Reykjavik Cup — Home Advantage
Iceland · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Fylkir | +83% | +67% | +100% | 3.00/0.50 |
| 2 |  IR Reykjavik | +20% | +25% | +14% | 2.00/1.50 |
| 3 |  Vikingur Reykjavik | +8% | -50% | +67% | 2.00/3.00 |
| 4 |  Fram Reykjavik | +5% | +43% | -33% | 1.50/1.00 |
| 5 |  Leiknir R. | +2% | +43% | -38% | 0.00/0.50 |
| 6 |  Fjolnir | -2% | -20% | +17% | 0.50/1.50 |
| 7 |  Throttur Reykjavik | -10% | -54% | +33% | 2.00/3.00 |
| 8 |  Valur Reykjavik | -33% | -100% | +33% | 0.00/0.00 |
| 9 |  KR Reykjavik | -40% | +20% | -100% | 1.50/3.00 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
Reykjavik Cup (Iceland) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the Reykjavik Cup (Iceland), the average home win rate is 30% compared to 40% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Fram Reykjavik shows the strongest home advantage, winning 50% of home games versus just 0% away (a difference of +50%). At the other end, Vikingur Reykjavik actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 50% versus 100% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fylkir | +67% | 5.00 | 1.00 |
| 2 | Leiknir R. | +43% | 2.50 | 1.00 |
| 3 | Fram Reykjavik | +43% | 2.50 | 1.00 |
| 4 | IR Reykjavik | +25% | 2.50 | 1.50 |
| 5 | KR Reykjavik | +20% | 3.00 | 2.00 |
| 6 | Fjolnir | -20% | 2.00 | 3.00 |
| 7 | Vikingur Reykjavik | -50% | 1.50 | 4.50 |
| 8 | Throttur Reykjavik | -54% | 1.50 | 5.00 |
| 9 | Valur Reykjavik | -100% | 0.00 | 0.50 |
Reykjavik Cup (Iceland) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Leiknir R. has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Reykjavik Cup (Iceland), netting 2.50 goals/match at home versus 1.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +43%. In contrast, Vikingur Reykjavik scores more away (4.50/match) than at home (1.50/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -50% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fylkir | +100% | 0.00 | 2.50 |
| 2 | Vikingur Reykjavik | +67% | 0.50 | 2.50 |
| 3 | Valur Reykjavik | +33% | 2.00 | 4.00 |
| 4 | Throttur Reykjavik | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 |
| 5 | Fjolnir | +17% | 2.50 | 3.50 |
| 6 | IR Reykjavik | +14% | 1.50 | 2.00 |
| 7 | Fram Reykjavik | -33% | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| 8 | Leiknir R. | -38% | 4.50 | 2.00 |
| 9 | KR Reykjavik | -100% | 3.50 | 0.00 |
Reykjavik Cup (Iceland) — Home Defence Analysis
Vikingur Reykjavik has the best home defensive record in the Reykjavik Cup (Iceland), conceding just 0.50 goals/match at home compared to 2.50 away — a Defence Advantage of +67%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Leiknir R. concedes more at home (4.50/match) than away (2.00/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fjolnir | +100% | 0.50 | 0.00 |
| 2 | IR Reykjavik | +100% | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| 3 | Leiknir R. | +50% | 1.50 | 0.50 |
| 4 | Fram Reykjavik | -33% | 0.50 | 1.00 |
| 5 | Vikingur Reykjavik | -56% | 1.00 | 3.50 |
Reykjavik Cup (Iceland) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Fjolnir has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Reykjavik Cup (Iceland), netting 0.50 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Vikingur Reykjavik shows the weakest home output in this period, with 1.00/match at home against 3.50 away (-56%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IR Reykjavik | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| 2 | Vikingur Reykjavik | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 |
| 3 | Fjolnir | 0% | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| 4 | Fram Reykjavik | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| 5 | Leiknir R. | -60% | 2.00 | 0.50 |
Reykjavik Cup (Iceland) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, IR Reykjavik has the best home defensive record in the Reykjavik Cup (Iceland), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.50 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Leiknir R. struggles most in this period at home, conceding 2.00/match at home versus 0.50 away (-60%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fram Reykjavik | +100% | 2.00 | 0.00 |
| 2 | Leiknir R. | +33% | 1.00 | 0.50 |
| 3 | IR Reykjavik | 0% | 1.50 | 1.50 |
| 4 | Fjolnir | -33% | 1.50 | 3.00 |
| 5 | Vikingur Reykjavik | -33% | 0.50 | 1.00 |
Reykjavik Cup (Iceland) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Fram Reykjavik has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Reykjavik Cup (Iceland), netting 2.00 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Vikingur Reykjavik shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.50/match at home against 1.00 away (-33%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vikingur Reykjavik | +100% | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| 2 | Fjolnir | +50% | 0.50 | 1.50 |
| 3 | IR Reykjavik | 0% | 1.50 | 1.50 |
| 4 | Leiknir R. | -25% | 2.50 | 1.50 |
| 5 | Fram Reykjavik | -50% | 1.50 | 0.50 |
Reykjavik Cup (Iceland) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Vikingur Reykjavik has the best home defensive record in the Reykjavik Cup (Iceland), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 1.50 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Fram Reykjavik struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.50/match at home versus 0.50 away (-50%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Iceland
- 1. Deild Home Advantage— Division Silver
- 2. Deild Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Fotbolti.net Cup A Home Advantage— Division Underground
- League Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Super Cup Home Advantage— Division Gold
- Úrvalsdeild Home Advantage— Division Gold
- Úrvalsdeild Women Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro