A Lyga — Home Advantage
Lithuania · 2026
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Suduva Marijampole | +26% | +5% | +46% | 2.06/1.53 |
| 2 |  Panevėžys | +22% | +9% | +36% | 1.63/0.94 |
| 3 |  Hegelmann Litauen | +16% | +18% | +13% | 0.94/0.69 |
| 4 |  Kauno Žalgiris | +16% | +10% | +21% | 1.88/2.00 |
| 5 |  Džiugas Telšiai | +12% | +13% | +12% | 1.65/1.25 |
| 6 |  FK Zalgiris Vilnius | +11% | +44% | -21% | 2.00/1.31 |
| 7 |  TransINVEST Vilnius | +3% | -15% | +20% | 1.69/1.65 |
| 8 |  Šiauliai | 0% | +7% | -7% | 1.00/0.50 |
| 9 |  FK Trakai | 0% | -8% | +7% | 0.29/0.11 |
| 10 |  Banga | -5% | +5% | -15% | 1.44/1.47 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
A Lyga (Lithuania) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the A Lyga (Lithuania), the average home win rate is 39% compared to 29% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. FK Zalgiris Vilnius shows the strongest home advantage, winning 65% of home games versus just 31% away (a difference of +33%). At the other end, Banga actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 38% versus 41% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FK Zalgiris Vilnius | +44% | 2.24 | 0.88 |
| 2 | Hegelmann Litauen | +18% | 1.18 | 0.81 |
| 3 | Džiugas Telšiai | +13% | 1.53 | 1.19 |
| 4 | Kauno Žalgiris | +10% | 2.24 | 1.81 |
| 5 | Panevėžys | +9% | 1.19 | 1.00 |
| 6 | Šiauliai | +7% | 0.94 | 0.81 |
| 7 | Banga | +5% | 1.38 | 1.24 |
| 8 | Suduva Marijampole | +5% | 1.56 | 1.41 |
| 9 | FK Trakai | -8% | 0.29 | 0.33 |
| 10 | TransINVEST Vilnius | -15% | 1.44 | 1.94 |
A Lyga (Lithuania) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
FK Zalgiris Vilnius has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the A Lyga (Lithuania), netting 2.24 goals/match at home versus 0.88 away — a Scoring Advantage of +44%. In contrast, TransINVEST Vilnius scores more away (1.94/match) than at home (1.44/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -15% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Suduva Marijampole | +46% | 0.50 | 1.35 |
| 2 | Panevėžys | +36% | 0.94 | 2.00 |
| 3 | Kauno Žalgiris | +21% | 0.53 | 0.81 |
| 4 | TransINVEST Vilnius | +20% | 0.94 | 1.41 |
| 5 | Hegelmann Litauen | +13% | 1.53 | 2.00 |
| 6 | Džiugas Telšiai | +12% | 1.24 | 1.56 |
| 7 | FK Trakai | +7% | 2.43 | 2.78 |
| 8 | Šiauliai | -7% | 1.94 | 1.69 |
| 9 | Banga | -15% | 1.13 | 0.82 |
| 10 | FK Zalgiris Vilnius | -21% | 1.35 | 0.88 |
A Lyga (Lithuania) — Home Defence Analysis
Suduva Marijampole has the best home defensive record in the A Lyga (Lithuania), conceding just 0.50 goals/match at home compared to 1.35 away — a Defence Advantage of +46%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, FK Zalgiris Vilnius concedes more at home (1.35/match) than away (0.88/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FK Zalgiris Vilnius | +56% | 1.12 | 0.31 |
| 2 | FK Trakai | +44% | 0.29 | 0.11 |
| 3 | Hegelmann Litauen | +31% | 0.59 | 0.31 |
| 4 | Kauno Žalgiris | +31% | 1.29 | 0.69 |
| 5 | Džiugas Telšiai | +27% | 0.65 | 0.38 |
| 6 | Suduva Marijampole | +8% | 0.63 | 0.53 |
| 7 | Panevėžys | +5% | 0.63 | 0.56 |
| 8 | Banga | -2% | 0.56 | 0.59 |
| 9 | Šiauliai | -3% | 0.29 | 0.31 |
| 10 | TransINVEST Vilnius | -9% | 0.69 | 0.82 |
A Lyga (Lithuania) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, FK Zalgiris Vilnius has the biggest home scoring advantage in the A Lyga (Lithuania), netting 1.12 goals/match at home versus 0.31 away — a Scoring Advantage of +56%. At the other end, TransINVEST Vilnius shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.69/match at home against 0.82 away (-9%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kauno Žalgiris | +81% | 0.06 | 0.56 |
| 2 | Suduva Marijampole | +43% | 0.19 | 0.47 |
| 3 | Panevėžys | +39% | 0.44 | 1.00 |
| 4 | TransINVEST Vilnius | +36% | 0.25 | 0.53 |
| 5 | FK Trakai | +32% | 0.86 | 1.67 |
| 6 | Hegelmann Litauen | +24% | 0.65 | 1.06 |
| 7 | Džiugas Telšiai | +23% | 0.35 | 0.56 |
| 8 | Banga | -10% | 0.50 | 0.41 |
| 9 | Šiauliai | -13% | 1.06 | 0.81 |
| 10 | FK Zalgiris Vilnius | -27% | 0.65 | 0.38 |
A Lyga (Lithuania) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Kauno Žalgiris has the best home defensive record in the A Lyga (Lithuania), conceding just 0.06 goals/match at home compared to 0.56 away — a Defence Advantage of +81%. FK Zalgiris Vilnius struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.65/match at home versus 0.38 away (-27%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FK Zalgiris Vilnius | +33% | 1.12 | 0.56 |
| 2 | Šiauliai | +13% | 0.65 | 0.50 |
| 3 | Panevėžys | +13% | 0.56 | 0.44 |
| 4 | Banga | +11% | 0.81 | 0.65 |
| 5 | Hegelmann Litauen | +8% | 0.59 | 0.50 |
| 6 | Džiugas Telšiai | +4% | 0.88 | 0.81 |
| 7 | Suduva Marijampole | +3% | 0.94 | 0.88 |
| 8 | Kauno Žalgiris | -9% | 0.94 | 1.13 |
| 9 | TransINVEST Vilnius | -20% | 0.75 | 1.12 |
| 10 | FK Trakai | -100% | 0.00 | 0.22 |
A Lyga (Lithuania) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, FK Zalgiris Vilnius has the biggest home scoring advantage in the A Lyga (Lithuania), netting 1.12 goals/match at home versus 0.56 away — a Scoring Advantage of +33%. At the other end, FK Trakai shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.00/match at home against 0.22 away (-100%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Suduva Marijampole | +48% | 0.31 | 0.88 |
| 2 | Panevėžys | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 |
| 3 | TransINVEST Vilnius | +12% | 0.69 | 0.88 |
| 4 | Džiugas Telšiai | +6% | 0.88 | 1.00 |
| 5 | Hegelmann Litauen | +3% | 0.88 | 0.94 |
| 6 | Šiauliai | 0% | 0.88 | 0.88 |
| 7 | FK Zalgiris Vilnius | -17% | 0.71 | 0.50 |
| 8 | FK Trakai | -17% | 1.57 | 1.11 |
| 9 | Banga | -21% | 0.63 | 0.41 |
| 10 | Kauno Žalgiris | -31% | 0.47 | 0.25 |
A Lyga (Lithuania) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Suduva Marijampole has the best home defensive record in the A Lyga (Lithuania), conceding just 0.31 goals/match at home compared to 0.88 away — a Defence Advantage of +48%. Kauno Žalgiris struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.47/match at home versus 0.25 away (-31%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Lithuania
- 1 Lyga Home Advantage— Division Pro
- Cup Home Advantage— Division Underground
- Super Cup Home Advantage— Division Silver