MatchPulse
Damallsvenskan

Damallsvenskan — Home Advantage

Sweden · 2026

Home Advantage

#TeamHome AdvantageScoredDefencePPG (Home / Away)
1Djurgården W+29%+25%+33%1.50/1.00
2AIK W+28%+3%+53%2.33/1.00
3Vittsjö W+24%+17%+31%1.58/1.08
4Växjö W+22%+38%+6%1.08/0.50
5Malmö FF W+21%+9%+33%2.25/1.58
6Uppsala W+21%+29%+13%0.50/0.00
7Hammarby W+19%+15%+23%2.75/2.17
8Rosengård W+17%+17%+17%1.25/0.75
9Häcken W+10%+14%+7%2.83/2.75
10Piteå W+10%+14%+6%1.17/1.08
11Brommapojkarna W+4%+21%-14%1.58/1.08
12Eskilstuna United W+3%0%+7%1.42/1.33
13Kristianstad W-7%-14%0%1.25/1.67
14Norrköping W-11%0%-21%1.00/1.00

1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.

2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.

3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.

The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.

Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.

Damallsvenskan (Sweden) — Home Advantage Analysis

In the Damallsvenskan (Sweden), the average home win rate is 48% compared to 35% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. AIK W shows the strongest home advantage, winning 75% of home games versus just 25% away (a difference of +50%). At the other end, Kristianstad W actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 33% versus 50% on the road.

Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Växjö W+38%1.500.67
2Uppsala W+29%0.750.42
3Djurgården W+25%1.671.00
4Brommapojkarna W+21%1.671.08
5Vittsjö W+17%1.421.00
6Rosengård W+17%1.170.83
7Hammarby W+15%2.922.17
8Piteå W+14%1.331.00
9Häcken W+14%3.752.83
10Malmö FF W+9%2.081.75
11AIK W+3%1.671.58
12Eskilstuna United W0%0.920.92
13Norrköping W0%1.081.08
14Kristianstad W-14%1.502.00

Damallsvenskan (Sweden) — Home Goals Scored Analysis

Växjö W has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Damallsvenskan (Sweden), netting 1.50 goals/match at home versus 0.67 away — a Scoring Advantage of +38%. In contrast, Kristianstad W scores more away (2.00/match) than at home (1.50/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -14% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.

Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1AIK W+53%0.672.17
2Djurgården W+33%1.082.17
3Malmö FF W+33%0.501.00
4Vittsjö W+31%0.921.75
5Hammarby W+23%0.420.67
6Rosengård W+17%1.001.42
7Uppsala W+13%3.254.25
8Eskilstuna United W+7%1.171.33
9Häcken W+7%0.580.67
10Växjö W+6%1.832.08
11Piteå W+6%1.331.50
12Kristianstad W0%1.581.58
13Brommapojkarna W-14%2.081.58
14Norrköping W-21%1.921.25

Damallsvenskan (Sweden) — Home Defence Analysis

AIK W has the best home defensive record in the Damallsvenskan (Sweden), conceding just 0.67 goals/match at home compared to 2.17 away — a Defence Advantage of +53%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Norrköping W concedes more at home (1.92/match) than away (1.25/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.

1st Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Uppsala W+60%0.330.08
2Brommapojkarna W+60%1.000.25
3Vittsjö W+45%0.670.25
4Växjö W+45%0.670.25
5Hammarby W+28%1.921.08
6Kristianstad W+18%0.830.58
7Häcken W+17%2.001.42
8Malmö FF W+17%1.170.83
9Djurgården W+14%0.670.50
10Rosengård W+11%0.420.33
11AIK W+10%0.920.75
12Piteå W+5%0.830.75
13Eskilstuna United W-12%0.580.75
14Norrköping W-23%0.420.67

Damallsvenskan (Sweden) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Uppsala W has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Damallsvenskan (Sweden), netting 0.33 goals/match at home versus 0.08 away — a Scoring Advantage of +60%. At the other end, Norrköping W shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.42/match at home against 0.67 away (-23%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.

1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1AIK W+80%0.171.50
2Rosengård W+57%0.250.92
3Hammarby W+50%0.170.50
4Växjö W+33%0.751.50
5Djurgården W+26%0.581.00
6Vittsjö W+25%0.500.83
7Kristianstad W+14%0.751.00
8Malmö FF W+11%0.330.42
9Piteå W+7%0.580.67
10Uppsala W+6%1.922.17
11Häcken W0%0.250.25
12Brommapojkarna W-6%0.750.67
13Eskilstuna United W-8%0.580.50
14Norrköping W-29%0.920.50

Damallsvenskan (Sweden) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, AIK W has the best home defensive record in the Damallsvenskan (Sweden), conceding just 0.17 goals/match at home compared to 1.50 away — a Defence Advantage of +80%. Norrköping W struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.92/match at home versus 0.50 away (-29%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.

2nd Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Växjö W+33%0.830.42
2Piteå W+33%0.500.25
3Djurgården W+33%1.000.50
4Eskilstuna United W+33%0.330.17
5Norrköping W+23%0.670.42
6Rosengård W+20%0.750.50
7Uppsala W+11%0.420.33
8Häcken W+11%1.751.42
9Vittsjö W0%0.750.75
10Malmö FF W0%0.920.92
11Hammarby W-4%1.001.08
12AIK W-5%0.750.83
13Brommapojkarna W-11%0.670.83
14Kristianstad W-36%0.671.42

Damallsvenskan (Sweden) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Växjö W has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Damallsvenskan (Sweden), netting 0.83 goals/match at home versus 0.42 away — a Scoring Advantage of +33%. At the other end, Kristianstad W shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.67/match at home against 1.42 away (-36%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.

2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Malmö FF W+56%0.170.58
2Djurgården W+40%0.501.17
3Vittsjö W+38%0.420.92
4Uppsala W+22%1.332.08
5Eskilstuna United W+18%0.580.83
6AIK W+14%0.500.67
7Häcken W+11%0.330.42
8Piteå W+5%0.750.83
9Norrköping W-14%1.000.75
10Kristianstad W-18%0.830.58
11Brommapojkarna W-19%1.330.92
12Rosengård W-20%0.750.50
13Hammarby W-20%0.250.17
14Växjö W-30%1.080.58

Damallsvenskan (Sweden) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Malmö FF W has the best home defensive record in the Damallsvenskan (Sweden), conceding just 0.17 goals/match at home compared to 0.58 away — a Defence Advantage of +56%. Växjö W struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.08/match at home versus 0.58 away (-30%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.