NISA — Home Advantage
USA · 2024/25
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +31% | +31% | +31% | 2.40/1.09 | |
| 2 | +20% | +33% | +7% | 1.17/0.38 | |
| 3 | +9% | +8% | +10% | 0.90/0.90 | |
| 4 | +2% | 0% | +4% | 0.00/0.13 | |
| 5 | -4% | +5% | -13% | 1.89/2.10 | |
| 6 | -8% | +6% | -22% | 2.56/2.67 | |
| 7 | -14% | -23% | -5% | 0.78/1.14 | |
| 8 | -17% | -35% | +1% | 0.86/1.18 | |
| 9 | -17% | -6% | -29% | 2.10/2.63 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
NISA (USA) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the NISA (USA), the average home win rate is 42% compared to 40% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Michigan Stars shows the strongest home advantage, winning 80% of home games versus just 27% away (a difference of +53%). At the other end, LA Force actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 60% versus 88% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +33% | 1.50 | 0.75 | |
| 2 | +31% | 2.40 | 1.27 | |
| 3 | +8% | 1.30 | 1.10 | |
| 4 | +6% | 2.78 | 2.44 | |
| 5 | +5% | 1.89 | 1.70 | |
| 6 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 7 | -6% | 2.00 | 2.25 | |
| 8 | -23% | 0.89 | 1.43 | |
| 9 | -35% | 1.00 | 2.09 |
NISA (USA) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Georgia Lions has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the NISA (USA), netting 1.50 goals/match at home versus 0.75 away — a Scoring Advantage of +33%. In contrast, Club De Lyon scores more away (2.09/match) than at home (1.00/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -35% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +31% | 0.90 | 1.73 | |
| 2 | +10% | 1.90 | 2.30 | |
| 3 | +7% | 1.83 | 2.13 | |
| 4 | +4% | 2.67 | 2.88 | |
| 5 | +1% | 2.14 | 2.18 | |
| 6 | -5% | 1.89 | 1.71 | |
| 7 | -13% | 0.78 | 0.60 | |
| 8 | -22% | 1.22 | 0.78 | |
| 9 | -29% | 0.90 | 0.50 |
NISA (USA) — Home Defence Analysis
Michigan Stars has the best home defensive record in the NISA (USA), conceding just 0.90 goals/match at home compared to 1.73 away — a Defence Advantage of +31%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, LA Force concedes more at home (0.90/match) than away (0.50/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.67 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | +71% | 0.83 | 0.14 | |
| 3 | +35% | 0.83 | 0.40 | |
| 4 | +20% | 0.75 | 0.50 | |
| 5 | +11% | 1.11 | 0.89 | |
| 6 | +8% | 0.33 | 0.29 | |
| 7 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 8 | -12% | 0.67 | 0.86 | |
| 9 | -41% | 0.50 | 1.20 |
NISA (USA) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Arizona Monsoon has the biggest home scoring advantage in the NISA (USA), netting 0.67 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Club De Lyon shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.50/match at home against 1.20 away (-41%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +32% | 0.22 | 0.43 | |
| 2 | +26% | 0.67 | 1.14 | |
| 3 | +20% | 0.67 | 1.00 | |
| 4 | +18% | 0.70 | 1.00 | |
| 5 | +9% | 0.67 | 0.80 | |
| 6 | 0% | 0.13 | 0.13 | |
| 7 | -2% | 0.75 | 0.71 | |
| 8 | -20% | 1.00 | 0.67 | |
| 9 | -25% | 0.56 | 0.33 |
NISA (USA) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, LA Force has the best home defensive record in the NISA (USA), conceding just 0.22 goals/match at home compared to 0.43 away — a Defence Advantage of +32%. Maryland Bobcats struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.56/match at home versus 0.33 away (-25%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +25% | 1.17 | 0.70 | |
| 2 | +7% | 1.00 | 0.88 | |
| 3 | +3% | 1.67 | 1.56 | |
| 4 | -3% | 1.22 | 1.29 | |
| 5 | -3% | 0.67 | 0.71 | |
| 6 | -4% | 0.80 | 0.88 | |
| 7 | -25% | 0.67 | 1.10 | |
| 8 | -33% | 0.33 | 0.67 | |
| 9 | -35% | 0.56 | 1.14 |
NISA (USA) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Michigan Stars has the biggest home scoring advantage in the NISA (USA), netting 1.17 goals/match at home versus 0.70 away — a Scoring Advantage of +25%. At the other end, Capo shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.56/match at home against 1.14 away (-35%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +24% | 1.33 | 2.17 | |
| 2 | +14% | 0.83 | 1.10 | |
| 3 | +9% | 1.08 | 1.29 | |
| 4 | -3% | 1.20 | 1.13 | |
| 5 | -9% | 0.75 | 0.63 | |
| 6 | -10% | 1.33 | 1.10 | |
| 7 | -20% | 0.67 | 0.44 | |
| 8 | -36% | 1.22 | 0.57 | |
| 9 | -69% | 0.78 | 0.14 |
NISA (USA) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Arizona Monsoon has the best home defensive record in the NISA (USA), conceding just 1.33 goals/match at home compared to 2.17 away — a Defence Advantage of +24%. LA Force struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.78/match at home versus 0.14 away (-69%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — USA
- MLS All-Star Home Advantage— Division Underground
- MLS Next Pro Home Advantage— Division Gold
- Major League Soccer Home Advantage— Division Premium
- NPSL Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- NWSL - Liga MXF Summer Cup Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- NWSL Women Home Advantage— Division Women's Elite
- NWSL Women - Challenge Cup Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- US Open Cup Home Advantage— Division Gold
- USL Championship Home Advantage— Division Pro
- USL League One Home Advantage— Division Pro
- USL League One Cup Home Advantage— Division SemiPro
- USL League Two Home Advantage— Division SemiPro
- USL Super League Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- USL W League Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- WPSL Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro