MLS Next Pro — Home & Away Tables
USA · 2026
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 42 | 19 | +23 | 41 | WWWWW | 2.41 | 35% | 59% | 2.47 | 82% | 65% | 3.59 | ||
| 2 | 16 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 31 | 17 | +14 | 35 | WWWWL | 2.19 | 38% | 56% | 1.94 | 69% | 56% | 3.00 | ||
| 3 | 15 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 32 | 16 | +16 | 34 | WWDDW | 2.27 | 27% | 73% | 2.13 | 93% | 67% | 3.20 | ||
| 4 | 16 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 38 | 19 | +19 | 33 | WDWWL | 2.06 | 25% | 69% | 2.38 | 94% | 69% | 3.56 | ||
| 5 | 16 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 35 | 18 | +17 | 33 | WWDWL | 2.06 | 38% | 50% | 2.19 | 88% | 69% | 3.31 | ||
| 6 | 14 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 27 | 15 | +12 | 31 | DWWWD | 2.21 | 21% | 71% | 1.93 | 79% | 64% | 3.00 | ||
| 7 | 15 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 39 | 23 | +16 | 30 | LWWWL | 2.00 | 13% | 73% | 2.60 | 87% | 80% | 4.13 | ||
| 8 | 14 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 29 | 18 | +11 | 30 | WWWWW | 2.14 | 29% | 64% | 2.07 | 93% | 64% | 3.36 | ||
| 9 | 15 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 30 | 15 | +15 | 27 | DLLLD | 1.80 | 40% | 40% | 2.00 | 100% | 53% | 3.00 | ||
| 10 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 32 | 19 | +13 | 26 | LWWLL | 1.86 | 29% | 57% | 2.29 | 86% | 79% | 3.64 | ||
| 11 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 28 | 24 | +4 | 26 | DWWWL | 1.86 | 14% | 86% | 2.00 | 93% | 86% | 3.71 | ||
| 12 | 14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 28 | 19 | +9 | 25 | LDWWW | 1.79 | 29% | 64% | 2.00 | 86% | 50% | 3.36 | ||
| 13 | 16 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 18 | 16 | +2 | 25 | WDDWL | 1.56 | 44% | 44% | 1.13 | 56% | 44% | 2.13 | ||
| 14 | 14 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 22 | 14 | +8 | 24 | LWWWD | 1.71 | 29% | 50% | 1.57 | 64% | 50% | 2.57 | ||
| 15 | 14 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 36 | 22 | +14 | 23 | LLWDL | 1.64 | 21% | 71% | 2.57 | 100% | 86% | 4.14 | ||
| 16 | 14 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 30 | 16 | +14 | 22 | LWLLW | 1.57 | 21% | 50% | 2.14 | 71% | 57% | 3.29 | ||
| 17 | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 34 | 29 | +5 | 22 | DLWWL | 1.57 | 0% | 93% | 2.43 | 93% | 93% | 4.50 | ||
| 18 | 14 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 31 | 26 | +5 | 22 | WWLLW | 1.57 | 14% | 79% | 2.21 | 93% | 86% | 4.07 | ||
| 19 | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 24 | 21 | +3 | 22 | WLWDW | 1.57 | 21% | 64% | 1.71 | 86% | 71% | 3.21 | ||
| 20 | 14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 27 | 19 | +8 | 21 | DDWLD | 1.50 | 21% | 64% | 1.93 | 86% | 71% | 3.29 | ||
| 21 | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 17 | 15 | +2 | 21 | DWLWD | 1.50 | 29% | 57% | 1.21 | 57% | 43% | 2.29 | ||
| 22 | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 22 | 23 | -1 | 21 | LDWLL | 1.50 | 29% | 64% | 1.57 | 86% | 71% | 3.21 | ||
| 23 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 24 | 19 | +5 | 20 | DWDDL | 1.43 | 29% | 57% | 1.71 | 100% | 64% | 3.07 | ||
| 24 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 25 | 21 | +4 | 20 | LDWWL | 1.43 | 43% | 57% | 1.79 | 86% | 71% | 3.29 | ||
| 25 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 23 | 21 | +2 | 20 | WLWLD | 1.43 | 29% | 71% | 1.64 | 93% | 57% | 3.14 | ||
| 26 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 24 | 25 | -1 | 20 | WLWWL | 1.43 | 0% | 71% | 1.71 | 93% | 64% | 3.50 | ||
| 27 | 14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 17 | 24 | -7 | 15 | WDWLW | 1.07 | 21% | 64% | 1.21 | 79% | 57% | 2.93 | ||
| 28 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 21 | 23 | -2 | 14 | LDLLL | 1.00 | 21% | 64% | 1.50 | 71% | 71% | 3.14 | ||
| 29 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 18 | 31 | -13 | 12 | WDWLL | 0.86 | 7% | 71% | 1.29 | 86% | 57% | 3.50 | ||
| 30 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 15 | 34 | -19 | 11 | WWDLL | 0.79 | 7% | 57% | 1.07 | 86% | 71% | 3.50 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Are The Best Teams Playing at Home?
Chattanooga is performing extremely well at home. Their home game win percentage is 76%.
Austin II is within the top 3 teams that perform well at home, with a home game win ratio of 69%.
Columbus Crew II is within the top 3 teams that perform well at home, with a home game win ratio of 67%.
Sporting KC II is one of the most poorly performing teams at home fixtures — within the bottom 3. Sporting KC II has a home game win ratio of 21%.
Inter Miami II is one of the most poorly performing teams at home fixtures — within the bottom 3. Inter Miami II has a home game win ratio of 21%.
FC Cincinnati II has the lowest home game win percentage of all teams with 29%.
- •MLS Next Pro (USA) Home Table consists of 30 teams that have each played an average of 14.5 matches at home venues.
- •Home win % in the MLS Next Pro is 48%
- •Home teams in the MLS Next Pro score an average of 1.89 goals per game, while they concede 1.43 per match at home games.
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 25 | 6 | +19 | 31 | DDLWW | 2.21 | 64% | 36% | 1.79 | 86% | 29% | 2.21 | ||
| 2 | 14 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 21 | 14 | +7 | 30 | WWWDD | 2.14 | 57% | 36% | 1.50 | 71% | 50% | 2.50 | ||
| 3 | 16 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 30 | 29 | +1 | 25 | WLLWL | 1.56 | 13% | 75% | 1.88 | 88% | 75% | 3.69 | ||
| 4 | 14 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 35 | 24 | +11 | 23 | WWDLW | 1.64 | 14% | 79% | 2.50 | 100% | 86% | 4.21 | ||
| 5 | 15 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 26 | 21 | +5 | 23 | LDDWL | 1.53 | 20% | 80% | 1.73 | 80% | 73% | 3.13 | ||
| 6 | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 25 | 20 | +5 | 22 | LLDWD | 1.57 | 21% | 79% | 1.79 | 86% | 71% | 3.21 | ||
| 7 | 15 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 24 | 20 | +4 | 22 | WDWLW | 1.47 | 33% | 60% | 1.60 | 73% | 53% | 2.93 | ||
| 8 | 14 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 24 | 26 | -2 | 22 | WLWWW | 1.57 | 21% | 57% | 1.71 | 79% | 64% | 3.57 | ||
| 9 | 15 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 23 | 28 | -5 | 21 | WWWLL | 1.40 | 0% | 87% | 1.53 | 100% | 87% | 3.40 | ||
| 10 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 23 | 24 | -1 | 20 | WDLWW | 1.43 | 14% | 79% | 1.64 | 79% | 64% | 3.36 | ||
| 11 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 20 | 25 | -5 | 20 | LDWWW | 1.43 | 7% | 57% | 1.43 | 86% | 64% | 3.21 | ||
| 12 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 18 | 23 | -5 | 20 | DWWDL | 1.33 | 27% | 60% | 1.20 | 87% | 47% | 2.73 | ||
| 13 | 14 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 21 | 27 | -6 | 18 | LLLLW | 1.29 | 7% | 71% | 1.50 | 93% | 64% | 3.43 | ||
| 14 | 17 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 27 | 35 | -8 | 18 | WLDWW | 1.06 | 18% | 71% | 1.59 | 82% | 71% | 3.65 | ||
| 15 | 15 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 17 | DDLWL | 1.13 | 13% | 73% | 1.47 | 87% | 60% | 2.93 | ||
| 16 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 23 | 24 | -1 | 17 | LLDLW | 1.21 | 14% | 57% | 1.64 | 93% | 57% | 3.36 | ||
| 17 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 17 | 23 | -6 | 17 | LDWDL | 1.13 | 20% | 47% | 1.13 | 67% | 53% | 2.67 | ||
| 18 | 16 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 23 | 32 | -9 | 15 | LLLWL | 0.94 | 6% | 75% | 1.44 | 81% | 69% | 3.44 | ||
| 19 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 22 | 29 | -7 | 14 | LLLDL | 0.93 | 20% | 60% | 1.47 | 80% | 67% | 3.40 | ||
| 20 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 18 | 30 | -12 | 14 | LLLWL | 1.00 | 14% | 50% | 1.29 | 86% | 79% | 3.43 | ||
| 21 | 14 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 15 | 22 | -7 | 13 | LWLDL | 0.93 | 14% | 50% | 1.07 | 71% | 36% | 2.64 | ||
| 22 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 20 | 32 | -12 | 11 | LLWLL | 0.79 | 21% | 50% | 1.43 | 79% | 71% | 3.71 | ||
| 23 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 21 | 41 | -20 | 11 | LLLLW | 0.79 | 0% | 79% | 1.50 | 93% | 93% | 4.43 | ||
| 24 | 14 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 18 | 29 | -11 | 10 | LWLLL | 0.71 | 7% | 71% | 1.29 | 93% | 86% | 3.36 | ||
| 25 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 14 | 34 | -20 | 7 | LLLLL | 0.50 | 7% | 43% | 1.00 | 86% | 79% | 3.43 | ||
| 26 | 14 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 17 | 32 | -15 | 6 | LDLDD | 0.43 | 14% | 71% | 1.21 | 79% | 71% | 3.50 | ||
| 27 | 14 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 11 | 28 | -17 | 4 | LLDLL | 0.29 | 0% | 57% | 0.79 | 93% | 50% | 2.79 | ||
| 28 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 11 | 39 | -28 | 4 | LLWLD | 0.29 | 0% | 57% | 0.79 | 93% | 71% | 3.57 | ||
| 29 | 14 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 15 | 37 | -22 | 3 | DLLDL | 0.21 | 14% | 79% | 1.07 | 79% | 71% | 3.71 | ||
| 30 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 12 | 43 | -31 | 2 | LLLLL | 0.14 | 0% | 57% | 0.86 | 86% | 71% | 3.93 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Are The Best Teams Playing Away From Home?
Austin II is performing extremely well away from home. Their away game win percentage is 64%.
Portland Timbers II is within the top 3 teams that perform well away, with an away game win ratio of 64%.
Huntsville City is within the top 3 teams that perform well away, with an away game win ratio of 50%.
Inter Miami II is one of the most poorly performing teams away from home — within the bottom 3. Inter Miami II has an away game win ratio of 0%.
Vancouver Whitecaps II is one of the most poorly performing teams away from home — within the bottom 3. Vancouver Whitecaps II has an away game win ratio of 0%.
Colorado Rapids II has the lowest away game win percentage of all teams with 0%.
- •MLS Next Pro (USA) Away Table consists of 30 teams that have each played an average of 14.5 matches away from home.
- •Away win % in the MLS Next Pro is 29%
- •Away teams in the MLS Next Pro score an average of 1.43 goals per game, while they concede 1.89 per match away from home.
MLS Next Pro (USA) Home and Away Table Insights
434 home fixtures have been played so far in the MLS Next Pro (USA). As it stands right now, Chattanooga, Austin II and Columbus Crew II are the top 3 best performers at home, with win percentages of 76%, 69% and 67% respectively. Home teams in the MLS Next Pro score an average of 1.89 goals per match while conceding 1.43, giving a combined average of 3.32 total goals per game — making Over 2.5 goals the most common outcome in home fixtures. The BTTS rate at home stands at 63% while 24% of home matches end in a Clean Sheet. At the other end of the home table, Sporting KC II and Inter Miami II have struggled at home with win rates of just 21% and 21%.
Meanwhile, the MLS Next Pro away table tells a slightly different story. Austin II, Portland Timbers II and Huntsville City have been the standout performers on the road, with away win rates of 64%, 64% and 50%. Away teams in the MLS Next Pro score 1.43 goals per game and concede 1.89 — a combined 3.32 total goals per match, favouring Over 2.5 goals in away matches. BTTS is recorded in 64% of away fixtures, while 16% end in a Clean Sheet for the visiting side. Inter Miami II and Vancouver Whitecaps II have found life on the road particularly difficult, with away win percentages of just 0% and 0% respectively.
Home & Away Tables — USA
- MLS All-Star Home & Away Tables— Division Underground
- Major League Soccer Home & Away Tables— Division Premium
- NISA Home & Away Tables— Division Underground
- NPSL Home & Away Tables— Division Amateur
- NWSL - Liga MXF Summer Cup Home & Away Tables— Division Women's Pro
- NWSL Women Home & Away Tables— Division Women's Elite
- NWSL Women - Challenge Cup Home & Away Tables— Division Women's Pro
- US Open Cup Home & Away Tables— Division Gold
- USL Championship Home & Away Tables— Division Pro
- USL League One Home & Away Tables— Division Pro
- USL League One Cup Home & Away Tables— Division SemiPro
- USL League Two Home & Away Tables— Division SemiPro
- USL Super League Home & Away Tables— Division Women's Pro
- USL W League Home & Away Tables— Division Women's Pro
- WPSL Home & Away Tables— Division Women's Pro