2. Deild — Home Advantage
Iceland · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Magni | +41% | +49% | +33% | 1.82/0.45 |
| 2 |  Thróttur Vogar | +32% | +39% | +24% | 2.00/0.09 |
| 3 |  Vikingur Olafsiik | +28% | +39% | +17% | 1.91/0.91 |
| 4 |  Kári | +22% | 0% | +45% | 2.09/1.73 |
| 5 |  Fjardabyggd / Leiknir | +21% | +22% | +20% | 1.45/1.18 |
| 6 |  Kormákur / Hvöt | +19% | +33% | +5% | 1.45/1.00 |
| 7 |  Dalvík / Reynir | +19% | -8% | +46% | 1.91/0.91 |
| 8 |  Fjolnir | +18% | +2% | +35% | 1.73/1.00 |
| 9 |  Hvíti riddarinn | +16% | +29% | +4% | 1.09/0.45 |
| 10 |  Haukar | +14% | +16% | +13% | 2.55/1.73 |
| 11 |  Selfoss | +11% | +16% | +6% | 2.18/1.91 |
| 12 |  KFG | +11% | +21% | 0% | 1.36/0.64 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
2. Deild (Iceland) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the 2. Deild (Iceland), the average home win rate is 53% compared to 27% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Thróttur Vogar shows the strongest home advantage, winning 64% of home games versus just 0% away (a difference of +64%). At the other end, Fjardabyggd / Leiknir actually performs similarly at home and away, with a home win rate of 45% versus 36% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Magni | +49% | 2.36 | 0.82 |
| 2 | Vikingur Olafsiik | +39% | 2.09 | 0.91 |
| 3 | Thróttur Vogar | +39% | 2.09 | 0.91 |
| 4 | Kormákur / Hvöt | +33% | 2.55 | 1.27 |
| 5 | Hvíti riddarinn | +29% | 1.64 | 0.91 |
| 6 | Fjardabyggd / Leiknir | +22% | 2.82 | 1.82 |
| 7 | KFG | +21% | 2.09 | 1.36 |
| 8 | Selfoss | +16% | 2.91 | 2.09 |
| 9 | Haukar | +16% | 2.91 | 2.09 |
| 10 | Fjolnir | +2% | 2.27 | 2.18 |
| 11 | Kári | 0% | 2.55 | 2.55 |
| 12 | Dalvík / Reynir | -8% | 1.55 | 1.82 |
2. Deild (Iceland) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Magni has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the 2. Deild (Iceland), netting 2.36 goals/match at home versus 0.82 away — a Scoring Advantage of +49%. In contrast, Dalvík / Reynir scores more away (1.82/match) than at home (1.55/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -8% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dalvík / Reynir | +46% | 0.91 | 2.45 |
| 2 | Kári | +45% | 0.73 | 1.91 |
| 3 | Fjolnir | +35% | 1.36 | 2.82 |
| 4 | Magni | +33% | 1.64 | 3.27 |
| 5 | Thróttur Vogar | +24% | 1.45 | 2.36 |
| 6 | Fjardabyggd / Leiknir | +20% | 1.64 | 2.45 |
| 7 | Vikingur Olafsiik | +17% | 1.55 | 2.18 |
| 8 | Haukar | +13% | 1.27 | 1.64 |
| 9 | Selfoss | +6% | 1.55 | 1.73 |
| 10 | Kormákur / Hvöt | +5% | 1.64 | 1.82 |
| 11 | Hvíti riddarinn | +4% | 2.36 | 2.55 |
| 12 | KFG | 0% | 2.64 | 2.64 |
2. Deild (Iceland) — Home Defence Analysis
Dalvík / Reynir has the best home defensive record in the 2. Deild (Iceland), conceding just 0.91 goals/match at home compared to 2.45 away — a Defence Advantage of +46%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, KFG concedes more at home (2.64/match) than away (2.64/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Magni | +43% | 0.91 | 0.36 |
| 2 | Hvíti riddarinn | +40% | 0.64 | 0.27 |
| 3 | Vikingur Olafsiik | +33% | 0.73 | 0.36 |
| 4 | Kormákur / Hvöt | +33% | 1.45 | 0.73 |
| 5 | Thróttur Vogar | +29% | 0.82 | 0.45 |
| 6 | Selfoss | +26% | 1.55 | 0.91 |
| 7 | Fjardabyggd / Leiknir | +19% | 1.45 | 1.00 |
| 8 | Kári | +17% | 1.27 | 0.91 |
| 9 | Fjolnir | +4% | 1.09 | 1.00 |
| 10 | Haukar | -11% | 0.73 | 0.91 |
| 11 | KFG | -29% | 0.45 | 0.82 |
| 12 | Dalvík / Reynir | -37% | 0.45 | 1.00 |
2. Deild (Iceland) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Magni has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 2. Deild (Iceland), netting 0.91 goals/match at home versus 0.36 away — a Scoring Advantage of +43%. At the other end, Dalvík / Reynir shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.45/match at home against 1.00 away (-37%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kári | +78% | 0.09 | 0.73 |
| 2 | Dalvík / Reynir | +60% | 0.27 | 1.09 |
| 3 | Fjolnir | +37% | 0.45 | 1.00 |
| 4 | Vikingur Olafsiik | +33% | 0.45 | 0.91 |
| 5 | Fjardabyggd / Leiknir | +33% | 0.45 | 0.91 |
| 6 | Magni | +19% | 1.00 | 1.45 |
| 7 | Thróttur Vogar | +18% | 0.64 | 0.91 |
| 8 | KFG | +9% | 1.36 | 1.64 |
| 9 | Haukar | +6% | 0.73 | 0.82 |
| 10 | Hvíti riddarinn | -19% | 1.45 | 1.00 |
| 11 | Kormákur / Hvöt | -20% | 0.82 | 0.55 |
| 12 | Selfoss | -29% | 1.00 | 0.55 |
2. Deild (Iceland) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Kári has the best home defensive record in the 2. Deild (Iceland), conceding just 0.09 goals/match at home compared to 0.73 away — a Defence Advantage of +78%. Selfoss struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.00/match at home versus 0.55 away (-29%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Magni | +52% | 1.45 | 0.45 |
| 2 | KFG | +50% | 1.64 | 0.55 |
| 3 | Thróttur Vogar | +47% | 1.27 | 0.45 |
| 4 | Vikingur Olafsiik | +43% | 1.36 | 0.55 |
| 5 | Kormákur / Hvöt | +33% | 1.09 | 0.55 |
| 6 | Haukar | +30% | 2.18 | 1.18 |
| 7 | Fjardabyggd / Leiknir | +25% | 1.36 | 0.82 |
| 8 | Hvíti riddarinn | +22% | 1.00 | 0.64 |
| 9 | Dalvík / Reynir | +14% | 1.09 | 0.82 |
| 10 | Selfoss | +7% | 1.36 | 1.18 |
| 11 | Fjolnir | 0% | 1.18 | 1.18 |
| 12 | Kári | -13% | 1.27 | 1.64 |
2. Deild (Iceland) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Magni has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 2. Deild (Iceland), netting 1.45 goals/match at home versus 0.45 away — a Scoring Advantage of +52%. At the other end, Kári shows the weakest home output in this period, with 1.27/match at home against 1.64 away (-13%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Magni | +48% | 0.64 | 1.82 |
| 2 | Selfoss | +37% | 0.55 | 1.18 |
| 3 | Dalvík / Reynir | +36% | 0.64 | 1.36 |
| 4 | Fjolnir | +33% | 0.91 | 1.82 |
| 5 | Kári | +30% | 0.64 | 1.18 |
| 6 | Thróttur Vogar | +28% | 0.82 | 1.45 |
| 7 | Hvíti riddarinn | +26% | 0.91 | 1.55 |
| 8 | Kormákur / Hvöt | +22% | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| 9 | Haukar | +20% | 0.55 | 0.82 |
| 10 | Fjardabyggd / Leiknir | +13% | 1.18 | 1.55 |
| 11 | Vikingur Olafsiik | +8% | 1.09 | 1.27 |
| 12 | KFG | -12% | 1.27 | 1.00 |
2. Deild (Iceland) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Magni has the best home defensive record in the 2. Deild (Iceland), conceding just 0.64 goals/match at home compared to 1.82 away — a Defence Advantage of +48%. KFG struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.27/match at home versus 1.00 away (-12%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Iceland
- 1. Deild Home Advantage— Division Silver
- Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Fotbolti.net Cup A Home Advantage— Division Underground
- League Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Reykjavik Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Super Cup Home Advantage— Division Gold
- Úrvalsdeild Home Advantage— Division Gold
- Úrvalsdeild Women Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro