1. Deild — Home Advantage
Iceland · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Njardvik | +32% | +38% | +25% | 2.33/0.83 |
| 2 |  HK Kopavogur | +30% | +18% | +42% | 2.58/0.67 |
| 3 |  IR Reykjavik | +23% | +15% | +30% | 1.91/0.64 |
| 4 |  Fylkir | +22% | +19% | +25% | 2.17/1.50 |
| 5 |  Vestri | +20% | +33% | +7% | 1.73/0.73 |
| 6 |  Leiknir R. | +19% | +29% | +9% | 1.82/0.73 |
| 7 |  Grindavik | +18% | -12% | +49% | 1.55/0.73 |
| 8 |  Throttur Reykjavik | +14% | +13% | +15% | 2.42/1.67 |
| 9 |  Völsungur | +11% | +13% | +9% | 1.55/0.82 |
| 10 |  Ægir | +6% | -4% | +16% | 0.36/0.45 |
| 11 |  Afturelding | +4% | +11% | -3% | 2.36/1.73 |
| 12 |  Grotta | -4% | +17% | -26% | 0.91/1.55 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
1. Deild (Iceland) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the 1. Deild (Iceland), the average home win rate is 55% compared to 28% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. HK Kopavogur shows the strongest home advantage, winning 83% of home games versus just 17% away (a difference of +67%). At the other end, Grotta actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 27% versus 45% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Njardvik | +38% | 2.25 | 1.00 |
| 2 | Vestri | +33% | 1.82 | 0.91 |
| 3 | Leiknir R. | +29% | 2.00 | 1.09 |
| 4 | Fylkir | +19% | 2.67 | 1.83 |
| 5 | HK Kopavogur | +18% | 2.75 | 1.92 |
| 6 | Grotta | +17% | 1.91 | 1.36 |
| 7 | IR Reykjavik | +15% | 2.09 | 1.55 |
| 8 | Throttur Reykjavik | +13% | 2.50 | 1.92 |
| 9 | Völsungur | +13% | 1.64 | 1.27 |
| 10 | Afturelding | +11% | 3.27 | 2.64 |
| 11 | Ægir | -4% | 1.09 | 1.18 |
| 12 | Grindavik | -12% | 1.00 | 1.27 |
1. Deild (Iceland) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Njardvik has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the 1. Deild (Iceland), netting 2.25 goals/match at home versus 1.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +38%. In contrast, Grindavik scores more away (1.27/match) than at home (1.00/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -12% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grindavik | +49% | 0.82 | 2.36 |
| 2 | HK Kopavogur | +42% | 1.08 | 2.67 |
| 3 | IR Reykjavik | +30% | 1.45 | 2.73 |
| 4 | Fylkir | +25% | 1.25 | 2.08 |
| 5 | Njardvik | +25% | 1.00 | 1.67 |
| 6 | Ægir | +16% | 2.64 | 3.64 |
| 7 | Throttur Reykjavik | +15% | 0.92 | 1.25 |
| 8 | Leiknir R. | +9% | 1.36 | 1.64 |
| 9 | Völsungur | +9% | 1.82 | 2.18 |
| 10 | Vestri | +7% | 1.82 | 2.09 |
| 11 | Afturelding | -3% | 1.55 | 1.45 |
| 12 | Grotta | -26% | 2.45 | 1.45 |
1. Deild (Iceland) — Home Defence Analysis
Grindavik has the best home defensive record in the 1. Deild (Iceland), conceding just 0.82 goals/match at home compared to 2.36 away — a Defence Advantage of +49%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Grotta concedes more at home (2.45/match) than away (1.45/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leiknir R. | +54% | 0.91 | 0.27 |
| 2 | Grotta | +41% | 1.09 | 0.45 |
| 3 | Vestri | +40% | 0.64 | 0.27 |
| 4 | Throttur Reykjavik | +28% | 1.33 | 0.75 |
| 5 | HK Kopavogur | +20% | 1.25 | 0.83 |
| 6 | Afturelding | +19% | 1.73 | 1.18 |
| 7 | Njardvik | +18% | 1.08 | 0.75 |
| 8 | Fylkir | +13% | 1.08 | 0.83 |
| 9 | IR Reykjavik | +5% | 1.00 | 0.91 |
| 10 | Grindavik | -17% | 0.45 | 0.64 |
| 11 | Völsungur | -17% | 0.45 | 0.64 |
| 12 | Ægir | -17% | 0.45 | 0.64 |
1. Deild (Iceland) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Leiknir R. has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 1. Deild (Iceland), netting 0.91 goals/match at home versus 0.27 away — a Scoring Advantage of +54%. At the other end, Ægir shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.45/match at home against 0.64 away (-17%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grindavik | +71% | 0.27 | 1.64 |
| 2 | HK Kopavogur | +71% | 0.25 | 1.50 |
| 3 | IR Reykjavik | +71% | 0.18 | 1.09 |
| 4 | Fylkir | +53% | 0.33 | 1.08 |
| 5 | Leiknir R. | +29% | 0.45 | 0.82 |
| 6 | Throttur Reykjavik | +27% | 0.33 | 0.58 |
| 7 | Ægir | +10% | 1.27 | 1.55 |
| 8 | Njardvik | +7% | 0.58 | 0.67 |
| 9 | Afturelding | -6% | 0.82 | 0.73 |
| 10 | Völsungur | -27% | 1.27 | 0.73 |
| 11 | Vestri | -33% | 1.27 | 0.64 |
| 12 | Grotta | -40% | 1.27 | 0.55 |
1. Deild (Iceland) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Grindavik has the best home defensive record in the 1. Deild (Iceland), conceding just 0.27 goals/match at home compared to 1.64 away — a Defence Advantage of +71%. Grotta struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.27/match at home versus 0.55 away (-40%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Njardvik | +65% | 1.17 | 0.25 |
| 2 | Vestri | +30% | 1.18 | 0.64 |
| 3 | Völsungur | +30% | 1.18 | 0.64 |
| 4 | IR Reykjavik | +26% | 1.09 | 0.64 |
| 5 | Fylkir | +23% | 1.58 | 1.00 |
| 6 | HK Kopavogur | +16% | 1.50 | 1.08 |
| 7 | Leiknir R. | +14% | 1.09 | 0.82 |
| 8 | Ægir | +8% | 0.64 | 0.55 |
| 9 | Afturelding | +3% | 1.55 | 1.45 |
| 10 | Throttur Reykjavik | 0% | 1.17 | 1.17 |
| 11 | Grotta | -5% | 0.82 | 0.91 |
| 12 | Grindavik | -8% | 0.55 | 0.64 |
1. Deild (Iceland) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Njardvik has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 1. Deild (Iceland), netting 1.17 goals/match at home versus 0.25 away — a Scoring Advantage of +65%. At the other end, Grindavik shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.55/match at home against 0.64 away (-8%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vestri | +45% | 0.55 | 1.45 |
| 2 | Völsungur | +45% | 0.55 | 1.45 |
| 3 | Njardvik | +41% | 0.42 | 1.00 |
| 4 | Ægir | +21% | 1.36 | 2.09 |
| 5 | HK Kopavogur | +17% | 0.83 | 1.17 |
| 6 | Grindavik | +14% | 0.55 | 0.73 |
| 7 | IR Reykjavik | +13% | 1.27 | 1.64 |
| 8 | Throttur Reykjavik | +7% | 0.58 | 0.67 |
| 9 | Fylkir | +4% | 0.92 | 1.00 |
| 10 | Afturelding | 0% | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| 11 | Leiknir R. | -5% | 0.91 | 0.82 |
| 12 | Grotta | -13% | 1.18 | 0.91 |
1. Deild (Iceland) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Vestri has the best home defensive record in the 1. Deild (Iceland), conceding just 0.55 goals/match at home compared to 1.45 away — a Defence Advantage of +45%. Grotta struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.18/match at home versus 0.91 away (-13%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Iceland
- 2. Deild Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Fotbolti.net Cup A Home Advantage— Division Underground
- League Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Reykjavik Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Super Cup Home Advantage— Division Gold
- Úrvalsdeild Home Advantage— Division Gold
- Úrvalsdeild Women Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro