MatchPulse
1 Lyga

1 Lyga — Home Advantage

Lithuania · 2026

Lithuania — 1 Lyga 2026 — Detailed Stats
Competition
Home & Away TablesForm TableHome AdvantageAway AdvantageDrawsPredictions
Goals
AVG TotalGoals ScoredGoals ConcededClean SheetsBTTSFailed To Score
Over/Under
Over 0.5 ~ 5.5 TablesUnder 0.5 ~ 5.5 Tables
More
1st Half Table2nd Half TableWinning / Losing at HT

Home Advantage

#TeamHome AdvantageScoredDefencePPG (Home / Away)
1Babrungas+26%+13%+40%2.71/2.20
2Jonava+26%+24%+27%1.29/0.87
3Kauno Žalgiris II+20%+21%+20%1.40/0.57
4Hegelmann II+19%+25%+14%1.13/0.71
5Transinvest 2+17%+18%+16%1.13/0.86
6BFA+15%+10%+21%2.00/1.27
7Garliava+15%+5%+24%1.27/0.79
8Tauras+15%+15%+14%1.92/1.47
9Žalgiris II+9%+16%+2%1.86/1.60
10Dainava+7%+1%+14%1.80/1.43
11FA Šiauliai II+4%-3%+11%0.67/0.57
12Atmosfera+3%-9%+16%1.36/1.29
13Be1 NFA+2%+8%-3%2.29/1.86
14Minija+1%+8%-5%2.79/2.21
15Neptūną Klaipėda0%+13%-12%1.71/1.33
16Ekranas-6%+3%-15%0.67/0.57

1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.

2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.

3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.

The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.

Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.

1 Lyga (Lithuania) — Home Advantage Analysis

In the 1 Lyga (Lithuania), the average home win rate is 49% compared to 35% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Kauno Žalgiris II shows the strongest home advantage, winning 47% of home games versus just 14% away (a difference of +32%). At the other end, Transinvest 2 actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 27% versus 29% on the road.

Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Hegelmann II+25%1.530.93
2Jonava+24%1.430.87
3Kauno Žalgiris II+21%1.200.79
4Transinvest 2+18%1.531.07
5Žalgiris II+16%1.861.33
6Tauras+15%2.081.53
7Babrungas+13%2.071.60
8Neptūną Klaipėda+13%1.291.00
9BFA+10%1.641.33
10Minija+8%2.862.43
11Be1 NFA+8%1.931.64
12Garliava+5%1.271.14
13Ekranas+3%1.071.00
14Dainava+1%1.531.50
15FA Šiauliai II-3%1.131.21
16Atmosfera-9%1.431.71

1 Lyga (Lithuania) — Home Goals Scored Analysis

Hegelmann II has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the 1 Lyga (Lithuania), netting 1.53 goals/match at home versus 0.93 away — a Scoring Advantage of +25%. In contrast, Atmosfera scores more away (1.71/match) than at home (1.43/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -9% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.

Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Babrungas+40%0.290.67
2Jonava+27%1.001.73
3Garliava+24%1.001.64
4BFA+21%1.141.73
5Kauno Žalgiris II+20%1.332.00
6Transinvest 2+16%1.872.57
7Atmosfera+16%1.141.57
8Hegelmann II+14%1.932.57
9Tauras+14%1.151.53
10Dainava+14%0.871.14
11FA Šiauliai II+11%2.132.64
12Žalgiris II+2%1.291.33
13Be1 NFA-3%1.071.00
14Minija-5%0.710.64
15Neptūną Klaipėda-12%1.431.13
16Ekranas-15%2.531.86

1 Lyga (Lithuania) — Home Defence Analysis

Babrungas has the best home defensive record in the 1 Lyga (Lithuania), conceding just 0.29 goals/match at home compared to 0.67 away — a Defence Advantage of +40%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Ekranas concedes more at home (2.53/match) than away (1.86/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.

1st Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Jonava+36%0.860.40
2Žalgiris II+27%0.930.53
3Tauras+24%0.770.47
4Be1 NFA+24%0.930.57
5Minija+20%1.070.71
6Ekranas+20%0.530.36
7Hegelmann II+20%0.530.36
8Transinvest 2+19%0.730.50
9Babrungas+13%0.860.67
10Dainava+12%0.730.57
11Garliava+9%0.600.50
12BFA+9%0.710.60
13FA Šiauliai II+4%0.470.43
14Neptūną Klaipėda-9%0.500.60
15Atmosfera-26%0.500.86
16Kauno Žalgiris II-69%0.070.36

1 Lyga (Lithuania) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, Jonava has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 1 Lyga (Lithuania), netting 0.86 goals/match at home versus 0.40 away — a Scoring Advantage of +36%. At the other end, Kauno Žalgiris II shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.07/match at home against 0.36 away (-69%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.

1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1BFA+65%0.140.67
2Minija+43%0.140.36
3Transinvest 2+41%0.531.29
4Atmosfera+29%0.430.79
5Babrungas+22%0.210.33
6FA Šiauliai II+20%0.671.00
7Kauno Žalgiris II+18%0.600.86
8Hegelmann II+15%1.001.36
9Žalgiris II+11%0.430.53
10Jonava+7%0.640.73
11Be1 NFA0%0.360.36
12Tauras-1%0.620.60
13Neptūną Klaipėda-3%0.500.47
14Ekranas-13%0.930.71
15Garliava-19%0.730.50
16Dainava-37%0.470.21

1 Lyga (Lithuania) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis

In the 1st Half, BFA has the best home defensive record in the 1 Lyga (Lithuania), conceding just 0.14 goals/match at home compared to 0.67 away — a Defence Advantage of +65%. Dainava struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.47/match at home versus 0.21 away (-37%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.

2nd Half — Home Goals Scored

#TeamScoring AdvantageHome Scored / matchAway Scored / match
1Kauno Žalgiris II+45%1.130.43
2Neptūną Klaipėda+33%0.790.40
3Hegelmann II+27%1.000.57
4Transinvest 2+17%0.800.57
5Babrungas+13%1.210.93
6BFA+12%0.930.73
7Tauras+10%1.311.07
8Jonava+10%0.570.47
9Žalgiris II+7%0.930.80
10Atmosfera+4%0.930.86
11Minija+2%1.791.71
12Garliava+2%0.670.64
13Be1 NFA-3%1.001.07
14Dainava-7%0.800.93
15FA Šiauliai II-8%0.670.79
16Ekranas-9%0.530.64

1 Lyga (Lithuania) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Kauno Žalgiris II has the biggest home scoring advantage in the 1 Lyga (Lithuania), netting 1.13 goals/match at home versus 0.43 away — a Scoring Advantage of +45%. At the other end, Ekranas shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.53/match at home against 0.64 away (-9%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.

2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)

#TeamDefence AdvantageHome Conceded / matchAway Conceded / match
1Babrungas+65%0.070.33
2Garliava+62%0.271.14
3Jonava+47%0.361.00
4Dainava+40%0.400.93
5Tauras+27%0.540.93
6Kauno Žalgiris II+22%0.731.14
7Hegelmann II+13%0.931.21
8FA Šiauliai II+6%1.471.64
9Atmosfera+5%0.710.79
10BFA+3%1.001.07
11Transinvest 2-2%1.331.29
12Žalgiris II-3%0.860.80
13Be1 NFA-5%0.710.64
14Neptūną Klaipėda-16%0.930.67
15Ekranas-17%1.601.14
16Minija-33%0.570.29

1 Lyga (Lithuania) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis

In the 2nd Half, Babrungas has the best home defensive record in the 1 Lyga (Lithuania), conceding just 0.07 goals/match at home compared to 0.33 away — a Defence Advantage of +65%. Minija struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.57/match at home versus 0.29 away (-33%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.

Home Advantage Tables — Lithuania