MatchPulse
MLS Next Pro

MLS Next ProHome Advantage

USA · 2026

Home Advantage

#TeamHome AdvantageScoredDefencePPG (Home / Away)
1FC Cincinnati II+29%+32%+27%1.08/0.29
2Columbus Crew II+27%+24%+30%2.31/0.86
3Chicago Fire II+26%+31%+20%2.00/0.71
4Real Monarchs+24%+29%+19%1.50/0.50
5Tacoma Defiance+24%+11%+36%1.77/1.00
6Vancouver Whitecaps II+23%+27%+20%1.54/0.21
7Los Angeles FC II+23%+9%+37%2.21/0.85
8Chattanooga+21%+16%+27%2.29/1.31
9Carolina Core+19%+14%+23%1.43/0.38
10Inter Miami II+18%+25%+11%0.86/0.15
11Toronto II+18%+18%+17%2.00/0.79
12New York RB II+18%+26%+9%1.77/1.50
13Houston Dynamo FC II+18%+6%+30%2.00/1.57
14Atlanta United II+17%+31%+4%2.14/1.08
15New York City II+17%+15%+20%2.14/1.00
16North Texas+17%+28%+6%1.50/1.00
17The Town+17%+19%+15%1.57/1.08
18Minnesota United II+17%+25%+8%1.69/1.23
19Ventura County+14%+19%+10%2.14/1.46
20St. Louis City II+13%+17%+8%1.54/1.46
21Colorado Rapids II+13%+19%+6%0.92/0.29
22Orlando City II+12%+24%0%1.69/1.29
23Crown Legacy+10%-5%+25%2.14/1.54
24Philadelphia Union II+9%-7%+25%1.54/1.43
25Huntsville City+8%+3%+12%1.43/1.46
26Sporting KC II-1%-13%+11%0.79/0.62
27Connecticut FC-2%-4%0%1.46/1.57
28New England II-6%-4%-9%1.50/1.54
29Portland Timbers II-9%-14%-4%1.62/2.23
30Austin II-16%+8%-40%2.29/2.15

1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.

2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.

3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.

The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.

Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.

MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Advantage Analysis

In the MLS Next Pro (USA), the average home win rate is 49% compared to 29% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Los Angeles FC II shows the strongest home advantage, winning 64% of home games versus just 15% away (a difference of +49%). At the other end, Portland Timbers II actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 38% versus 69% on the road.

Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1FC Cincinnati II+32%1.540.79
2Chicago Fire II+31%2.461.29
3Atlanta United II+31%2.791.46
4Real Monarchs+29%1.831.00
5North Texas+28%1.931.08
6Vancouver Whitecaps II+27%1.851.07
7New York RB II+26%2.691.57
8Inter Miami II+25%1.290.77
9Minnesota United II+25%1.921.15
10Columbus Crew II+24%2.231.36
11Orlando City II+24%2.461.50
12Ventura County+19%2.501.69
13Colorado Rapids II+19%1.150.79
14The Town+19%2.141.46
15Toronto II+18%2.081.43
16St. Louis City II+17%1.851.31
17Chattanooga+16%2.361.69
18New York City II+15%2.071.54
19Carolina Core+14%1.641.23
20Tacoma Defiance+11%1.621.29
21Los Angeles FC II+9%1.931.62
22Austin II+8%2.071.77
23Houston Dynamo FC II+6%2.001.79
24Huntsville City+3%1.791.69
25New England II-4%1.571.69
26Connecticut FC-4%1.852.00
27Crown Legacy-5%2.292.54
28Philadelphia Union II-7%1.231.43
29Sporting KC II-13%1.071.38
30Portland Timbers II-14%1.151.54

MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Goals Scored Analysis

FC Cincinnati II has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the MLS Next Pro (USA), netting 1.54 goals/match at home versus 0.79 away — a Scoring Advantage of +32%. In contrast, Portland Timbers II scores more away (1.54/match) than at home (1.15/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -14% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.

Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Los Angeles FC II+37%1.072.31
2Tacoma Defiance+36%1.002.14
3Columbus Crew II+30%1.082.00
4Houston Dynamo FC II+30%0.771.43
5FC Cincinnati II+27%1.622.79
6Chattanooga+27%1.071.85
7Philadelphia Union II+25%1.081.79
8Crown Legacy+25%1.071.77
9Carolina Core+23%1.502.38
10Chicago Fire II+20%1.382.07
11New York City II+20%1.291.92
12Vancouver Whitecaps II+20%1.772.64
13Real Monarchs+19%1.672.43
14Toronto II+17%1.622.29
15The Town+15%1.141.54
16Huntsville City+12%1.501.92
17Inter Miami II+11%2.212.77
18Sporting KC II+11%2.433.00
19Ventura County+10%1.141.38
20New York RB II+9%1.541.86
21St. Louis City II+8%1.311.54
22Minnesota United II+8%1.311.54
23North Texas+6%1.361.54
24Colorado Rapids II+6%1.772.00
25Atlanta United II+4%1.571.69
26Connecticut FC0%1.851.86
27Orlando City II0%1.921.93
28Portland Timbers II-4%1.081.00
29New England II-9%1.641.38
30Austin II-40%1.070.46

MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Defence Analysis

Los Angeles FC II has the best home defensive record in the MLS Next Pro (USA), conceding just 1.07 goals/match at home compared to 2.31 away — a Defence Advantage of +37%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Austin II concedes more at home (1.07/match) than away (0.46/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.

1st Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Toronto II+47%1.380.50
2Minnesota United II+37%1.000.46
3Tacoma Defiance+37%0.770.36
4Vancouver Whitecaps II+37%0.770.36
5Chicago Fire II+37%1.380.64
6Colorado Rapids II+31%0.540.29
7The Town+27%1.210.69
8Orlando City II+27%1.000.57
9Inter Miami II+26%0.790.46
10Carolina Core+25%0.640.38
11Atlanta United II+24%1.000.62
12New York City II+24%1.000.62
13Ventura County+20%0.930.62
14Houston Dynamo FC II+16%1.080.79
15Real Monarchs+14%0.670.50
16St. Louis City II+13%0.690.54
17New York RB II+12%1.000.79
18Philadelphia Union II+10%0.620.50
19New England II+6%0.790.69
20Huntsville City+5%0.860.77
21FC Cincinnati II+4%0.460.43
22Los Angeles FC II+1%0.860.85
23Connecticut FC0%1.001.00
24Chattanooga-4%0.931.00
25Columbus Crew II-7%0.620.71
26Crown Legacy-10%1.141.38
27North Texas-10%0.500.62
28Austin II-11%0.861.08
29Sporting KC II-18%0.430.62
30Portland Timbers II-33%0.230.46

MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Toronto II has the biggest home scoring advantage in the MLS Next Pro (USA), netting 1.38 goals/match at home versus 0.50 away — a Scoring Advantage of +47%. At the other end, Portland Timbers II shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.23/match at home against 0.46 away (-33%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.

1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Huntsville City+45%0.501.31
2Chattanooga+42%0.290.69
3Houston Dynamo FC II+40%0.150.36
4Columbus Crew II+39%0.541.21
5Vancouver Whitecaps II+37%0.691.50
6New York City II+30%0.500.92
7FC Cincinnati II+28%0.851.50
8Carolina Core+27%0.711.23
9Colorado Rapids II+24%0.621.00
10Toronto II+21%0.460.71
11Los Angeles FC II+20%0.711.08
12Tacoma Defiance+20%0.380.57
13Philadelphia Union II+19%0.540.79
14Ventura County+18%0.430.62
15Crown Legacy+18%0.640.92
16Minnesota United II+14%0.690.92
17Sporting KC II+14%1.211.62
18St. Louis City II+13%0.540.69
19Chicago Fire II+12%0.620.79
20New York RB II+6%0.690.79
21The Town+4%0.360.38
22Real Monarchs+3%0.670.71
23Connecticut FC-4%0.770.71
24Portland Timbers II-8%0.540.46
25Orlando City II-8%1.000.86
26Austin II-11%0.290.23
27Atlanta United II-12%0.790.62
28Inter Miami II-14%1.210.92
29New England II-20%0.930.62
30North Texas-38%0.860.38

MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Huntsville City has the best home defensive record in the MLS Next Pro (USA), conceding just 0.50 goals/match at home compared to 1.31 away — a Defence Advantage of +45%. North Texas struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.86/match at home versus 0.38 away (-38%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.

2nd Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1North Texas+51%1.430.46
2FC Cincinnati II+50%1.080.36
3Columbus Crew II+43%1.620.64
4Real Monarchs+40%1.170.50
5New York RB II+37%1.690.79
6Atlanta United II+36%1.790.85
7Chattanooga+35%1.430.69
8Austin II+27%1.210.69
9Chicago Fire II+25%1.080.64
10Inter Miami II+24%0.500.31
11Orlando City II+22%1.460.93
12Vancouver Whitecaps II+20%1.080.71
13St. Louis City II+20%1.150.77
14Ventura County+19%1.571.08
15Los Angeles FC II+16%1.070.77
16Minnesota United II+14%0.920.69
17Colorado Rapids II+10%0.620.50
18The Town+9%0.930.77
19Carolina Core+8%1.000.85
20New York City II+7%1.070.92
21Huntsville City0%0.930.92
22Crown Legacy0%1.141.15
23Houston Dynamo FC II-4%0.921.00
24Tacoma Defiance-5%0.850.93
25Portland Timbers II-8%0.921.08
26Connecticut FC-8%0.851.00
27Sporting KC II-9%0.640.77
28New England II-12%0.791.00
29Toronto II-15%0.690.93
30Philadelphia Union II-20%0.620.93

MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, North Texas has the biggest home scoring advantage in the MLS Next Pro (USA), netting 1.43 goals/match at home versus 0.46 away — a Scoring Advantage of +51%. At the other end, Philadelphia Union II shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.62/match at home against 0.93 away (-20%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.

2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Los Angeles FC II+55%0.361.23
2Tacoma Defiance+44%0.621.57
3North Texas+40%0.501.15
4Crown Legacy+33%0.430.85
5Philadelphia Union II+30%0.541.00
6Inter Miami II+30%1.001.85
7Houston Dynamo FC II+27%0.621.07
8Real Monarchs+26%1.001.71
9Chicago Fire II+25%0.771.29
10FC Cincinnati II+25%0.771.29
11Chattanooga+19%0.791.15
12The Town+19%0.791.15
13Carolina Core+19%0.791.15
14Columbus Crew II+19%0.540.79
15Atlanta United II+16%0.791.08
16Toronto II+15%1.151.57
17New York City II+12%0.791.00
18New York RB II+12%0.851.07
19Orlando City II+7%0.921.07
20Sporting KC II+7%1.211.38
21St. Louis City II+5%0.770.85
22Ventura County+4%0.710.77
23New England II+4%0.710.77
24Vancouver Whitecaps II+3%1.081.14
25Connecticut FC+3%1.081.14
26Portland Timbers II0%0.540.54
27Minnesota United II0%0.620.62
28Colorado Rapids II-7%1.151.00
29Huntsville City-24%1.000.62
30Austin II-55%0.790.23

MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Los Angeles FC II has the best home defensive record in the MLS Next Pro (USA), conceding just 0.36 goals/match at home compared to 1.23 away — a Defence Advantage of +55%. Austin II struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.79/match at home versus 0.23 away (-55%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.

Home Advantage TablesUSA