MatchPulse
Liga Profesional Argentina

Liga Profesional Argentina — xG (Expected Goals)

Argentina · 2026/27

Expected Goals (xG)

xG data available for 35 games
#TeamMPxGFxGF/gxGAxGA/gGFGADiff
1River Plate3550.01.4329.60.854730-3
2Estudiantes L.P.3244.61.3931.91.003929-5.6
3Rosario Central3444.51.3135.41.044931+4.5
4Union Santa Fe3342.91.3034.81.064847+5.1
5Independ. Rivadavia3142.51.3733.01.075040+7.5
6Argentinos JRS3341.51.2627.20.834126-0.5
7Boca Juniors3141.21.3324.50.794726+5.8
8Instituto Cordoba3138.31.2326.90.874130+2.7
9Lanus3236.81.1530.90.973628-0.8
10Defensa Y Justicia3136.71.1832.91.063935+2.3
11Gimnasia L.P.3336.11.0933.41.014340+6.9
12Racing Club3335.91.0938.01.153539-0.9
13Talleres Cordoba3235.91.1235.61.113336-2.9
14Tigre2934.31.1826.10.903331-1.3
15Huracan3233.81.0636.51.143232-1.8
16Velez Sarsfield3133.81.0938.21.234328+9.2
17Belgrano Cordoba3433.60.9936.81.084029+6.4
18Independiente3232.81.0232.11.003838+5.2
19Sarmiento Junin3132.71.0544.31.433643+3.3
20Platense3031.91.0636.31.212635-5.9
21Barracas Central3130.91.0036.41.183028-0.9
22Gimnasia M.3029.60.9938.51.283138+1.4
23Banfield2928.40.9846.81.613342+4.6
24San Lorenzo3227.90.8737.21.162429-3.9
25Newells Old Boys3027.90.9333.31.112938+1.1
26Deportivo Riestra3027.80.9330.11.011529-12.8
27Aldosivi3127.80.9038.91.262243-5.8
28Atletico Tucuman3026.80.8928.30.942935+2.2
29Central Cordoba de Santiago3025.20.8445.21.512246-3.2
30Estudiantes de Rio Cuarto2920.50.7133.41.151545-5.5
xGF = xG For (created)xGA = xG Against (conceded)Diff = GF − xGF (over/under-performing)
xG Attack Ranking

LEAGUE xG STATS

30 teams with xG data
League avg xGF/g: 1.09
League avg xGA/g: 1.10
Best overperformer: Velez Sarsfield (+9.2)
Biggest underperformer: Deportivo Riestra (-12.8)

Liga Profesional Argentina (Argentina) — Expected Goals (xG) Analysis

The Liga Profesional Argentina (Argentina) averages 1.09 xG per game this season. River Plate creates the most chances with 1.43 xGF per game, while Estudiantes de Rio Cuarto creates the fewest with 0.71 xGF per game. Velez Sarsfield is over-performing their xG (43 goals vs 33.8 xGF) — regression likely. Deportivo Riestra is under-performing (15 goals vs 27.8 xGF) — improvement expected.

Betting Angle — xG & Regression Markets

xG is the most powerful predictor of future performance — teams that consistently over-perform their xG (scoring more than expected) tend to regress. Look for under-performing high-xG teams as value opportunities in match result markets, especially Asian Handicap and Both Teams To Score.

Expected Goals (xG) — Argentina