Úrvalsdeild — Home Advantage
Iceland · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Thor Akureyri | +23% | +21% | +25% | 1.46/0.79 |
| 2 |  Keflavik | +18% | +6% | +30% | 1.46/0.79 |
| 3 |  IBV Vestmannaeyjar | +15% | +17% | +13% | 1.15/0.50 |
| 4 |  FH hafnarfjordur | +14% | +11% | +18% | 1.21/1.00 |
| 5 |  Stjarnan | +14% | +13% | +15% | 1.43/1.08 |
| 6 |  IA Akranes | +14% | +4% | +24% | 1.54/1.29 |
| 7 |  KR Reykjavik | +13% | +15% | +11% | 2.36/1.77 |
| 8 |  KA Akureyri | +12% | +6% | +18% | 1.23/0.93 |
| 9 |  Breidablik | +12% | +11% | +12% | 1.69/1.00 |
| 10 |  Valur Reykjavik | +7% | +26% | -12% | 1.29/1.23 |
| 11 |  Vikingur Reykjavik | +1% | +5% | -3% | 2.29/2.46 |
| 12 |  Fram Reykjavik | -5% | +6% | -16% | 1.50/2.00 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
Úrvalsdeild (Iceland) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the Úrvalsdeild (Iceland), the average home win rate is 44% compared to 34% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Breidablik shows the strongest home advantage, winning 54% of home games versus just 21% away (a difference of +32%). At the other end, Vikingur Reykjavik actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 64% versus 77% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Valur Reykjavik | +26% | 2.36 | 1.38 |
| 2 | Thor Akureyri | +21% | 1.31 | 0.86 |
| 3 | IBV Vestmannaeyjar | +17% | 1.62 | 1.14 |
| 4 | KR Reykjavik | +15% | 3.93 | 2.92 |
| 5 | Stjarnan | +13% | 2.21 | 1.69 |
| 6 | Breidablik | +11% | 2.23 | 1.79 |
| 7 | FH hafnarfjordur | +11% | 1.71 | 1.38 |
| 8 | Keflavik | +6% | 1.69 | 1.50 |
| 9 | KA Akureyri | +6% | 1.85 | 1.64 |
| 10 | Fram Reykjavik | +6% | 2.50 | 2.23 |
| 11 | Vikingur Reykjavik | +5% | 3.07 | 2.77 |
| 12 | IA Akranes | +4% | 2.08 | 1.93 |
Úrvalsdeild (Iceland) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Valur Reykjavik has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Úrvalsdeild (Iceland), netting 2.36 goals/match at home versus 1.38 away — a Scoring Advantage of +26%. In contrast, IA Akranes scores more away (1.93/match) than at home (2.08/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of 4% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Keflavik | +30% | 1.38 | 2.57 |
| 2 | Thor Akureyri | +25% | 1.62 | 2.71 |
| 3 | IA Akranes | +24% | 1.54 | 2.50 |
| 4 | FH hafnarfjordur | +18% | 1.50 | 2.15 |
| 5 | KA Akureyri | +18% | 1.69 | 2.43 |
| 6 | Stjarnan | +15% | 1.93 | 2.62 |
| 7 | IBV Vestmannaeyjar | +13% | 1.77 | 2.29 |
| 8 | Breidablik | +12% | 1.85 | 2.36 |
| 9 | KR Reykjavik | +11% | 1.93 | 2.38 |
| 10 | Vikingur Reykjavik | -3% | 1.07 | 1.00 |
| 11 | Valur Reykjavik | -12% | 2.43 | 1.92 |
| 12 | Fram Reykjavik | -16% | 2.36 | 1.69 |
Úrvalsdeild (Iceland) — Home Defence Analysis
Keflavik has the best home defensive record in the Úrvalsdeild (Iceland), conceding just 1.38 goals/match at home compared to 2.57 away — a Defence Advantage of +30%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Fram Reykjavik concedes more at home (2.36/match) than away (1.69/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IA Akranes | +31% | 1.08 | 0.57 |
| 2 | Stjarnan | +26% | 1.43 | 0.85 |
| 3 | FH hafnarfjordur | +25% | 1.14 | 0.69 |
| 4 | Keflavik | +21% | 0.77 | 0.50 |
| 5 | Thor Akureyri | +18% | 0.62 | 0.43 |
| 6 | Vikingur Reykjavik | +13% | 1.29 | 1.00 |
| 7 | KR Reykjavik | +11% | 2.00 | 1.62 |
| 8 | Valur Reykjavik | +11% | 0.86 | 0.69 |
| 9 | KA Akureyri | +8% | 0.85 | 0.71 |
| 10 | IBV Vestmannaeyjar | -3% | 0.54 | 0.57 |
| 11 | Breidablik | -8% | 0.85 | 1.00 |
| 12 | Fram Reykjavik | -10% | 1.14 | 1.38 |
Úrvalsdeild (Iceland) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, IA Akranes has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Úrvalsdeild (Iceland), netting 1.08 goals/match at home versus 0.57 away — a Scoring Advantage of +31%. At the other end, Fram Reykjavik shows the weakest home output in this period, with 1.14/match at home against 1.38 away (-10%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stjarnan | +37% | 0.79 | 1.69 |
| 2 | Keflavik | +36% | 0.54 | 1.14 |
| 3 | Thor Akureyri | +27% | 0.69 | 1.21 |
| 4 | FH hafnarfjordur | +25% | 0.64 | 1.08 |
| 5 | IA Akranes | +23% | 0.54 | 0.86 |
| 6 | KR Reykjavik | +18% | 0.86 | 1.23 |
| 7 | Breidablik | +18% | 0.85 | 1.21 |
| 8 | IBV Vestmannaeyjar | +12% | 0.85 | 1.07 |
| 9 | KA Akureyri | 0% | 1.08 | 1.07 |
| 10 | Fram Reykjavik | -16% | 1.07 | 0.77 |
| 11 | Vikingur Reykjavik | -20% | 0.57 | 0.38 |
| 12 | Valur Reykjavik | -21% | 1.43 | 0.92 |
Úrvalsdeild (Iceland) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Stjarnan has the best home defensive record in the Úrvalsdeild (Iceland), conceding just 0.79 goals/match at home compared to 1.69 away — a Defence Advantage of +37%. Valur Reykjavik struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.43/match at home versus 0.92 away (-21%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Valur Reykjavik | +37% | 1.50 | 0.69 |
| 2 | IBV Vestmannaeyjar | +31% | 1.08 | 0.57 |
| 3 | Breidablik | +28% | 1.38 | 0.79 |
| 4 | Thor Akureyri | +24% | 0.69 | 0.43 |
| 5 | Fram Reykjavik | +23% | 1.36 | 0.85 |
| 6 | KR Reykjavik | +19% | 1.93 | 1.31 |
| 7 | KA Akureyri | +4% | 1.00 | 0.93 |
| 8 | Vikingur Reykjavik | 0% | 1.79 | 1.77 |
| 9 | Stjarnan | -4% | 0.79 | 0.85 |
| 10 | Keflavik | -4% | 0.92 | 1.00 |
| 11 | FH hafnarfjordur | -10% | 0.57 | 0.69 |
| 12 | IA Akranes | -15% | 1.00 | 1.36 |
Úrvalsdeild (Iceland) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Valur Reykjavik has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Úrvalsdeild (Iceland), netting 1.50 goals/match at home versus 0.69 away — a Scoring Advantage of +37%. At the other end, IA Akranes shows the weakest home output in this period, with 1.00/match at home against 1.36 away (-15%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KA Akureyri | +38% | 0.62 | 1.36 |
| 2 | Keflavik | +26% | 0.85 | 1.43 |
| 3 | IA Akranes | +24% | 1.00 | 1.64 |
| 4 | Thor Akureyri | +24% | 0.92 | 1.50 |
| 5 | IBV Vestmannaeyjar | +14% | 0.92 | 1.21 |
| 6 | FH hafnarfjordur | +11% | 0.86 | 1.08 |
| 7 | Vikingur Reykjavik | +10% | 0.50 | 0.62 |
| 8 | Breidablik | +7% | 1.00 | 1.14 |
| 9 | KR Reykjavik | +4% | 1.07 | 1.15 |
| 10 | Valur Reykjavik | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 11 | Stjarnan | -11% | 1.14 | 0.92 |
| 12 | Fram Reykjavik | -16% | 1.29 | 0.92 |
Úrvalsdeild (Iceland) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, KA Akureyri has the best home defensive record in the Úrvalsdeild (Iceland), conceding just 0.62 goals/match at home compared to 1.36 away — a Defence Advantage of +38%. Fram Reykjavik struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.29/match at home versus 0.92 away (-16%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Iceland
- 1. Deild Home Advantage— Division Silver
- 2. Deild Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Fotbolti.net Cup A Home Advantage— Division Underground
- League Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Reykjavik Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Super Cup Home Advantage— Division Gold
- Úrvalsdeild Women Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro