MatchPulse
Challenger Pro League

Challenger Pro League — xG (Expected Goals)

Belgium · 2026/27

Expected Goals (xG)

xG data available for 7 games
#TeamMPxGFxGF/gxGAxGA/gGFGADiff
1Beerschot VA717.32.477.41.06237+5.7
2Dender713.11.875.90.85123-1.1
3Excelsior Virton712.51.7911.71.671410+1.5
4Sporting Hasselt611.91.9815.02.501213+0.1
5AS Eupen510.92.182.80.55159+4.1
6KRC Genk II69.31.5511.61.931316+3.7
7Francs Borains59.21.847.51.51910-0.2
8Lokeren-Temse59.11.826.11.231614+6.9
9Club Brugge II78.31.1810.31.471417+5.7
10Liège67.71.2911.21.861322+5.3
11Seraing United67.21.206.61.111216+4.8
12KAA Gent II67.11.199.71.611113+3.9
13Patro Eisden76.30.9114.72.101415+7.7
14RSC Anderlecht II66.01.0012.42.06717+1
15K. Lierse S.K.44.51.117.41.86710+2.6
xGF = xG For (created)xGA = xG Against (conceded)Diff = GF − xGF (over/under-performing)
xG Attack Ranking
Beerschot VAHigh xGF2.47
AS EupenHigh xGF2.18
Sporting HasseltHigh xGF1.98
Patro EisdenLow xGF0.91
K. Lierse S.K.Low xGF1.11

LEAGUE xG STATS

15 teams with xG data
League avg xGF/g: 1.56
League avg xGA/g: 1.56
Best overperformer: Patro Eisden (+7.7)
Biggest underperformer: Dender (-1.1)

Challenger Pro League (Belgium) — Expected Goals (xG) Analysis

The Challenger Pro League (Belgium) averages 1.56 xG per game this season. Beerschot VA creates the most chances with 2.47 xGF per game, while Patro Eisden creates the fewest with 0.91 xGF per game. Patro Eisden is over-performing their xG (14 goals vs 6.3 xGF) — regression likely. Dender is under-performing (12 goals vs 13.1 xGF) — improvement expected.

Betting Angle — xG & Regression Markets

xG is the most powerful predictor of future performance — teams that consistently over-perform their xG (scoring more than expected) tend to regress. Look for under-performing high-xG teams as value opportunities in match result markets, especially Asian Handicap and Both Teams To Score.

Expected Goals (xG) — Belgium