MatchPulse
Matogrossense 2

Matogrossense 2 — Home Advantage

Brazil · 2026

Home Advantage

#TeamHome AdvantageScoredDefencePPG (Home / Away)
1Grêmio Sorriso+75%+100%+50%1.50/0.50
2Campo Novo+72%+100%+44%0.00/0.00
3Sinop Fc+33%-33%+100%1.67/3.00
4Cacerense+16%-6%+38%1.33/1.00
5Sorriso+7%+60%-45%1.33/2.00
6Paulistano MT0%+100%-100%0.00/1.00
7Ação-2%-9%+6%1.67/2.00
8Atlético Matogrossense-25%-33%-17%0.50/0.50
9Santa Cruz MT-42%-38%-45%0.67/1.50
10Uirapuru-48%-53%-43%1.33/3.00

1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.

2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.

3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.

The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.

Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.

Matogrossense 2 (Brazil) — Home Advantage Analysis

In the Matogrossense 2 (Brazil), the average home win rate is 22% compared to 35% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Grêmio Sorriso shows the strongest home advantage, winning 50% of home games versus just 0% away (a difference of +50%). At the other end, Uirapuru actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 33% versus 100% on the road.

Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Grêmio Sorriso+100%2.000.00
2Campo Novo+100%0.500.00
3Paulistano MT+100%0.500.00
4Sorriso+60%4.001.00
5Cacerense-6%1.331.50
6Ação-9%1.672.00
7Sinop Fc-33%1.002.00
8Atlético Matogrossense-33%0.501.00
9Santa Cruz MT-38%0.330.75
10Uirapuru-53%1.334.33

Matogrossense 2 (Brazil) — Home Goals Scored Analysis

Grêmio Sorriso has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Matogrossense 2 (Brazil), netting 2.00 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. In contrast, Uirapuru scores more away (4.33/match) than at home (1.33/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -53% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.

Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Sinop Fc+100%0.000.67
2Grêmio Sorriso+50%0.501.50
3Campo Novo+44%2.506.50
4Cacerense+38%0.671.50
5Ação+6%1.331.50
6Atlético Matogrossense-17%3.502.50
7Uirapuru-43%1.670.67
8Santa Cruz MT-45%0.670.25
9Sorriso-45%1.330.50
10Paulistano MT-100%3.000.00

Matogrossense 2 (Brazil) — Home Defence Analysis

Sinop Fc has the best home defensive record in the Matogrossense 2 (Brazil), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.67 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Paulistano MT concedes more at home (3.00/match) than away (0.00/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.

1st Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Grêmio Sorriso+100%1.000.00
2Paulistano MT+100%0.500.00
3Santa Cruz MT0%0.330.33
4Cacerense-14%0.500.67
5Uirapuru-20%1.001.50
6Ação-50%0.501.50
7Sinop Fc-60%0.331.33
8Atlético Matogrossense-100%0.000.50

Matogrossense 2 (Brazil) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Grêmio Sorriso has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Matogrossense 2 (Brazil), netting 1.00 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Atlético Matogrossense shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.00/match at home against 0.50 away (-100%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.

1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Sinop Fc+100%0.000.67
2Grêmio Sorriso+100%0.000.50
3Cacerense+100%0.000.67
4Ação+20%1.001.50
5Atlético Matogrossense-33%1.000.50
6Paulistano MT-100%1.000.00
7Santa Cruz MT-100%0.330.00
8Uirapuru-100%1.000.00

Matogrossense 2 (Brazil) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Sinop Fc has the best home defensive record in the Matogrossense 2 (Brazil), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.67 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Uirapuru struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.00/match at home versus 0.00 away (-100%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.

2nd Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Grêmio Sorriso+100%1.000.00
2Ação+50%1.500.50
3Cacerense+20%1.000.67
4Sinop Fc0%0.670.67
5Atlético Matogrossense0%0.500.50
6Paulistano MT0%0.000.00
7Uirapuru-85%0.334.00
8Santa Cruz MT-100%0.000.33

Matogrossense 2 (Brazil) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Grêmio Sorriso has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Matogrossense 2 (Brazil), netting 1.00 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Santa Cruz MT shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.00/match at home against 0.33 away (-100%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.

2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Cacerense+100%0.000.67
2Grêmio Sorriso+33%0.501.00
3Sinop Fc0%0.000.00
4Atlético Matogrossense-11%2.502.00
5Uirapuru-14%0.670.50
6Ação-100%0.500.00
7Paulistano MT-100%2.000.00
8Santa Cruz MT-100%0.330.00

Matogrossense 2 (Brazil) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Cacerense has the best home defensive record in the Matogrossense 2 (Brazil), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.67 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Santa Cruz MT struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.33/match at home versus 0.00 away (-100%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.

Home Advantage Tables — Brazil