MatchPulse
Virsliga

Virsliga — Under 0.5 ~ 5.5 Tables

Latvia · 2026

Under 2.5 Stats

#TeamMPUnder 2.5%HomeAway
1352263%59%67%
2352160%61%59%
3352057%76%39%
4351749%50%47%
5351646%41%50%
6351440%33%47%
7351440%33%47%
8351337%35%39%
9351234%44%24%
1035926%18%33%

Under 2.5 Insights

League average

45%

Highest rate

Grobiņa
63%

Lowest rate

Riga
26%

Best at home

FS Jelgava
76%

Best away

Grobiņa
67%

Which Virsliga Teams Have The Highest Under 2.5 Rate?

In the 2026 season, Grobiņa lead the Virsliga with a 63% Under 2.5 rate — 22 of their 35 completed fixtures have stayed within the 2.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 59% and away 67%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 45%, putting Grobiņa ahead of the rest.

BFC Daugavpils and FS Jelgava rank second and third respectively. BFC Daugavpils recorded a 60% rate across 35 matches (21 stayed below), while FS Jelgava stand at 57% from 35 outings (20 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 2.5 fixtures in the Virsliga this term.

At the other end, Riga record the lowest Under 2.5 rate in the Virsliga at 26% — only 9 of their 35 fixtures have stayed under 2.5 goals. Their home rate is 18% and away 33%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.

Under 2.5 Betting Angle — Virsliga

With a league-wide Under 2.5 rate of 45%, the Virsliga shows a moderate lean toward compact scoreboards. The top three clubs average 60%, sitting 15 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Grobiņa's fixtures have gone Under 2.5 in 63% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.

Under 0.5 Stats

#TeamMPUnder 0.5%HomeAway
135411%11%12%
23539%11%6%
33539%18%0%
43526%0%11%
53526%0%11%
63526%6%6%
73513%0%6%
83513%6%0%
93513%6%0%
103513%0%6%

Under 0.5 Insights

League average

6%

Highest rate

BFC Daugavpils
11%

Lowest rate

Tukums
3%

Best at home

Grobiņa
18%

Best away

BFC Daugavpils
12%

Which Virsliga Teams Have The Highest Under 0.5 Rate?

In the 2026 season, BFC Daugavpils lead the Virsliga with a 11% Under 0.5 rate — 4 of their 35 completed fixtures have stayed within the 0.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 11% and away 12%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 6%, putting BFC Daugavpils ahead of the rest.

FK Liepaja and Grobiņa rank second and third respectively. FK Liepaja recorded a 9% rate across 35 matches (3 stayed below), while Grobiņa stand at 9% from 35 outings (3 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 0.5 fixtures in the Virsliga this term.

At the other end, Tukums record the lowest Under 0.5 rate in the Virsliga at 3% — only 1 of their 35 fixtures have stayed under 0.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 6%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.

Under 0.5 Betting Angle — Virsliga

With a league-wide Under 0.5 rate of 6%, the Virsliga is not predominantly defensive in character. The top three clubs average 10%, sitting 4 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. BFC Daugavpils's fixtures have gone Under 0.5 in 11% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.

Under 1.5 Stats

#TeamMPUnder 1.5%HomeAway
1351337%44%29%
2351234%47%22%
3351131%41%22%
435926%18%33%
535823%22%24%
635823%17%29%
735823%11%35%
835514%22%6%
935514%6%22%
103539%6%11%

Under 1.5 Insights

League average

23%

Highest rate

BFC Daugavpils
37%

Lowest rate

Tukums
9%

Best at home

FS Jelgava
47%

Best away

Rīgas FS
35%

Which Virsliga Teams Have The Highest Under 1.5 Rate?

In the 2026 season, BFC Daugavpils lead the Virsliga with a 37% Under 1.5 rate — 13 of their 35 completed fixtures have stayed within the 1.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 44% and away 29%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 23%, putting BFC Daugavpils ahead of the rest.

FS Jelgava and Grobiņa rank second and third respectively. FS Jelgava recorded a 34% rate across 35 matches (12 stayed below), while Grobiņa stand at 31% from 35 outings (11 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 1.5 fixtures in the Virsliga this term.

At the other end, Tukums record the lowest Under 1.5 rate in the Virsliga at 9% — only 3 of their 35 fixtures have stayed under 1.5 goals. Their home rate is 6% and away 11%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.

Under 1.5 Betting Angle — Virsliga

With a league-wide Under 1.5 rate of 23%, the Virsliga is not predominantly defensive in character. The top three clubs average 34%, sitting 11 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. BFC Daugavpils's fixtures have gone Under 1.5 in 37% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.

Under 3.5 Stats

#TeamMPUnder 3.5%HomeAway
1353086%82%89%
2352777%83%71%
3352674%78%71%
4352571%65%78%
5352469%82%56%
6352366%67%65%
7352366%71%61%
8352263%39%88%
9351851%61%41%
10351646%41%50%

Under 3.5 Insights

League average

67%

Highest rate

Super Nova
86%

Lowest rate

Riga
46%

Best at home

BFC Daugavpils
83%

Best away

Super Nova
89%

Which Virsliga Teams Have The Highest Under 3.5 Rate?

In the 2026 season, Super Nova lead the Virsliga with a 86% Under 3.5 rate — 30 of their 35 completed fixtures have stayed within the 3.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 82% and away 89%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 67%, putting Super Nova ahead of the rest.

BFC Daugavpils and Auda rank second and third respectively. BFC Daugavpils recorded a 77% rate across 35 matches (27 stayed below), while Auda stand at 74% from 35 outings (26 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 3.5 fixtures in the Virsliga this term.

At the other end, Riga record the lowest Under 3.5 rate in the Virsliga at 46% — only 16 of their 35 fixtures have stayed under 3.5 goals. Their home rate is 41% and away 50%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.

Under 3.5 Betting Angle — Virsliga

With a league-wide Under 3.5 rate of 67%, the Virsliga frequently delivers low-scoring fixtures. The top three clubs average 79%, sitting 12 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Super Nova's fixtures have gone Under 3.5 in 86% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.

Under 4.5 Stats

#TeamMPUnder 4.5%HomeAway
1353291%100%82%
2353291%88%94%
3353086%78%94%
4353086%82%89%
5352880%83%76%
6352880%82%78%
7352777%61%94%
8352674%82%67%
9352571%72%71%
10352469%76%61%

Under 4.5 Insights

League average

81%

Highest rate

BFC Daugavpils
91%

Lowest rate

Riga
69%

Best at home

BFC Daugavpils
100%

Best away

Super Nova
94%

Which Virsliga Teams Have The Highest Under 4.5 Rate?

In the 2026 season, BFC Daugavpils lead the Virsliga with a 91% Under 4.5 rate — 32 of their 35 completed fixtures have stayed within the 4.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 100% and away 82%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 81%, putting BFC Daugavpils ahead of the rest.

Super Nova and FK Liepaja rank second and third respectively. Super Nova recorded a 91% rate across 35 matches (32 stayed below), while FK Liepaja stand at 86% from 35 outings (30 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 4.5 fixtures in the Virsliga this term.

At the other end, Riga record the lowest Under 4.5 rate in the Virsliga at 69% — only 24 of their 35 fixtures have stayed under 4.5 goals. Their home rate is 76% and away 61%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.

Under 4.5 Betting Angle — Virsliga

With a league-wide Under 4.5 rate of 81%, the Virsliga frequently delivers low-scoring fixtures. The top three clubs average 89%, sitting 8 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. BFC Daugavpils's fixtures have gone Under 4.5 in 91% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.

Under 5.5 Stats

#TeamMPUnder 5.5%HomeAway
1353497%100%94%
2353497%94%100%
3353394%89%100%
4353394%94%94%
5353291%94%88%
6353291%94%89%
7353189%94%83%
8353189%88%89%
9352983%88%78%
10352983%72%94%

Under 5.5 Insights

League average

91%

Highest rate

BFC Daugavpils
97%

Lowest rate

Rīgas FS
83%

Best at home

BFC Daugavpils
100%

Best away

FK Liepaja
100%

Which Virsliga Teams Have The Highest Under 5.5 Rate?

In the 2026 season, BFC Daugavpils lead the Virsliga with a 97% Under 5.5 rate — 34 of their 35 completed fixtures have stayed within the 5.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 100% and away 94%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 91%, putting BFC Daugavpils ahead of the rest.

FK Liepaja and Auda rank second and third respectively. FK Liepaja recorded a 97% rate across 35 matches (34 stayed below), while Auda stand at 94% from 35 outings (33 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 5.5 fixtures in the Virsliga this term.

At the other end, Rīgas FS record the lowest Under 5.5 rate in the Virsliga at 83% — only 29 of their 35 fixtures have stayed under 5.5 goals. Their home rate is 72% and away 94%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.

Under 5.5 Betting Angle — Virsliga

With a league-wide Under 5.5 rate of 91%, the Virsliga frequently delivers low-scoring fixtures. The top three clubs average 96%, sitting 5 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. BFC Daugavpils's fixtures have gone Under 5.5 in 97% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.