MatchPulse
Copa de la Liga Profesional

Copa de la Liga ProfesionalxG (Expected Goals)

Argentina · 2024

Expected Goals (xG)

xG data available for 16 games
#TeamMPxGFxGF/gxGAxGA/gGFGADiff
1River Plate1527.81.8517.61.182813+0.3
2Argentinos JRS1622.41.4020.41.282615+3.6
3Estudiantes L.P.1622.11.3811.20.702411+1.9
4Talleres Cordoba1421.91.5611.80.842416+2.1
5Godoy Cruz1521.81.4614.00.93178-4.8
6Boca Juniors1621.01.3115.10.952415+3
7Velez Sarsfield1620.41.2816.51.031715-3.4
8Racing Club1418.51.3213.70.982411+5.5
9Defensa Y Justicia1517.41.1617.41.161814+0.6
10Atletico Tucuman1417.11.2214.01.00823-9.1
11Belgrano Cordoba1416.81.2016.01.141921+2.2
12Barracas Central1516.81.1216.01.062018+3.2
13Gimnasia L.P.1414.81.0620.21.441823+3.2
14Lanus1414.81.0614.01.002014+5.2
15Platense1414.81.0612.90.921014-4.8
16Independ. Rivadavia1314.61.1222.11.701325-1.6
17Newells Old Boys1413.70.9815.71.121315-0.7
18Independiente1313.71.069.80.751410+0.3
19Huracan1413.70.9814.31.021212-1.7
20Instituto Cordoba1413.20.9416.01.141817+4.8
21Union Santa Fe1413.20.9413.70.981614+2.8
22Banfield1413.20.9416.31.161415+0.8
23Tigre1412.30.8821.61.54725-5.3
24Sarmiento Junin1412.00.8616.21.16919-3
25Rosario Central1412.00.8620.21.441018-2
26San Lorenzo1411.20.8014.81.061014-1.2
27Central Cordoba de Santiago149.00.6418.81.341020+1
28Deportivo Riestra147.00.5017.11.22816+1
xGF = xG For (created)xGA = xG Against (conceded)Diff = GF − xGF (over/under-performing)
* xG estimated from shots on goal using the league's average conversion rate. API xG data is not available for this league.
xG Attack Ranking
River PlateHigh xGF1.85
Talleres CordobaHigh xGF1.56
Godoy CruzHigh xGF1.46
San LorenzoLow xGF0.80

LEAGUE xG STATS

28 teams with xG data
League avg xGF/g: 1.10
League avg xGA/g: 1.12
Best overperformer: Racing Club (+5.5)
Biggest underperformer: Atletico Tucuman (-9.1)

Copa de la Liga Profesional (Argentina) — Expected Goals (xG) Analysis

The Copa de la Liga Profesional (Argentina) averages 1.10 xG per game this season. River Plate creates the most chances with 1.85 xGF per game, while Deportivo Riestra creates the fewest with 0.50 xGF per game. Racing Club is over-performing their xG (24 goals vs 18.5 xGF) — regression likely. Atletico Tucuman is under-performing (8 goals vs 17.1 xGF) — improvement expected.

Betting Angle — xG & Regression Markets

xG is the most powerful predictor of future performance — teams that consistently over-perform their xG (scoring more than expected) tend to regress. Look for under-performing high-xG teams as value opportunities in match result markets, especially Asian Handicap and Both Teams To Score.

Expected Goals (xG)Argentina