
| 20 | +5% | 1.07 | 1.19 | |
| 21 | +5% | 0.79 | 0.87 | |
| 22 | +4% | 0.93 | 1.00 | |
| 23 | +3% | 1.07 | 1.14 | |
| 24 | +3% | 0.69 | 0.73 | |
| 25 | +1% | 0.56 | 0.57 | |
| 26 | -3% | 0.71 | 0.67 | |
| 27 | -3% | 0.64 | 0.60 | |
| 28 | -7% | 1.14 | 1.00 | |
| 29 | -22% | 1.00 | 0.64 | |
| 30 | -56% | 0.75 | 0.21 |
MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Los Angeles FC II has the best home defensive record in the MLS Next Pro (USA), conceding just 0.36 goals/match at home compared to 1.12 away — a Defence Advantage of +52%. Austin II struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.75/match at home versus 0.21 away (-56%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — USA
- MLS All-Star Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Major League Soccer Home Advantage— Division Premium
- NISA Home Advantage— Division Underground
- NPSL Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- NWSL - Liga MXF Summer Cup Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- NWSL Women Home Advantage— Division Women's Elite
- NWSL Women - Challenge Cup Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- US Open Cup Home Advantage— Division Gold
- USL Championship Home Advantage— Division Pro
- USL League One Home Advantage— Division Pro
- USL League One Cup Home Advantage— Division SemiPro
- USL League Two Home Advantage— Division SemiPro
- USL Super League Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- USL W League Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- WPSL Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro