Cup — Home Advantage
Russia · 2026/27
Home Advantage
| # | Team | Home Advantage | Scored | Defence | PPG (Home / Away) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | +100% | +100% | 3.00/0.00 | |
| 2 | +83% | +100% | +67% | 1.00/0.00 | |
| 3 | +75% | +50% | +100% | 3.00/1.50 | |
| 4 | +75% | +50% | +100% | 3.00/1.00 | |
| 5 | +67% | +33% | +100% | 3.00/1.00 | |
| 6 | +67% | +33% | +100% | 3.00/3.00 | |
| 7 | +67% | +33% | +100% | 3.00/1.00 | |
| 8 | +67% | +33% | +100% | 3.00/1.00 | |
| 9 | +55% | +9% | +100% | 3.00/2.33 | |
| 10 | +52% | +65% | +38% | 2.00/0.50 | |
| 11 | +50% | +100% | 0% | 1.00/0.00 | |
| 12 | +50% | 0% | +100% | 3.00/0.00 | |
| 13 | +50% | 0% | +100% | 3.00/0.00 | |
| 14 | +50% | +100% | 0% | 1.00/0.00 | |
| 15 | +46% | +20% | +71% | 3.00/1.50 | |
| 16 | +35% | +50% | +20% | 3.00/1.50 | |
| 17 | +33% | -33% | +100% | 3.00/1.00 | |
| 18 | +32% | +50% | +14% | 1.00/0.33 | |
| 19 | +29% | +64% | -6% | 1.50/0.67 | |
| 20 | +25% | +50% | 0% | 0.00/0.33 | |
| 21 | +25% | +50% | 0% | 3.00/0.00 | |
| 22 | +24% | +9% | +38% | 3.00/2.00 | |
| 23 | +23% | +50% | -3% | 0.50/0.33 | |
| 24 | +23% | +25% | +20% | 2.33/1.00 | |
| 25 | +21% | +45% | -3% | 1.00/0.00 | |
| 26 | +20% | +6% | +33% | 1.50/2.00 | |
| 27 | +17% | +33% | 0% | 2.00/1.00 | |
| 28 | +8% | -33% | +50% | 2.33/3.00 | |
| 29 | +5% | -9% | +20% | 1.33/3.00 | |
| 30 | +5% | -9% | +20% | 2.33/3.00 | |
| 31 | +5% | +43% | -33% | 2.00/1.50 | |
| 32 | +3% | -33% | +40% | 2.00/2.00 | |
| 33 | 0% | +100% | -100% | 2.00/1.00 | |
| 34 | 0% | +33% | -33% | 1.00/1.00 | |
| 35 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.00/1.00 | |
| 36 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.00/1.00 | |
| 37 | -8% | -50% | +33% | 1.00/3.00 | |
| 38 | -10% | 0% | -20% | 1.50/1.00 | |
| 39 | -17% | -33% | 0% | 3.00/3.00 | |
| 40 | -17% | -33% | 0% | 1.50/3.00 | |
| 41 | -17% | -33% | 0% | 0.50/3.00 | |
| 42 | -17% | -20% | -14% | 1.33/2.00 | |
| 43 | -22% | -64% | +20% | 0.67/1.50 | |
| 44 | -23% | 0% | -45% | 1.33/2.00 | |
| 45 | -23% | 0% | -45% | 0.67/1.50 | |
| 46 | -25% | -50% | 0% | 2.00/2.00 | |
| 47 | -27% | -20% | -33% | 1.50/2.00 | |
| 48 | -46% | -100% | +8% | 0.50/1.33 | |
| 49 | -50% | -100% | 0% | 1.00/3.00 | |
| 50 | -50% | -100% | 0% | 1.00/3.00 | |
| 51 | -50% | -100% | 0% | 0.00/3.00 | |
| 52 | -57% | -14% | -100% | 1.50/3.00 | |
| 53 | -67% | -100% | -33% | 0.00/3.00 | |
| 54 | -80% | -60% | -100% | 0.50/3.00 |
1. Home Advantage: How much a team's results improve on their own ground versus on the road — a combined signal from both attack and defence.
2. Scored: Compares goals scored per game at home against goals scored per game away. A positive figure means the team finds the net more easily at home.
3. Defence: Compares goals conceded per game at home against goals conceded away. A positive figure means the team keeps opponents quieter on their own turf.
The combined Home Advantage score is the average of the Scoring and Defence figures, weighted equally.
Goal-based metrics give a sharper picture of home performance than win/loss records alone, since they reflect the margin of each match.
Cup (Russia) — Home Advantage Analysis
In the Cup (Russia), the average home win rate is 47% compared to 40% away — a clear indicator that home advantage is a significant factor. CSKA Moscow shows the strongest home advantage, winning 67% of home games versus just 0% away (a difference of +67%). At the other end, Baltika actually performs better away than at home, with a home win rate of 0% versus 50% on the road.
Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | +100% | 2.00 | 0.00 | |
| 3 | +100% | 3.00 | 0.00 | |
| 4 | +100% | 1.50 | 0.00 | |
| 5 | +100% | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 6 | +65% | 2.33 | 0.50 | |
| 7 | +64% | 1.50 | 0.33 | |
| 8 | +50% | 1.00 | 0.33 | |
| 9 | +50% | 1.00 | 0.33 | |
| 10 | +50% | 1.00 | 0.33 | |
| 11 | +50% | 3.00 | 1.00 | |
| 12 | +50% | 3.00 | 1.00 | |
| 13 | +50% | 3.00 | 1.00 | |
| 14 | +50% | 3.00 | 1.00 | |
| 15 | +45% | 2.67 | 1.00 | |
| 16 | +43% | 2.50 | 1.00 | |
| 17 | +33% | 2.00 | 1.00 | |
| 18 | +33% | 2.00 | 1.00 | |
| 19 | +33% | 4.00 | 2.00 | |
| 20 | +33% | 2.00 | 1.00 | |
| 21 | +33% | 2.00 | 1.00 | |
| 22 | +33% | 2.00 | 1.00 | |
| 23 | +25% | 1.67 | 1.00 | |
| 24 | +20% | 3.00 | 2.00 | |
| 25 | +9% | 3.00 | 2.50 | |
| 26 | +9% | 2.00 | 1.67 | |
| 27 | +6% | 1.50 | 1.33 | |
| 28 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 29 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 30 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 31 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 32 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 33 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 34 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 35 | -9% | 1.67 | 2.00 | |
| 36 | -9% | 1.67 | 2.00 | |
| 37 | -14% | 1.50 | 2.00 | |
| 38 | -20% | 1.00 | 1.50 | |
| 39 | -20% | 0.67 | 1.00 | |
| 40 | -33% | 2.00 | 4.00 | |
| 41 | -33% | 1.50 | 3.00 | |
| 42 | -33% | 2.00 | 4.00 | |
| 43 | -33% | 2.00 | 4.00 | |
| 44 | -33% | 1.00 | 2.00 | |
| 45 | -33% | 2.00 | 4.00 | |
| 46 | -50% | 0.50 | 1.50 | |
| 47 | -50% | 1.00 | 3.00 | |
| 48 | -60% | 0.50 | 2.00 | |
| 49 | -64% | 0.33 | 1.50 | |
| 50 | -100% | 0.00 | 3.00 | |
| 51 | -100% | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| 52 | -100% | 0.00 | 3.00 | |
| 53 | -100% | 0.00 | 2.00 | |
| 54 | -100% | 0.00 | 2.00 |
Cup (Russia) — Home Goals Scored Analysis
CSKA Moscow has the biggest scoring advantage at home in the Cup (Russia), netting 2.33 goals/match at home versus 0.50 away — a Scoring Advantage of +65%. In contrast, Akron scores more away (1.00/match) than at home (0.00/match), representing a scoring disadvantage of -100% at their own ground. A high positive Scoring Advantage is a key signal for Over 2.5 and BTTS betting markets in home fixtures.
Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| 2 | +100% | 0.00 | 4.00 | |
| 3 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| 4 | +100% | 0.00 | 4.00 | |
| 5 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| 6 | +100% | 0.00 | 2.00 | |
| 7 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.50 | |
| 8 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| 9 | +100% | 0.00 | 3.00 | |
| 10 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| 11 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| 12 | +71% | 0.33 | 2.00 | |
| 13 | +67% | 1.00 | 5.00 | |
| 14 | +50% | 0.67 | 2.00 | |
| 15 | +40% | 1.00 | 2.33 | |
| 16 | +38% | 0.67 | 1.50 | |
| 17 | +38% | 0.67 | 1.50 | |
| 18 | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 19 | +33% | 1.00 | 2.00 | |
| 20 | +20% | 0.67 | 1.00 | |
| 21 | +20% | 0.67 | 1.00 | |
| 22 | +20% | 0.67 | 1.00 | |
| 23 | +20% | 0.67 | 1.00 | |
| 24 | +20% | 1.00 | 1.50 | |
| 25 | +14% | 1.00 | 1.33 | |
| 26 | +8% | 2.00 | 2.33 | |
| 27 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 28 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 29 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 30 | 0% | 3.00 | 3.00 | |
| 31 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 32 | 0% | 2.00 | 2.00 | |
| 33 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 34 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 35 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 36 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 37 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 38 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 39 | 0% | 3.00 | 3.00 | |
| 40 | 0% | 2.00 | 2.00 | |
| 41 | -3% | 2.67 | 2.50 | |
| 42 | -3% | 2.50 | 2.33 | |
| 43 | -6% | 1.50 | 1.33 | |
| 44 | -14% | 0.67 | 0.50 | |
| 45 | -20% | 1.50 | 1.00 | |
| 46 | -33% | 2.00 | 1.00 | |
| 47 | -33% | 2.00 | 1.00 | |
| 48 | -33% | 2.00 | 1.00 | |
| 49 | -33% | 2.00 | 1.00 | |
| 50 | -45% | 1.33 | 0.50 | |
| 51 | -45% | 1.33 | 0.50 | |
| 52 | -100% | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 53 | -100% | 1.50 | 0.00 | |
| 54 | -100% | 1.50 | 0.00 |
Cup (Russia) — Home Defence Analysis
Zenit has the best home defensive record in the Cup (Russia), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 1.00 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. This makes them an excellent Clean Sheet and Under 2.5 candidate in home fixtures. On the flip side, Baltika concedes more at home (1.33/match) than away (0.50/match), suggesting their home defence struggles despite the crowd backing. High Defence Advantage combined with low scoring opponents points strongly to Under 2.5 and BTTS No outcomes.
1st Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | +100% | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 3 | +60% | 2.00 | 0.50 | |
| 4 | +54% | 1.67 | 0.50 | |
| 5 | +45% | 1.33 | 0.50 | |
| 6 | +45% | 1.33 | 0.50 | |
| 7 | +38% | 1.50 | 0.67 | |
| 8 | +20% | 0.50 | 0.33 | |
| 9 | +20% | 0.50 | 0.33 | |
| 10 | +20% | 0.50 | 0.33 | |
| 11 | +14% | 0.67 | 0.50 | |
| 12 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 13 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 14 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 15 | -20% | 0.33 | 0.50 | |
| 16 | -20% | 0.67 | 1.00 | |
| 17 | -33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 18 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.33 | |
| 19 | -100% | 0.00 | 1.33 | |
| 20 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 21 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.33 | |
| 22 | -100% | 0.00 | 1.00 |
Cup (Russia) — Home Goals Scored (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Akhmat has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Cup (Russia), netting 1.00 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Murom shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.00/match at home against 1.00 away (-100%). First-half scoring patterns are key indicators for Half-Time result and Asian Handicap markets.
1st Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.33 | |
| 2 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.50 | |
| 3 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| 4 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.00 | |
| 5 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 6 | +64% | 0.33 | 1.50 | |
| 7 | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 8 | +14% | 0.50 | 0.67 | |
| 9 | +14% | 0.50 | 0.67 | |
| 10 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 11 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 12 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 13 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 14 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 15 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 16 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 17 | -14% | 0.67 | 0.50 | |
| 18 | -20% | 1.00 | 0.67 | |
| 19 | -20% | 0.50 | 0.33 | |
| 20 | -33% | 1.00 | 0.50 | |
| 21 | -100% | 0.67 | 0.00 | |
| 22 | -100% | 0.33 | 0.00 |
Cup (Russia) — Home Defence (1st Half) Analysis
In the 1st Half, Zenit has the best home defensive record in the Cup (Russia), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 0.33 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Krylia Sovetov struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.33/match at home versus 0.00 away (-100%). Strong first-half home defence is a reliable indicator for Half-Time 0-0 and Under 0.5 HT markets.
2nd Half — Home Goals Scored
| # | Team | Scoring Advantage | Home Scored / match | Away Scored / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.67 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | +100% | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
| 3 | +100% | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 4 | +100% | 2.00 | 0.00 | |
| 5 | +100% | 0.50 | 0.00 | |
| 6 | +45% | 1.33 | 0.50 | |
| 7 | +33% | 2.00 | 1.00 | |
| 8 | +33% | 1.00 | 0.50 | |
| 9 | +33% | 1.00 | 0.50 | |
| 10 | +33% | 2.00 | 1.00 | |
| 11 | +20% | 0.50 | 0.33 | |
| 12 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 13 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 14 | 0% | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| 15 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 16 | -5% | 1.50 | 1.67 | |
| 17 | -9% | 1.67 | 2.00 | |
| 18 | -20% | 0.33 | 0.50 | |
| 19 | -20% | 0.33 | 0.50 | |
| 20 | -33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 21 | -64% | 0.33 | 1.50 | |
| 22 | -100% | 0.00 | 0.67 |
Cup (Russia) — Home Goals Scored (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, CSKA Moscow has the biggest home scoring advantage in the Cup (Russia), netting 0.67 goals/match at home versus 0.00 away — a Scoring Advantage of +100%. At the other end, Akron shows the weakest home output in this period, with 0.00/match at home against 0.67 away (-100%). Second-half scoring advantage is particularly valuable for live betting and Over/Under markets in the final stages.
2nd Half — Home Defence (Conceded)
| # | Team | Defence Advantage | Home Conceded / match | Away Conceded / match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | +100% | 0.00 | 1.50 | |
| 2 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.67 | |
| 3 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.33 | |
| 4 | +100% | 0.00 | 0.50 | |
| 5 | +45% | 0.50 | 1.33 | |
| 6 | +33% | 0.50 | 1.00 | |
| 7 | +20% | 0.33 | 0.50 | |
| 8 | +20% | 0.33 | 0.50 | |
| 9 | +14% | 0.50 | 0.67 | |
| 10 | +14% | 1.00 | 1.33 | |
| 11 | +9% | 1.67 | 2.00 | |
| 12 | +5% | 1.50 | 1.67 | |
| 13 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 14 | 0% | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 15 | 0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 16 | -14% | 0.67 | 0.50 | |
| 17 | -45% | 1.33 | 0.50 | |
| 18 | -50% | 1.50 | 0.50 | |
| 19 | -50% | 1.50 | 0.50 | |
| 20 | -100% | 0.33 | 0.00 | |
| 21 | -100% | 0.67 | 0.00 | |
| 22 | -100% | 0.67 | 0.00 |
Cup (Russia) — Home Defence (2nd Half) Analysis
In the 2nd Half, CSKA Moscow has the best home defensive record in the Cup (Russia), conceding just 0.00 goals/match at home compared to 1.50 away — a Defence Advantage of +100%. Baltika struggles most in this period at home, conceding 0.67/match at home versus 0.00 away (-100%). A high second-half home defence advantage is a strong signal for Under 1.5 2H and Clean Sheet in the second period.
Home Advantage Tables — Russia
- First League Home Advantage— Division Silver
- Premier League Home Advantage— Division Gold
- Second League - Group 1 Home Advantage— Division Regional
- Second League - Group 2 Home Advantage— Division Regional
- Second League - Group 3 Home Advantage— Division Regional
- Second League - Group 4 Home Advantage— Division Regional
- Second League A - Division A Gold Home Advantage— Division Regional
- Second League A - Division A Silver Home Advantage— Division Regional
- Second League A - Promotion Play-offs Home Advantage— Division Regional
- Second League A - Spring Season Gold Home Advantage— Division Regional
- Second League A - Spring Season Silver Home Advantage— Division Regional
- Super Cup Home Advantage— Division Gold
- Super Cup Women Home Advantage
- Supreme Division Women Home Advantage— Division Women's Pro
- Youth Championship Home Advantage— Division Academy