Suomen Cup — Home Advantage
Finland · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Turku PS | +75% | +50% | +100% | 3.00/1.33 |
| 2 |  Inter Turku | +42% | +33% | +50% | 3.00/3.00 |
| 3 |  PEPO | +40% | +60% | +20% | 3.00/1.50 |
| 4 |  Lahti | +21% | +9% | +33% | 3.00/2.25 |
| 5 |  Ilves | +5% | +9% | 0% | 3.00/1.50 |
| 6 |  VJS | +4% | +20% | -12% | 3.00/1.33 |
| 7 |  HJK Helsinki | -12% | +8% | -33% | 3.00/3.00 |
| 8 |  KäPa | -15% | -50% | +20% | 1.00/3.00 |
| 9 |  EBK | -17% | -33% | 0% | 1.00/1.33 |
| 10 |  Mariehamn | -20% | -40% | 0% | 1.50/3.00 |
| 11 |  Honka | -22% | +6% | -50% | 1.50/2.33 |
| 12 |  PPJ | -33% | -100% | +33% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 13 |  SJK | -34% | -48% | -20% | 1.50/3.00 |
| 14 |  VPS | -36% | -21% | -50% | 2.00/2.33 |
| 15 |  JPS | -40% | +20% | -100% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 16 |  KuPS | -50% | -100% | 0% | 1.00/3.00 |
| 17 |  GBK | -50% | -100% | 0% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 18 |  Töölön Taisto | -50% | -50% | -50% | 0.00/1.00 |
| 19 |  MaPS | -50% | -100% | 0% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 20 |  SJK Akatemia | -55% | -43% | -67% | 1.50/3.00 |
| 21 |  OLS | -57% | -80% | -33% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 22 |  JäPS | -60% | -100% | -20% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 23 |  PK-35 | -67% | -100% | -33% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 24 |  Union Plaani | -67% | -33% | -100% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 25 |  KuPS Akatemia | -67% | -100% | -33% | 0.00/2.00 |
| 26 |  Virkiä | -69% | -78% | -60% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 27 |  Jokerit | -71% | -100% | -43% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 28 |  Atlantis | -73% | -45% | -100% | 1.00/3.00 |
| 29 |  Leki | -76% | -71% | -80% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 30 |  EPS | -80% | -100% | -60% | 0.00/2.00 |
| 31 |  SalPa | -80% | -60% | -100% | 1.00/3.00 |
| 32 |  VPS II | -80% | -60% | -100% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 33 |  Kraft | -86% | -100% | -71% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 34 |  EIF Akademi | -87% | -100% | -75% | 0.00/1.00 |
| 35 |  Rops | -89% | -100% | -78% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 36 |  HIFK Helsinki | -91% | -83% | -100% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 37 |  P-Iirot | -100% | -100% | -100% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 38 |  PIF | -100% | -100% | -100% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 39 |  Valtti | -100% | -100% | -100% | 0.00/3.00 |
| 40 |  Huima / Urho | -100% | -100% | -100% | 0.00/3.00 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
Suomen Cup (Finland) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the Suomen Cup (Finland), the average home win rate is 71% compared to 85% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Ilves shows the strongest home advantage, winning 100% of home games versus just 50% away (a difference of +50%). At the other end, SJK Akatemia actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 50% versus 100% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PEPO | +60% | 2.00 | 0.50 |
| 2 | Turku PS | +50% | 3.00 | 1.00 |
| 3 | Inter Turku | +33% | 5.00 | 2.50 |
| 4 | JPS | +20% | 3.00 | 2.00 |
| 5 | VJS | +20% | 5.00 | 3.33 |
| 6 | Ilves | +9% | 3.00 | 2.50 |
| 7 | Lahti | +9% | 3.00 | 2.50 |
| 8 | HJK Helsinki | +8% | 6.50 | 5.50 |
| 9 | Honka | +6% | 3.00 | 2.67 |
| 10 | VPS | -21% | 4.33 | 6.67 |
| 11 | EBK | -33% | 2.00 | 4.00 |
| 12 | Union Plaani | -33% | 2.00 | 4.00 |
| 13 | Mariehamn | -40% | 1.50 | 3.50 |
| 14 | SJK Akatemia | -43% | 1.00 | 2.50 |
| 15 | Atlantis | -45% | 3.00 | 8.00 |
| 16 | SJK | -48% | 2.00 | 5.67 |
| 17 | KäPa | -50% | 1.00 | 3.00 |
| 18 | Töölön Taisto | -50% | 1.00 | 3.00 |
| 19 | SalPa | -60% | 1.00 | 4.00 |
| 20 | VPS II | -60% | 1.00 | 4.00 |
| 21 | Leki | -71% | 1.00 | 6.00 |
| 22 | Virkiä | -78% | 1.00 | 8.00 |
| 23 | OLS | -80% | 1.00 | 9.00 |
| 24 | HIFK Helsinki | -83% | 1.00 | 10.50 |
| 25 | KuPS | -100% | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| 26 | Rops | -100% | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| 27 | JäPS | -100% | 0.00 | 4.67 |
| 28 | EPS | -100% | 0.00 | 2.00 |
| 29 | P-Iirot | -100% | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| 30 | GBK | -100% | 0.00 | 3.00 |
| 31 | Kraft | -100% | 0.00 | 3.00 |
| 32 | PIF | -100% | 0.00 | 4.00 |
| 33 | PK-35 | -100% | 0.00 | 6.50 |
| 34 | Jokerit | -100% | 0.00 | 4.00 |
| 35 | PPJ | -100% | 0.00 | 5.00 |
| 36 | MaPS | -100% | 0.00 | 4.00 |
| 37 | Valtti | -100% | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 38 | KuPS Akatemia | -100% | 0.00 | 2.50 |
| 39 | Huima / Urho | -100% | 0.00 | 10.00 |
| 40 | EIF Akademi | -100% | 0.00 | 1.00 |
Suomen Cup (Finland) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Inter Turku has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Suomen Cup (Finland), netting 5.00 goals/match at home versus 2.50 away — a Scoring Advantage of +33%. In contrast, SJK scores more away (5.67/match) than at home (2.00/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -48% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Turku PS | +100% | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 2 | Inter Turku | +50% | 0.50 | 1.50 |
| 3 | Lahti | +33% | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| 4 | PPJ | +33% | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| 5 | PEPO | +20% | 1.00 | 1.50 |
| 6 | KäPa | +20% | 1.00 | 1.50 |
| 7 | Mariehamn | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| 8 | Ilves | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 9 | KuPS | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 10 | GBK | 0% | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| 11 | MaPS | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 12 | EBK | 0% | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| 13 | VJS | -12% | 3.00 | 2.33 |
| 14 | SJK | -20% | 1.00 | 0.67 |
| 15 | JäPS | -20% | 1.00 | 0.67 |
| 16 | HJK Helsinki | -33% | 1.00 | 0.50 |
| 17 | OLS | -33% | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| 18 | PK-35 | -33% | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| 19 | KuPS Akatemia | -33% | 1.00 | 0.50 |
| 20 | Jokerit | -43% | 5.00 | 2.00 |
| 21 | Töölön Taisto | -50% | 9.00 | 3.00 |
| 22 | VPS | -50% | 1.00 | 0.33 |
| 23 | Honka | -50% | 4.00 | 1.33 |
| 24 | EPS | -60% | 4.00 | 1.00 |
| 25 | Virkiä | -60% | 4.00 | 1.00 |
| 26 | SJK Akatemia | -67% | 2.50 | 0.50 |
| 27 | Kraft | -71% | 6.00 | 1.00 |
| 28 | EIF Akademi | -75% | 7.00 | 1.00 |
| 29 | Rops | -78% | 4.00 | 0.50 |
| 30 | Leki | -80% | 9.00 | 1.00 |
| 31 | HIFK Helsinki | -100% | 3.00 | 0.00 |
| 32 | P-Iirot | -100% | 4.00 | 0.00 |
| 33 | SalPa | -100% | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| 34 | VPS II | -100% | 6.00 | 0.00 |
| 35 | Atlantis | -100% | 3.00 | 0.00 |
| 36 | PIF | -100% | 2.00 | 0.00 |
| 37 | JPS | -100% | 5.00 | 0.00 |
| 38 | Valtti | -100% | 2.00 | 0.00 |
| 39 | Union Plaani | -100% | 4.00 | 0.00 |
| 40 | Huima / Urho | -100% | 4.00 | 0.00 |
Suomen Cup (Finland) — Home Defence Analysis
Inter Turku has the best home defensive record in the Suomen Cup (Finland), conceding just 0.50 goals/match at home compared to 1.50 away — a Defence Advantage of +50%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, SJK Akatemia concedes more at home (2.50/match) than away (0.50/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ilves | +67% | 2.50 | 0.50 |
| 2 | Inter Turku | +60% | 2.00 | 0.50 |
| 3 | HJK Helsinki | +8% | 3.50 | 3.00 |
| 4 | SJK Akatemia | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | Honka | -5% | 1.50 | 1.67 |
| 6 | VPS | -11% | 2.67 | 3.33 |
| 7 | SJK | -45% | 1.50 | 4.00 |
| 8 | Mariehamn | -50% | 0.50 | 1.50 |
Suomen Cup (Finland) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Ilves has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Suomen Cup (Finland), netting 2.50 goals/match at home versus 0.50 away — a Scoring Advantage of +67%. At the other end, Mariehamn shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.50/match at home against 1.50 away (-50%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mariehamn | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| 2 | HJK Helsinki | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| 3 | VPS | +100% | 0.00 | 0.33 |
| 4 | Inter Turku | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 |
| 5 | SJK | +14% | 0.50 | 0.67 |
| 6 | Ilves | -33% | 1.00 | 0.50 |
| 7 | SJK Akatemia | -50% | 1.50 | 0.50 |
| 8 | Honka | -71% | 2.00 | 0.33 |
Suomen Cup (Finland) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Mariehamn has the best home defensive record in the Suomen Cup (Finland), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.50 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Honka struggles most in this period at home, conceding 2.00/match at home versus 0.33 away (-71%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Inter Turku | +20% | 3.00 | 2.00 |
| 2 | Honka | +20% | 1.50 | 1.00 |
| 3 | HJK Helsinki | +9% | 3.00 | 2.50 |
| 4 | Mariehamn | -33% | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| 5 | VPS | -33% | 1.67 | 3.33 |
| 6 | SJK Akatemia | -43% | 1.00 | 2.50 |
| 7 | SJK | -54% | 0.50 | 1.67 |
| 8 | Ilves | -60% | 0.50 | 2.00 |
Suomen Cup (Finland) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Inter Turku has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Suomen Cup (Finland), netting 3.00 goals/match at home versus 2.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +20%. At the other end, Ilves shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.50/match at home against 2.00 away (-60%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ilves | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| 2 | Inter Turku | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| 3 | Honka | -33% | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| 4 | Mariehamn | -100% | 0.50 | 0.00 |
| 5 | HJK Helsinki | -100% | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | VPS | -100% | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | SJK | -100% | 0.50 | 0.00 |
| 8 | SJK Akatemia | -100% | 1.00 | 0.00 |
Suomen Cup (Finland) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Ilves has the best home defensive record in the Suomen Cup (Finland), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.50 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. SJK Akatemia struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.00/match at home versus 0.00 away (-100%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Finland
- Kakkonen - Lohko A Home Advantage— Division Regional
- Kakkonen - Lohko B Home Advantage— Division Regional
- Kakkonen - Lohko C Home Advantage— Division Regional
- Kakkonen - Play-offs Home Advantage— Division Regional
- Kakkosen Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Kansallinen Liiga Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- League Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Veikkausliiga Home Advantage— Division Gold
- Ykkönen Home Advantage— Division Silver
- Ykköscup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Ykkösliiga Home Advantage— Division Pro