1. Liga — Failed To Score
Latvia · 2026
Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | FTS% | Home% | Away% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | 12 | 48% | 25% | 69% | |
| 2 | 25 | 10 | 40% | 54% | 25% | |
| 3 | 25 | 7 | 28% | 23% | 33% | |
| 4 | 25 | 7 | 28% | 31% | 25% | |
| 5 | 25 | 7 | 28% | 31% | 25% | |
| 6 | 25 | 6 | 24% | 8% | 42% | |
| 7 | 25 | 6 | 24% | 8% | 38% | |
| 8 | 25 | 5 | 20% | 15% | 25% | |
| 9 | 25 | 5 | 20% | 15% | 25% | |
| 10 | 25 | 4 | 16% | 33% | 0% | |
| 11 | 25 | 2 | 8% | 17% | 0% | |
| 12 | 25 | 2 | 8% | 0% | 15% | |
| 13 | 25 | 1 | 4% | 0% | 8% | |
| 14 | 25 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Home / Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | 7 | 54% | |
| 2 | 12 | 4 | 33% | |
| 3 | 13 | 4 | 31% | |
| 4 | 13 | 4 | 31% | |
| 5 | 12 | 3 | 25% | |
| 6 | 13 | 3 | 23% | |
| 7 | 12 | 2 | 17% | |
| 8 | 13 | 2 | 15% | |
| 9 | 13 | 2 | 15% | |
| 10 | 13 | 1 | 8% | |
| 11 | 12 | 1 | 8% | |
| 12 | 12 | 0 | 0% | |
| 13 | 12 | 0 | 0% | |
| 14 | 12 | 0 | 0% |
Away / Failed To Score
| # | Team | MP | FTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | 9 | 69% | |
| 2 | 12 | 5 | 42% | |
| 3 | 13 | 5 | 38% | |
| 4 | 12 | 4 | 33% | |
| 5 | 12 | 3 | 25% | |
| 6 | 12 | 3 | 25% | |
| 7 | 12 | 3 | 25% | |
| 8 | 12 | 3 | 25% | |
| 9 | 12 | 3 | 25% | |
| 10 | 13 | 2 | 15% | |
| 11 | 13 | 1 | 8% | |
| 12 | 13 | 0 | 0% | |
| 13 | 13 | 0 | 0% | |
| 14 | 13 | 0 | 0% |
Which teams fail to score most often?
Rēzekne FA fails to score most often in the league — 48%
JFK Ventspils is #2 for failed-to-score rate — 40%
Smiltene is #3 for failed-to-score rate — 28%
Metta / LU rarely fails to score — 0%
Riga Mariners rarely fails to score — 4%
Valmiera / BSS rarely fails to score — 8%
League Blank Stats
- consists of 14 teams
- League failed-to-score rate: 21%
- Home FTS rate: 19%
- Away FTS rate: 23%
1. Liga (Latvia) — Failed To Score Analysis
In the 1. Liga (Latvia), teams fail to score in 42% of matches this season. Rēzekne FA fails to score the most, going blank in 48% of their games (12 matches), with 25% at home and 69% away. Metta / LU has the most reliable attack, failing to score in only 0% of games.
Betting Angle — Low-Scoring Markets
A high failed-to-score rate is a strong signal for BTTS No, Under 1.5, and Clean Sheet markets when facing that team. When two high-FTS teams play each other, the Under 1.5 and even the 0-0 Correct Score become statistically viable bets.
Statistics Tables — Latvia
- Cup Failed To Score— Division Underground
- Super Cup Failed To Score— Division Silver
- Virsliga Failed To Score— Division Silver