MLS Next Pro — Home Advantage
USA · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +29% | +32% | +27% | 1.08/0.29 | |
| 2 | +27% | +24% | +30% | 2.31/0.86 | |
| 3 | +26% | +31% | +20% | 2.00/0.71 | |
| 4 | +24% | +29% | +19% | 1.50/0.50 | |
| 5 | +24% | +11% | +36% | 1.77/1.00 | |
| 6 | +23% | +27% | +20% | 1.54/0.21 | |
| 7 | +23% | +9% | +37% | 2.21/0.85 | |
| 8 | +21% | +16% | +27% | 2.29/1.31 | |
| 9 | +19% | +14% | +23% | 1.43/0.38 | |
| 10 | +18% | +25% | +11% | 0.86/0.15 | |
| 11 | +18% | +18% | +17% | 2.00/0.79 | |
| 12 | +18% | +26% | +9% | 1.77/1.50 | |
| 13 | +18% | +6% | +30% | 2.00/1.57 | |
| 14 | +17% | +31% | +4% | 2.14/1.08 | |
| 15 | +17% | +15% | +20% | 2.14/1.00 | |
| 16 | +17% | +28% | +6% | 1.50/1.00 | |
| 17 | +17% | +19% | +15% | 1.57/1.08 | |
| 18 | +17% | +25% | +8% | 1.69/1.23 | |
| 19 | +14% | +19% | +10% | 2.14/1.46 | |
| 20 | +13% | +17% | +8% | 1.54/1.46 | |
| 21 | +13% | +19% | +6% | 0.92/0.29 | |
| 22 | +12% | +24% | 0% | 1.69/1.29 | |
| 23 | +10% | -5% | +25% | 2.14/1.54 | |
| 24 | +9% | -7% | +25% | 1.54/1.43 | |
| 25 | +8% | +3% | +12% | 1.43/1.46 | |
| 26 | -1% | -13% | +11% | 0.79/0.62 | |
| 27 | -2% | -4% | 0% | 1.46/1.57 | |
| 28 | -6% | -4% | -9% | 1.50/1.54 | |
| 29 | -9% | -14% | -4% | 1.62/2.23 | |
| 30 | -16% | +8% | -40% | 2.29/2.15 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the MLS Next Pro (USA), the average home win rate is 49% compared to 29% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Los Angeles FC II shows the strongest home advantage, winning 64% of home games versus just 15% away (a difference of +49%). At the other end, Portland Timbers II actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 38% versus 69% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +32% | 1.54 | 0.79 | |
| 2 | +31% | 2.46 | 1.29 | |
| 3 | +31% | 2.79 | 1.46 | |
| 4 | +29% | 1.83 | 1.00 | |
| 5 | +28% | 1.93 | 1.08 | |
| 6 | +27% | 1.85 | 1.07 | |
| 7 | +26% | 2.69 | 1.57 | |
| 8 | +25% | 1.29 | 0.77 | |
| 9 | +25% | 1.92 | 1.15 | |
| 10 | +24% | 2.23 | 1.36 | |
| 11 | +24% | 2.46 | 1.50 | |
| 12 | +19% | 2.50 | 1.69 | |
| 13 | +19% | 1.15 | 0.79 | |
| 14 | +19% | 2.14 | 1.46 | |
| 15 | +18% | 2.08 | 1.43 | |
| 16 | +17% | 1.85 | 1.31 | |
| 17 | +16% | 2.36 | 1.69 | |
| 18 | +15% | 2.07 | 1.54 | |
| 19 | +14% | 1.64 | 1.23 | |
| 20 | +11% | 1.62 | 1.29 | |
| 21 | +9% | 1.93 | 1.62 | |
| 22 | +8% | 2.07 | 1.77 | |
| 23 | +6% | 2.00 | 1.79 | |
| 24 | +3% | 1.79 | 1.69 | |
| 25 | -4% | 1.57 | 1.69 | |
| 26 | -4% | 1.85 | 2.00 | |
| 27 | -5% | 2.29 | 2.54 | |
| 28 | -7% | 1.23 | 1.43 | |
| 29 | -13% | 1.07 | 1.38 | |
| 30 | -14% | 1.15 | 1.54 |
MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
FC Cincinnati II has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the MLS Next Pro (USA), netting 1.54 goals/match at home versus 0.79 away — a Scoring Advantage of +32%. In contrast, Portland Timbers II scores more away (1.54/match) than at home (1.15/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -14% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +37% | 1.07 | 2.31 | |
| 2 | +36% | 1.00 | 2.14 | |
| 3 | +30% | 1.08 | 2.00 | |
| 4 | +30% | 0.77 | 1.43 | |
| 5 | +27% | 1.62 | 2.79 | |
| 6 | +27% | 1.07 | 1.85 | |
| 7 | +25% | 1.08 | 1.79 | |
| 8 | +25% | 1.07 | 1.77 | |
| 9 | +23% | 1.50 | 2.38 | |
| 10 | +20% | 1.38 | 2.07 | |
| 11 | +20% | 1.29 | 1.92 | |
| 12 | +20% | 1.77 | 2.64 | |
| 13 | +19% | 1.67 | 2.43 | |
| 14 | +17% | 1.62 | 2.29 | |
| 15 | +15% | 1.14 | 1.54 | |
| 16 | +12% | 1.50 | 1.92 | |
| 17 | +11% | 2.21 | 2.77 | |
| 18 | +11% | 2.43 | 3.00 | |
| 19 | +10% | 1.14 | 1.38 | |
| 20 | +9% | 1.54 | 1.86 | |
| 21 | +8% | 1.31 | 1.54 | |
| 22 | +8% | 1.31 | 1.54 | |
| 23 | +6% | 1.36 | 1.54 | |
| 24 | +6% | 1.77 | 2.00 | |
| 25 | +4% | 1.57 | 1.69 | |
| 26 | 0% | 1.85 | 1.86 | |
| 27 | 0% | 1.92 | 1.93 | |
| 28 | -4% | 1.08 | 1.00 | |
| 29 | -9% | 1.64 | 1.38 | |
| 30 | -40% | 1.07 | 0.46 |
MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Defence Analysis
Los Angeles FC II has the best home defensive record in the MLS Next Pro (USA), conceding just 1.07 goals/match at home compared to 2.31 away — a Defence Advantage of +37%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Austin II concedes more at home (1.07/match) than away (0.46/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +47% | 1.38 | 0.50 | |
| 2 | +37% | 1.00 | 0.46 | |
| 3 | +37% | 0.77 | 0.36 | |
| 4 | +37% | 0.77 | 0.36 | |
| 5 | +37% | 1.38 | 0.64 | |
| 6 | +31% | 0.54 | 0.29 | |
| 7 | +27% | 1.21 | 0.69 | |
| 8 | +27% | 1.00 | 0.57 | |
| 9 | +26% | 0.79 | 0.46 | |
| 10 | +25% | 0.64 | 0.38 | |
| 11 | +24% | 1.00 | 0.62 | |
| 12 | +24% | 1.00 | 0.62 | |
| 13 | +20% | 0.93 | 0.62 | |
| 14 | +16% | 1.08 | 0.79 | |
| 15 | +14% | 0.67 | 0.50 | |
| 16 | +13% | 0.69 | 0.54 | |
| 17 | +12% | 1.00 | 0.79 | |
| 18 | +10% | 0.62 | 0.50 | |
| 19 | +6% | 0.79 | 0.69 | |
| 20 | +5% | 0.86 | 0.77 | |
| 21 | +4% | 0.46 | 0.43 | |
| 22 | +1% | 0.86 | 0.85 | |
| 23 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 24 | -4% | 0.93 | 1.00 | |
| 25 | -7% | 0.62 | 0.71 | |
| 26 | -10% | 1.14 | 1.38 | |
| 27 | -10% | 0.50 | 0.62 | |
| 28 | -11% | 0.86 | 1.08 | |
| 29 | -18% | 0.43 | 0.62 | |
| 30 | -33% | 0.23 | 0.46 |
MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Toronto II has the biggest home scoring advantage in the MLS Next Pro (USA), netting 1.38 goals/match at home versus 0.50 away — a Scoring Advantage of +47%. At the other end, Portland Timbers II shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.23/match at home against 0.46 away (-33%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +45% | 0.50 | 1.31 | |
| 2 | +42% | 0.29 | 0.69 | |
| 3 | +40% | 0.15 | 0.36 | |
| 4 | +39% | 0.54 | 1.21 | |
| 5 | +37% | 0.69 | 1.50 | |
| 6 | +30% | 0.50 | 0.92 | |
| 7 | +28% | 0.85 | 1.50 | |
| 8 | +27% | 0.71 | 1.23 | |
| 9 | +24% | 0.62 | 1.00 | |
| 10 | +21% | 0.46 | 0.71 | |
| 11 | +20% | 0.71 | 1.08 | |
| 12 | +20% | 0.38 | 0.57 | |
| 13 | +19% | 0.54 | 0.79 | |
| 14 | +18% | 0.43 | 0.62 | |
| 15 | +18% | 0.64 | 0.92 | |
| 16 | +14% | 0.69 | 0.92 | |
| 17 | +14% | 1.21 | 1.62 | |
| 18 | +13% | 0.54 | 0.69 | |
| 19 | +12% | 0.62 | 0.79 | |
| 20 | +6% | 0.69 | 0.79 | |
| 21 | +4% | 0.36 | 0.38 | |
| 22 | +3% | 0.67 | 0.71 | |
| 23 | -4% | 0.77 | 0.71 | |
| 24 | -8% | 0.54 | 0.46 | |
| 25 | -8% | 1.00 | 0.86 | |
| 26 | -11% | 0.29 | 0.23 | |
| 27 | -12% | 0.79 | 0.62 | |
| 28 | -14% | 1.21 | 0.92 | |
| 29 | -20% | 0.93 | 0.62 | |
| 30 | -38% | 0.86 | 0.38 |
MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Huntsville City has the best home defensive record in the MLS Next Pro (USA), conceding just 0.50 goals/match at home compared to 1.31 away — a Defence Advantage of +45%. North Texas struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.86/match at home versus 0.38 away (-38%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +51% | 1.43 | 0.46 | |
| 2 | +50% | 1.08 | 0.36 | |
| 3 | +43% | 1.62 | 0.64 | |
| 4 | +40% | 1.17 | 0.50 | |
| 5 | +37% | 1.69 | 0.79 | |
| 6 | +36% | 1.79 | 0.85 | |
| 7 | +35% | 1.43 | 0.69 | |
| 8 | +27% | 1.21 | 0.69 | |
| 9 | +25% | 1.08 | 0.64 | |
| 10 | +24% | 0.50 | 0.31 | |
| 11 | +22% | 1.46 | 0.93 | |
| 12 | +20% | 1.08 | 0.71 | |
| 13 | +20% | 1.15 | 0.77 | |
| 14 | +19% | 1.57 | 1.08 | |
| 15 | +16% | 1.07 | 0.77 | |
| 16 | +14% | 0.92 | 0.69 | |
| 17 | +10% | 0.62 | 0.50 | |
| 18 | +9% | 0.93 | 0.77 | |
| 19 | +8% | 1.00 | 0.85 | |
| 20 | +7% | 1.07 | 0.92 | |
| 21 | 0% | 0.93 | 0.92 | |
| 22 | 0% | 1.14 | 1.15 | |
| 23 | -4% | 0.92 | 1.00 | |
| 24 | -5% | 0.85 | 0.93 | |
| 25 | -8% | 0.92 | 1.08 | |
| 26 | -8% | 0.85 | 1.00 | |
| 27 | -9% | 0.64 | 0.77 | |
| 28 | -12% | 0.79 | 1.00 | |
| 29 | -15% | 0.69 | 0.93 | |
| 30 | -20% | 0.62 | 0.93 |
MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, North Texas has the biggest home scoring advantage in the MLS Next Pro (USA), netting 1.43 goals/match at home versus 0.46 away — a Scoring Advantage of +51%. At the other end, Philadelphia Union II shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.62/match at home against 0.93 away (-20%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +55% | 0.36 | 1.23 | |
| 2 | +44% | 0.62 | 1.57 | |
| 3 | +40% | 0.50 | 1.15 | |
| 4 | +33% | 0.43 | 0.85 | |
| 5 | +30% | 0.54 | 1.00 | |
| 6 | +30% | 1.00 | 1.85 | |
| 7 | +27% | 0.62 | 1.07 | |
| 8 | +26% | 1.00 | 1.71 | |
| 9 | +25% | 0.77 | 1.29 | |
| 10 | +25% | 0.77 | 1.29 | |
| 11 | +19% | 0.79 | 1.15 | |
| 12 | +19% | 0.79 | 1.15 | |
| 13 | +19% | 0.79 | 1.15 | |
| 14 | +19% | 0.54 | 0.79 | |
| 15 | +16% | 0.79 | 1.08 | |
| 16 | +15% | 1.15 | 1.57 | |
| 17 | +12% | 0.79 | 1.00 | |
| 18 | +12% | 0.85 | 1.07 | |
| 19 | +7% | 0.92 | 1.07 | |
| 20 | +7% | 1.21 | 1.38 | |
| 21 | +5% | 0.77 | 0.85 | |
| 22 | +4% | 0.71 | 0.77 | |
| 23 | +4% | 0.71 | 0.77 | |
| 24 | +3% | 1.08 | 1.14 | |
| 25 | +3% | 1.08 | 1.14 | |
| 26 | 0% | 0.54 | 0.54 | |
| 27 | 0% | 0.62 | 0.62 | |
| 28 | -7% | 1.15 | 1.00 | |
| 29 | -24% | 1.00 | 0.62 | |
| 30 | -55% | 0.79 | 0.23 |
MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Los Angeles FC II has the best home defensive record in the MLS Next Pro (USA), conceding just 0.36 goals/match at home compared to 1.23 away — a Defence Advantage of +55%. Austin II struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.79/match at home versus 0.23 away (-55%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — USA
- MLS All-Star Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Major League Soccer Home Advantage— Division Premium
- NISA Home Advantage— Division Underground
- NPSL Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- NWSL - Liga MXF Summer Cup Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- NWSL Women Home Advantage— Division Women's Elite
- NWSL Women - Challenge Cup Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- US Open Cup Home Advantage— Division Gold
- USL Championship Home Advantage— Division Pro
- USL League One Home Advantage— Division Pro
- USL League One Cup Home Advantage— Division SemiPro
- USL League Two Home Advantage— Division SemiPro
- USL Super League Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- USL W League Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- WPSL Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro