League Cup — Home Advantage
Finland · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Lahti | +77% | +100% | +54% | 3.00/0.33 |
| 2 |  KuPS | +67% | +100% | +33% | 1.00/0.00 |
| 3 |  Mariehamn | +38% | +43% | +33% | 2.00/1.33 |
| 4 |  AC Oulu | +29% | -9% | +67% | 3.00/2.33 |
| 5 |  SJK | +26% | +45% | +6% | 1.00/0.00 |
| 6 |  HJK Helsinki | +23% | +20% | +25% | 2.00/1.00 |
| 7 |  Ilves | +9% | +29% | -11% | 2.33/2.00 |
| 8 |  FF Jaro | -17% | -28% | -6% | 1.50/2.00 |
| 9 |  Gnistan | -22% | -38% | -5% | 0.67/1.50 |
| 10 |  VPS | -39% | -40% | -38% | 0.00/1.00 |
| 11 |  Turku PS | -45% | -100% | +9% | 0.00/0.33 |
| 12 |  Inter Turku | -67% | -33% | -100% | 2.25/3.00 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
League Cup (Finland) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the League Cup (Finland), the average home win rate is 48% compared to 37% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Lahti shows the strongest home advantage, winning 100% of home games versus just 0% away (a difference of +100%). At the other end, Gnistan actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 0% versus 50% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KuPS | +100% | 2.00 | 0.00 |
| 2 | Lahti | +100% | 3.50 | 0.00 |
| 3 | SJK | +45% | 1.33 | 0.50 |
| 4 | Mariehamn | +43% | 2.50 | 1.00 |
| 5 | Ilves | +29% | 3.00 | 1.67 |
| 6 | HJK Helsinki | +20% | 2.00 | 1.33 |
| 7 | AC Oulu | -9% | 3.33 | 4.00 |
| 8 | FF Jaro | -28% | 1.50 | 2.67 |
| 9 | Inter Turku | -33% | 1.50 | 3.00 |
| 10 | Gnistan | -38% | 0.67 | 1.50 |
| 11 | VPS | -40% | 1.00 | 2.33 |
| 12 | Turku PS | -100% | 0.00 | 1.00 |
League Cup (Finland) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
KuPS has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the League Cup (Finland), netting 2.00 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. In contrast, Turku PS scores more away (1.00/match) than at home (0.00/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -100% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AC Oulu | +67% | 0.33 | 1.67 |
| 2 | Lahti | +54% | 0.50 | 1.67 |
| 3 | Mariehamn | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 |
| 4 | KuPS | +33% | 2.00 | 4.00 |
| 5 | HJK Helsinki | +25% | 1.00 | 1.67 |
| 6 | Turku PS | +9% | 2.50 | 3.00 |
| 7 | SJK | +6% | 2.67 | 3.00 |
| 8 | Gnistan | -5% | 1.67 | 1.50 |
| 9 | FF Jaro | -6% | 3.00 | 2.67 |
| 10 | Ilves | -11% | 1.67 | 1.33 |
| 11 | VPS | -38% | 3.00 | 1.33 |
| 12 | Inter Turku | -100% | 1.25 | 0.00 |
League Cup (Finland) — Home Defence Analysis
AC Oulu has the best home defensive record in the League Cup (Finland), conceding just 0.33 goals/match at home compared to 1.67 away — a Defence Advantage of +67%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Inter Turku concedes more at home (1.25/match) than away (0.00/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KuPS | +100% | 0.33 | 0.00 |
| 2 | Lahti | +100% | 1.50 | 0.00 |
| 3 | HJK Helsinki | +60% | 1.33 | 0.33 |
| 4 | Mariehamn | +50% | 1.00 | 0.33 |
| 5 | Ilves | +20% | 2.00 | 1.33 |
| 6 | SJK | +14% | 0.67 | 0.50 |
| 7 | VPS | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 8 | AC Oulu | 0% | 1.33 | 1.33 |
| 9 | FF Jaro | -33% | 0.50 | 1.00 |
| 10 | Inter Turku | -60% | 0.50 | 2.00 |
| 11 | Turku PS | -100% | 0.00 | 0.33 |
| 12 | Gnistan | -100% | 0.00 | 1.00 |
League Cup (Finland) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, KuPS has the biggest home scoring advantage in the League Cup (Finland), netting 0.33 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Gnistan shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.00/match at home against 1.00 away (-100%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
League Cup (Finland) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Lahti has the best home defensive record in the League Cup (Finland), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.67 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Inter Turku struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.75/match at home versus 0.00 away (-100%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SJK | +100% | 0.67 | 0.00 |
| 2 | KuPS | +100% | 1.67 | 0.00 |
| 3 | Lahti | +100% | 2.00 | 0.00 |
| 4 | Ilves | +50% | 1.00 | 0.33 |
| 5 | Mariehamn | +38% | 1.50 | 0.67 |
| 6 | Gnistan | +14% | 0.67 | 0.50 |
| 7 | Inter Turku | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 8 | AC Oulu | -14% | 2.00 | 2.67 |
| 9 | HJK Helsinki | -20% | 0.67 | 1.00 |
| 10 | FF Jaro | -25% | 1.00 | 1.67 |
| 11 | VPS | -100% | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| 12 | Turku PS | -100% | 0.00 | 0.67 |
League Cup (Finland) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, SJK has the biggest home scoring advantage in the League Cup (Finland), netting 0.67 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Turku PS shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.00/match at home against 0.67 away (-100%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mariehamn | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 |
| 2 | HJK Helsinki | +33% | 0.67 | 1.33 |
| 3 | Lahti | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 |
| 4 | AC Oulu | +33% | 0.33 | 0.67 |
| 5 | Turku PS | +25% | 1.00 | 1.67 |
| 6 | KuPS | +20% | 1.33 | 2.00 |
| 7 | Gnistan | +20% | 0.33 | 0.50 |
| 8 | FF Jaro | -9% | 2.00 | 1.67 |
| 9 | SJK | -14% | 1.33 | 1.00 |
| 10 | VPS | -33% | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| 11 | Ilves | -33% | 0.67 | 0.33 |
| 12 | Inter Turku | -100% | 0.50 | 0.00 |
League Cup (Finland) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Mariehamn has the best home defensive record in the League Cup (Finland), conceding just 0.50 goals/match at home compared to 1.00 away — a Defence Advantage of +33%. Inter Turku struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.50/match at home versus 0.00 away (-100%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Finland
- Kakkonen - Lohko A Home Advantage— Division Regional
- Kakkonen - Lohko B Home Advantage— Division Regional
- Kakkonen - Lohko C Home Advantage— Division Regional
- Kakkonen - Play-offs Home Advantage— Division Regional
- Kakkosen Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Kansallinen Liiga Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- Suomen Cup Home Advantage— Division Silver
- Veikkausliiga Home Advantage— Division Gold
- Ykkönen Home Advantage— Division Silver
- Ykköscup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Ykkösliiga Home Advantage— Division Pro