FA Cup — Home Advantage
China · 2026/27
China — FA Cup 2026/27 — Detailed Stats
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Chongqing Tongliang Long | +67% | +33% | +100% | 3.00/1.50 |
| 2 |  Dalian Zhixing | +38% | -25% | +100% | 3.00/0.67 |
| 3 |  Rizhao Yuqi | +15% | -20% | +50% | 2.33/1.50 |
| 4 |  Shanghai Shenhua | +13% | +60% | -33% | 3.00/1.50 |
| 5 |  Beijing Guoan | +10% | +20% | 0% | 3.00/3.00 |
| 6 |  Wuhan Three Towns | 0% | +100% | -100% | 1.00/1.00 |
| 7 |  Shaanxi Union | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.00/1.50 |
| 8 |  Yunnan Yukun | -10% | -20% | 0% | 2.33/3.00 |
| 9 |  Qingdao Red Lions | -17% | -33% | 0% | 2.00/3.00 |
| 10 |  SHANGHAI SIPG | -38% | -43% | -33% | 1.00/3.00 |
| 11 |  Suzhou Dongwu | -50% | 0% | -100% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 12 |  Hebei Kungfu | -50% | 0% | -100% | 0.00/1.00 |
| 13 |  Wuxi Wugou | -50% | 0% | -100% | 1.00/3.00 |
| 14 |  Shenzhen Juniors | -50% | 0% | -100% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 15 |  Guangzhou E-Power | -50% | 0% | -100% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 16 |  Guangzhou Dandelion | -50% | 0% | -100% | 0.00/1.00 |
| 17 |  Henan Jianye | -67% | -33% | -100% | 1.00/3.00 |
| 18 |  Xi'an Ronghai | -67% | -33% | -100% | 1.00/3.00 |
| 19 |  Langfang Glory City | -67% | -33% | -100% | 2.00/3.00 |
| 20 |  Ningbo Professional | -67% | -100% | -33% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 21 |  Shandong Luneng | -75% | -100% | -50% | 0.00/2.00 |
| 22 |  Jiangxi Liansheng | -87% | -75% | -100% | 1.50/3.00 |
| 23 |  Guangxi Hengchen | -100% | -100% | -100% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 24 |  Shenzhen 2028 | -100% | -100% | -100% | 0.00/3.00 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wuhan Three Towns | +100% | 2.00 | 0.00 |
| 2 | Shanghai Shenhua | +60% | 4.00 | 1.00 |
| 3 | Chongqing Tongliang Long | +33% | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| 4 | Beijing Guoan | +20% | 3.00 | 2.00 |
| 5 | Suzhou Dongwu | 0% | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| 6 | Hebei Kungfu | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | Wuxi Wugou | 0% | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| 8 | Shenzhen Juniors | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 9 | Guangzhou E-Power | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 10 | Shaanxi Union | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 11 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 12 | Rizhao Yuqi | -20% | 1.67 | 2.50 |
| 13 | Yunnan Yukun | -20% | 2.67 | 4.00 |
| 14 | Dalian Zhixing | -25% | 1.00 | 1.67 |
| 15 | Henan Jianye | -33% | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| 16 | Qingdao Red Lions | -33% | 0.50 | 1.00 |
| 17 | Xi'an Ronghai | -33% | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| 18 | Langfang Glory City | -33% | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| 19 | SHANGHAI SIPG | -43% | 1.00 | 2.50 |
| 20 | Jiangxi Liansheng | -75% | 1.00 | 7.00 |
| 21 | Shandong Luneng | -100% | 0.00 | 3.50 |
| 22 | Guangxi Hengchen | -100% | 0.00 | 4.00 |
| 23 | Shenzhen 2028 | -100% | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 24 | Ningbo Professional | -100% | 0.00 | 4.00 |
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chongqing Tongliang Long | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| 2 | Dalian Zhixing | +100% | 0.00 | 2.00 |
| 3 | Rizhao Yuqi | +50% | 0.67 | 2.00 |
| 4 | Beijing Guoan | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 5 | Qingdao Red Lions | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | Yunnan Yukun | 0% | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| 7 | Shaanxi Union | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 8 | Shanghai Shenhua | -33% | 1.00 | 0.50 |
| 9 | SHANGHAI SIPG | -33% | 1.00 | 0.50 |
| 10 | Ningbo Professional | -33% | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| 11 | Shandong Luneng | -50% | 3.00 | 1.00 |
| 12 | Henan Jianye | -100% | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| 13 | Jiangxi Liansheng | -100% | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| 14 | Suzhou Dongwu | -100% | 4.00 | 0.00 |
| 15 | Wuhan Three Towns | -100% | 2.00 | 0.00 |
| 16 | Hebei Kungfu | -100% | 2.00 | 0.00 |
| 17 | Wuxi Wugou | -100% | 2.00 | 0.00 |
| 18 | Xi'an Ronghai | -100% | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| 19 | Shenzhen Juniors | -100% | 3.00 | 0.00 |
| 20 | Guangxi Hengchen | -100% | 5.00 | 0.00 |
| 21 | Guangzhou E-Power | -100% | 2.00 | 0.00 |
| 22 | Langfang Glory City | -100% | 0.50 | 0.00 |
| 23 | Guangzhou Dandelion | -100% | 2.00 | 0.00 |
| 24 | Shenzhen 2028 | -100% | 2.00 | 0.00 |
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rizhao Yuqi | +33% | 1.00 | 0.50 |
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rizhao Yuqi | +20% | 0.33 | 0.50 |
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rizhao Yuqi | -50% | 0.67 | 2.00 |
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rizhao Yuqi | +64% | 0.33 | 1.50 |
Home Advantage Tables — China
- League One Home Advantage— Division Gold
- League Two Home Advantage— Division Pro
- Super Cup Home Advantage— Division Premium
- Super League Home Advantage— Division Premium