Cup — Corner Stats
Russia · 2026/27
Total Corners
| # | Team | MP | O 7.5 | O 8.5 | O 9.5 | O 10.5 | O 11.5 | O 12.5 | O 13.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 16.0 | |
| 2 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 15.0 | |
| 3 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 13.0 | |
| 4 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 12.7 | |
| 5 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 12.5 | |
| 6 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 12.0 | |
| 7 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 11.7 | |
| 8 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 11.7 | |
| 9 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 11.5 | |
| 10 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 11.3 | |
| 11 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 11.0 | |
| 12 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11.0 | |
| 13 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 11.0 | |
| 14 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 10.7 | |
| 15 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 10.5 | |
| 16 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 10.3 | |
| 17 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 10.3 | |
| 18 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10.0 | |
| 19 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10.0 | |
| 20 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 10.0 | |
| 21 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10.0 | |
| 22 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10.0 | |
| 23 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.7 | |
| 24 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 9.7 | |
| 25 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.5 | |
| 26 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 9.5 | |
| 27 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.5 | |
| 28 | 3 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 9.3 | |
| 29 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 30 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 31 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 32 | 3 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 9.0 | |
| 33 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 34 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 35 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 36 | 3 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 8.7 | |
| 37 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.5 | |
| 38 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.5 | |
| 39 | 3 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 8.3 | |
| 40 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.0 | |
| 41 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 7.7 | |
| 42 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 7.5 | |
| 43 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 44 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 45 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 46 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.5 | |
| 47 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.3 | |
| 48 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 49 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 50 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 51 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 |
Total Corners
League avg
9.36
Highest avg
16.0
Lowest avg
3.0
Total Corners in Cup 2026 — Stats & Analysis
Volna Nizhegorodskaya leads the Cup with 12.67 total corners per fixture, recorded across 3 fixtures. This places them well clear of the competition in terms of corner activity.
CSKA Moscow (11.67) and Rodina Moskva (11.67) follow as the next most active sides, with the trio averaging 12.00 combined. Their fixtures consistently generate significant corner volume.
At the other end, Rubin produce just 6.33 total corners per fixture — the lowest in the competition — across 3 games.
Corner Market Insights
The Cup features moderate corner activity, with a league-wide average of 9.85 total corners per match across all qualifying fixtures. This baseline is essential when evaluating corner-related betting markets.
The top three clubs — Volna Nizhegorodskaya, CSKA Moscow, and Rodina Moskva — average 12.00 collectively, sitting 2.15 above the league mean. Fixtures involving these sides provide a structural edge for above-threshold corner markets.
Corners For
| # | Team | MP | O 2.5 | O 3.5 | O 4.5 | O 5.5 | O 6.5 | O 7.5 | O 8.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 9.0 | |
| 2 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 8.0 | |
| 3 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 7.5 | |
| 4 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 7.3 | |
| 5 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 6 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 7 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 8 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 7.0 | |
| 9 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 6.3 | |
| 10 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 6.0 | |
| 11 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 6.0 | |
| 12 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 6.0 | |
| 13 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 6.0 | |
| 14 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 6.0 | |
| 15 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 6.0 | |
| 16 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 6.0 | |
| 17 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.0 | |
| 18 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5.5 | |
| 19 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 5.0 | |
| 20 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5.0 | |
| 21 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5.0 | |
| 22 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 5.0 | |
| 23 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5.0 | |
| 24 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5.0 | |
| 25 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 5.0 | |
| 26 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5.0 | |
| 27 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 4.7 | |
| 28 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 4.7 | |
| 29 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.7 | |
| 30 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 4.7 | |
| 31 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 4.5 | |
| 32 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 4.5 | |
| 33 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.3 | |
| 34 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 4.3 | |
| 35 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 36 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 37 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 38 | 3 | 100% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.7 | |
| 39 | 3 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 3.3 | |
| 40 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 41 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 42 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 43 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 44 | 3 | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.7 | |
| 45 | 3 | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.3 | |
| 46 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 47 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 48 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 49 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 50 | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.5 |
Corners For
League avg
4.79
Highest avg
9.0
Lowest avg
0.5
Corners Won (For) in Cup 2026 — Stats
Zenit leads the Cup with 7.33 corners won per match, recorded across 3 fixtures. This places them well clear of the competition in terms of corner activity.
CSKA Moscow (6.33) and Akhmat (6.00) follow as the next most active sides, with the trio averaging 6.55 combined. Their fixtures consistently generate significant corner volume.
At the other end, Dinamo Makhachkala produce just 2.33 corners won per match — the lowest in the competition — across 3 games.
Corner Market Insights
The Cup features moderate corner activity, with a league-wide average of 4.83 corners won per match across all qualifying fixtures. This baseline is essential when evaluating corner-related betting markets.
The top three clubs — Zenit, CSKA Moscow, and Akhmat — average 6.55 collectively, sitting 1.72 above the league mean. Fixtures involving these sides provide a structural edge for above-threshold corner markets.
Corners Against
| # | Team | MP | O 2.5 | O 3.5 | O 4.5 | O 5.5 | O 6.5 | O 7.5 | O 8.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 10.0 | |
| 2 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 67% | 67% | 9.0 | |
| 3 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 8.0 | |
| 4 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 5 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 7.0 | |
| 6 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 7 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 8 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 9 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 10 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 6.7 | |
| 11 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 6.7 | |
| 12 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 6.5 | |
| 13 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 6.0 | |
| 14 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 6.0 | |
| 15 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.0 | |
| 16 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 6.0 | |
| 17 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 5.5 | |
| 18 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 5.3 | |
| 19 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5.3 | |
| 20 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5.3 | |
| 21 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 5.3 | |
| 22 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5.0 | |
| 23 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5.0 | |
| 24 | 3 | 100% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 4.7 | |
| 25 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.5 | |
| 26 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 4.5 | |
| 27 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.5 | |
| 28 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.3 | |
| 29 | 3 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 4.3 | |
| 30 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 4.3 | |
| 31 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 32 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 33 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 34 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 35 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 36 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.7 | |
| 37 | 3 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.7 | |
| 38 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.5 | |
| 39 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.5 | |
| 40 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.5 | |
| 41 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 42 | 3 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 43 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 44 | 3 | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 45 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 46 | 3 | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.7 | |
| 47 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 48 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 49 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 50 | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.5 |
Corners Against
League avg
4.76
Highest avg
10.0
Lowest avg
0.5
Corners Conceded (Against) in Cup 2026 — Stats
Rodina Moskva leads the Cup with 9.00 corners conceded per match, recorded across 3 fixtures. This places them well clear of the competition in terms of corner activity.
Volna Nizhegorodskaya (8.00) and Dinamo Makhachkala (6.67) follow as the next most active sides, with the trio averaging 7.89 combined. Their fixtures consistently generate significant corner volume.
At the other end, Spartak Moscow produce just 1.67 corners conceded per match — the lowest in the competition — across 3 games.
Corner Market Insights
The Cup features high corner volume, with a league-wide average of 5.02 corners conceded per match across all qualifying fixtures. This baseline is essential when evaluating corner-related betting markets.
The top three clubs — Rodina Moskva, Volna Nizhegorodskaya, and Dinamo Makhachkala — average 7.89 collectively, sitting 2.87 above the league mean. Fixtures involving these sides provide a structural edge for above-threshold corner markets.
Home Total Corners
| # | Team | MP | O 7.5 | O 8.5 | O 9.5 | O 10.5 | O 11.5 | O 12.5 | O 13.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 15.5 | |
| 2 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 15.0 | |
| 3 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 15.0 | |
| 4 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 14.0 | |
| 5 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 13.0 | |
| 6 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 12.0 | |
| 7 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 12.0 | |
| 8 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 12.0 | |
| 9 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 12.0 | |
| 10 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 11.5 | |
| 11 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11.0 | |
| 12 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 11.0 | |
| 13 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11.0 | |
| 14 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11.0 | |
| 15 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10.0 | |
| 16 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10.0 | |
| 17 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10.0 | |
| 18 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10.0 | |
| 19 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.5 | |
| 20 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.5 | |
| 21 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.5 | |
| 22 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 9.5 | |
| 23 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 24 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 25 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 26 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 27 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.0 | |
| 28 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.0 | |
| 29 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 30 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 31 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 32 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 33 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 34 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 35 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.5 | |
| 36 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.0 | |
| 37 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.5 | |
| 38 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 39 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 |
Home Total Corners
League avg
9.54
Highest avg
15.5
Lowest avg
3.0
Away Total Corners
| # | Team | MP | O 7.5 | O 8.5 | O 9.5 | O 10.5 | O 11.5 | O 12.5 | O 13.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 16.0 | |
| 2 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 15.0 | |
| 3 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 15.0 | |
| 4 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 14.0 | |
| 5 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 14.0 | |
| 6 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 13.0 | |
| 7 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 13.0 | |
| 8 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 12.0 | |
| 9 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 12.0 | |
| 10 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 12.0 | |
| 11 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 12.0 | |
| 12 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 11.5 | |
| 13 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11.0 | |
| 14 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11.0 | |
| 15 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11.0 | |
| 16 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 10.5 | |
| 17 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 10.5 | |
| 18 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10.0 | |
| 19 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10.0 | |
| 20 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10.0 | |
| 21 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10.0 | |
| 22 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10.0 | |
| 23 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10.0 | |
| 24 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 25 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 26 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 27 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 28 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 9.0 | |
| 29 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.0 | |
| 30 | 2 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.5 | |
| 31 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 32 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 33 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 34 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 35 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 36 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.0 | |
| 37 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.0 | |
| 38 | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.0 | |
| 39 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5.0 | |
| 40 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 41 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 42 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 |
Away Total Corners
League avg
9.6
Highest avg
16.0
Lowest avg
3.0