Super League Women — Form Table
South-Africa · 2026
Combined Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | +8 | 21 | WWWWWWW | 3.00 | 71% | 0% | 29% | 1.43 | 43% | 29% | 1.71 | ||
| 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 0 | +22 | 19 | WWWWWDW | 2.71 | 100% | 14% | 0% | 3.14 | 57% | 57% | 3.14 | ||
| 3 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 7 | +8 | 15 | WLLWWWW | 2.14 | 43% | 0% | 57% | 2.14 | 71% | 71% | 3.14 | ||
| 4 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 1 | +9 | 14 | WWWLDWD | 2.00 | 86% | 43% | 0% | 1.43 | 43% | 43% | 1.57 | ||
| 5 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 7 | +4 | 13 | WWLWDLW | 1.86 | 57% | 14% | 29% | 1.57 | 71% | 57% | 2.57 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 10 | LLLDWWW | 1.43 | 43% | 43% | 14% | 1.14 | 71% | 57% | 2.57 | ||
| 7 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 9 | WDWDDLL | 1.29 | 29% | 43% | 43% | 1.00 | 71% | 43% | 2.14 | ||
| 8 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 9 | WLLWWLL | 1.29 | 29% | 57% | 14% | 0.86 | 86% | 57% | 3.00 | ||
| 9 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 | LDDLLWW | 1.14 | 0% | 43% | 57% | 1.00 | 57% | 29% | 2.00 | ||
| 10 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 8 | LWDDLLW | 1.14 | 14% | 29% | 57% | 1.00 | 86% | 43% | 2.29 | ||
| 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 8 | WWLLDDL | 1.14 | 29% | 43% | 29% | 0.86 | 57% | 29% | 2.14 | ||
| 12 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 7 | WLWLDLL | 1.00 | 43% | 43% | 29% | 0.57 | 29% | 29% | 1.43 | ||
| 13 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 6 | LLLLWWL | 0.86 | 29% | 29% | 43% | 1.29 | 57% | 57% | 2.86 | ||
| 14 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 16 | -9 | 6 | LWLWLLL | 0.86 | 0% | 43% | 57% | 1.00 | 100% | 71% | 3.29 | ||
| 15 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 5 | LLLDLWD | 0.71 | 29% | 86% | 14% | 0.43 | 29% | 14% | 1.29 | ||
| 16 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 19 | -17 | 1 | LLDLLLL | 0.14 | 14% | 86% | 14% | 0.29 | 57% | 57% | 3.00 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Who Is in the Best Form in the Last 7 Games?
University of Fort Hare W leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 games.
Mamelodi Sundowns W is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 86% and 2.71 PPG.
University of Johannesburg W is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.14 PPG.
Richmond United W is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 0% and 0.14 PPG.
Diepkloof W is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 games with a win rate of 14% and 0.71 PPG.
City Lads W has the worst form over the last 7 games with just 29% wins and only 0.86 PPG.
- •The Super League Women (South-Africa) Last 7 Games Form Table covers 16 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent games.
- •Win rate across the Super League Women in this period is 42%
- •Teams score an average of 1.20 goals per game and concede 1.19 — a combined 2.38 total goals per match, keeping most games Under 2.5 goals.
- •BTTS occurs in 30% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 39% of games.
Super League Women (South-Africa) Last 7 Games — Form Table Insights
University of Fort Hare W, Mamelodi Sundowns W and University of Johannesburg W have been the standout performers in the Super League Women (South-Africa) over the last 7 games, leading the form table with 3.00, 2.71 and 2.14 PPG respectively. Across the Super League Women, teams score an average of 1.20 goals and concede 1.19 per game — a combined 2.38 total goals, keeping most games Under 2.5. BTTS has occurred in 30% of fixtures while 39% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Richmond United W and Diepkloof W have struggled in recent games, collecting just 0.14 and 0.71 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the Super League Women.
Home Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 0 | +17 | 16 | WWWWWD | 2.67 | 100% | 17% | 0% | 2.83 | 67% | 50% | 2.83 | ||
| 2 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 4 | +8 | 16 | WWDWLWW | 2.29 | 71% | 14% | 29% | 1.71 | 57% | 43% | 2.29 | ||
| 3 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | +7 | 16 | DWWWWW | 2.67 | 100% | 17% | 0% | 1.17 | 33% | 0% | 1.17 | ||
| 4 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 9 | +4 | 14 | WWDWWDL | 2.00 | 29% | 29% | 57% | 1.86 | 86% | 86% | 3.14 | ||
| 5 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 5 | +3 | 13 | WLWWWLD | 1.86 | 71% | 43% | 0% | 1.14 | 43% | 43% | 1.86 | ||
| 6 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7 | +3 | 11 | LWWDWD | 1.83 | 33% | 17% | 50% | 1.67 | 100% | 50% | 2.83 | ||
| 7 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 6 | +3 | 10 | WLWDLW | 1.67 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 1.50 | 67% | 50% | 2.50 | ||
| 8 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 10 | WWWLLDL | 1.43 | 29% | 43% | 29% | 1.14 | 57% | 43% | 2.43 | ||
| 9 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 9 | DWDDLW | 1.50 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 1.17 | 67% | 17% | 2.00 | ||
| 10 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 | LLWDLW | 1.17 | 17% | 17% | 67% | 1.17 | 100% | 67% | 2.67 | ||
| 11 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 7 | DWWLLL | 1.17 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 1.17 | 83% | 67% | 3.33 | ||
| 12 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 16 | -8 | 6 | WWLLLL | 1.00 | 0% | 50% | 50% | 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 4.00 | ||
| 13 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 5 | DLDWLLL | 0.71 | 29% | 29% | 57% | 0.71 | 57% | 43% | 2.43 | ||
| 14 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 4 | LLLDLW | 0.67 | 17% | 67% | 33% | 0.67 | 33% | 33% | 2.00 | ||
| 15 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 3 | LLLLLW | 0.50 | 17% | 67% | 17% | 0.67 | 100% | 67% | 2.67 | ||
| 16 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 3 | LLLWL | 0.60 | 0% | 60% | 40% | 0.80 | 80% | 60% | 3.20 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Home Forms? (Last 7 Home Games)
Mamelodi Sundowns W leads the form table with 83% wins and 2.67 PPG in the last 7 home games.
University of Fort Hare W is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 83% and 2.67 PPG.
University of Johannesburg W is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 home games, with a win rate of 71% and 2.29 PPG.
Stellenbosch W is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 17% and 0.50 PPG.
City Lads W is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 home games with a win rate of 20% and 0.60 PPG.
Diepkloof W has the worst form over the last 7 home games with just 17% wins and only 0.67 PPG.
- •The Super League Women (South-Africa) Home Form Table (Last 7) covers 16 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent home games.
- •Win rate across the Super League Women in this period is 44%
- •Teams score an average of 1.30 goals per game and concede 1.27 — a combined 2.57 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 35% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 35% of games.
Super League Women (South-Africa) — Home Form Table Insights (Last 7 Home Games)
Mamelodi Sundowns W, University of Fort Hare W and University of Johannesburg W have been the standout performers in the Super League Women (South-Africa) over the last 7 home games, leading the form table with 2.67, 2.67 and 2.29 PPG respectively. Across the Super League Women, teams score an average of 1.30 goals and concede 1.27 per game — a combined 2.57 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 35% of fixtures while 35% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Stellenbosch W and City Lads W have struggled in recent home games, collecting just 0.50 and 0.60 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the Super League Women.
Away Form Table — Last 7
| # ▴ | Club | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form | PPG | CS | FTS | BTTS | GF/g | 1.5+ | 2.5+ | AVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 0 | +26 | 18 | WWWWWW | 3.00 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 4.33 | 83% | 83% | 4.33 | ||
| 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 5 | +3 | 12 | DDDWWW | 2.00 | 33% | 17% | 67% | 1.33 | 67% | 50% | 2.17 | ||
| 3 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 8 | +2 | 12 | WLWLWW | 2.00 | 33% | 33% | 33% | 1.67 | 83% | 50% | 3.00 | ||
| 4 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 7 | +2 | 12 | WLWLWLW | 1.71 | 57% | 29% | 14% | 1.29 | 57% | 57% | 2.29 | ||
| 5 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 11 | DLWWDW | 1.83 | 67% | 33% | 17% | 1.17 | 50% | 33% | 1.83 | ||
| 6 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 7 | +5 | 10 | LWDLWW | 1.67 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 2.00 | 83% | 67% | 3.17 | ||
| 7 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 4 | +8 | 9 | WWDDDL | 1.50 | 33% | 33% | 50% | 2.00 | 67% | 33% | 2.67 | ||
| 8 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 8 | DWLWDL | 1.33 | 67% | 67% | 0% | 0.50 | 17% | 0% | 0.83 | ||
| 9 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 7 | DWLLLWL | 1.00 | 29% | 14% | 57% | 1.43 | 71% | 57% | 3.00 | ||
| 10 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 7 | LWLWD | 1.40 | 20% | 20% | 60% | 1.00 | 60% | 40% | 2.40 | ||
| 11 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 7 | LLLLDWW | 1.00 | 29% | 43% | 29% | 1.00 | 57% | 43% | 2.71 | ||
| 12 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 6 | LWLLLW | 1.00 | 0% | 33% | 67% | 1.00 | 67% | 67% | 2.67 | ||
| 13 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 4 | LLWLDL | 0.67 | 17% | 50% | 33% | 0.50 | 67% | 33% | 2.00 | ||
| 14 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 4 | LLWLLD | 0.67 | 33% | 50% | 33% | 0.67 | 83% | 50% | 2.67 | ||
| 15 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 16 | -13 | 3 | LLLLWLL | 0.43 | 0% | 71% | 29% | 0.43 | 100% | 57% | 2.71 | ||
| 16 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 16 | -14 | 2 | LLLDLDL | 0.29 | 14% | 71% | 29% | 0.29 | 71% | 57% | 2.57 |
MP = Matches Played · W = Wins · D = Draws · L = Losses · GF = Goals For · GA = Goals Against · GD = Goal Difference · Pts = Points · Form = Last 5 results · PPG = Points Per Game · CS = Clean Sheets % · FTS = Failed to Score · BTTS = Both Teams To Score % · GF/g = Goals scored per game · 1.5+ = Over 1.5 Goals % · 2.5+ = Over 2.5 Goals % · AVG = Average total goals per game
Which Teams Have The Best And Worst Away Forms? (Last 7 Away Games)
Mamelodi Sundowns W leads the form table with 100% wins and 3.00 PPG in the last 7 away games.
TS Galaxy W is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 67% and 2.00 PPG.
University of Fort Hare W is among the top 3 in-form teams over the last 7 away games, with a win rate of 50% and 2.00 PPG.
Richmond United W is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 0% and 0.29 PPG.
City Lads W is struggling — within the bottom 3 over the last 7 away games with a win rate of 14% and 0.43 PPG.
Diepkloof W has the worst form over the last 7 away games with just 17% wins and only 0.67 PPG.
- •The Super League Women (South-Africa) Away Form Table (Last 7) covers 16 teams, each having played a maximum of 7 recent away games.
- •Win rate across the Super League Women in this period is 38%
- •Teams score an average of 1.27 goals per game and concede 1.30 — a combined 2.57 total goals per match, making Over 2.5 the statistically favoured outcome.
- •BTTS occurs in 35% of recent matches, while FTS (at least one team fails to score) is recorded in 38% of games.
Super League Women (South-Africa) — Away Form Table Insights (Last 7 Away Games)
Mamelodi Sundowns W, TS Galaxy W and University of Fort Hare W have been the standout performers in the Super League Women (South-Africa) over the last 7 away games, leading the form table with 3.00, 2.00 and 2.00 PPG respectively. Across the Super League Women, teams score an average of 1.27 goals and concede 1.30 per game — a combined 2.57 total goals, making Over 2.5 the most common outcome. BTTS has occurred in 35% of fixtures while 38% ended in FTS for at least one side.
On the other end, Richmond United W and City Lads W have struggled in recent away games, collecting just 0.29 and 0.43 PPG respectively. Their FTS rate suggests attacking output remains a concern heading into upcoming fixtures in the Super League Women.
Form Tables — South-Africa
- 1st Division Form Table— Division Underground
- 8 Cup Form Table— Division Pro
- Cup Form Table— Division Pro
- Diski Challenge Form Table— Division Underground
- Diski Shield Form Table— Division Underground
- League Cup Form Table— Division Pro
- Premier Soccer League Form Table— Division Pro