National League - National — Home Advantage
New-Zealand · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Napier City Rovers | +62% | +60% | +64% | 2.33/0.00 |
| 2 |  Wellington Phoenix II | +56% | +45% | +66% | 1.33/0.00 |
| 3 |  Auckland United | +44% | +54% | +33% | 2.00/0.67 |
| 4 |  Cashmere Technical | +33% | +33% | +33% | 2.33/2.00 |
| 5 |  Wellington Olympic | +9% | +3% | +14% | 1.50/2.33 |
| 6 |  Auckland FC 2 | +5% | +25% | -16% | 0.33/0.00 |
| 7 |  Auckland City | +2% | +3% | 0% | 2.00/2.33 |
| 8 |  Eastern Suburbs | -1% | +38% | -41% | 0.00/1.33 |
| 9 |  Ferrymead Bays | -21% | -33% | -9% | 0.33/1.00 |
| 10 |  Birkenhead United | -45% | -45% | -45% | 2.00/3.00 |
| 11 |  Miramar | -48% | -71% | -25% | 1.00/3.00 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
National League - National (New-Zealand) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the National League - National (New-Zealand), the average home win rate is 39% compared to 42% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Napier City Rovers shows the strongest home advantage, winning 67% of home games versus just 0% away (a difference of +67%). At the other end, Miramar actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 33% versus 100% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Napier City Rovers | +60% | 2.00 | 0.50 |
| 2 | Auckland United | +54% | 3.33 | 1.00 |
| 3 | Wellington Phoenix II | +45% | 1.33 | 0.50 |
| 4 | Eastern Suburbs | +38% | 1.50 | 0.67 |
| 5 | Cashmere Technical | +33% | 4.67 | 2.33 |
| 6 | Auckland FC 2 | +25% | 1.67 | 1.00 |
| 7 | Auckland City | +3% | 2.50 | 2.33 |
| 8 | Wellington Olympic | +3% | 2.50 | 2.33 |
| 9 | Ferrymead Bays | -33% | 0.33 | 0.67 |
| 10 | Birkenhead United | -45% | 1.33 | 3.50 |
| 11 | Miramar | -71% | 0.67 | 4.00 |
National League - National (New-Zealand) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Napier City Rovers has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the National League - National (New-Zealand), netting 2.00 goals/match at home versus 0.50 away — a Scoring Advantage of +60%. In contrast, Miramar scores more away (4.00/match) than at home (0.67/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -71% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wellington Phoenix II | +66% | 1.33 | 6.50 |
| 2 | Napier City Rovers | +64% | 1.00 | 4.50 |
| 3 | Auckland United | +33% | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| 4 | Cashmere Technical | +33% | 0.33 | 0.67 |
| 5 | Wellington Olympic | +14% | 1.00 | 1.33 |
| 6 | Auckland City | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 7 | Ferrymead Bays | -9% | 2.00 | 1.67 |
| 8 | Auckland FC 2 | -16% | 3.67 | 2.67 |
| 9 | Miramar | -25% | 1.67 | 1.00 |
| 10 | Eastern Suburbs | -41% | 4.00 | 1.67 |
| 11 | Birkenhead United | -45% | 1.33 | 0.50 |
National League - National (New-Zealand) — Home Defence Analysis
Wellington Phoenix II has the best home defensive record in the National League - National (New-Zealand), conceding just 1.33 goals/match at home compared to 6.50 away — a Defence Advantage of +66%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Birkenhead United concedes more at home (1.33/match) than away (0.50/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wellington Phoenix II | +100% | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| 2 | Eastern Suburbs | +100% | 0.50 | 0.00 |
| 3 | Ferrymead Bays | +100% | 0.33 | 0.00 |
| 4 | Auckland United | +50% | 1.00 | 0.33 |
| 5 | Cashmere Technical | +23% | 2.67 | 1.67 |
| 6 | Auckland FC 2 | 0% | 0.67 | 0.67 |
| 7 | Auckland City | -14% | 0.50 | 0.67 |
| 8 | Wellington Olympic | -14% | 1.00 | 1.33 |
| 9 | Napier City Rovers | -20% | 0.33 | 0.50 |
| 10 | Birkenhead United | -64% | 0.33 | 1.50 |
| 11 | Miramar | -71% | 0.33 | 2.00 |
National League - National (New-Zealand) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Wellington Phoenix II has the biggest home scoring advantage in the National League - National (New-Zealand), netting 1.00 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Miramar shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.33/match at home against 2.00 away (-71%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wellington Olympic | +100% | 0.00 | 0.33 |
| 2 | Wellington Phoenix II | +64% | 0.67 | 3.00 |
| 3 | Auckland United | +50% | 0.33 | 1.00 |
| 4 | Napier City Rovers | +38% | 0.67 | 1.50 |
| 5 | Auckland FC 2 | +11% | 1.33 | 1.67 |
| 6 | Cashmere Technical | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | Miramar | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 8 | Ferrymead Bays | -33% | 1.33 | 0.67 |
| 9 | Eastern Suburbs | -50% | 1.00 | 0.33 |
| 10 | Auckland City | -100% | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| 11 | Birkenhead United | -100% | 1.00 | 0.00 |
National League - National (New-Zealand) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Wellington Olympic has the best home defensive record in the National League - National (New-Zealand), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.33 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Birkenhead United struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.00/match at home versus 0.00 away (-100%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Napier City Rovers | +100% | 1.67 | 0.00 |
| 2 | Auckland United | +56% | 2.33 | 0.67 |
| 3 | Cashmere Technical | +50% | 2.00 | 0.67 |
| 4 | Auckland FC 2 | +50% | 1.00 | 0.33 |
| 5 | Eastern Suburbs | +20% | 1.00 | 0.67 |
| 6 | Wellington Olympic | +20% | 1.50 | 1.00 |
| 7 | Auckland City | +9% | 2.00 | 1.67 |
| 8 | Wellington Phoenix II | -20% | 0.33 | 0.50 |
| 9 | Birkenhead United | -33% | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| 10 | Miramar | -71% | 0.33 | 2.00 |
| 11 | Ferrymead Bays | -100% | 0.00 | 0.67 |
National League - National (New-Zealand) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Napier City Rovers has the biggest home scoring advantage in the National League - National (New-Zealand), netting 1.67 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Ferrymead Bays shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.00/match at home against 0.67 away (-100%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Auckland City | +100% | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 2 | Napier City Rovers | +80% | 0.33 | 3.00 |
| 3 | Wellington Phoenix II | +68% | 0.67 | 3.50 |
| 4 | Cashmere Technical | +33% | 0.33 | 0.67 |
| 5 | Auckland United | +20% | 0.67 | 1.00 |
| 6 | Birkenhead United | +20% | 0.33 | 0.50 |
| 7 | Ferrymead Bays | +20% | 0.67 | 1.00 |
| 8 | Wellington Olympic | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 9 | Eastern Suburbs | -38% | 3.00 | 1.33 |
| 10 | Auckland FC 2 | -40% | 2.33 | 1.00 |
| 11 | Miramar | -100% | 0.67 | 0.00 |
National League - National (New-Zealand) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Auckland City has the best home defensive record in the National League - National (New-Zealand), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 1.00 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Miramar struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.67/match at home versus 0.00 away (-100%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — New-Zealand
- Chatham Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- National League - Central Home Advantage— Division Underground
- National League - Championship - Final Home Advantage— Division Underground
- National League - Northern Home Advantage— Division Underground
- National League - Southern Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Premiership Home Advantage— Division Underground