NB I — Home Advantage
Hungary · 2026/27
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Zalaegerszegi TE | +71% | +88% | +55% | 2.17/0.00 |
| 2 |  MTK Budapest | +31% | +25% | +36% | 1.50/0.50 |
| 3 |  Nyiregyhaza | +27% | +9% | +44% | 1.60/0.43 |
| 4 |  Ferencvarosi TC | +21% | +9% | +32% | 1.80/1.83 |
| 5 |  Ujpest | +19% | +20% | +18% | 2.17/0.83 |
| 6 |  Paks | +16% | +27% | +5% | 1.67/1.17 |
| 7 |  Vasas | +8% | +10% | +6% | 1.33/1.33 |
| 8 |  Gyori ETO FC | +5% | +7% | +2% | 1.86/1.80 |
| 9 |  Budapest Honved | +3% | -9% | +15% | 1.33/1.00 |
| 10 |  Debreceni VSC | -10% | -14% | -6% | 1.33/1.83 |
| 11 |  Kisvarda FC | -15% | -17% | -14% | 0.67/1.33 |
| 12 |  Puskas Academy | -27% | +6% | -60% | 1.00/2.50 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
NB I (Hungary) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the NB I (Hungary), the average home win rate is 42% compared to 31% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. Zalaegerszegi TE shows the strongest home advantage, winning 67% of home games versus just 0% away (a difference of +67%). At the other end, Puskas Academy actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 33% versus 83% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zalaegerszegi TE | +88% | 2.50 | 0.17 |
| 2 | Paks | +27% | 2.33 | 1.33 |
| 3 | MTK Budapest | +25% | 1.67 | 1.00 |
| 4 | Ujpest | +20% | 2.00 | 1.33 |
| 5 | Vasas | +10% | 1.83 | 1.50 |
| 6 | Ferencvarosi TC | +9% | 2.00 | 1.67 |
| 7 | Nyiregyhaza | +9% | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| 8 | Gyori ETO FC | +7% | 1.86 | 1.60 |
| 9 | Puskas Academy | +6% | 1.50 | 1.33 |
| 10 | Budapest Honved | -9% | 1.17 | 1.40 |
| 11 | Debreceni VSC | -14% | 1.50 | 2.00 |
| 12 | Kisvarda FC | -17% | 0.83 | 1.17 |
NB I (Hungary) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
Zalaegerszegi TE has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the NB I (Hungary), netting 2.50 goals/match at home versus 0.17 away — a Scoring Advantage of +88%. In contrast, Kisvarda FC scores more away (1.17/match) than at home (0.83/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -17% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zalaegerszegi TE | +55% | 0.83 | 2.83 |
| 2 | Nyiregyhaza | +44% | 1.00 | 2.57 |
| 3 | MTK Budapest | +36% | 1.33 | 2.83 |
| 4 | Ferencvarosi TC | +32% | 0.60 | 1.17 |
| 5 | Ujpest | +18% | 1.17 | 1.67 |
| 6 | Budapest Honved | +15% | 1.33 | 1.80 |
| 7 | Vasas | +6% | 1.33 | 1.50 |
| 8 | Paks | +5% | 1.67 | 1.83 |
| 9 | Gyori ETO FC | +2% | 1.14 | 1.20 |
| 10 | Debreceni VSC | -6% | 1.50 | 1.33 |
| 11 | Kisvarda FC | -14% | 1.33 | 1.00 |
| 12 | Puskas Academy | -60% | 2.00 | 0.50 |
NB I (Hungary) — Home Defence Analysis
Zalaegerszegi TE has the best home defensive record in the NB I (Hungary), conceding just 0.83 goals/match at home compared to 2.83 away — a Defence Advantage of +55%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Puskas Academy concedes more at home (2.00/match) than away (0.50/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Budapest Honved | +61% | 0.83 | 0.20 |
| 2 | Zalaegerszegi TE | +60% | 0.67 | 0.17 |
| 3 | Kisvarda FC | +50% | 0.50 | 0.17 |
| 4 | Vasas | +33% | 0.67 | 0.33 |
| 5 | Paks | +33% | 1.00 | 0.50 |
| 6 | Ferencvarosi TC | +20% | 1.00 | 0.67 |
| 7 | Puskas Academy | +9% | 1.00 | 0.83 |
| 8 | Ujpest | 0% | 0.67 | 0.67 |
| 9 | Debreceni VSC | -11% | 0.67 | 0.83 |
| 10 | MTK Budapest | -14% | 0.50 | 0.67 |
| 11 | Nyiregyhaza | -28% | 0.40 | 0.71 |
| 12 | Gyori ETO FC | -30% | 0.43 | 0.80 |
NB I (Hungary) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Budapest Honved has the biggest home scoring advantage in the NB I (Hungary), netting 0.83 goals/match at home versus 0.20 away — a Scoring Advantage of +61%. At the other end, Gyori ETO FC shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.43/match at home against 0.80 away (-30%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nyiregyhaza | +62% | 0.20 | 0.86 |
| 2 | Vasas | +60% | 0.17 | 0.67 |
| 3 | Ferencvarosi TC | +54% | 0.20 | 0.67 |
| 4 | MTK Budapest | +45% | 0.50 | 1.33 |
| 5 | Budapest Honved | +41% | 0.17 | 0.40 |
| 6 | Ujpest | +20% | 0.67 | 1.00 |
| 7 | Zalaegerszegi TE | +20% | 0.67 | 1.00 |
| 8 | Paks | -17% | 1.17 | 0.83 |
| 9 | Debreceni VSC | -20% | 1.00 | 0.67 |
| 10 | Kisvarda FC | -20% | 0.50 | 0.33 |
| 11 | Gyori ETO FC | -36% | 0.43 | 0.20 |
| 12 | Puskas Academy | -67% | 0.83 | 0.17 |
NB I (Hungary) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Nyiregyhaza has the best home defensive record in the NB I (Hungary), conceding just 0.20 goals/match at home compared to 0.86 away — a Defence Advantage of +62%. Puskas Academy struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.83/match at home versus 0.17 away (-67%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zalaegerszegi TE | +100% | 1.83 | 0.00 |
| 2 | MTK Budapest | +56% | 1.17 | 0.33 |
| 3 | Nyiregyhaza | +47% | 0.80 | 0.29 |
| 4 | Ujpest | +33% | 1.33 | 0.67 |
| 5 | Gyori ETO FC | +28% | 1.43 | 0.80 |
| 6 | Paks | +23% | 1.33 | 0.83 |
| 7 | Ferencvarosi TC | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 8 | Vasas | 0% | 1.17 | 1.17 |
| 9 | Puskas Academy | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| 10 | Debreceni VSC | -17% | 0.83 | 1.17 |
| 11 | Kisvarda FC | -50% | 0.33 | 1.00 |
| 12 | Budapest Honved | -57% | 0.33 | 1.20 |
NB I (Hungary) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Zalaegerszegi TE has the biggest home scoring advantage in the NB I (Hungary), netting 1.83 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Budapest Honved shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.33/match at home against 1.20 away (-57%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zalaegerszegi TE | +83% | 0.17 | 1.83 |
| 2 | Nyiregyhaza | +36% | 0.80 | 1.71 |
| 3 | Paks | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 |
| 4 | MTK Budapest | +29% | 0.83 | 1.50 |
| 5 | Gyori ETO FC | +17% | 0.71 | 1.00 |
| 6 | Ujpest | +14% | 0.50 | 0.67 |
| 7 | Debreceni VSC | +14% | 0.50 | 0.67 |
| 8 | Ferencvarosi TC | +11% | 0.40 | 0.50 |
| 9 | Budapest Honved | +9% | 1.17 | 1.40 |
| 10 | Kisvarda FC | -11% | 0.83 | 0.67 |
| 11 | Vasas | -17% | 1.17 | 0.83 |
| 12 | Puskas Academy | -56% | 1.17 | 0.33 |
NB I (Hungary) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, Zalaegerszegi TE has the best home defensive record in the NB I (Hungary), conceding just 0.17 goals/match at home compared to 1.83 away — a Defence Advantage of +83%. Puskas Academy struggles most in this period at home, conceding 1.17/match at home versus 0.33 away (-56%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Hungary
- Magyar Kupa Home Advantage— Division SemiPro
- NB II Home Advantage— Division Silver
- NB III - Northeast Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- NB III - Northwest Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- NB III - Promotion Play-offs Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- NB III - Southeast Home Advantage— Division Amateur
- NB III - Southwest Home Advantage— Division Amateur