Cup — Card Stats
Russia · 2026/27
Yellow Cards — Match Total
| # | Team | MP | O 1.5 | O 2.5 | O 3.5 | O 4.5 | O 5.5 | O 6.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 6.5 | |
| 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 6.0 | |
| 3 | 5 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 60% | 60% | 20% | 5.4 | |
| 4 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 5.0 | |
| 5 | 4 | 100% | 100% | 75% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 5.0 | |
| 6 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 67% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 4.7 | |
| 7 | 5 | 100% | 100% | 80% | 60% | 20% | 0% | 4.6 | |
| 8 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 4.5 | |
| 9 | 4 | 100% | 100% | 75% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 4.5 | |
| 10 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 4.3 | |
| 11 | 5 | 100% | 80% | 60% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 4.0 | |
| 12 | 5 | 80% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 13 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 14 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 15 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 16 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.0 | |
| 17 | 4 | 75% | 75% | 75% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 3.8 | |
| 18 | 5 | 100% | 80% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 3.2 | |
| 19 | 4 | 75% | 75% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 20 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 21 | 5 | 80% | 60% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 22 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 23 | 4 | 100% | 75% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 24 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 25 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 26 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 27 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 28 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 29 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 30 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 31 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 32 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 33 | 4 | 100% | 75% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 34 | 5 | 60% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 2.8 | |
| 35 | 5 | 100% | 60% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.8 | |
| 36 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.5 | |
| 37 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.5 | |
| 38 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.5 | |
| 39 | 5 | 80% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.4 | |
| 40 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 41 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 42 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 43 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 44 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 45 | 5 | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.6 | |
| 46 | 2 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 47 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 48 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 49 | 1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 50 | 2 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 |
Yellow Cards — Match Total
League avg
3.19
Most carded
6.5
Fewest carded
1.0
Yellow Cards per Match in Cup 2026
Rodina Moskva leads Cup with an average of 5.40 yellow cards per match across 5 fixtures — placing them at the top of the discipline table.
Spartak Moscow (5.00) and Spartak Kostroma (4.67) follow closely, with the trio averaging 5.02 combined. Their games consistently generate elevated card activity.
At the other end, FC Rostov averages just 1.60 yellow cards per match — the lowest figure in the competition across 5 matches.
Disciplinary Market Insights
The Cup averages 3.61 yellow cards per match as a league-wide baseline — a key reference for disciplinary betting markets.
The most active trio (Rodina Moskva, Spartak Moscow, Spartak Kostroma) averages 5.02 collectively, sitting 1.41 above the league mean. Fixtures involving these sides provide a structural edge in over-threshold card markets.
Yellow Cards For
| # | Team | MP | O 0.5 | O 1.5 | O 2.5 | O 3.5 | O 4.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 3.5 | |
| 2 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 3 | 5 | 100% | 80% | 80% | 40% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 4 | 5 | 100% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 2.8 | |
| 5 | 5 | 100% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 2.8 | |
| 6 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 2.7 | |
| 7 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 2.5 | |
| 8 | 4 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 2.3 | |
| 9 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 10 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 11 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 12 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 13 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 14 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 15 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 16 | 5 | 100% | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 17 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 18 | 4 | 75% | 75% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 19 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 20 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 21 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 22 | 5 | 100% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 1.8 | |
| 23 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.7 | |
| 24 | 5 | 100% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 1.6 | |
| 25 | 5 | 100% | 60% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.6 | |
| 26 | 4 | 75% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 27 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 28 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 29 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 30 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 31 | 4 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 32 | 5 | 80% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.2 | |
| 33 | 5 | 80% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.2 | |
| 34 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 35 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 36 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 37 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 38 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 39 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 40 | 4 | 75% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 41 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 42 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 43 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 44 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 45 | 4 | 75% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.8 | |
| 46 | 5 | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.6 | |
| 47 | 2 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.5 | |
| 48 | 2 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.5 | |
| 49 | 2 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.5 |
Yellow Cards For
League avg
1.64
Most carded
3.5
Fewest carded
0.5
Yellow Cards For — Cup 2026
Lokomotiv leads Cup with an average of 3.00 yellow cards per match across 5 fixtures — placing them at the top of the discipline table.
Baltika (2.80) and FC Orenburg (2.80) follow closely, with the trio averaging 2.87 combined. Their games consistently generate elevated card activity.
At the other end, FC Rostov averages just 0.60 yellow cards per match — the lowest figure in the competition across 5 matches.
Disciplinary Market Insights
The Cup averages 1.77 yellow cards per match as a league-wide baseline — a key reference for disciplinary betting markets.
The most active trio (Lokomotiv, Baltika, FC Orenburg) averages 2.87 collectively, sitting 1.1 above the league mean. Fixtures involving these sides provide a structural edge in over-threshold card markets.
Yellow Cards Against
| # | Team | MP | O 0.5 | O 1.5 | O 2.5 | O 3.5 | O 4.5 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 100% | 75% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 3.5 | |
| 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 3.5 | |
| 3 | 5 | 100% | 80% | 80% | 60% | 20% | 3.4 | |
| 4 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 3.0 | |
| 5 | 4 | 100% | 100% | 75% | 0% | 0% | 2.8 | |
| 6 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 2.7 | |
| 7 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 2.5 | |
| 8 | 4 | 100% | 75% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 2.3 | |
| 9 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 10 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 11 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 12 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 13 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 14 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 15 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 16 | 3 | 100% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 17 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 18 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 19 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.0 | |
| 20 | 5 | 80% | 60% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 1.8 | |
| 21 | 4 | 100% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 1.8 | |
| 22 | 5 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 1.6 | |
| 23 | 5 | 100% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 1.6 | |
| 24 | 5 | 100% | 60% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.6 | |
| 25 | 4 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 26 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 27 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 28 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 29 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 30 | 2 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 31 | 4 | 100% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 32 | 5 | 80% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.2 | |
| 33 | 5 | 100% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.2 | |
| 34 | 5 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 1.2 | |
| 35 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 36 | 5 | 60% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 37 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 38 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 39 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 40 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 41 | 2 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 42 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 43 | 2 | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.0 | |
| 44 | 5 | 60% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.6 | |
| 45 | 2 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.5 | |
| 46 | 2 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.5 | |
| 47 | 2 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.5 |
Yellow Cards Against
League avg
1.68
Most carded
3.5
Fewest carded
0.5
Yellow Cards Against — Cup 2026
Krylia Sovetov leads Cup with an average of 3.50 yellow cards conceded per match across 4 fixtures — placing them at the top of the discipline table.
Rodina Moskva (3.40) and Spartak Moscow (2.75) follow closely, with the trio averaging 3.22 combined. Their games consistently generate elevated card activity.
At the other end, Fakel averages just 0.60 yellow cards conceded per match — the lowest figure in the competition across 5 matches.
Disciplinary Market Insights
The Cup averages 1.84 yellow cards conceded per match as a league-wide baseline — a key reference for disciplinary betting markets.
The most active trio (Krylia Sovetov, Rodina Moskva, Spartak Moscow) averages 3.22 collectively, sitting 1.38 above the league mean. Fixtures involving these sides provide a structural edge in over-threshold card markets.