USL League One Cup — Home Advantage
USA · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +83% | +67% | +100% | 3.00/1.00 | |
| 2 | +57% | +100% | +14% | 1.50/0.00 | |
| 3 | +55% | +50% | +60% | 3.00/1.50 | |
| 4 | +50% | +67% | +33% | 2.00/1.50 | |
| 5 | +47% | +60% | +33% | 2.00/0.50 | |
| 6 | +47% | +60% | +33% | 3.00/0.00 | |
| 7 | +46% | +50% | +43% | 1.50/0.00 | |
| 8 | +42% | +33% | +50% | 1.50/0.00 | |
| 9 | +36% | +71% | 0% | 3.00/1.00 | |
| 10 | +31% | -38% | +100% | 2.33/3.00 | |
| 11 | +30% | +60% | 0% | 0.50/0.00 | |
| 12 | +29% | +14% | +43% | 2.00/0.50 | |
| 13 | +28% | 0% | +56% | 2.00/0.50 | |
| 14 | +27% | +33% | +20% | 3.00/1.75 | |
| 15 | +27% | +33% | +20% | 1.50/0.00 | |
| 16 | +26% | -6% | +58% | 2.33/1.50 | |
| 17 | +25% | +50% | 0% | 3.00/0.50 | |
| 18 | +17% | 0% | +33% | 0.50/0.00 | |
| 19 | +14% | 0% | +27% | 0.50/0.00 | |
| 20 | +10% | +20% | 0% | 1.50/1.00 | |
| 21 | +10% | 0% | +20% | 0.50/1.50 | |
| 22 | +10% | 0% | +20% | 0.50/0.50 | |
| 23 | +7% | -20% | +33% | 2.00/3.00 | |
| 24 | 0% | -20% | +20% | 1.50/1.50 | |
| 25 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.50/1.50 | |
| 26 | -2% | -14% | +11% | 0.50/0.50 | |
| 27 | -8% | 0% | -17% | 1.50/1.50 | |
| 28 | -11% | -43% | +20% | 2.33/3.00 | |
| 29 | -12% | +47% | -71% | 3.00/1.50 | |
| 30 | -13% | -20% | -5% | 1.33/2.00 | |
| 31 | -17% | -33% | 0% | 0.50/1.00 | |
| 32 | -19% | +11% | -50% | 1.50/2.00 | |
| 33 | -22% | -33% | -11% | 0.00/0.00 | |
| 34 | -25% | -50% | 0% | 0.50/1.50 | |
| 35 | -25% | -50% | 0% | 1.00/3.00 | |
| 36 | -27% | +3% | -58% | 1.50/2.00 | |
| 37 | -33% | -33% | -33% | 0.00/1.50 | |
| 38 | -42% | -50% | -33% | 1.00/3.00 | |
| 39 | -50% | -60% | -40% | 0.00/2.00 | |
| 40 | -55% | -50% | -60% | 0.00/2.00 | |
| 41 | -75% | -100% | -50% | 0.00/2.00 | |
| 42 | -78% | -100% | -56% | 0.00/1.50 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
USL League One Cup (USA) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the USL League One Cup (USA), the average home win rate is 39% compared to 33% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Birmingham Legion shows the strongest home advantage, winning 100% of home games versus just 0% away (a difference of +100%). At the other end, Detroit City actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 0% versus 100% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 2.00 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | +71% | 3.00 | 0.50 | |
| 3 | +67% | 2.50 | 0.50 | |
| 4 | +67% | 2.50 | 0.50 | |
| 5 | +60% | 2.00 | 0.50 | |
| 6 | +60% | 2.00 | 0.50 | |
| 7 | +60% | 2.00 | 0.50 | |
| 8 | +50% | 1.50 | 0.50 | |
| 9 | +50% | 3.00 | 1.00 | |
| 10 | +50% | 3.00 | 1.00 | |
| 11 | +47% | 3.50 | 1.25 | |
| 12 | +33% | 3.00 | 1.50 | |
| 13 | +33% | 1.00 | 0.50 | |
| 14 | +33% | 2.00 | 1.00 | |
| 15 | +20% | 1.50 | 1.00 | |
| 16 | +14% | 2.00 | 1.50 | |
| 17 | +11% | 2.50 | 2.00 | |
| 18 | +3% | 2.50 | 2.33 | |
| 19 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 20 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 21 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 22 | 0% | 2.50 | 2.50 | |
| 23 | 0% | 1.50 | 1.50 | |
| 24 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 25 | 0% | 1.50 | 1.50 | |
| 26 | -6% | 1.33 | 1.50 | |
| 27 | -14% | 1.50 | 2.00 | |
| 28 | -20% | 1.00 | 1.50 | |
| 29 | -20% | 1.00 | 1.50 | |
| 30 | -20% | 1.33 | 2.00 | |
| 31 | -33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 32 | -33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 33 | -33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 34 | -38% | 1.33 | 3.00 | |
| 35 | -43% | 1.33 | 3.33 | |
| 36 | -50% | 1.00 | 3.00 | |
| 37 | -50% | 0.50 | 1.50 | |
| 38 | -50% | 0.50 | 1.50 | |
| 39 | -50% | 0.50 | 1.50 | |
| 40 | -60% | 0.50 | 2.00 | |
| 41 | -100% | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| 42 | -100% | 0.00 | 1.50 |
USL League One Cup (USA) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Greenville Triumph has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the USL League One Cup (USA), netting 2.00 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. In contrast, Sporting JAX scores more away (1.50/match) than at home (0.00/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -100% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 2 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 3 | +60% | 0.50 | 2.00 | |
| 4 | +58% | 0.67 | 2.50 | |
| 5 | +56% | 1.00 | 3.50 | |
| 6 | +50% | 1.00 | 3.00 | |
| 7 | +43% | 1.00 | 2.50 | |
| 8 | +43% | 1.00 | 2.50 | |
| 9 | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 10 | +33% | 0.25 | 0.50 | |
| 11 | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 12 | +33% | 1.50 | 3.00 | |
| 13 | +33% | 1.00 | 2.00 | |
| 14 | +27% | 2.00 | 3.50 | |
| 15 | +20% | 0.67 | 1.00 | |
| 16 | +20% | 0.50 | 0.75 | |
| 17 | +20% | 1.00 | 1.50 | |
| 18 | +20% | 1.00 | 1.50 | |
| 19 | +20% | 1.00 | 1.50 | |
| 20 | +20% | 2.00 | 3.00 | |
| 21 | +14% | 1.50 | 2.00 | |
| 22 | +11% | 2.00 | 2.50 | |
| 23 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 24 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 25 | 0% | 1.50 | 1.50 | |
| 26 | 0% | 1.50 | 1.50 | |
| 27 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 28 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 29 | 0% | 2.50 | 2.50 | |
| 30 | 0% | 1.50 | 1.50 | |
| 31 | -5% | 1.67 | 1.50 | |
| 32 | -11% | 2.50 | 2.00 | |
| 33 | -17% | 3.50 | 2.50 | |
| 34 | -33% | 1.00 | 0.50 | |
| 35 | -33% | 3.00 | 1.50 | |
| 36 | -40% | 3.50 | 1.50 | |
| 37 | -50% | 1.50 | 0.50 | |
| 38 | -50% | 1.50 | 0.50 | |
| 39 | -56% | 3.50 | 1.00 | |
| 40 | -58% | 2.50 | 0.67 | |
| 41 | -60% | 2.00 | 0.50 | |
| 42 | -71% | 1.50 | 0.25 |
USL League One Cup (USA) — Home Defence Analysis
Pittsburgh Riverhounds has the best home defensive record in the USL League One Cup (USA), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.50 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Louisville City concedes more at home (1.50/match) than away (0.25/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 1.50 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | +100% | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 3 | +100% | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 4 | +100% | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 5 | +100% | 1.50 | 0.00 | |
| 6 | +100% | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 7 | +100% | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 8 | +100% | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 9 | +100% | 1.50 | 0.00 | |
| 10 | +100% | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 11 | +71% | 1.50 | 0.25 | |
| 12 | +60% | 2.00 | 0.50 | |
| 13 | +50% | 1.50 | 0.50 | |
| 14 | +33% | 1.00 | 0.50 | |
| 15 | +20% | 0.75 | 0.50 | |
| 16 | +20% | 1.50 | 1.00 | |
| 17 | +14% | 0.67 | 0.50 | |
| 18 | +6% | 1.50 | 1.33 | |
| 19 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 20 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 21 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 22 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 23 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 24 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 25 | -11% | 1.33 | 1.67 | |
| 26 | -14% | 1.50 | 2.00 | |
| 27 | -20% | 1.00 | 1.50 | |
| 28 | -33% | 1.00 | 2.00 | |
| 29 | -33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 30 | -33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 31 | -50% | 0.50 | 1.50 | |
| 32 | -50% | 0.50 | 1.50 | |
| 33 | -64% | 0.33 | 1.50 | |
| 34 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 35 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 36 | -100% | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| 37 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 38 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 39 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 40 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 41 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 42 | -100% | 0.00 | 1.00 |
USL League One Cup (USA) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Birmingham Legion has the biggest home scoring advantage in the USL League One Cup (USA), netting 1.50 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Sporting JAX shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.00/match at home against 1.00 away (-100%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 2 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| 3 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 4 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 5 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 6 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| 7 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| 8 | +100% | 0.00 | 2.00 | |
| 9 | +64% | 0.33 | 1.50 | |
| 10 | +50% | 0.50 | 1.50 | |
| 11 | +50% | 0.50 | 1.50 | |
| 12 | +50% | 0.50 | 1.50 | |
| 13 | +50% | 0.50 | 1.50 | |
| 14 | +43% | 1.00 | 2.50 | |
| 15 | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 16 | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 17 | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 18 | +33% | 1.00 | 2.00 | |
| 19 | +20% | 0.50 | 0.75 | |
| 20 | +20% | 1.00 | 1.50 | |
| 21 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 22 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 23 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 24 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 25 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 26 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 27 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 28 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 29 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 30 | -14% | 0.67 | 0.50 | |
| 31 | -20% | 1.50 | 1.00 | |
| 32 | -60% | 2.00 | 0.50 | |
| 33 | -64% | 1.50 | 0.33 | |
| 34 | -71% | 1.50 | 0.25 | |
| 35 | -100% | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 36 | -100% | 0.33 | 0.00 | |
| 37 | -100% | 2.00 | 0.00 | |
| 38 | -100% | 3.00 | 0.00 | |
| 39 | -100% | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 40 | -100% | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 41 | -100% | 1.50 | 0.00 | |
| 42 | -100% | 1.50 | 0.00 |
USL League One Cup (USA) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, El Paso Locomotive has the best home defensive record in the USL League One Cup (USA), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.50 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Boise struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.50/match at home versus 0.00 away (-100%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | +100% | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 3 | +100% | 1.50 | 0.00 | |
| 4 | +100% | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 5 | +100% | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 6 | +100% | 1.50 | 0.00 | |
| 7 | +100% | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 8 | +100% | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 9 | +50% | 1.50 | 0.50 | |
| 10 | +50% | 1.50 | 0.50 | |
| 11 | +50% | 1.50 | 0.50 | |
| 12 | +50% | 1.50 | 0.50 | |
| 13 | +33% | 1.00 | 0.50 | |
| 14 | +33% | 1.00 | 0.50 | |
| 15 | +33% | 2.00 | 1.00 | |
| 16 | +33% | 2.00 | 1.00 | |
| 17 | +33% | 1.00 | 0.50 | |
| 18 | +33% | 1.00 | 0.50 | |
| 19 | +33% | 2.00 | 1.00 | |
| 20 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 21 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 22 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 23 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 24 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 25 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 26 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 27 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 28 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 29 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 30 | -20% | 1.00 | 1.50 | |
| 31 | -20% | 0.67 | 1.00 | |
| 32 | -33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 33 | -50% | 0.50 | 1.50 | |
| 34 | -50% | 0.50 | 1.50 | |
| 35 | -50% | 0.50 | 1.50 | |
| 36 | -50% | 0.33 | 1.00 | |
| 37 | -60% | 0.25 | 1.00 | |
| 38 | -100% | 0.00 | 1.67 | |
| 39 | -100% | 0.00 | 1.50 | |
| 40 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 41 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 42 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.50 |
USL League One Cup (USA) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Orange County SC has the biggest home scoring advantage in the USL League One Cup (USA), netting 0.50 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Sporting JAX shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.00/match at home against 0.50 away (-100%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 2 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 3 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.50 | |
| 4 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 5 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 6 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.50 | |
| 7 | +50% | 0.33 | 1.00 | |
| 8 | +50% | 0.33 | 1.00 | |
| 9 | +50% | 0.50 | 1.50 | |
| 10 | +50% | 0.50 | 1.50 | |
| 11 | +50% | 0.50 | 1.50 | |
| 12 | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 13 | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 14 | +25% | 1.50 | 2.50 | |
| 15 | +20% | 1.00 | 1.50 | |
| 16 | +20% | 1.00 | 1.50 | |
| 17 | +14% | 1.50 | 2.00 | |
| 18 | +14% | 1.50 | 2.00 | |
| 19 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 20 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 21 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 22 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 23 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 24 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 25 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 26 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 27 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 28 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 29 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 30 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 31 | -14% | 2.00 | 1.50 | |
| 32 | -20% | 1.50 | 1.00 | |
| 33 | -33% | 1.00 | 0.50 | |
| 34 | -43% | 2.50 | 1.00 | |
| 35 | -50% | 1.50 | 0.50 | |
| 36 | -50% | 1.50 | 0.50 | |
| 37 | -50% | 1.50 | 0.50 | |
| 38 | -50% | 1.00 | 0.33 | |
| 39 | -100% | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 40 | -100% | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 41 | -100% | 0.25 | 0.00 | |
| 42 | -100% | 1.00 | 0.00 |
USL League One Cup (USA) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Birmingham Legion has the best home defensive record in the USL League One Cup (USA), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.50 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Brooklyn struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.00/match at home versus 0.00 away (-100%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — USA
- MLS All-Star Home Advantage— Division Underground
- MLS Next Pro Home Advantage— Division Gold
- Major League Soccer Home Advantage— Division Premium
- NISA Home Advantage— Division Underground
- NPSL Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- NWSL - Liga MXF Summer Cup Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- NWSL Women Home Advantage— Division Women's Elite
- NWSL Women - Challenge Cup Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- US Open Cup Home Advantage— Division Gold
- USL Championship Home Advantage— Division Pro
- USL League One Home Advantage— Division Pro
- USL League Two Home Advantage— Division SemiPro
- USL Super League Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- USL W League Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- WPSL Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro