Chatham Cup — Halbzeittabelle 1. Hälfte
New-Zealand · 2026
Spitzenreiter:Fencibles United — 9ptsLiga Ø:1.53 goals
Höchster Ø:Dunedin City Royals (4.00)
Niedrigster Ø:Cambridge (0.00)Gesamt / 1. Halbzeit-Tabelle
| # | Team | MP | S-U-N | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Letzte 5 (HZ) | PPSp (HZ) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fencibles United | 3 | 3-0-0 | 6 | 0 | +6 | 9 | WWW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 2 |  Cashmere Technical | 3 | 2-1-0 | 6 | 1 | +5 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 2.33 |
| 3 |  Napier City Rovers | 3 | 2-1-0 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 3.00 |
| 4 |  Auckland United | 2 | 1-1-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 4 | WD | 2.00 | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0.50 |
| 5 |  Miramar | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 6 |  Nelson Suburbs | 3 | 1-0-2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 | LLW | 1.00 | 33% | 0% | 67% | 100% | 67% | 0% | 1.67 |
| 7 | Cambridge | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 8 |  Melville United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 9 |  Takapuna | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 10 |  Hibiscus Coast | 2 | 0-1-1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 3.00 |
| 11 |  Auckland City | 2 | 0-1-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 1 | LD | 0.50 | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 12 |  Island Bay | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 13 |  Petone | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 14 |  Northern AFC | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 15 |  South Auckland Rangers | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 16 | Dunedin City Royals | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
Chatham Cup 2026 — Halbzeit-Tabelle
Fencibles United führt die Chatham Cup-Tabelle der ersten Halbzeit gesamt mit 9 Punkten aus 3 Spielen (3S-0U-0N) an, mit einem Schnitt von 2.00 Toren pro Spiel.
Cashmere Technical folgt auf Platz 2 mit 7 Punkten. Der Ligaschnitt beträgt 1.53 Tore pro Spiel, mit Dunedin City Royals als höchstem Wert (4.00).
Spitzenreiter:Fencibles United — 9ptsLiga Ø:1.7 goalsHöchster Ø:Hibiscus Coast (6.00)Niedrigster Ø:Auckland United (0.00)Heim / 1. Halbzeit-Tabelle
| # | Team | MP | S-U-N | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Letzte 5 (HZ) | PPSp (HZ) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fencibles United | 3 | 3-0-0 | 6 | 0 | +6 | 9 | WWW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 2 | Cashmere Technical | 2 | 1-1-0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 4 | DW | 2.00 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 3 | Nelson Suburbs | 2 | 1-0-1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 1.50 |
| 4 | Auckland United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 5 | Melville United | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 6 | Auckland City | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 7 | Island Bay | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 8 | Petone | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 9 | Hibiscus Coast | 1 | 0-0-1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 6.00 |
| 10 | Dunedin City Royals | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 4 | -4 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
Chatham Cup 2026 — Heim Halbzeit-Tabelle
Fencibles United führt die Chatham Cup-Tabelle der ersten Halbzeit zu Hause mit 9 Punkten aus 3 Spielen (3S-0U-0N) an, mit einem Schnitt von 2.00 Toren pro Spiel.
Cashmere Technical folgt auf Platz 2 mit 4 Punkten. Der Ligaschnitt beträgt 1.70 Tore pro Spiel, mit Hibiscus Coast als höchstem Wert (6.00).
Spitzenreiter:Napier City Rovers — 7ptsLiga Ø:1.55 goalsHöchster Ø:Cashmere Technical (4.00)Niedrigster Ø:Takapuna (0.00)Auswärts / 1. Halbzeit-Tabelle
| # | Team | MP | S-U-N | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Letzte 5 (HZ) | PPSp (HZ) | CS | BTTS | FTS | 0.5+ | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Napier City Rovers | 3 | 2-1-0 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 7 | DWW | 2.33 | 33% | 67% | 0% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 3.00 |
| 2 | Cashmere Technical | 1 | 1-0-0 | 4 | 0 | +4 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 4.00 |
| 3 | Auckland United | 1 | 1-0-0 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 | W | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 4 | Miramar | 2 | 1-0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | LW | 1.50 | 50% | 0% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1.00 |
| 5 | Takapuna | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 6 | Cambridge | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 7 | Hibiscus Coast | 1 | 0-1-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | D | 1.00 | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.00 |
| 8 | Northern AFC | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 9 | South Auckland Rangers | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 10 | Auckland City | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
| 11 | Nelson Suburbs | 1 | 0-0-1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 | L | 0.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 2.00 |
Chatham Cup 2026 — Auswärts Halbzeit-Tabelle
Napier City Rovers führt die Chatham Cup-Tabelle der ersten Halbzeit auswärts mit 7 Punkten aus 3 Spielen (2S-1U-0N) an, mit einem Schnitt von 3.00 Toren pro Spiel.
Cashmere Technical folgt auf Platz 2 mit 3 Punkten. Der Ligaschnitt beträgt 1.55 Tore pro Spiel, mit Cashmere Technical als höchstem Wert (4.00).