Virsliga — Home Advantage
Latvia · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  FK Liepaja | +29% | +36% | +21% | 1.78/0.94 |
| 2 |  Tukums | +25% | +30% | +20% | 1.18/0.28 |
| 3 |  Grobiņa | +22% | +29% | +16% | 1.06/0.61 |
| 4 |  BFC Daugavpils | +14% | +2% | +27% | 1.78/1.12 |
| 5 |  Ogre United | +14% | +9% | +18% | 0.67/0.41 |
| 6 |  Riga | +5% | +4% | +6% | 2.53/2.22 |
| 7 |  Rīgas FS | +5% | +24% | -14% | 2.39/2.71 |
| 8 |  Auda | +4% | +5% | +3% | 2.00/2.00 |
| 9 |  Super Nova | -6% | 0% | -12% | 0.88/1.33 |
| 10 |  FS Jelgava | -8% | -27% | +12% | 0.82/1.00 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
Virsliga (Latvia) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the Virsliga (Latvia), the average home win rate is 43% compared to 34% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. BFC Daugavpils shows the strongest home advantage, winning 56% of home games versus just 24% away (a difference of +32%). At the other end, Rīgas FS actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 72% versus 88% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FK Liepaja | +36% | 1.89 | 0.88 |
| 2 | Tukums | +30% | 1.65 | 0.89 |
| 3 | Grobiņa | +29% | 1.00 | 0.56 |
| 4 | Rīgas FS | +24% | 3.06 | 1.88 |
| 5 | Ogre United | +9% | 1.06 | 0.88 |
| 6 | Auda | +5% | 1.83 | 1.65 |
| 7 | Riga | +4% | 2.82 | 2.61 |
| 8 | BFC Daugavpils | +2% | 1.22 | 1.18 |
| 9 | Super Nova | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 10 | FS Jelgava | -27% | 0.76 | 1.33 |
Virsliga (Latvia) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
FK Liepaja has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Virsliga (Latvia), netting 1.89 goals/match at home versus 0.88 away — a Scoring Advantage of +36%. In contrast, FS Jelgava scores more away (1.33/match) than at home (0.76/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -27% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BFC Daugavpils | +27% | 0.78 | 1.35 |
| 2 | FK Liepaja | +21% | 1.11 | 1.71 |
| 3 | Tukums | +20% | 1.53 | 2.28 |
| 4 | Ogre United | +18% | 2.00 | 2.88 |
| 5 | Grobiņa | +16% | 1.53 | 2.11 |
| 6 | FS Jelgava | +12% | 1.53 | 1.94 |
| 7 | Riga | +6% | 0.88 | 1.00 |
| 8 | Auda | +3% | 1.06 | 1.12 |
| 9 | Super Nova | -12% | 1.71 | 1.33 |
| 10 | Rīgas FS | -14% | 0.78 | 0.59 |
Virsliga (Latvia) — Home Defence Analysis
BFC Daugavpils has the best home defensive record in the Virsliga (Latvia), conceding just 0.78 goals/match at home compared to 1.35 away — a Defence Advantage of +27%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Rīgas FS concedes more at home (0.78/match) than away (0.59/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FK Liepaja | +53% | 0.94 | 0.29 |
| 2 | BFC Daugavpils | +40% | 0.56 | 0.24 |
| 3 | Ogre United | +27% | 0.61 | 0.35 |
| 4 | Auda | +19% | 0.94 | 0.65 |
| 5 | Tukums | +17% | 0.71 | 0.50 |
| 6 | Rīgas FS | +16% | 1.22 | 0.88 |
| 7 | Super Nova | +15% | 0.53 | 0.39 |
| 8 | Grobiņa | +3% | 0.35 | 0.33 |
| 9 | Riga | -1% | 1.35 | 1.39 |
| 10 | FS Jelgava | -31% | 0.35 | 0.67 |
Virsliga (Latvia) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, FK Liepaja has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Virsliga (Latvia), netting 0.94 goals/match at home versus 0.29 away — a Scoring Advantage of +53%. At the other end, FS Jelgava shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.35/match at home against 0.67 away (-31%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BFC Daugavpils | +58% | 0.11 | 0.41 |
| 2 | FK Liepaja | +54% | 0.28 | 0.94 |
| 3 | Rīgas FS | +26% | 0.28 | 0.47 |
| 4 | Ogre United | +17% | 1.00 | 1.41 |
| 5 | Tukums | +10% | 0.82 | 1.00 |
| 6 | Grobiņa | +4% | 0.82 | 0.89 |
| 7 | Riga | +4% | 0.41 | 0.44 |
| 8 | Auda | +3% | 0.56 | 0.59 |
| 9 | FS Jelgava | +1% | 0.71 | 0.72 |
| 10 | Super Nova | -3% | 0.76 | 0.72 |
Virsliga (Latvia) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, BFC Daugavpils has the best home defensive record in the Virsliga (Latvia), conceding just 0.11 goals/match at home compared to 0.41 away — a Defence Advantage of +58%. Super Nova struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.76/match at home versus 0.72 away (-3%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grobiņa | +49% | 0.65 | 0.22 |
| 2 | Tukums | +42% | 0.94 | 0.39 |
| 3 | Rīgas FS | +29% | 1.83 | 1.00 |
| 4 | FK Liepaja | +23% | 0.94 | 0.59 |
| 5 | Riga | +9% | 1.47 | 1.22 |
| 6 | Auda | -6% | 0.89 | 1.00 |
| 7 | Ogre United | -9% | 0.44 | 0.53 |
| 8 | Super Nova | -13% | 0.47 | 0.61 |
| 9 | BFC Daugavpils | -17% | 0.67 | 0.94 |
| 10 | FS Jelgava | -24% | 0.41 | 0.67 |
Virsliga (Latvia) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Grobiņa has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Virsliga (Latvia), netting 0.65 goals/match at home versus 0.22 away — a Scoring Advantage of +49%. At the other end, FS Jelgava shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.41/match at home against 0.67 away (-24%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tukums | +29% | 0.71 | 1.28 |
| 2 | Grobiņa | +27% | 0.71 | 1.22 |
| 3 | FS Jelgava | +19% | 0.82 | 1.22 |
| 4 | Ogre United | +19% | 1.00 | 1.47 |
| 5 | BFC Daugavpils | +17% | 0.67 | 0.94 |
| 6 | Riga | +8% | 0.47 | 0.56 |
| 7 | Auda | +3% | 0.50 | 0.53 |
| 8 | FK Liepaja | -4% | 0.83 | 0.76 |
| 9 | Super Nova | -21% | 0.94 | 0.61 |
| 10 | Rīgas FS | -62% | 0.50 | 0.12 |
Virsliga (Latvia) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Tukums has the best home defensive record in the Virsliga (Latvia), conceding just 0.71 goals/match at home compared to 1.28 away — a Defence Advantage of +29%. Rīgas FS struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.50/match at home versus 0.12 away (-62%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Latvia
- 1. Liga Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Super Cup Home Advantage— Division Silver