1. Liga — Home Advantage

Latvia · 2026

Latvia — 1. Liga 2026 — Detailed Stats

Competition

Home & Away Tables Form Table Home Advantage Away Advantage Draws Predictions

Goals

AVG Total Goals Scored Goals Conceded Clean Sheets BTTS Failed To Score

Over/Under

Over 0.5 ~ 5.5 Tables Under 0.5 ~ 5.5 Tables

1st Half Table 2nd Half Table Winning / Losing at HT

Home Advantage

#	Team	Home Advantage	Scored	Defence	PPG (Home / Away)
1	Rēzekne FA	+36%	+56%	+17%	0.50/0.00
2	Riga FC II	+23%	+37%	+9%	2.00/0.67
3	Metta / LU	+22%	+32%	+12%	2.75/2.54
4	Tukums II	+15%	-10%	+40%	1.15/0.42
5	JFK Ventspils	+11%	-7%	+29%	0.77/0.75
6	JDFS Alberts	+10%	+8%	+13%	1.92/1.62
7	Skanste	+9%	0%	+17%	1.23/0.83
8	Rīgas FS II	+8%	+6%	+10%	0.67/1.00
9	Smiltene	+6%	+12%	-1%	1.00/0.92
10	Riga Mariners	+5%	+2%	+9%	2.33/2.15
11	Leevon / PPK	-1%	+19%	-20%	2.31/2.00
12	Mārupe	-2%	+9%	-13%	1.23/1.50
13	Valmiera / BSS	-7%	-2%	-12%	2.08/2.46
14	Super Nova 2	-7%	-10%	-4%	1.17/1.15

1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.

2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.

3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.

The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.

Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.

1. Liga (Latvia) — Home Advantage Analysis

In the 1. Liga (Latvia), the average home win rate is 44% compared to 36% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Riga FC II shows the strongest home advantage, winning 62% of home games versus just 8% away (a difference of +53%). At the other end, Valmiera / BSS actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 58% versus 77% on the road.

Home Goals Scored

#	Team	Scoring Advantage	Home Scored / match	Away Scored / match
1	Rēzekne FA	+56%	1.08	0.31
2	Riga FC II	+37%	2.15	1.00
3	Metta / LU	+32%	5.33	2.77
4	Leevon / PPK	+19%	2.31	1.58
5	Smiltene	+12%	1.69	1.33
6	Mārupe	+9%	1.69	1.42
7	JDFS Alberts	+8%	2.25	1.92
8	Rīgas FS II	+6%	1.75	1.54
9	Riga Mariners	+2%	2.58	2.46
10	Skanste	0%	1.92	1.92
11	Valmiera / BSS	-2%	2.58	2.69
12	JFK Ventspils	-7%	1.08	1.25
13	Tukums II	-10%	1.15	1.42
14	Super Nova 2	-10%	1.25	1.54

1. Liga (Latvia) — Home Goals Scored Analysis

Rēzekne FA has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the 1. Liga (Latvia), netting 1.08 goals/match at home versus 0.31 away — a Scoring Advantage of +56%. In contrast, Super Nova 2 scores more away (1.54/match) than at home (1.25/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -10% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.

Home Defence (Conceded)

#	Team	Defence Advantage	Home Conceded / match	Away Conceded / match
1	Tukums II	+40%	1.69	3.92
2	JFK Ventspils	+29%	1.38	2.50
3	Skanste	+17%	1.77	2.50
4	Rēzekne FA	+17%	2.75	3.85
5	JDFS Alberts	+13%	1.25	1.62
6	Metta / LU	+12%	0.67	0.85
7	Rīgas FS II	+10%	2.50	3.08
8	Riga FC II	+9%	1.46	1.75
9	Riga Mariners	+9%	1.17	1.38
10	Smiltene	-1%	2.54	2.50
11	Super Nova 2	-4%	1.67	1.54
12	Valmiera / BSS	-12%	1.17	0.92
13	Mārupe	-13%	1.85	1.42
14	Leevon / PPK	-20%	1.38	0.92

1. Liga (Latvia) — Home Defence Analysis

Tukums II has the best home defensive record in the 1. Liga (Latvia), conceding just 1.69 goals/match at home compared to 3.92 away — a Defence Advantage of +40%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Leevon / PPK concedes more at home (1.38/match) than away (0.92/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.

1st Half — Home Goals Scored

#	Team	Scoring Advantage	Home Scored / match	Away Scored / match
1	Rēzekne FA	+69%	0.42	0.08
2	Metta / LU	+46%	3.33	1.23
3	Riga FC II	+41%	1.00	0.42
4	Mārupe	+30%	0.62	0.33
5	Leevon / PPK	+22%	1.31	0.83
6	Valmiera / BSS	+18%	1.00	0.69
7	Rīgas FS II	+18%	1.00	0.69
8	Super Nova 2	+9%	0.83	0.69
9	JDFS Alberts	+4%	0.83	0.77
10	Smiltene	+2%	0.69	0.67
11	Skanste	+1%	0.85	0.83
12	JFK Ventspils	-10%	0.62	0.75
13	Riga Mariners	-19%	0.83	1.23
14	Tukums II	-24%	0.46	0.75

1. Liga (Latvia) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Rēzekne FA has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 1. Liga (Latvia), netting 0.42 goals/match at home versus 0.08 away — a Scoring Advantage of +69%. At the other end, Tukums II shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.46/match at home against 0.75 away (-24%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.

1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#	Team	Defence Advantage	Home Conceded / match	Away Conceded / match
1	Metta / LU	+69%	0.08	0.46
2	JDFS Alberts	+43%	0.33	0.85
3	Tukums II	+43%	0.92	2.33
4	Rēzekne FA	+42%	0.67	1.62
5	Rīgas FS II	+42%	0.67	1.62
6	Riga FC II	+15%	0.62	0.83
7	Smiltene	+15%	0.92	1.25
8	JFK Ventspils	+9%	0.77	0.92
9	Riga Mariners	+2%	0.67	0.69
10	Leevon / PPK	-7%	0.77	0.67
11	Mārupe	-12%	0.85	0.67
12	Super Nova 2	-14%	0.92	0.69
13	Skanste	-15%	1.23	0.92
14	Valmiera / BSS	-37%	0.50	0.23

1. Liga (Latvia) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Metta / LU has the best home defensive record in the 1. Liga (Latvia), conceding just 0.08 goals/match at home compared to 0.46 away — a Defence Advantage of +69%. Valmiera / BSS struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.50/match at home versus 0.23 away (-37%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.

2nd Half — Home Goals Scored

#	Team	Scoring Advantage	Home Scored / match	Away Scored / match
1	Rēzekne FA	+49%	0.67	0.23
2	Riga FC II	+33%	1.15	0.58
3	Smiltene	+20%	1.00	0.67
4	Riga Mariners	+17%	1.75	1.23
5	Leevon / PPK	+14%	1.00	0.75
6	Metta / LU	+13%	2.00	1.54
7	JDFS Alberts	+10%	1.42	1.15
8	Tukums II	+2%	0.69	0.67
9	Mārupe	0%	1.08	1.08
10	Skanste	0%	1.08	1.08
11	JFK Ventspils	-4%	0.46	0.50
12	Rīgas FS II	-6%	0.75	0.85
13	Valmiera / BSS	-12%	1.58	2.00
14	Super Nova 2	-34%	0.42	0.85

1. Liga (Latvia) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Rēzekne FA has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 1. Liga (Latvia), netting 0.67 goals/match at home versus 0.23 away — a Scoring Advantage of +49%. At the other end, Super Nova 2 shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.42/match at home against 0.85 away (-34%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.

2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#	Team	Defence Advantage	Home Conceded / match	Away Conceded / match
1	Skanste	+49%	0.54	1.58
2	JFK Ventspils	+44%	0.62	1.58
3	Tukums II	+35%	0.77	1.58
4	Riga Mariners	+16%	0.50	0.69
5	Super Nova 2	+6%	0.75	0.85
6	Riga FC II	+4%	0.85	0.92
7	Rēzekne FA	+3%	2.08	2.23
8	Valmiera / BSS	+2%	0.67	0.69
9	JDFS Alberts	-9%	0.92	0.77
10	Rīgas FS II	-11%	1.83	1.46
11	Smiltene	-13%	1.62	1.25
12	Mārupe	-14%	1.00	0.75
13	Metta / LU	-21%	0.58	0.38
14	Leevon / PPK	-42%	0.62	0.25

1. Liga (Latvia) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Skanste has the best home defensive record in the 1. Liga (Latvia), conceding just 0.54 goals/match at home compared to 1.58 away — a Defence Advantage of +49%. Leevon / PPK struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.62/match at home versus 0.25 away (-42%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.

Home Advantage Tables — Latvia

Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
Super Cup Home Advantage— Division Silver
Virsliga Home Advantage— Division Silver