MatchPulse
Division 2 - Norrland

Division 2 - Norrland — Home Advantage

Sweden · 2026

Home Advantage

#TeamHome AdvantageScoredDefencePPG (Home / Away)
1IFK Östersund+25%+17%+33%2.08/1.08
2IFK Umeå+17%+26%+8%0.27/0.18
3Gottne+16%+16%+15%1.69/1.15
4Täfteå+15%+4%+26%1.69/1.38
5Boden+9%+18%0%1.38/1.23
6Fransta+8%-10%+26%1.42/1.17
7Umeå FC Akademi+8%+9%+6%1.45/1.00
8IFK Luleå+6%+9%+3%1.92/2.15
9Lucksta+4%+2%+7%1.46/0.92
10Kubikenborg+4%-2%+10%2.15/2.15
11Storfors+4%+19%-11%1.27/1.18
12Skellefteå-2%+4%-8%1.62/1.85
13Friska Viljor-6%+4%-17%1.36/1.73
14Umea FF-11%-12%-10%0.82/1.36
15Bergnäsets-80%-100%-60%0.00/0.00

1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.

2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.

3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.

The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.

Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.

Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden) — Home Advantage Analysis

In the Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden), the average home win rate is 43% compared to 38% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. IFK Östersund shows the strongest home advantage, winning 62% of home games versus just 23% away (a difference of +38%). At the other end, Umea FF actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 18% versus 36% on the road.

Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1IFK Umeå+26%1.090.64
2Storfors+19%1.731.18
3Boden+18%1.541.08
4IFK Östersund+17%2.621.85
5Gottne+16%2.461.77
6IFK Luleå+9%2.382.00
7Umeå FC Akademi+9%2.271.91
8Skellefteå+4%1.921.77
9Friska Viljor+4%2.362.18
10Täfteå+4%2.152.00
11Lucksta+2%1.921.85
12Kubikenborg-2%2.382.46
13Fransta-10%1.832.25
14Umea FF-12%1.732.18
15Bergnäsets-100%0.001.00

Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden) — Home Goals Scored Analysis

IFK Umeå has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden), netting 1.09 goals/match at home versus 0.64 away — a Scoring Advantage of +26%. In contrast, Umea FF scores more away (2.18/match) than at home (1.73/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -12% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.

Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1IFK Östersund+33%1.082.15
2Täfteå+26%1.312.23
3Fransta+26%1.672.83
4Gottne+15%1.692.31
5Kubikenborg+10%1.001.23
6IFK Umeå+8%3.093.64
7Lucksta+7%2.082.38
8Umeå FC Akademi+6%2.002.27
9IFK Luleå+3%1.231.31
10Boden0%1.771.77
11Skellefteå-8%1.541.31
12Umea FF-10%2.452.00
13Storfors-11%2.271.82
14Friska Viljor-17%1.911.36
15Bergnäsets-60%8.002.00

Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden) — Home Defence Analysis

IFK Östersund has the best home defensive record in the Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden), conceding just 1.08 goals/match at home compared to 2.15 away — a Defence Advantage of +33%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Friska Viljor concedes more at home (1.91/match) than away (1.36/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.

1st Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Boden+54%0.770.23
2IFK Umeå+50%0.550.18
3Friska Viljor+30%1.180.64
4Gottne+19%1.461.00
5Lucksta+19%1.230.85
6Kubikenborg+17%1.310.92
7Skellefteå+14%0.920.69
8Fransta+14%1.000.75
9IFK Luleå+7%1.151.00
10Täfteå0%0.850.85
11Storfors0%0.550.55
12Umeå FC Akademi-7%0.640.73
13IFK Östersund-8%0.851.00
14Umea FF-11%0.730.91

Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Boden has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden), netting 0.77 goals/match at home versus 0.23 away — a Scoring Advantage of +54%. At the other end, Umea FF shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.73/match at home against 0.91 away (-11%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.

1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1IFK Östersund+58%0.311.15
2Gottne+50%0.381.15
3Fransta+39%0.581.33
4Täfteå+30%0.621.15
5Skellefteå+13%0.540.69
6Lucksta+12%0.851.08
7Kubikenborg+9%0.380.46
8Umea FF+9%0.911.09
9IFK Umeå+7%1.271.45
10Boden0%1.001.00
11Storfors0%0.910.91
12Umeå FC Akademi-13%1.180.91
13IFK Luleå-14%0.620.46
14Friska Viljor-20%0.820.55

Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, IFK Östersund has the best home defensive record in the Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden), conceding just 0.31 goals/match at home compared to 1.15 away — a Defence Advantage of +58%. Friska Viljor struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.82/match at home versus 0.55 away (-20%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.

2nd Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1IFK Östersund+35%1.770.85
2Storfors+30%1.180.64
3Umeå FC Akademi+16%1.641.18
4Gottne+13%1.000.77
5IFK Luleå+10%1.231.00
6IFK Umeå+9%0.550.45
7Täfteå+6%1.311.15
8Skellefteå-4%1.001.08
9Boden-5%0.770.85
10Umea FF-12%1.001.27
11Friska Viljor-13%1.181.55
12Kubikenborg-18%1.081.54
13Lucksta-18%0.691.00
14Fransta-29%0.831.50

Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, IFK Östersund has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden), netting 1.77 goals/match at home versus 0.85 away — a Scoring Advantage of +35%. At the other end, Fransta shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.83/match at home against 1.50 away (-29%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.

2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Umeå FC Akademi+25%0.821.36
2Täfteå+22%0.691.08
3Fransta+16%1.081.50
4IFK Luleå+16%0.620.85
5IFK Östersund+13%0.771.00
6Kubikenborg+11%0.620.77
7IFK Umeå+9%1.822.18
8Lucksta+3%1.231.31
9Boden0%0.770.77
10Gottne-6%1.311.15
11Friska Viljor-14%1.090.82
12Storfors-20%1.360.91
13Skellefteå-24%1.000.62
14Umea FF-26%1.550.91

Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Umeå FC Akademi has the best home defensive record in the Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden), conceding just 0.82 goals/match at home compared to 1.36 away — a Defence Advantage of +25%. Umea FF struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.55/match at home versus 0.91 away (-26%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.