FA Cup — Under 0.5 ~ 5.5 Tables
China · 2026/27
Under 2.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 2.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 2 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 4 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 7 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 8 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 9 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 10 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 11 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 12 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 13 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 14 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 15 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 17 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 18 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 19 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 20 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 21 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 22 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 23 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 24 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 25 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 26 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 27 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 28 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 29 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 30 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 31 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 32 | 4 | 3 | 75% | 100% | 67% | |
| 33 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 100% | 0% | |
| 34 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 67% | 0% | |
| 35 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 100% | |
| 36 | 4 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 37 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 38 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 39 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 40 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 41 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 42 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 43 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 44 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 45 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 46 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 47 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 48 | 5 | 2 | 40% | 67% | 0% | |
| 49 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 100% | 0% | |
| 50 | 4 | 1 | 25% | 33% | 0% | |
| 51 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 54 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 56 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 57 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 2.5 Insights
League average
61%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which FA Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 2.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Chongqing Tongliang Long lead the FA Cup with a 100% Under 2.5 rate — 3 of their 3 completed fixtures have stayed within the 2.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 100% and away 100%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 57%, putting Chongqing Tongliang Long ahead of the rest.
Langfang Glory City and Qingdao Red Lions rank second and third respectively. Langfang Glory City recorded a 100% rate across 3 matches (3 stayed below), while Qingdao Red Lions stand at 100% from 3 outings (3 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 2.5 fixtures in the FA Cup this term.
At the other end, Shanghai Zetian record the lowest Under 2.5 rate in the FA Cup at 0% — only 0 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 2.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 2.5 Betting Angle — FA Cup
With a league-wide Under 2.5 rate of 57%, the FA Cup frequently delivers low-scoring fixtures. The top three clubs average 100%, sitting 43 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Chongqing Tongliang Long's fixtures have gone Under 2.5 in 100% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 0.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 0.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 6 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 7 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 8 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 9 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 10 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 11 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 12 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 13 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 14 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 16 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 17 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 18 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 19 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 20 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 21 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 22 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 23 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 24 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 25 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 26 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 27 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 28 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 29 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 32 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 33 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 34 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 35 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 36 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 37 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 38 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | 5 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 51 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 54 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 56 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 57 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 0.5 Insights
League average
7%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which FA Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 0.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Qingdao Red Lions lead the FA Cup with a 33% Under 0.5 rate — 1 of their 3 completed fixtures have stayed within the 0.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 50% and away 0%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 2%, putting Qingdao Red Lions ahead of the rest.
Beijing Guoan and Chongqing Tongliang Long rank second and third respectively. Beijing Guoan recorded a 0% rate across 3 matches (0 stayed below), while Chongqing Tongliang Long stand at 0% from 3 outings (0 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 0.5 fixtures in the FA Cup this term.
At the other end, Yunnan Yukun record the lowest Under 0.5 rate in the FA Cup at 0% — only 0 of their 4 fixtures have stayed under 0.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 0.5 Betting Angle — FA Cup
With a league-wide Under 0.5 rate of 2%, the FA Cup is not predominantly defensive in character. The top three clubs average 11%, sitting 9 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Qingdao Red Lions's fixtures have gone Under 0.5 in 33% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 1.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 1.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 10 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 13 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 67% | 0% | |
| 14 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 15 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 16 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 17 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 18 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 19 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 20 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 21 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 22 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 23 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 50% | |
| 24 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 50% | 0% | |
| 25 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 0% | 50% | |
| 26 | 4 | 1 | 25% | 25% | 0% | |
| 27 | 4 | 1 | 25% | 100% | 0% | |
| 28 | 4 | 1 | 25% | 33% | 0% | |
| 29 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 30 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 31 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 32 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 33 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 34 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 35 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 36 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 37 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 38 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 39 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 40 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 41 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 42 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 43 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 44 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 45 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 46 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 47 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 48 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 49 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 50 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 51 | 5 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 52 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 53 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 54 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 55 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 56 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 57 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 1.5 Insights
League average
26%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which FA Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 1.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Qingdao Red Lions lead the FA Cup with a 100% Under 1.5 rate — 3 of their 3 completed fixtures have stayed within the 1.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 100% and away 100%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 21%, putting Qingdao Red Lions ahead of the rest.
Shanghai Second and Chongqing Tongliang Long rank second and third respectively. Shanghai Second recorded a 67% rate across 3 matches (2 stayed below), while Chongqing Tongliang Long stand at 33% from 3 outings (1 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 1.5 fixtures in the FA Cup this term.
At the other end, Xi'an Ronghai record the lowest Under 1.5 rate in the FA Cup at 0% — only 0 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 1.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 1.5 Betting Angle — FA Cup
With a league-wide Under 1.5 rate of 21%, the FA Cup is not predominantly defensive in character. The top three clubs average 67%, sitting 46 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Qingdao Red Lions's fixtures have gone Under 1.5 in 100% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 3.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 3.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 4 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 2 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 4 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 9 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 10 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 11 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 12 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 13 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 14 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 15 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 16 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 17 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 18 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 19 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 20 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 21 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 22 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 23 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 24 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 25 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 26 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 27 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 28 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 29 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 30 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 31 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 32 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 33 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 34 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 35 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 36 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 37 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 38 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 39 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 40 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 41 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 42 | 4 | 3 | 75% | 100% | 67% | |
| 43 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 100% | |
| 44 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 100% | 0% | |
| 45 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 100% | |
| 46 | 5 | 3 | 60% | 100% | 0% | |
| 47 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 48 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 49 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 50 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 51 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 52 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 53 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 54 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 55 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 100% | 0% | |
| 56 | 4 | 1 | 25% | 33% | 0% | |
| 57 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 58 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 59 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 60 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 61 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 3.5 Insights
League average
74%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which FA Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 3.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Dalian Kewei lead the FA Cup with a 100% Under 3.5 rate — 4 of their 4 completed fixtures have stayed within the 3.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 100% and away 0%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 74%, putting Dalian Kewei ahead of the rest.
Chongqing Tongliang Long and Langfang Glory City rank second and third respectively. Chongqing Tongliang Long recorded a 100% rate across 3 matches (3 stayed below), while Langfang Glory City stand at 100% from 3 outings (3 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 3.5 fixtures in the FA Cup this term.
At the other end, Shanghai Zetian record the lowest Under 3.5 rate in the FA Cup at 0% — only 0 of their 3 fixtures have stayed under 3.5 goals. Their home rate is 0% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 3.5 Betting Angle — FA Cup
With a league-wide Under 3.5 rate of 74%, the FA Cup frequently delivers low-scoring fixtures. The top three clubs average 100%, sitting 26 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Dalian Kewei's fixtures have gone Under 3.5 in 100% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 4.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 4.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 4 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 2 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 4 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 10 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 11 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 12 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 13 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 14 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 15 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 16 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 17 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 18 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 19 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 20 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 21 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 22 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 23 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 24 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 25 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 26 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 27 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 28 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 29 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 30 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 31 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 32 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 33 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 34 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 35 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 36 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 37 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 38 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 39 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 40 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 41 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 42 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 43 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 44 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 45 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 46 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 47 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 48 | 5 | 4 | 80% | 100% | 50% | |
| 49 | 4 | 3 | 75% | 100% | 67% | |
| 50 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 100% | 0% | |
| 51 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 100% | 50% | |
| 52 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 0% | 100% | |
| 53 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 54 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 55 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 50% | 0% | |
| 56 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 100% | 0% | |
| 57 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 58 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 59 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 33% | 0% | |
| 60 | 4 | 1 | 25% | 33% | 0% | |
| 61 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 62 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 4.5 Insights
League average
84%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which FA Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 4.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Dalian Kewei lead the FA Cup with a 100% Under 4.5 rate — 4 of their 4 completed fixtures have stayed within the 4.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 100% and away 0%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 81%, putting Dalian Kewei ahead of the rest.
Beijing Guoan and Chongqing Tongliang Long rank second and third respectively. Beijing Guoan recorded a 100% rate across 3 matches (3 stayed below), while Chongqing Tongliang Long stand at 100% from 3 outings (3 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 4.5 fixtures in the FA Cup this term.
At the other end, Yunnan Yukun record the lowest Under 4.5 rate in the FA Cup at 25% — only 1 of their 4 fixtures have stayed under 4.5 goals. Their home rate is 33% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 4.5 Betting Angle — FA Cup
With a league-wide Under 4.5 rate of 81%, the FA Cup frequently delivers low-scoring fixtures. The top three clubs average 100%, sitting 19 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Dalian Kewei's fixtures have gone Under 4.5 in 100% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.
Under 5.5 Stats
| # | Team | MP | Under 5.5 | % | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 5 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 4 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 10 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 11 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 12 | 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 13 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 14 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 15 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 16 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 17 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 18 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 19 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 20 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 21 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 22 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 23 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 24 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 25 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 26 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 27 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 28 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 29 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 30 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| 31 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 32 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 33 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 34 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 35 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 36 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 37 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 38 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 39 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 40 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 41 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 42 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 43 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 44 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 45 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 46 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 47 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 48 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 49 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 50 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 51 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 52 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 53 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 54 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 100% | |
| 55 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | |
| 56 | 4 | 3 | 75% | 100% | 67% | |
| 57 | 3 | 2 | 67% | 100% | 0% | |
| 58 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
| 59 | 2 | 1 | 50% | 0% | 100% | |
| 60 | 3 | 1 | 33% | 33% | 0% | |
| 61 | 4 | 1 | 25% | 33% | 0% | |
| 62 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 63 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| 64 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Under 5.5 Insights
League average
90%
Highest rate
Lowest rate
Best at home
Best away
Which FA Cup Teams Have The Highest Under 5.5 Rate?
In the 2026 season, Rizhao Yuqi lead the FA Cup with a 100% Under 5.5 rate — 5 of their 5 completed fixtures have stayed within the 5.5-goal threshold. At home that figure reaches 100% and away 100%, illustrating a consistent pattern of low-scoring games. The league average sits at 87%, putting Rizhao Yuqi ahead of the rest.
Dalian Kewei and Beijing Guoan rank second and third respectively. Dalian Kewei recorded a 100% rate across 4 matches (4 stayed below), while Beijing Guoan stand at 100% from 3 outings (3 stayed below). Together, these three clubs set the benchmark for Under 5.5 fixtures in the FA Cup this term.
At the other end, Yunnan Yukun record the lowest Under 5.5 rate in the FA Cup at 25% — only 1 of their 4 fixtures have stayed under 5.5 goals. Their home rate is 33% and away 0%, making their matches more open-ended than most in the competition this season.
Under 5.5 Betting Angle — FA Cup
With a league-wide Under 5.5 rate of 87%, the FA Cup frequently delivers low-scoring fixtures. The top three clubs average 100%, sitting 13 points above the league mean — a meaningful spread that rewards targeting specific match-ups. Rizhao Yuqi's fixtures have gone Under 5.5 in 100% of cases this term, making their games among the most reliable for low-goal markets in the competition.