Virsliga — Failed To Score
Latvia · 2026
Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | FTS% | Home% | Away% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  FS Jelgava | 35 | 17 | 49% | 59% | 39% |
| 2 |  Grobiņa | 35 | 16 | 46% | 47% | 44% |
| 3 |  FK Liepaja | 35 | 11 | 31% | 22% | 41% |
| 4 |  Ogre United | 35 | 11 | 31% | 28% | 35% |
| 5 |  Super Nova | 35 | 10 | 29% | 24% | 33% |
| 6 |  BFC Daugavpils | 35 | 10 | 29% | 33% | 24% |
| 7 |  Tukums | 35 | 9 | 26% | 12% | 39% |
| 8 |  Auda | 35 | 3 | 9% | 11% | 6% |
| 9 |  Rīgas FS | 35 | 2 | 6% | 11% | 0% |
| 10 |  Riga | 35 | 2 | 6% | 0% | 11% |
Home / Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FS Jelgava | 17 | 10 | 59% |
| 2 | Grobiņa | 17 | 8 | 47% |
| 3 | BFC Daugavpils | 18 | 6 | 33% |
| 4 | Ogre United | 18 | 5 | 28% |
| 5 | Super Nova | 17 | 4 | 24% |
| 6 | FK Liepaja | 18 | 4 | 22% |
| 7 | Tukums | 17 | 2 | 12% |
| 8 | Auda | 18 | 2 | 11% |
| 9 | Rīgas FS | 18 | 2 | 11% |
| 10 | Riga | 17 | 0 | 0% |
Away / Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grobiņa | 18 | 8 | 44% |
| 2 | FK Liepaja | 17 | 7 | 41% |
| 3 | Tukums | 18 | 7 | 39% |
| 4 | FS Jelgava | 18 | 7 | 39% |
| 5 | Ogre United | 17 | 6 | 35% |
| 6 | Super Nova | 18 | 6 | 33% |
| 7 | BFC Daugavpils | 17 | 4 | 24% |
| 8 | Riga | 18 | 2 | 11% |
| 9 | Auda | 17 | 1 | 6% |
| 10 | Rīgas FS | 17 | 0 | 0% |
Which teams fail to score most often?
FS Jelgava fails to score most often in the league — 49%
Grobiņa is #2 for failed-to-score rate — 46%
FK Liepaja is #3 for failed-to-score rate — 31%
Riga rarely fails to score — 6%
Rīgas FS rarely fails to score — 6%
Auda rarely fails to score — 9%
League Blank Stats
- consists of 10 teams
- League failed-to-score rate: 26%
- Home FTS rate: 25%
- Away FTS rate: 27%
Virsliga (Latvia) — Failed To Score Analysis
In the Virsliga (Latvia), teams fail to score in 52% of matches this season. FS Jelgava fails to score the most, going blank in 49% of their games (17 matches), with 59% at home and 39% away. Riga has the most reliable attack, failing to score in only 6% of games.
Betting Angle — Low-Scoring Markets
A high failed-to-score rate is a strong signal for BTTS No, Under 1.5, and Clean Sheet markets when facing that team. When two high-FTS teams play each other, the Under 1.5 and even the 0-0 Correct Score become statistically viable bets.
Statistics Tables — Latvia
- 1. Liga Failed To Score— Division Underground
- Cup Failed To Score— Division Underground
- Super Cup Failed To Score— Division Silver