FA Cup — 1st Half Table
China · 2026/27
China — FA Cup 2026/27 — Detailed Stats
Leader:SHANGHAI SIPG — 9ptsLeague Avg:1.32 goals
Highest Avg:Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong (5.00)
Lowest Avg:Wuhan Lianzhen (0.00)Overall / Half-Time Table
| # | Team | MP | W-D-L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 (HT) | PPG (HT) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHANGHAI SIPG | 3 | 3-0-0 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 9 | WWW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 33% | 0% | 1.33 |
| 2 |  Beijing Guoan | 3 | 3-0-0 | 3 | 0 | +3 | 9 | WWW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 3 |  Rizhao Yuqi | 5 | 2-2-1 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 8 | LDDWW | 1.60 | 60% | 20% | 40% | 80% | 40% | 0% | 1.20 |
| 4 |  Jiangxi Liansheng | 3 | 2-1-0 | 7 | 0 | +7 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 100% | 0% | 33% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 2.33 |
| 5 |  Shanghai Shenhua | 3 | 2-1-0 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 2.00 |
| 6 |  Shaanxi Union | 3 | 2-1-0 | 3 | 0 | +3 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 100% | 0% | 33% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 7 |  Chongqing Tongliang Long | 3 | 2-1-0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 100% | 0% | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0.67 |
| 8 |  Dalian Kewei | 4 | 2-1-1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 7 | LWDW | 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 100% | 25% | 0% | 1.25 |
| 9 |  Yunnan Yukun | 4 | 1-3-0 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 6 | DDDW | 1.50 | 25% | 75% | 25% | 75% | 75% | 75% | 3.25 |
| 10 |  Dalian Zhixing | 4 | 1-3-0 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 6 | DDDW | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 1.75 |
| 11 |  Qingdao Red Lions | 3 | 1-2-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 5 | DDW | 1.67 | 100% | 0% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0.33 |
| 12 |  Shanghai Zetian | 3 | 1-1-1 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 4 | LDW | 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 2.00 |
| 13 |  Chengdu Better City | 2 | 1-1-0 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 2.50 |
| 14 |  Wuhan Three Towns | 2 | 1-1-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 15 |  Shanghai Second | 3 | 1-1-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | LWD | 1.33 | 67% | 0% | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0.67 |
| 16 |  Sichuan Jiuniu | 2 | 1-0-1 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 2.00 |
| 17 |  Ningbo Professional | 2 | 1-0-1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 2.50 |
| 18 |  Wuxi Wugou | 2 | 1-0-1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 2.50 |
| 19 |  Changchun Yatai | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 20 |  Suzhou Dongwu | 2 | 1-0-1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 3.00 |
| 21 |  Guangxi Hengchen | 2 | 1-0-1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 22 |  Beijing Pengrui | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 23 |  Yulin Miners | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 24 |  Shandong Luneng | 3 | 1-0-2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 | LLW | 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | 67% | 0% | 1.67 |
| 25 |  Shenzhen 2028 | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 26 |  Qingdao Jonoon | 2 | 1-0-1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
| 27 |  Shenzhen Juniors | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 2.00 |
| 28 |  Guizhou Xufengtang | 2 | 0-2-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 29 |  Henan Jianye | 2 | 0-2-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 30 | Wuhan Lianzhen | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 31 |  Xi'an Ronghai | 3 | 0-2-1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 2 | DLD | 0.67 | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 32 |  Langfang Glory City | 3 | 0-2-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 2 | LDD | 0.67 | 67% | 0% | 100% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0.33 |
| 33 |  Tai'an Tiankuang | 1 | 0-1-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 34 |  Nantong Zhiyun | 1 | 0-1-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 35 |  Tianjin Teda | 1 | 0-1-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 36 |  Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 1 | 0-1-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 37 |  Ningxia Pingluo | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 38 |  Qingdao Fuli | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 39 |  Dongguan United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 40 |  BIT | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 41 |  Nantong Haimen Codion | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 42 |  Xiamen Feilu | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 43 |  Yunnan Cuanhe | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 44 |  Nanjing City | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 45 |  Guangdong Mingtu | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 46 |  Qingdao Youth Island | 2 | 0-1-1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 47 |  Hebei Kungfu | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 48 |  Guangzhou E-Power | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 49 |  Liaocheng Legend | 2 | 0-1-1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 2.00 |
| 50 |  Hubei Chufeng Heli | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 51 |  Guangzhou Dandelion | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 52 |  Shenyang Urban | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 53 |  Xiamen Chengyi | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 54 |  Hangzhou Greentown | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 55 |  Shangyu Pterosaur | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 56 |  Yichun Grand Tiger | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 57 |  Yanbian Longding | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 58 |  Guizhou Zhucheng | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 59 |  Guangdong Shudihong | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 60 |  Chongqing Handa | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 61 |  Meizhou Kejia | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 62 |  Dalian Huayi | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 63 |  Changchun Xidu | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 64 | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
FA Cup 2026 — Half-Time Table
SHANGHAI SIPG leads the FA Cup first half table overall with 9 points from 3 games (3W-0D-0L), averaging 1.33 goals per game.
Beijing Guoan follows in second place with 9 points. The league average at first half overall is 1.32 goals per game, with Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong recording the highest average at 5.00.
Leader:Dalian Kewei — 7ptsLeague Avg:1.47 goalsHighest Avg:Shanghai Shenhua (5.00)Lowest Avg:Qingdao Red Lions (0.00)Home / Half-Time Table
| # | Team | MP | W-D-L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 (HT) | PPG (HT) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dalian Kewei | 4 | 2-1-1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 7 | LWDW | 1.75 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 100% | 25% | 0% | 1.25 |
| 2 | Rizhao Yuqi | 3 | 1-2-0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 5 | DDW | 1.67 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 67% | 67% | 0% | 1.33 |
| 3 | Shanghai Zetian | 3 | 1-1-1 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 4 | LDW | 1.33 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 2.00 |
| 4 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 2 | 1-1-0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 5 | Shanghai Second | 3 | 1-1-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | LWD | 1.33 | 67% | 0% | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0.67 |
| 6 | Shanghai Shenhua | 1 | 1-0-0 | 4 | 1 | +3 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
| 7 | Chongqing Tongliang Long | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 8 | SHANGHAI SIPG | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 9 | Beijing Guoan | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 10 | Shaanxi Union | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 11 | Wuhan Three Towns | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 12 | Yunnan Yukun | 3 | 0-3-0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | DDD | 1.00 | 33% | 67% | 33% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 2.67 |
| 13 | Beijing Pengrui | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 14 | Yulin Miners | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 15 | Guizhou Xufengtang | 2 | 0-2-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 16 | Qingdao Red Lions | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 17 | Wuhan Lianzhen | 2 | 0-2-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | DD | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 18 | Henan Jianye | 1 | 0-1-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 19 | Yunnan Cuanhe | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 20 | Qingdao Fuli | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 21 | Ningxia Pingluo | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 22 | Dalian Zhixing | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 23 | Xi'an Ronghai | 2 | 0-1-1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 | DL | 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 24 | Langfang Glory City | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 25 | Liaocheng Legend | 2 | 0-1-1 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 2.00 |
| 26 | Hubei Chufeng Heli | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 27 | Suzhou Dongwu | 1 | 0-0-1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
| 28 | Wuxi Wugou | 1 | 0-0-1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 29 | Ningbo Professional | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 30 | Chongqing Handa | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 31 | Xiamen Chengyi | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 32 | Guangzhou E-Power | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 33 | Guangdong Shudihong | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 34 | Hebei Kungfu | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 35 | Guangxi Hengchen | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 36 | Shenzhen 2028 | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 37 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 38 | Shandong Luneng | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 39 | Shenzhen Juniors | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
| 40 | Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
FA Cup 2026 — Home Half-Time Table
Dalian Kewei leads the FA Cup first half table at home with 7 points from 4 games (2W-1D-1L), averaging 1.25 goals per game.
Rizhao Yuqi follows in second place with 5 points. The league average at first half at home is 1.47 goals per game, with Shanghai Shenhua recording the highest average at 5.00.
Leader:SHANGHAI SIPG — 6ptsLeague Avg:1.32 goalsHighest Avg:Jiangxi Liansheng (5.00)Lowest Avg:Xiamen Feilu (0.00)Away / Half-Time Table
| # | Team | MP | W-D-L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Last 5 (HT) | PPG (HT) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHANGHAI SIPG | 2 | 2-0-0 | 3 | 0 | +3 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 2 | Beijing Guoan | 2 | 2-0-0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 6 | WW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 3 | Dalian Zhixing | 3 | 1-2-0 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 5 | DDW | 1.67 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 2.33 |
| 4 | Shaanxi Union | 2 | 1-1-0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 5 | Chengdu Better City | 2 | 1-1-0 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 2.50 |
| 6 | Shanghai Shenhua | 2 | 1-1-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 7 | Chongqing Tongliang Long | 2 | 1-1-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 8 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 1 | 1-0-0 | 5 | 0 | +5 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
| 9 | Ningbo Professional | 1 | 1-0-0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
| 10 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 2 | 1-0-1 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 2.00 |
| 11 | Guangxi Hengchen | 1 | 1-0-0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 12 | Wuxi Wugou | 1 | 1-0-0 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 13 | Yunnan Yukun | 1 | 1-0-0 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 5.00 |
| 14 | Shandong Luneng | 2 | 1-0-1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 15 | Shenzhen Juniors | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 16 | Changchun Yatai | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 17 | Shenzhen 2028 | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 18 | Suzhou Dongwu | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 19 | Qingdao Red Lions | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 20 | Rizhao Yuqi | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 21 | Qingdao Jonoon | 2 | 1-0-1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
| 22 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 1 | 0-1-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 23 | Nantong Zhiyun | 1 | 0-1-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 24 | Tianjin Teda | 1 | 0-1-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 25 | Tai'an Tiankuang | 1 | 0-1-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 26 | Xiamen Feilu | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 27 | Nanjing City | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 28 | Dongguan United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 29 | Hebei Kungfu | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 30 | Nantong Haimen Codion | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 31 | Xi'an Ronghai | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 32 | BIT | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 33 | Guangzhou E-Power | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 34 | Langfang Glory City | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 35 | Guangdong Mingtu | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 36 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 37 | Henan Jianye | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 38 | Wuhan Three Towns | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 39 | Qingdao Youth Island | 2 | 0-1-1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 40 | Guizhou Zhucheng | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 41 | Shangyu Pterosaur | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 42 | Shenyang Urban | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 43 | Hangzhou Greentown | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 44 | Yichun Grand Tiger | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 45 | Yanbian Longding | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 46 | Dalian Huayi | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 47 | Meizhou Kejia | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 48 | Changchun Xidu | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 3.00 |
FA Cup 2026 — Away Half-Time Table
SHANGHAI SIPG leads the FA Cup first half table away with 6 points from 2 games (2W-0D-0L), averaging 1.50 goals per game.
Beijing Guoan follows in second place with 6 points. The league average at first half away is 1.32 goals per game, with Jiangxi Liansheng recording the highest average at 5.00.