FA Cup — Home & Away Tables
China · 2026/27
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Dalian Kewei | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 9 | WWWL | 2.25 | 50% | 50% | 1.50 | 75% | 50% | 2.25 | |
| 2 |  Rizhao Yuqi | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | +3 | 7 | WDW | 2.33 | 33% | 67% | 1.67 | 100% | 33% | 2.33 | |
| 3 |  Yunnan Yukun | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 33% | 67% | 2.67 | 67% | 67% | 4.67 | |
| 4 |  Shanghai Second | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 6 | WWL | 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 1.00 | 33% | 33% | 1.67 | |
| 5 |  Shanghai Zetian | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 | WWL | 2.00 | 0% | 67% | 2.67 | 100% | 100% | 5.33 | |
| 6 |  Guizhou Xufengtang | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 1.50 | |
| 7 |  Langfang Glory City | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 1.00 | 50% | 0% | 1.50 | |
| 8 |  Qingdao Red Lions | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 0.50 | |
| 9 |  Shanghai Shenhua | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 100% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 10 |  Beijing Guoan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 100% | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 11 |  Chongqing Tongliang Long | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 12 |  Dalian Zhixing | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 13 |  Beijing Pengrui | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | |
| 14 |  Jiangxi Liansheng | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 15 |  Yulin Miners | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 16 |  Wuhan Lianzhen | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 0.50 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 17 |  Xi'an Ronghai | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 18 |  Wuxi Wugou | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 19 |  Wuhan Three Towns | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 20 |  Shaanxi Union | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 21 |  SHANGHAI SIPG | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 22 |  Henan Jianye | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 23 |  Yunnan Cuanhe | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 24 |  Liaocheng Legend | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 50% | 3.50 | |
| 25 |  Hubei Chufeng Heli | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 0.00 | 50% | 50% | 2.00 | |
| 26 |  Guangzhou E-Power | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 27 |  Xiamen Chengyi | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 28 |  Chongqing Handa | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 29 |  Suzhou Dongwu | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 30 |  Shenzhen Juniors | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 31 |  Ningxia Pingluo | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 32 |  Hebei Kungfu | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 33 |  Guangzhou Dandelion | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 34 |  Shenzhen 2028 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 35 |  Ningbo Professional | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 36 |  Qingdao Fuli | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 37 |  Guangdong Shudihong | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 38 |  Shandong Luneng | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 39 |  Guangxi Hengchen | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 40 |  Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | -7 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 100% | 7.00 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Are The Best Teams Playing at Home?
Shanghai Shenhua is performing extremely well at home. Their home game win percentage is 100%.
Beijing Guoan is within the top 3 teams that perform well at home, with a home game win ratio of 100%.
Chongqing Tongliang Long is within the top 3 teams that perform well at home, with a home game win ratio of 100%.
Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong is one of the most poorly performing teams at home fixtures — within the bottom 3. Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong has a home game win ratio of 0%.
Guangxi Hengchen is one of the most poorly performing teams at home fixtures — within the bottom 3. Guangxi Hengchen has a home game win ratio of 0%.
Shandong Luneng has the lowest home game win percentage of all teams with 0%.
- •FA Cup (China) Home Table consists of 40 teams that have each played an average of 1.5 matches at home venues.
- •Home win % in the FA Cup is 36%
- •Home teams in the FA Cup score an average of 1.11 goals per game, while they concede 1.51 per match at home games.
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHANGHAI SIPG | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 50% | 50% | 2.50 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 2 | Beijing Guoan | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 3 | Shandong Luneng | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | +5 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 3.50 | 100% | 100% | 4.50 | |
| 4 |  Chengdu Better City | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | +4 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 3.50 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 5 |  Sichuan Jiuniu | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 50% | 3.00 | |
| 6 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | +7 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 7.00 | 100% | 100% | 7.00 | |
| 7 | Guangxi Hengchen | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 4.00 | |
| 8 | Ningbo Professional | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 100% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 5.00 | |
| 9 | Yunnan Yukun | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 100% | 4.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 10 | Xi'an Ronghai | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 11 | Henan Jianye | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 12 | Langfang Glory City | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 13 | Suzhou Dongwu | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 14 | Wuxi Wugou | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 15 | Rizhao Yuqi | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 0% | 100% | 2.50 | 100% | 100% | 4.50 | |
| 16 | Chongqing Tongliang Long | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 1.00 | 50% | 0% | 1.50 | |
| 17 | Shanghai Shenhua | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 1.00 | 50% | 0% | 1.50 | |
| 18 | Guangzhou E-Power | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 19 | Shenzhen Juniors | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 20 | Shenzhen 2028 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 21 | Qingdao Red Lions | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 1.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 22 | Shaanxi Union | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | WL | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 23 | Dalian Zhixing | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 2 | DDL | 0.67 | 0% | 100% | 1.67 | 100% | 33% | 3.67 | |
| 24 |  Changchun Yatai | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 25 |  Hangzhou Greentown | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 26 |  BIT | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 27 |  Tianjin Teda | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 28 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 29 |  Nantong Haimen Codion | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 30 | Wuhan Three Towns | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 31 | Hebei Kungfu | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | |
| 32 |  Qingdao Youth Island | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 0.50 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 33 |  Qingdao Jonoon | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 0% | 100% | 1.50 | 100% | 100% | 4.50 | |
| 34 |  Meizhou Kejia | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 35 |  Nantong Zhiyun | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 36 |  Guizhou Zhucheng | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 37 |  Tai'an Tiankuang | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 1.00 | 100% | 100% | 3.00 | |
| 38 |  Xiamen Feilu | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 39 |  Nanjing City | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 40 |  Yanbian Longding | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 41 |  Shenyang Urban | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 42 |  Guangdong Mingtu | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 43 |  Dongguan United | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 1.00 | |
| 44 |  Changchun Xidu | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 45 |  Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 2.00 | 100% | 100% | 6.00 | |
| 46 |  Dalian Huayi | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 47 |  Shangyu Pterosaur | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 | |
| 48 |  Yichun Grand Tiger | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 0.00 | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Are The Best Teams Playing Away From Home?
SHANGHAI SIPG is performing extremely well away from home. Their away game win percentage is 100%.
Beijing Guoan is within the top 3 teams that perform well away, with an away game win ratio of 100%.
Jiangxi Liansheng is within the top 3 teams that perform well away, with an away game win ratio of 100%.
Yichun Grand Tiger is one of the most poorly performing teams away from home — within the bottom 3. Yichun Grand Tiger has an away game win ratio of 0%.
Shangyu Pterosaur is one of the most poorly performing teams away from home — within the bottom 3. Shangyu Pterosaur has an away game win ratio of 0%.
Dalian Huayi has the lowest away game win percentage of all teams with 0%.
- •FA Cup (China) Away Table consists of 48 teams that have each played an average of 1.3 matches away from home.
- •Away win % in the FA Cup is 39%
- •Away teams in the FA Cup score an average of 1.51 goals per game, while they concede 1.11 per match away from home.
FA Cup (China) Home and Away Table Insights
61 home fixtures have been played so far in the FA Cup (China). As it stands right now, Shanghai Shenhua, Beijing Guoan and Chongqing Tongliang Long are the top 3 best performers at home, with win percentages of 100%, 100% and 100% respectively. Home teams in the FA Cup score an average of 1.11 goals per match while conceding 1.51, giving a combined average of 2.62 total goals per game — making Over 2.5 goals the most common outcome in home fixtures. The BTTS rate at home stands at 44% while 28% of home matches end in a Clean Sheet. At the other end of the home table, Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong and Guangxi Hengchen have struggled at home with win rates of just 0% and 0%.
Meanwhile, the FA Cup away table tells a slightly different story. SHANGHAI SIPG, Beijing Guoan and Jiangxi Liansheng have been the standout performers on the road, with away win rates of 100%, 100% and 100%. Away teams in the FA Cup score 1.51 goals per game and concede 1.11 — a combined 2.62 total goals per match, favouring Over 2.5 goals in away matches. BTTS is recorded in 44% of away fixtures, while 34% end in a Clean Sheet for the visiting side. Yichun Grand Tiger and Shangyu Pterosaur have found life on the road particularly difficult, with away win percentages of just 0% and 0% respectively.
Home & Away Tables — China
- League One Home & Away Tables— Division Gold
- League Two Home & Away Tables— Division Pro
- Super Cup Home & Away Tables— Division Premium
- Super League Home & Away Tables— Division Premium