MatchPulse
Division 2 - Norrland

Division 2 - NorrlandHome Advantage

Sweden · 2026

Home Advantage

#TeamHome AdvantageScoredDefencePPG (Home / Away)
1IFK Östersund+23%+22%+25%2.10/1.30
2Täfteå+22%+6%+38%1.90/1.20
3IFK Umeå+18%+32%+4%0.30/0.13
4Kubikenborg+17%+14%+20%2.20/1.90
5Fransta+14%+3%+24%1.22/1.11
6Boden+13%+26%0%1.50/1.30
7Gottne+13%+16%+10%1.40/0.80
8Skellefteå+10%+14%+5%2.10/2.10
9Lucksta+9%+11%+7%1.60/0.90
10Storfors+6%+19%-6%1.25/1.00
11IFK Luleå+2%-5%+8%1.60/2.40
12Friska Viljor-6%-11%0%1.11/1.67
13Umeå FC Akademi-6%-9%-3%1.11/1.22
14Umea FF-8%-9%-8%0.89/1.33

1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.

2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.

3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.

The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.

Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.

Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden) — Home Advantage Analysis

In the Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden), the average home win rate is 41% compared to 37% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. IFK Östersund shows the strongest home advantage, winning 60% of home games versus just 30% away (a difference of +30%). At the other end, IFK Luleå actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 50% versus 80% on the road.

Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1IFK Umeå+32%1.200.63
2Boden+26%1.701.00
3IFK Östersund+22%2.801.80
4Storfors+19%1.751.20
5Gottne+16%2.201.60
6Skellefteå+14%2.401.80
7Kubikenborg+14%2.501.90
8Lucksta+11%2.001.60
9Täfteå+6%2.502.20
10Fransta+3%1.891.78
11IFK Luleå-5%2.102.30
12Umea FF-9%1.782.11
13Umeå FC Akademi-9%1.672.00
14Friska Viljor-11%1.782.22

Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden) — Home Goals Scored Analysis

IFK Umeå has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden), netting 1.20 goals/match at home versus 0.63 away — a Scoring Advantage of +32%. In contrast, Friska Viljor scores more away (2.22/match) than at home (1.78/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -11% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.

Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Täfteå+38%1.002.20
2IFK Östersund+25%1.202.00
3Fransta+24%1.893.11
4Kubikenborg+20%1.001.50
5Gottne+10%1.902.30
6IFK Luleå+8%1.201.40
7Lucksta+7%1.902.20
8Skellefteå+5%1.001.10
9IFK Umeå+4%3.103.38
10Boden0%1.601.60
11Friska Viljor0%1.891.89
12Umeå FC Akademi-3%2.222.11
13Storfors-6%2.382.10
14Umea FF-8%2.221.89

Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden) — Home Defence Analysis

Täfteå has the best home defensive record in the Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden), conceding just 1.00 goals/match at home compared to 2.20 away — a Defence Advantage of +38%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Umea FF concedes more at home (2.22/match) than away (1.89/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.

1st Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Boden+54%1.000.30
2Fransta+43%1.110.44
3Skellefteå+33%1.200.60
4IFK Umeå+33%0.500.25
5Friska Viljor+29%1.000.56
6Kubikenborg+27%1.400.80
7Storfors+17%0.630.44
8Lucksta+16%1.110.80
9Gottne+12%1.401.11
10Umea FF+6%0.750.67
11IFK Luleå+5%1.101.00
12Täfteå+1%1.111.10
13IFK Östersund0%1.001.00
14Umeå FC Akademi-56%0.220.78

Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Boden has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden), netting 1.00 goals/match at home versus 0.30 away — a Scoring Advantage of +54%. At the other end, Umeå FC Akademi shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.22/match at home against 0.78 away (-56%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.

1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1IFK Östersund+67%0.201.00
2Täfteå+49%0.441.30
3Fransta+44%0.561.44
4Gottne+43%0.401.00
5Kubikenborg+33%0.300.60
6Lucksta+29%0.671.20
7Skellefteå+11%0.400.50
8IFK Umeå+7%1.201.38
9Storfors+5%1.001.11
10Umea FF0%1.001.00
11Boden-5%1.101.00
12IFK Luleå-6%0.500.44
13Friska Viljor-11%1.110.89
14Umeå FC Akademi-16%1.220.89

Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, IFK Östersund has the best home defensive record in the Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden), conceding just 0.20 goals/match at home compared to 1.00 away — a Defence Advantage of +67%. Umeå FC Akademi struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.22/match at home versus 0.89 away (-16%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.

2nd Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1IFK Östersund+38%1.800.80
2Storfors+34%1.130.56
3IFK Umeå+30%0.700.38
4Gottne+29%0.800.44
5Täfteå+17%1.561.10
6Umeå FC Akademi+8%1.441.22
7Boden0%0.700.70
8Skellefteå0%1.201.20
9Kubikenborg0%1.101.10
10Umea FF-7%1.251.44
11Lucksta-9%0.670.80
12IFK Luleå-14%1.001.33
13Fransta-26%0.781.33
14Friska Viljor-36%0.781.67

Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, IFK Östersund has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden), netting 1.80 goals/match at home versus 0.80 away — a Scoring Advantage of +38%. At the other end, Friska Viljor shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.78/match at home against 1.67 away (-36%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.

2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Täfteå+34%0.440.90
2IFK Luleå+18%0.701.00
3Kubikenborg+13%0.700.90
4Friska Viljor+13%0.781.00
5Fransta+11%1.331.67
6Umeå FC Akademi+10%1.001.22
7Boden+9%0.500.60
8IFK Umeå+3%1.902.00
9IFK Östersund0%1.001.00
10Skellefteå0%0.600.60
11Storfors-6%1.381.22
12Lucksta-10%1.221.00
13Umea FF-12%1.130.89
14Gottne-15%1.501.11

Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Täfteå has the best home defensive record in the Division 2 - Norrland (Sweden), conceding just 0.44 goals/match at home compared to 0.90 away — a Defence Advantage of +34%. Gottne struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.50/match at home versus 1.11 away (-15%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.