MatchPulse
Division 2 - Norra Svealand

Division 2 - Norra Svealand — Home Advantage

Sweden · 2026

Home Advantage

#TeamHome AdvantageScoredDefencePPG (Home / Away)
1Enskede+27%+12%+42%2.54/1.69
2Falu BS+26%+37%+15%2.08/1.31
3Täby+25%+17%+33%2.23/1.00
4Franke+22%+23%+21%1.92/0.92
5Sunnersta+19%+13%+25%2.31/1.85
6Viggbyholms IK+14%+41%-12%0.85/1.08
7Gute+13%+20%+5%1.38/1.15
8Angby+11%-10%+33%1.92/2.00
9Kungsängen+6%0%+12%1.08/0.92
10Skiljebo-3%+17%-23%2.38/2.15
11Helges-11%-27%+6%0.31/0.46
12Lidingö-12%-14%-9%0.71/1.36
13Korsnäs-15%-31%+2%0.46/0.85
14Bollstanäs-17%-22%-12%1.00/1.38
15Vallentuna-50%-100%0%0.00/0.00

1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.

2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.

3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.

The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.

Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.

Division 2 - Norra Svealand (Sweden) — Home Advantage Analysis

In the Division 2 - Norra Svealand (Sweden), the average home win rate is 43% compared to 36% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Täby shows the strongest home advantage, winning 69% of home games versus just 23% away (a difference of +46%). At the other end, Lidingö actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 14% versus 43% on the road.

Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Viggbyholms IK+41%1.460.62
2Falu BS+37%2.151.00
3Franke+23%2.231.38
4Gute+20%1.851.23
5Täby+17%2.081.46
6Skiljebo+17%2.691.92
7Sunnersta+13%2.922.23
8Enskede+12%1.851.46
9Kungsängen0%1.231.23
10Angby-10%2.002.46
11Lidingö-14%1.071.43
12Bollstanäs-22%1.382.15
13Helges-27%0.621.08
14Korsnäs-31%0.771.46
15Vallentuna-100%0.001.00

Division 2 - Norra Svealand (Sweden) — Home Goals Scored Analysis

Viggbyholms IK has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Division 2 - Norra Svealand (Sweden), netting 1.46 goals/match at home versus 0.62 away — a Scoring Advantage of +41%. In contrast, Korsnäs scores more away (1.46/match) than at home (0.77/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -31% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.

Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Enskede+42%0.541.31
2Angby+33%0.851.69
3Täby+33%0.771.54
4Sunnersta+25%0.691.15
5Franke+21%1.312.00
6Falu BS+15%1.081.46
7Kungsängen+12%1.381.77
8Helges+6%2.622.92
9Gute+5%1.461.62
10Korsnäs+2%2.462.54
11Vallentuna0%3.003.00
12Lidingö-9%2.211.86
13Viggbyholms IK-12%2.151.69
14Bollstanäs-12%2.151.69
15Skiljebo-23%1.230.77

Division 2 - Norra Svealand (Sweden) — Home Defence Analysis

Enskede has the best home defensive record in the Division 2 - Norra Svealand (Sweden), conceding just 0.54 goals/match at home compared to 1.31 away — a Defence Advantage of +42%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Skiljebo concedes more at home (1.23/match) than away (0.77/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.

1st Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Viggbyholms IK+60%0.620.15
2Lidingö+29%0.640.36
3Skiljebo+20%1.150.77
4Gute+11%0.770.62
5Täby+11%0.770.62
6Falu BS+7%0.620.54
7Sunnersta-3%1.231.31
8Enskede-5%0.690.77
9Angby-9%0.770.92
10Kungsängen-17%0.380.54
11Helges-25%0.230.38
12Bollstanäs-41%0.380.92
13Korsnäs-45%0.230.62
14Franke-60%0.230.92

Division 2 - Norra Svealand (Sweden) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Viggbyholms IK has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Division 2 - Norra Svealand (Sweden), netting 0.62 goals/match at home versus 0.15 away — a Scoring Advantage of +60%. At the other end, Franke shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.23/match at home against 0.92 away (-60%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.

1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Franke+37%0.461.00
2Täby+27%0.310.54
3Enskede+25%0.230.38
4Angby+20%0.310.46
5Kungsängen+11%0.620.77
6Sunnersta+8%0.460.54
7Helges0%0.920.92
8Gute-7%0.620.54
9Falu BS-7%0.620.54
10Korsnäs-8%1.080.92
11Bollstanäs-20%0.920.62
12Viggbyholms IK-30%1.000.54
13Lidingö-33%1.140.57
14Skiljebo-38%0.690.31

Division 2 - Norra Svealand (Sweden) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Franke has the best home defensive record in the Division 2 - Norra Svealand (Sweden), conceding just 0.46 goals/match at home compared to 1.00 away — a Defence Advantage of +37%. Skiljebo struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.69/match at home versus 0.31 away (-38%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.

2nd Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Franke+62%2.000.46
2Falu BS+54%1.540.46
3Viggbyholms IK+29%0.850.46
4Sunnersta+29%1.690.92
5Gute+27%1.080.62
6Enskede+25%1.150.69
7Täby+21%1.310.85
8Skiljebo+14%1.541.15
9Kungsängen+10%0.850.69
10Bollstanäs-10%1.001.23
11Angby-11%1.231.54
12Korsnäs-22%0.540.85
13Helges-29%0.380.69
14Lidingö-43%0.431.07

Division 2 - Norra Svealand (Sweden) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Franke has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Division 2 - Norra Svealand (Sweden), netting 2.00 goals/match at home versus 0.46 away — a Scoring Advantage of +62%. At the other end, Lidingö shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.43/match at home against 1.07 away (-43%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.

2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Enskede+50%0.310.92
2Sunnersta+45%0.230.62
3Angby+39%0.541.23
4Täby+37%0.461.00
5Falu BS+33%0.460.92
6Kungsängen+13%0.771.00
7Gute+12%0.851.08
8Lidingö+9%1.071.29
9Franke+8%0.851.00
10Helges+8%1.692.00
11Korsnäs+8%1.381.62
12Viggbyholms IK0%1.151.15
13Bollstanäs-7%1.231.08
14Skiljebo-8%0.540.46

Division 2 - Norra Svealand (Sweden) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Enskede has the best home defensive record in the Division 2 - Norra Svealand (Sweden), conceding just 0.31 goals/match at home compared to 0.92 away — a Defence Advantage of +50%. Skiljebo struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.54/match at home versus 0.46 away (-8%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.

Home Advantage Tables — Sweden