MLS Next Pro — Form Table
USA · 2026
Combined Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Chattanooga | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 8 | +13 | 21 | WWWWWWW | 3.00 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 3.00 | 86% | 86% | 4.14 | |
| 2 |  Huntsville City | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 7 | +9 | 16 | DWWWLWW | 2.29 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 2.29 | 86% | 71% | 3.29 | |
| 3 |  Philadelphia Union II | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 12 | +3 | 16 | WWLWWWD | 2.29 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 2.14 | 86% | 71% | 3.86 | |
| 4 |  Austin II | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 4 | +5 | 15 | WLWWWWL | 2.14 | 57% | 14% | 29% | 1.29 | 57% | 29% | 1.86 | |
| 5 |  Minnesota United II | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 7 | +8 | 14 | DWWWDWL | 2.00 | 43% | 14% | 57% | 2.14 | 86% | 43% | 3.14 | |
| 6 |  Atlanta United II | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 11 | +6 | 13 | WWDWLWL | 1.86 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 2.43 | 86% | 71% | 4.00 | |
| 7 |  Crown Legacy | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 10 | +6 | 13 | WLWDWWL | 1.86 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 2.29 | 100% | 100% | 3.71 | |
| 8 |  Ventura County | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 7 | +5 | 13 | DWWLWWL | 1.86 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 1.71 | 71% | 57% | 2.71 | |
| 9 |  Los Angeles FC II | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 10 | +4 | 11 | LDWLDWW | 1.57 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 2.00 | 71% | 57% | 3.43 | |
| 10 |  New York RB II | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 13 | +3 | 10 | WWWLDLL | 1.43 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.29 | 100% | 86% | 4.14 | |
| 11 |  Portland Timbers II | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 10 | DWDDDWL | 1.43 | 29% | 29% | 57% | 1.14 | 71% | 29% | 2.00 | |
| 12 |  New York City II | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 10 | WLLWWDL | 1.43 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 1.57 | 86% | 57% | 3.43 | |
| 13 |  Toronto II | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 10 | DLWWWLL | 1.43 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 1.86 | 100% | 86% | 4.14 | |
| 14 |  The Town | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 10 | +2 | 9 | LWLLWWL | 1.29 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 1.71 | 86% | 71% | 3.14 | |
| 15 |  Connecticut FC | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 9 | WLLLWWL | 1.29 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 2.29 | 71% | 71% | 4.57 | |
| 16 |  St. Louis City II | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 9 | WDDWDLL | 1.29 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.14 | 100% | 29% | 2.43 | |
| 17 |  Orlando City II | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 18 | -5 | 9 | LLLWWWL | 1.29 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.86 | 100% | 86% | 4.43 | |
| 18 |  Colorado Rapids II | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 | DDWLLLW | 1.14 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 1.43 | 71% | 57% | 2.86 | |
| 19 |  Columbus Crew II | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 8 | LLDDWWL | 1.14 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.43 | 86% | 57% | 3.14 | |
| 20 |  North Texas | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 8 | +1 | 7 | DDDWLDL | 1.00 | 29% | 29% | 71% | 1.29 | 71% | 43% | 2.43 | |
| 21 |  Carolina Core | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 7 | DWLLDDD | 1.00 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 1.86 | 100% | 71% | 4.14 | |
| 22 |  Vancouver Whitecaps II | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 7 | LLWWDLL | 1.00 | 14% | 29% | 71% | 1.86 | 86% | 71% | 4.29 | |
| 23 |  Tacoma Defiance | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 7 | LLWLWLD | 1.00 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.57 | 100% | 86% | 3.71 | |
| 24 |  Inter Miami II | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 23 | -9 | 7 | WLDWLLL | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 86% | 5.29 | |
| 25 |  Real Monarchs | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 16 | -9 | 7 | LLWLLDW | 1.00 | 29% | 43% | 43% | 1.00 | 86% | 86% | 3.29 | |
| 26 |  Houston Dynamo FC II | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 6 | DLLWDLD | 0.86 | 14% | 43% | 57% | 1.29 | 86% | 57% | 3.14 | |
| 27 |  Chicago Fire II | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 6 | WLWLLLL | 0.86 | 14% | 43% | 43% | 1.00 | 86% | 71% | 3.00 | |
| 28 |  New England II | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 5 | LLLDDWL | 0.71 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.57 | 100% | 86% | 3.86 | |
| 29 |  FC Cincinnati II | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 17 | -7 | 4 | LLWLLDL | 0.57 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.43 | 100% | 86% | 3.86 | |
| 30 |  Sporting KC II | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 22 | -13 | 4 | DLLLLLW | 0.57 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.29 | 100% | 100% | 4.43 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Is in the Best Form in the Last 7 Games?
Chattanooga leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 games.
Huntsville City is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.29 PPG.
Philadelphia Union II is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.29 PPG.
Sporting KC II is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 14% and 0.57 PPG.
FC Cincinnati II is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 14% and 0.57 PPG.
New England II has the worst form over the last 7 games with just 14% wins and only 0.71 PPG.
- •The MLS Next Pro (USA) Last 7 Games Form Table covers 30 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent games.
- •Win rate across the MLS Next Pro in this period is 40%
- •Teams score an average of 1.74 goals per game and concede 1.79 — a combined 3.53 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 71% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 16% of games.
MLS Next Pro (USA) Last 7 Games — Form Table Insights
Chattanooga, Huntsville City and Philadelphia Union II have been the standout performers in the MLS Next Pro (USA) over the last 7 games, leading the form table with 3.00, 2.29 and 2.29 PPG respectively. Across the MLS Next Pro, teams score an average of 1.74 goals and concede 1.79 per game — a combined 3.53 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 71% of fixtures while 16% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Sporting KC II and FC Cincinnati II have struggled in recent games, collecting just 0.57 and 0.57 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the MLS Next Pro.
Home Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chattanooga | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 7 | +16 | 21 | WWWWWWW | 3.00 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 3.29 | 86% | 86% | 4.29 | |
| 2 | New York City II | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 5 | +12 | 17 | DDWWWWW | 2.43 | 43% | 0% | 57% | 2.43 | 86% | 57% | 3.14 | |
| 3 | Ventura County | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 6 | +13 | 16 | WWWDWWL | 2.29 | 43% | 14% | 43% | 2.71 | 86% | 71% | 3.57 | |
| 4 | Tacoma Defiance | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 7 | +7 | 16 | WWLWWWD | 2.29 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 2.00 | 86% | 57% | 3.00 | |
| 5 | Connecticut FC | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 21 | 14 | +7 | 15 | WWWWLLW | 2.14 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 6 | Los Angeles FC II | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 8 | +7 | 15 | WDDWWWD | 2.14 | 29% | 14% | 71% | 2.14 | 86% | 71% | 3.29 | |
| 7 | Austin II | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 15 | LWWWWWL | 2.14 | 43% | 14% | 43% | 1.57 | 43% | 43% | 2.43 | |
| 8 | Minnesota United II | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 19 | 10 | +9 | 14 | WDLDWWW | 2.00 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 2.71 | 100% | 71% | 4.14 | |
| 9 | Columbus Crew II | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 7 | +8 | 14 | WLWWDDW | 2.00 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 2.14 | 100% | 57% | 3.14 | |
| 10 | Atlanta United II | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 11 | +7 | 13 | WDLWWWL | 1.86 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 2.57 | 86% | 86% | 4.14 | |
| 11 | Crown Legacy | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 10 | +5 | 13 | WLWWDWL | 1.86 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 2.14 | 100% | 86% | 3.57 | |
| 12 | Real Monarchs | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 10 | +4 | 13 | LWWLWDW | 1.86 | 29% | 14% | 71% | 2.00 | 86% | 86% | 3.43 | |
| 13 | Vancouver Whitecaps II | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 13 | +3 | 13 | DWWLWWL | 1.86 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 2.29 | 100% | 71% | 4.14 | |
| 14 | Toronto II | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 12 | +3 | 13 | LWDWWWL | 1.86 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 2.14 | 100% | 86% | 3.86 | |
| 15 | Colorado Rapids II | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 7 | +3 | 13 | LWWDWLW | 1.86 | 43% | 29% | 43% | 1.43 | 57% | 43% | 2.43 | |
| 16 | Chicago Fire II | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 10 | +8 | 12 | WWLWWLL | 1.71 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 2.57 | 86% | 71% | 4.00 | |
| 17 | Portland Timbers II | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 12 | WDWDDWL | 1.71 | 57% | 43% | 29% | 0.86 | 43% | 14% | 1.29 | |
| 18 | Huntsville City | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 9 | +2 | 11 | DWLDWWL | 1.57 | 43% | 0% | 57% | 1.57 | 86% | 57% | 2.86 | |
| 19 | Carolina Core | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 11 | +1 | 11 | WDWLWLD | 1.57 | 43% | 0% | 57% | 1.71 | 86% | 57% | 3.29 | |
| 20 | Philadelphia Union II | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 | WLDWLWD | 1.57 | 29% | 29% | 57% | 1.14 | 57% | 43% | 2.29 | |
| 21 | New York RB II | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 11 | +7 | 10 | WWLLWDL | 1.43 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 2.57 | 100% | 86% | 4.14 | |
| 22 | Orlando City II | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 10 | WLDLWWL | 1.43 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 2.00 | 86% | 86% | 4.00 | |
| 23 | North Texas | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 9 | +1 | 9 | WLDDWLD | 1.29 | 29% | 43% | 57% | 1.43 | 71% | 57% | 2.71 | |
| 24 | The Town | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 7 | LDLWLLW | 1.00 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.43 | 86% | 57% | 3.00 | |
| 25 | New England II | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 7 | WLLDWLL | 1.00 | 14% | 14% | 71% | 1.71 | 100% | 100% | 4.14 | |
| 26 | Inter Miami II | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 7 | LLWDWLL | 1.00 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.57 | 86% | 57% | 3.86 | |
| 27 | Sporting KC II | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 7 | LLWWDLL | 1.00 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.14 | 86% | 71% | 3.43 | |
| 28 | St. Louis City II | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 6 | LLDWDDL | 0.86 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.14 | 100% | 43% | 2.57 | |
| 29 | FC Cincinnati II | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 5 | WDLDLLL | 0.71 | 14% | 0% | 86% | 1.57 | 86% | 86% | 3.57 | |
| 30 | Houston Dynamo FC II | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 5 | WLDLLLD | 0.71 | 14% | 43% | 43% | 1.14 | 100% | 43% | 2.86 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms? (Last 7 Home Games)
Chattanooga leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 home games.
New York City II is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.43 PPG.
Ventura County is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.29 PPG.
Houston Dynamo FC II is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 14% and 0.71 PPG.
FC Cincinnati II is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 14% and 0.71 PPG.
St. Louis City II has the worst form over the last 7 home games with just 14% wins and only 0.86 PPG.
- •The MLS Next Pro (USA) Home Form Table (Last 7) covers 30 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent home games.
- •Win rate across the MLS Next Pro in this period is 49%
- •Teams score an average of 1.94 goals per game and concede 1.45 — a combined 3.39 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 64% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 16% of games.
MLS Next Pro (USA) — Home Form Table Insights (Last 7 Home Games)
Chattanooga, New York City II and Ventura County have been the standout performers in the MLS Next Pro (USA) over the last 7 home games, leading the form table with 3.00, 2.43 and 2.29 PPG respectively. Across the MLS Next Pro, teams score an average of 1.94 goals and concede 1.45 per game — a combined 3.39 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 64% of fixtures while 16% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Houston Dynamo FC II and FC Cincinnati II have struggled in recent home games, collecting just 0.71 and 0.71 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the MLS Next Pro.
Away Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Portland Timbers II | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 12 | 5 | +7 | 15 | WDWWWDD | 2.14 | 43% | 14% | 57% | 1.71 | 86% | 57% | 2.43 | |
| 2 | Crown Legacy | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 10 | +7 | 14 | DWWWDLW | 2.00 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 2.43 | 100% | 86% | 3.86 | |
| 3 | Huntsville City | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 13 | LDWLWWW | 1.86 | 29% | 43% | 43% | 1.57 | 57% | 43% | 2.43 | |
| 4 | Ventura County | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 9 | +4 | 13 | LWWDWLW | 1.86 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 1.86 | 86% | 57% | 3.14 | |
| 5 | Philadelphia Union II | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 13 | +1 | 13 | WLLDWWW | 1.86 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 2.00 | 100% | 71% | 3.86 | |
| 6 | Austin II | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 4 | +7 | 12 | WDDDLWW | 1.71 | 57% | 14% | 43% | 1.57 | 86% | 29% | 2.14 | |
| 7 | Chattanooga | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 8 | +1 | 12 | DDWDLWW | 1.71 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 1.29 | 71% | 43% | 2.43 | |
| 8 | Connecticut FC | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 | WWWLLWL | 1.71 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 1.71 | 71% | 57% | 3.43 | |
| 9 | Los Angeles FC II | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 13 | +1 | 10 | LLWLDWW | 1.43 | 29% | 0% | 71% | 2.00 | 71% | 71% | 3.86 | |
| 10 | New York RB II | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 9 | LLWWWLL | 1.29 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.71 | 100% | 100% | 3.86 | |
| 11 | Tacoma Defiance | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 9 | WWLLLWL | 1.29 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.57 | 86% | 86% | 3.86 | |
| 12 | New England II | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 8 | WLLDDWL | 1.14 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 1.71 | 100% | 86% | 3.57 | |
| 13 | The Town | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 8 | WLDDLWL | 1.14 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.14 | 86% | 43% | 2.57 | |
| 14 | Minnesota United II | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 8 | LWLDWDL | 1.14 | 29% | 43% | 43% | 1.14 | 71% | 43% | 2.71 | |
| 15 | St. Louis City II | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 8 | LLDWWDL | 1.14 | 29% | 43% | 43% | 0.86 | 86% | 43% | 2.14 | |
| 16 | Orlando City II | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 17 | -7 | 7 | WDLLLLW | 1.00 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.43 | 100% | 71% | 3.86 | |
| 17 | Houston Dynamo FC II | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 5 | LLLLDWD | 0.71 | 14% | 14% | 86% | 1.43 | 86% | 86% | 3.57 | |
| 18 | Chicago Fire II | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 18 | -6 | 5 | DDLWLLL | 0.71 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.71 | 100% | 100% | 4.29 | |
| 19 | North Texas | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 5 | LDLWLDL | 0.71 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 0.71 | 71% | 29% | 2.57 | |
| 20 | Columbus Crew II | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 4 | DLLLLWL | 0.57 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.29 | 71% | 71% | 3.29 | |
| 21 | Carolina Core | 7 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 4 | LDLDLDD | 0.57 | 14% | 14% | 86% | 1.57 | 86% | 71% | 4.00 | |
| 22 | Atlanta United II | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 4 | LLLLDLW | 0.57 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.29 | 86% | 57% | 3.43 | |
| 23 | FC Cincinnati II | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 21 | -12 | 4 | LLLLWLD | 0.57 | 0% | 14% | 86% | 1.29 | 100% | 86% | 4.29 | |
| 24 | Toronto II | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 9 | 21 | -12 | 3 | LLLLWLL | 0.43 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.29 | 86% | 86% | 4.29 | |
| 25 | Sporting KC II | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 22 | -15 | 3 | LLLLLLW | 0.43 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.00 | 86% | 86% | 4.14 | |
| 26 | Vancouver Whitecaps II | 7 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 17 | -11 | 2 | LLDLLDL | 0.29 | 14% | 29% | 71% | 0.86 | 71% | 57% | 3.29 | |
| 27 | Colorado Rapids II | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 1 | LLLLDLL | 0.14 | 0% | 43% | 57% | 0.86 | 86% | 71% | 3.00 | |
| 28 | New York City II | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 20 | -12 | 1 | LLLLLDL | 0.14 | 0% | 29% | 71% | 1.14 | 100% | 71% | 4.00 | |
| 29 | Real Monarchs | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 21 | -17 | 1 | DLLLLLL | 0.14 | 0% | 57% | 43% | 0.57 | 86% | 86% | 3.57 | |
| 30 | Inter Miami II | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 22 | -18 | 0 | LLLLLLL | 0.00 | 0% | 57% | 43% | 0.57 | 71% | 57% | 3.71 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms? (Last 7 Away Games)
Portland Timbers II leads the form table with 57% wins and 2.14 PPG in the last 7 away games.
Crown Legacy is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 57% and 2.00 PPG.
Huntsville City is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 57% and 1.86 PPG.
Inter Miami II is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.00 PPG.
Real Monarchs is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.14 PPG.
New York City II has the worst form over the last 7 away games with just 0% wins and only 0.14 PPG.
- •The MLS Next Pro (USA) Away Form Table (Last 7) covers 30 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent away games.
- •Win rate across the MLS Next Pro in this period is 27%
- •Teams score an average of 1.38 goals per game and concede 2.01 — a combined 3.39 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 65% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 24% of games.
MLS Next Pro (USA) — Away Form Table Insights (Last 7 Away Games)
Portland Timbers II, Crown Legacy and Huntsville City have been the standout performers in the MLS Next Pro (USA) over the last 7 away games, leading the form table with 2.14, 2.00 and 1.86 PPG respectively. Across the MLS Next Pro, teams score an average of 1.38 goals and concede 2.01 per game — a combined 3.39 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 65% of fixtures while 24% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Inter Miami II and Real Monarchs have struggled in recent away games, collecting just 0.00 and 0.14 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the MLS Next Pro.
Form Tables — USA
- MLS All-Star Form Table— Division Underground
- Major League Soccer Form Table— Division Premium
- NISA Form Table— Division Underground
- NPSL Form Table— Division Amateur
- NWSL - Liga MXF Summer Cup Form Table— Division Women's Pro
- NWSL Women Form Table— Division Women's Elite
- NWSL Women - Challenge Cup Form Table— Division Women's Pro
- US Open Cup Form Table— Division Gold
- USL Championship Form Table— Division Pro
- USL League One Form Table— Division Pro
- USL League One Cup Form Table— Division SemiPro
- USL League Two Form Table— Division SemiPro
- USL Super League Form Table— Division Women's Pro
- USL W League Form Table— Division Women's Pro
- WPSL Form Table— Division Women's Pro